Loading…

Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?

The annual preventable cost from non-adherence in the US health care system amounts to $100 billion. While the relationship between adherence and the health system, the condition, patient characteristics and socioeconomic factors are established, the role of the heterogeneous productivity of drug tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health care management science 2020-12, Vol.23 (4), p.605-618
Main Authors: Blankart, Katharina E, Lichtenberg, Frank R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813
container_end_page 618
container_issue 4
container_start_page 605
container_title Health care management science
container_volume 23
creator Blankart, Katharina E
Lichtenberg, Frank R
description The annual preventable cost from non-adherence in the US health care system amounts to $100 billion. While the relationship between adherence and the health system, the condition, patient characteristics and socioeconomic factors are established, the role of the heterogeneous productivity of drug treatment remains ambiguous. In this study, we perform cross-sectional retrospective analyses to study whether patients who use newer drugs are more adherent to pharmacotherapy than patients using older drugs within the same therapeutic class, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity at the individual level (e.g. healthy adherer bias). We use US Marketscan commercial claims and encounters data for 2008–2013 on patients initiating therapy for five chronic conditions. Productivity is captured by a drug’s earliest Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval year (“drug vintage”) and by FDA” therapeutic potential” designation. We control for situational factors as promotional activity, copayments and distribution channel. A 10-year increase in mean drug vintage is associated with a 2.5 percentage-point increase in adherence. FDA priority status, promotional activity and the share of mail-order prescription fills positively influenced adherence, while co-payments had a negative effect. Newer drugs not only may be more effective in terms of clinical benefits, on average. They provide means to ease drug therapy to increase adherence levels as one component of drug quality, a notion physicians and pharmacy benefit managers should be aware of.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10729-020-09513-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7674371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2431806152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1LwzAUDaK4Of0DglDwRYTqzXf7oozhFwx80eeQtunW0TYzaRX_vZkdfj3Ifbj3kHNObnIQOsZwgQHkpccgSRoDgRhSjmnMd9AYc0nilCbp7o95hA68XwEAB4H30YgSKYEkYozOp85Ea91Vpu181NiAdLE0LsCos1Fr3oyLCtcv_PUh2it17c3Rtk_Q8-3N0-w-nj_ePcym8zjngnaxJllWAhhWCC20DLfoHFKZEcBcSCwxz7MszQgjlMuCFwVLQJrcQFKUjCWYTtDV4Lvus8YUeVjF6VqtXdVo966srtTvk7ZaqoV9VVJIRuXG4Gxr4OxLb3ynmsrnpq51a2zvFWEUJ-EjOAnU0z_Ule1dG56nCBdYcAqhJogMrNxZ750pv5bBoDZRqCEKFaJQn1EoHkR0EPlAbhfGfVv_qzoZVCa3beXVpvnOOkWShHFJPwDxlZLM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561653030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Blankart, Katharina E ; Lichtenberg, Frank R</creator><creatorcontrib>Blankart, Katharina E ; Lichtenberg, Frank R</creatorcontrib><description>The annual preventable cost from non-adherence in the US health care system amounts to $100 billion. While the relationship between adherence and the health system, the condition, patient characteristics and socioeconomic factors are established, the role of the heterogeneous productivity of drug treatment remains ambiguous. In this study, we perform cross-sectional retrospective analyses to study whether patients who use newer drugs are more adherent to pharmacotherapy than patients using older drugs within the same therapeutic class, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity at the individual level (e.g. healthy adherer bias). We use US Marketscan commercial claims and encounters data for 2008–2013 on patients initiating therapy for five chronic conditions. Productivity is captured by a drug’s earliest Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval year (“drug vintage”) and by FDA” therapeutic potential” designation. We control for situational factors as promotional activity, copayments and distribution channel. A 10-year increase in mean drug vintage is associated with a 2.5 percentage-point increase in adherence. FDA priority status, promotional activity and the share of mail-order prescription fills positively influenced adherence, while co-payments had a negative effect. Newer drugs not only may be more effective in terms of clinical benefits, on average. They provide means to ease drug therapy to increase adherence levels as one component of drug quality, a notion physicians and pharmacy benefit managers should be aware of.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-9389</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1386-9620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9389</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10729-020-09513-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32770286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Drug therapy ; Econometrics ; Health Administration ; Health Informatics ; Innovation ; Management ; Medicines possession ratio ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Productivity in health care ; Promotion ; Vintage</subject><ispartof>Health care management science, 2020-12, Vol.23 (4), p.605-618</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9831-1787</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2561653030/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2561653030?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,11667,27901,27902,36037,36038,44339,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blankart, Katharina E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenberg, Frank R</creatorcontrib><title>Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?</title><title>Health care management science</title><addtitle>Health Care Manag Sci</addtitle><description>The annual preventable cost from non-adherence in the US health care system amounts to $100 billion. While the relationship between adherence and the health system, the condition, patient characteristics and socioeconomic factors are established, the role of the heterogeneous productivity of drug treatment remains ambiguous. In this study, we perform cross-sectional retrospective analyses to study whether patients who use newer drugs are more adherent to pharmacotherapy than patients using older drugs within the same therapeutic class, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity at the individual level (e.g. healthy adherer bias). We use US Marketscan commercial claims and encounters data for 2008–2013 on patients initiating therapy for five chronic conditions. Productivity is captured by a drug’s earliest Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval year (“drug vintage”) and by FDA” therapeutic potential” designation. We control for situational factors as promotional activity, copayments and distribution channel. A 10-year increase in mean drug vintage is associated with a 2.5 percentage-point increase in adherence. FDA priority status, promotional activity and the share of mail-order prescription fills positively influenced adherence, while co-payments had a negative effect. Newer drugs not only may be more effective in terms of clinical benefits, on average. They provide means to ease drug therapy to increase adherence levels as one component of drug quality, a notion physicians and pharmacy benefit managers should be aware of.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Health Administration</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicines possession ratio</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Productivity in health care</subject><subject>Promotion</subject><subject>Vintage</subject><issn>1572-9389</issn><issn>1386-9620</issn><issn>1572-9389</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UV1LwzAUDaK4Of0DglDwRYTqzXf7oozhFwx80eeQtunW0TYzaRX_vZkdfj3Ifbj3kHNObnIQOsZwgQHkpccgSRoDgRhSjmnMd9AYc0nilCbp7o95hA68XwEAB4H30YgSKYEkYozOp85Ea91Vpu181NiAdLE0LsCos1Fr3oyLCtcv_PUh2it17c3Rtk_Q8-3N0-w-nj_ePcym8zjngnaxJllWAhhWCC20DLfoHFKZEcBcSCwxz7MszQgjlMuCFwVLQJrcQFKUjCWYTtDV4Lvus8YUeVjF6VqtXdVo966srtTvk7ZaqoV9VVJIRuXG4Gxr4OxLb3ynmsrnpq51a2zvFWEUJ-EjOAnU0z_Ule1dG56nCBdYcAqhJogMrNxZ750pv5bBoDZRqCEKFaJQn1EoHkR0EPlAbhfGfVv_qzoZVCa3beXVpvnOOkWShHFJPwDxlZLM</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Blankart, Katharina E</creator><creator>Lichtenberg, Frank R</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-1787</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?</title><author>Blankart, Katharina E ; Lichtenberg, Frank R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Health Administration</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicines possession ratio</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Productivity in health care</topic><topic>Promotion</topic><topic>Vintage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blankart, Katharina E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenberg, Frank R</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health care management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blankart, Katharina E</au><au>Lichtenberg, Frank R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?</atitle><jtitle>Health care management science</jtitle><stitle>Health Care Manag Sci</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>605</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>605-618</pages><issn>1572-9389</issn><issn>1386-9620</issn><eissn>1572-9389</eissn><abstract>The annual preventable cost from non-adherence in the US health care system amounts to $100 billion. While the relationship between adherence and the health system, the condition, patient characteristics and socioeconomic factors are established, the role of the heterogeneous productivity of drug treatment remains ambiguous. In this study, we perform cross-sectional retrospective analyses to study whether patients who use newer drugs are more adherent to pharmacotherapy than patients using older drugs within the same therapeutic class, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity at the individual level (e.g. healthy adherer bias). We use US Marketscan commercial claims and encounters data for 2008–2013 on patients initiating therapy for five chronic conditions. Productivity is captured by a drug’s earliest Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval year (“drug vintage”) and by FDA” therapeutic potential” designation. We control for situational factors as promotional activity, copayments and distribution channel. A 10-year increase in mean drug vintage is associated with a 2.5 percentage-point increase in adherence. FDA priority status, promotional activity and the share of mail-order prescription fills positively influenced adherence, while co-payments had a negative effect. Newer drugs not only may be more effective in terms of clinical benefits, on average. They provide means to ease drug therapy to increase adherence levels as one component of drug quality, a notion physicians and pharmacy benefit managers should be aware of.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32770286</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10729-020-09513-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-1787</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1572-9389
ispartof Health care management science, 2020-12, Vol.23 (4), p.605-618
issn 1572-9389
1386-9620
1572-9389
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7674371
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM global; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Springer Nature
subjects Business and Management
Drug therapy
Econometrics
Health Administration
Health Informatics
Innovation
Management
Medicines possession ratio
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Productivity in health care
Promotion
Vintage
title Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A29%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20patients%20more%20adherent%20to%20newer%20drugs?&rft.jtitle=Health%20care%20management%20science&rft.au=Blankart,%20Katharina%20E&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=605-618&rft.issn=1572-9389&rft.eissn=1572-9389&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10729-020-09513-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2431806152%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-a2bbf00e4d6a6a7286ac097b2015671715cbb9b242357d5dd4807ece08df44813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561653030&rft_id=info:pmid/32770286&rfr_iscdi=true