Shared decision-making for the management of small renal masses — development and acceptability testing of a novel patient decision aid

• Published in: Canadian Urological Association journal 2020-12, Vol.14 (12), p.385-391
• Main Authors: Mcalpine, Kristen, Breau, Rodney H, Stacey, Dawn, Knee, Christopher, Jewett, Michael A.S, Violette, Philippe D, Richard, Patrick O, Cagiannos, Ilias, Morash, Christopher, Lavallee, Luke T
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Care and treatment; Decision-making; Kidney cancer; Medical personnel and patient; Methods; Original Research
• ISSN: 1911-6470; 1920-1214
• DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6575

Introduction: Shared decision-making incorporates patients' values and preferences to achieve high-quality decisions. The objective of this study was to develop an acceptable patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for the management of small renal masses (SRMs). Methods: The International Patient Decision Aids Standards were used to guide an evidence-based development process. Management options included active surveillance, thermal ablation, partial nephrectomy, and radical nephrectomy. A literature review was performed to provide incidence rates for outcomes of each option. Once a prototype was complete, alpha-testing was performed using a 10-question survey to assess acceptability with patients, patient advocates, urologists, and methodological experts. The primary outcome was acceptability of the decision aid. Results: A novel patient decision aid was created to facilitate shared decision-making for the management of SRMs. Acceptability testing was performed with 20 patients, 10 urologists, two patient advocates, and one methodological expert. Responders indicated the decision aid was appropriate in length (82%, 27/33), well-balanced (82%, 27/33), and had language that was easy to follow (94%, 31/33). All patient responders felt the decision aid would have been helpful during their consultation and would recommend the decision aid for future patients (100%, 20/20). Most urologists reported they intend to use the decision aid (90%, 9/10). Conclusions: A novel patient decision aid was created to facilitate shared decision-making for management of SRMs. This clinical tool was acceptable with patients, patient advocates, and urologists and is freely available at: