Loading…
Five years after commencing the objective structured clinical examination: are we getting it right? Medical students' assessment as the measuring index
Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess our use of OSCE from the perception of final year medical students. Materials and methods: This is a cross sectional survey of final year medical students undergoing the final examination in Surgery. All 102 medical students in the class were given t...
Saved in:
Published in: | African health sciences 2020-06, Vol.20 (2), p.960-965 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess our use of OSCE from
the perception of final year medical students. Materials and methods:
This is a cross sectional survey of final year medical students
undergoing the final examination in Surgery. All 102 medical students
in the class were given the self-administered questionnaire to fill.
The data were collated into excel spreadsheets and analysed using the
SPSS version 21. Results: A total of 79 completed questionnaires were
retrieved (return rate of 78%). All the students knew about and had
participated previously in OSCE, 94.9% accorded the OSCE fair.
76(93.2%) wanted the examination as the main method of clinical
assessment, 38(46.6%) had adequate preparation. In terms of the OSCE
stations not mirroring real clinical scenarios, 38(48.1%) disagreed,
and 26(20.5%) strongly disagreed. 34(43%) disagreeing that the
logistics was poor. The students rating of the OSCE, on a scale of 1 -
10, gave a mean score of >8 for spread of the OSCE stations, detail
of the questions and objectivity of the examination. The nearness to
clinical reality was rated as 7.52 with artificiality of the stations
rated as 4.12. Conclusion: The OSCE has gained acceptance amongst final
year medical students. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1680-6905 1729-0503 1680-6905 |
DOI: | 10.4314/ahs.v20i2.52 |