Loading…

The feasibility and safety of radical esophagectomy in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with pembrolizumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been tried for several thoracic malignancies; however, their application as a neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been studied. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of esophagectomy and total lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of thoracic disease 2020-11, Vol.12 (11), p.6426-6434
Main Authors: Park, Seong Yong, Hong, Min Hee, Kim, Hye Ryun, Lee, Chang Geol, Cho, Jae Ho, Cho, Byoung Chul, Kim, Dae Joon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-64a9a0260b50511c01260585b657eceb984e6abeb3dcaa4be96ba108eb5662313
cites
container_end_page 6434
container_issue 11
container_start_page 6426
container_title Journal of thoracic disease
container_volume 12
creator Park, Seong Yong
Hong, Min Hee
Kim, Hye Ryun
Lee, Chang Geol
Cho, Jae Ho
Cho, Byoung Chul
Kim, Dae Joon
description Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been tried for several thoracic malignancies; however, their application as a neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been studied. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of esophagectomy and total lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab. Between 2017 and 2018, 38 patients who received the neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical esophagectomy and total lymphadenectomy for ESCC were analyzed. Twenty-two patients received conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (Group 1), and sixteen patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab in clinical trial (Group 2). Two groups were compared retrospectively. The basic characteristics of age, clinical stage, location and methods of operation were not different between the two groups. The pathologic stages were higher in Group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant. The operative outcomes, i.e., operation time, blood loss, and numbers of dissected lymph nodes in the thorax, neck, and abdomen were comparable. Complications, including pulmonary complications and anastomotic leakage, were also comparable. The rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was also comparable between the two groups (31.8% 18.8%, P=0.469). Operative mortalities developed in 2 patients [0 2 (12.5%), P=0.171] due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Radical esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab may not increase the operative risk or reduce the quality of radical dissection including lymphadenectomy. The risk of ARDS after neoadjuvant neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab has to be studied in the further analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.21037/jtd-20-1088
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7711420</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>33282345</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-64a9a0260b50511c01260585b657eceb984e6abeb3dcaa4be96ba108eb5662313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1P5DAMjRCrBbHc9ozyA-iSj37NBQkhWJCQuMA5clJ3mlHblCQdNPwb_ikZhh2xvvhJtt-z_Qj5zdkfwZmsLlaxyQTLOKvrA3IsWFVlZSnyw08sMp7LxRE5DWHFUpRMiKr6SY6kFLWQeXFM3p86pC1CsNr2Nm4ojA0N0GKCrqUeGmugpxjc1MESTXTDhtqRThAtjjFQjwbt2o5LOqKDZjWvYYzUdDi47bCLHXqYNvTVxo5OOGjvevs2D6Bp6_yeOGmElxkGNwdqsO-pAW_s6Ab4RX600Ac8_con5Pn25un6Lnt4_Ht_ffWQGVnnMStzWAATJdMFKzg3jCdc1IUuiyqtqBd1jiVo1LIxALnGRakhvQ11kR4muTwhlzveadYDNiZd56FXk7cD-I1yYNX_ldF2aunWqqo4zwVLBOc7AuNdCB7b_Sxn6tMtldxSgqmtW6n97LvevvmfN_IDcf2XCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The feasibility and safety of radical esophagectomy in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with pembrolizumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Park, Seong Yong ; Hong, Min Hee ; Kim, Hye Ryun ; Lee, Chang Geol ; Cho, Jae Ho ; Cho, Byoung Chul ; Kim, Dae Joon</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Seong Yong ; Hong, Min Hee ; Kim, Hye Ryun ; Lee, Chang Geol ; Cho, Jae Ho ; Cho, Byoung Chul ; Kim, Dae Joon</creatorcontrib><description>Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been tried for several thoracic malignancies; however, their application as a neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been studied. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of esophagectomy and total lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab. Between 2017 and 2018, 38 patients who received the neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical esophagectomy and total lymphadenectomy for ESCC were analyzed. Twenty-two patients received conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (Group 1), and sixteen patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab in clinical trial (Group 2). Two groups were compared retrospectively. The basic characteristics of age, clinical stage, location and methods of operation were not different between the two groups. The pathologic stages were higher in Group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant. The operative outcomes, i.e., operation time, blood loss, and numbers of dissected lymph nodes in the thorax, neck, and abdomen were comparable. Complications, including pulmonary complications and anastomotic leakage, were also comparable. The rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was also comparable between the two groups (31.8% 18.8%, P=0.469). Operative mortalities developed in 2 patients [0 2 (12.5%), P=0.171] due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Radical esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab may not increase the operative risk or reduce the quality of radical dissection including lymphadenectomy. The risk of ARDS after neoadjuvant neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab has to be studied in the further analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-1439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-6624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-1088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33282345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of thoracic disease, 2020-11, Vol.12 (11), p.6426-6434</ispartof><rights>2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-64a9a0260b50511c01260585b657eceb984e6abeb3dcaa4be96ba108eb5662313</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711420/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711420/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Seong Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Min Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Ryun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang Geol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jae Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Byoung Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae Joon</creatorcontrib><title>The feasibility and safety of radical esophagectomy in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with pembrolizumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma</title><title>Journal of thoracic disease</title><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><description>Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been tried for several thoracic malignancies; however, their application as a neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been studied. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of esophagectomy and total lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab. Between 2017 and 2018, 38 patients who received the neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical esophagectomy and total lymphadenectomy for ESCC were analyzed. Twenty-two patients received conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (Group 1), and sixteen patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab in clinical trial (Group 2). Two groups were compared retrospectively. The basic characteristics of age, clinical stage, location and methods of operation were not different between the two groups. The pathologic stages were higher in Group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant. The operative outcomes, i.e., operation time, blood loss, and numbers of dissected lymph nodes in the thorax, neck, and abdomen were comparable. Complications, including pulmonary complications and anastomotic leakage, were also comparable. The rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was also comparable between the two groups (31.8% 18.8%, P=0.469). Operative mortalities developed in 2 patients [0 2 (12.5%), P=0.171] due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Radical esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab may not increase the operative risk or reduce the quality of radical dissection including lymphadenectomy. The risk of ARDS after neoadjuvant neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab has to be studied in the further analysis.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2072-1439</issn><issn>2077-6624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1P5DAMjRCrBbHc9ozyA-iSj37NBQkhWJCQuMA5clJ3mlHblCQdNPwb_ikZhh2xvvhJtt-z_Qj5zdkfwZmsLlaxyQTLOKvrA3IsWFVlZSnyw08sMp7LxRE5DWHFUpRMiKr6SY6kFLWQeXFM3p86pC1CsNr2Nm4ojA0N0GKCrqUeGmugpxjc1MESTXTDhtqRThAtjjFQjwbt2o5LOqKDZjWvYYzUdDi47bCLHXqYNvTVxo5OOGjvevs2D6Bp6_yeOGmElxkGNwdqsO-pAW_s6Ab4RX600Ac8_con5Pn25un6Lnt4_Ht_ffWQGVnnMStzWAATJdMFKzg3jCdc1IUuiyqtqBd1jiVo1LIxALnGRakhvQ11kR4muTwhlzveadYDNiZd56FXk7cD-I1yYNX_ldF2aunWqqo4zwVLBOc7AuNdCB7b_Sxn6tMtldxSgqmtW6n97LvevvmfN_IDcf2XCw</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Park, Seong Yong</creator><creator>Hong, Min Hee</creator><creator>Kim, Hye Ryun</creator><creator>Lee, Chang Geol</creator><creator>Cho, Jae Ho</creator><creator>Cho, Byoung Chul</creator><creator>Kim, Dae Joon</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>The feasibility and safety of radical esophagectomy in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with pembrolizumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma</title><author>Park, Seong Yong ; Hong, Min Hee ; Kim, Hye Ryun ; Lee, Chang Geol ; Cho, Jae Ho ; Cho, Byoung Chul ; Kim, Dae Joon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-64a9a0260b50511c01260585b657eceb984e6abeb3dcaa4be96ba108eb5662313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Seong Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Min Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Ryun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang Geol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jae Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Byoung Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae Joon</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Seong Yong</au><au>Hong, Min Hee</au><au>Kim, Hye Ryun</au><au>Lee, Chang Geol</au><au>Cho, Jae Ho</au><au>Cho, Byoung Chul</au><au>Kim, Dae Joon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The feasibility and safety of radical esophagectomy in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with pembrolizumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>6426</spage><epage>6434</epage><pages>6426-6434</pages><issn>2072-1439</issn><eissn>2077-6624</eissn><abstract>Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been tried for several thoracic malignancies; however, their application as a neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been studied. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of esophagectomy and total lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab. Between 2017 and 2018, 38 patients who received the neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical esophagectomy and total lymphadenectomy for ESCC were analyzed. Twenty-two patients received conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (Group 1), and sixteen patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab in clinical trial (Group 2). Two groups were compared retrospectively. The basic characteristics of age, clinical stage, location and methods of operation were not different between the two groups. The pathologic stages were higher in Group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant. The operative outcomes, i.e., operation time, blood loss, and numbers of dissected lymph nodes in the thorax, neck, and abdomen were comparable. Complications, including pulmonary complications and anastomotic leakage, were also comparable. The rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was also comparable between the two groups (31.8% 18.8%, P=0.469). Operative mortalities developed in 2 patients [0 2 (12.5%), P=0.171] due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Radical esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab may not increase the operative risk or reduce the quality of radical dissection including lymphadenectomy. The risk of ARDS after neoadjuvant neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with pembrolizumab has to be studied in the further analysis.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>33282345</pmid><doi>10.21037/jtd-20-1088</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-1439
ispartof Journal of thoracic disease, 2020-11, Vol.12 (11), p.6426-6434
issn 2072-1439
2077-6624
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7711420
source PubMed Central
subjects Original
title The feasibility and safety of radical esophagectomy in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with pembrolizumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A43%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20feasibility%20and%20safety%20of%20radical%20esophagectomy%20in%20patients%20receiving%20neoadjuvant%20chemoradiotherapy%20with%20pembrolizumab%20for%20esophageal%20squamous%20cell%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thoracic%20disease&rft.au=Park,%20Seong%20Yong&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6426&rft.epage=6434&rft.pages=6426-6434&rft.issn=2072-1439&rft.eissn=2077-6624&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/jtd-20-1088&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E33282345%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-64a9a0260b50511c01260585b657eceb984e6abeb3dcaa4be96ba108eb5662313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33282345&rfr_iscdi=true