Loading…
Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?
The annual preventable cost from non-adherence in the US health care system amounts to $100 billion. While the relationship between adherence and the health system, the condition, patient characteristics and socioeconomic factors are established, the role of the heterogeneous productivity of drug tr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Health care management science 2020-12, Vol.23 (4), p.605-618 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813 |
container_end_page | 618 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 605 |
container_title | Health care management science |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Blankart, Katharina E Lichtenberg, Frank R |
description | The annual preventable cost from non-adherence in the US health care system amounts to $100 billion. While the relationship between adherence and the health system, the condition, patient characteristics and socioeconomic factors are established, the role of the heterogeneous productivity of drug treatment remains ambiguous. In this study, we perform cross-sectional retrospective analyses to study whether patients who use newer drugs are more adherent to pharmacotherapy than patients using older drugs within the same therapeutic class, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity at the individual level (e.g. healthy adherer bias). We use US Marketscan commercial claims and encounters data for 2008–2013 on patients initiating therapy for five chronic conditions. Productivity is captured by a drug’s earliest Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval year (“drug vintage”) and by FDA” therapeutic potential” designation. We control for situational factors as promotional activity, copayments and distribution channel. A 10-year increase in mean drug vintage is associated with a 2.5 percentage-point increase in adherence. FDA priority status, promotional activity and the share of mail-order prescription fills positively influenced adherence, while co-payments had a negative effect. Newer drugs not only may be more effective in terms of clinical benefits, on average. They provide means to ease drug therapy to increase adherence levels as one component of drug quality, a notion physicians and pharmacy benefit managers should be aware of. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10729-020-09513-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7674371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2431806152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1LwzAUDaK4Of0DglDwRYTqzXf7oozhFwx80eeQtunW0TYzaRX_vZkdfj3Ifbj3kHNObnIQOsZwgQHkpccgSRoDgRhSjmnMd9AYc0nilCbp7o95hA68XwEAB4H30YgSKYEkYozOp85Ea91Vpu181NiAdLE0LsCos1Fr3oyLCtcv_PUh2it17c3Rtk_Q8-3N0-w-nj_ePcym8zjngnaxJllWAhhWCC20DLfoHFKZEcBcSCwxz7MszQgjlMuCFwVLQJrcQFKUjCWYTtDV4Lvus8YUeVjF6VqtXdVo966srtTvk7ZaqoV9VVJIRuXG4Gxr4OxLb3ynmsrnpq51a2zvFWEUJ-EjOAnU0z_Ule1dG56nCBdYcAqhJogMrNxZ750pv5bBoDZRqCEKFaJQn1EoHkR0EPlAbhfGfVv_qzoZVCa3beXVpvnOOkWShHFJPwDxlZLM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561653030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Blankart, Katharina E ; Lichtenberg, Frank R</creator><creatorcontrib>Blankart, Katharina E ; Lichtenberg, Frank R</creatorcontrib><description>The annual preventable cost from non-adherence in the US health care system amounts to $100 billion. While the relationship between adherence and the health system, the condition, patient characteristics and socioeconomic factors are established, the role of the heterogeneous productivity of drug treatment remains ambiguous. In this study, we perform cross-sectional retrospective analyses to study whether patients who use newer drugs are more adherent to pharmacotherapy than patients using older drugs within the same therapeutic class, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity at the individual level (e.g. healthy adherer bias). We use US Marketscan commercial claims and encounters data for 2008–2013 on patients initiating therapy for five chronic conditions. Productivity is captured by a drug’s earliest Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval year (“drug vintage”) and by FDA” therapeutic potential” designation. We control for situational factors as promotional activity, copayments and distribution channel. A 10-year increase in mean drug vintage is associated with a 2.5 percentage-point increase in adherence. FDA priority status, promotional activity and the share of mail-order prescription fills positively influenced adherence, while co-payments had a negative effect. Newer drugs not only may be more effective in terms of clinical benefits, on average. They provide means to ease drug therapy to increase adherence levels as one component of drug quality, a notion physicians and pharmacy benefit managers should be aware of.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-9389</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1386-9620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9389</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10729-020-09513-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32770286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Drug therapy ; Econometrics ; Health Administration ; Health Informatics ; Innovation ; Management ; Medicines possession ratio ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Productivity in health care ; Promotion ; Vintage</subject><ispartof>Health care management science, 2020-12, Vol.23 (4), p.605-618</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9831-1787</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2561653030/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2561653030?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,11667,27901,27902,36037,36038,44339,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blankart, Katharina E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenberg, Frank R</creatorcontrib><title>Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?</title><title>Health care management science</title><addtitle>Health Care Manag Sci</addtitle><description>The annual preventable cost from non-adherence in the US health care system amounts to $100 billion. While the relationship between adherence and the health system, the condition, patient characteristics and socioeconomic factors are established, the role of the heterogeneous productivity of drug treatment remains ambiguous. In this study, we perform cross-sectional retrospective analyses to study whether patients who use newer drugs are more adherent to pharmacotherapy than patients using older drugs within the same therapeutic class, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity at the individual level (e.g. healthy adherer bias). We use US Marketscan commercial claims and encounters data for 2008–2013 on patients initiating therapy for five chronic conditions. Productivity is captured by a drug’s earliest Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval year (“drug vintage”) and by FDA” therapeutic potential” designation. We control for situational factors as promotional activity, copayments and distribution channel. A 10-year increase in mean drug vintage is associated with a 2.5 percentage-point increase in adherence. FDA priority status, promotional activity and the share of mail-order prescription fills positively influenced adherence, while co-payments had a negative effect. Newer drugs not only may be more effective in terms of clinical benefits, on average. They provide means to ease drug therapy to increase adherence levels as one component of drug quality, a notion physicians and pharmacy benefit managers should be aware of.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Health Administration</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicines possession ratio</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Productivity in health care</subject><subject>Promotion</subject><subject>Vintage</subject><issn>1572-9389</issn><issn>1386-9620</issn><issn>1572-9389</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UV1LwzAUDaK4Of0DglDwRYTqzXf7oozhFwx80eeQtunW0TYzaRX_vZkdfj3Ifbj3kHNObnIQOsZwgQHkpccgSRoDgRhSjmnMd9AYc0nilCbp7o95hA68XwEAB4H30YgSKYEkYozOp85Ea91Vpu181NiAdLE0LsCos1Fr3oyLCtcv_PUh2it17c3Rtk_Q8-3N0-w-nj_ePcym8zjngnaxJllWAhhWCC20DLfoHFKZEcBcSCwxz7MszQgjlMuCFwVLQJrcQFKUjCWYTtDV4Lvus8YUeVjF6VqtXdVo966srtTvk7ZaqoV9VVJIRuXG4Gxr4OxLb3ynmsrnpq51a2zvFWEUJ-EjOAnU0z_Ule1dG56nCBdYcAqhJogMrNxZ750pv5bBoDZRqCEKFaJQn1EoHkR0EPlAbhfGfVv_qzoZVCa3beXVpvnOOkWShHFJPwDxlZLM</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Blankart, Katharina E</creator><creator>Lichtenberg, Frank R</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-1787</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?</title><author>Blankart, Katharina E ; Lichtenberg, Frank R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Health Administration</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicines possession ratio</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Productivity in health care</topic><topic>Promotion</topic><topic>Vintage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blankart, Katharina E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenberg, Frank R</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health care management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blankart, Katharina E</au><au>Lichtenberg, Frank R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?</atitle><jtitle>Health care management science</jtitle><stitle>Health Care Manag Sci</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>605</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>605-618</pages><issn>1572-9389</issn><issn>1386-9620</issn><eissn>1572-9389</eissn><abstract>The annual preventable cost from non-adherence in the US health care system amounts to $100 billion. While the relationship between adherence and the health system, the condition, patient characteristics and socioeconomic factors are established, the role of the heterogeneous productivity of drug treatment remains ambiguous. In this study, we perform cross-sectional retrospective analyses to study whether patients who use newer drugs are more adherent to pharmacotherapy than patients using older drugs within the same therapeutic class, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity at the individual level (e.g. healthy adherer bias). We use US Marketscan commercial claims and encounters data for 2008–2013 on patients initiating therapy for five chronic conditions. Productivity is captured by a drug’s earliest Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval year (“drug vintage”) and by FDA” therapeutic potential” designation. We control for situational factors as promotional activity, copayments and distribution channel. A 10-year increase in mean drug vintage is associated with a 2.5 percentage-point increase in adherence. FDA priority status, promotional activity and the share of mail-order prescription fills positively influenced adherence, while co-payments had a negative effect. Newer drugs not only may be more effective in terms of clinical benefits, on average. They provide means to ease drug therapy to increase adherence levels as one component of drug quality, a notion physicians and pharmacy benefit managers should be aware of.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32770286</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10729-020-09513-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-1787</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1572-9389 |
ispartof | Health care management science, 2020-12, Vol.23 (4), p.605-618 |
issn | 1572-9389 1386-9620 1572-9389 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7674371 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM global; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Springer Nature |
subjects | Business and Management Drug therapy Econometrics Health Administration Health Informatics Innovation Management Medicines possession ratio Operations Research/Decision Theory Productivity in health care Promotion Vintage |
title | Are patients more adherent to newer drugs? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A29%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20patients%20more%20adherent%20to%20newer%20drugs?&rft.jtitle=Health%20care%20management%20science&rft.au=Blankart,%20Katharina%20E&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=605-618&rft.issn=1572-9389&rft.eissn=1572-9389&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10729-020-09513-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2431806152%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561653030&rft_id=info:pmid/32770286&rfr_iscdi=true |