Loading…

SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assay Needs for the Next Phase of the US COVID-19 Pandemic Response

Abstract BackgroundThere is a need for validated and standardized severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) quantitative immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralization assays that can be used to understand the immunology and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and support the coronavi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Open Forum Infectious Diseases 2021-01, Vol.8 (1), p.ofaa555-ofaa555
Main Authors: Gundlapalli, Adi V, Salerno, Reynolds M, Brooks, John T, Averhoff, Francisco, Petersen, Lyle R, McDonald, L Clifford, Iademarco, Michael F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a74dd40b9392840543cdd4bf8b126ffa6fc5a7e969460f896e34cc4264c9d4013
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a74dd40b9392840543cdd4bf8b126ffa6fc5a7e969460f896e34cc4264c9d4013
container_end_page ofaa555
container_issue 1
container_start_page ofaa555
container_title Open Forum Infectious Diseases
container_volume 8
creator Gundlapalli, Adi V
Salerno, Reynolds M
Brooks, John T
Averhoff, Francisco
Petersen, Lyle R
McDonald, L Clifford
Iademarco, Michael F
description Abstract BackgroundThere is a need for validated and standardized severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) quantitative immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralization assays that can be used to understand the immunology and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and support the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic response. MethodsLiterature searches were conducted to identify English language publications from peer-reviewed journals and preprints from January 2020 through November 6, 2020. Relevant publications were reviewed for mention of IgG or neutralization assays for SARS-CoV-2, or both, and the methods of reporting assay results. ResultsQuantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG results have been reported from a limited number of studies; most studies used in-house laboratory-developed tests in limited settings, and only two semiquantitative tests have received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). As of November 6, 2020, there is only one SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay with FDA EUA. Relatively few studies have attempted correlation of quantitative IgG titers with neutralization results to estimate surrogates of protection. The number of individuals tested is small compared with the magnitude of the pandemic, and persons tested are not representative of disproportionately affected populations. Methods of reporting quantitative results are not standardized to enable comparisons and meta-analyses. ConclusionsLack of standardized SARS-CoV-2 quantitative IgG and neutralization assays precludes comparison of results from published studies. Interassay and interlaboratory validation and standardization of assays will support efforts to better understand antibody kinetics and longevity of humoral immune responses postillness, surrogates of immune protection, and vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy. Public–private partnerships could facilitate realization of these advances in the United States and worldwide.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ofid/ofaa555
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_COVID</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7717402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ofid/ofaa555</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2478038090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a74dd40b9392840543cdd4bf8b126ffa6fc5a7e969460f896e34cc4264c9d4013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1PGzEQxa0KVBBw6xlZ6oEeWOrP9fpSKUopREIFkYJ6sxzvmCzarIO9i-C_r0NSBD30YnvGv_c0o4fQJ0pOKNH8a_BNnQ9rpZQf0C7jrCoqLdXWm_cOOkjpnhBCKZFE6Y9oh3MhWJbsot_T0fW0GIfbguEpxNCGu8bhUUr2Gf8EqBP2IeJ-Drl66vHV3CbAwb90bqZ4fHk7-V5Qja9sV8MiS68hLUOXYB9te9smONjce-jmx-mv8XlxcXk2GY8uCicp7QurRF0LMtNcs0oQKbjL9cxXM8pK723pnbQKdKlFSXylS-DCOcFK4XTWUb6Hvq19l8NsAbWDro-2NcvYLGx8NsE25v1P18zNXXg0SlElCMsGXzYGMTwMkHqzaJKDtrUdhCEZJlRFeEU0yejnf9D7MMQur5epklKphVaZOl5TLoaUIvjXYSgxq9TMKjWzSS3jh28XeIX_ZpSBozUQhuX_rf4AHkee0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2461159497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assay Needs for the Next Phase of the US COVID-19 Pandemic Response</title><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Gundlapalli, Adi V ; Salerno, Reynolds M ; Brooks, John T ; Averhoff, Francisco ; Petersen, Lyle R ; McDonald, L Clifford ; Iademarco, Michael F</creator><creatorcontrib>Gundlapalli, Adi V ; Salerno, Reynolds M ; Brooks, John T ; Averhoff, Francisco ; Petersen, Lyle R ; McDonald, L Clifford ; Iademarco, Michael F ; CDC COVID-19 Response</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract BackgroundThere is a need for validated and standardized severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) quantitative immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralization assays that can be used to understand the immunology and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and support the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic response. MethodsLiterature searches were conducted to identify English language publications from peer-reviewed journals and preprints from January 2020 through November 6, 2020. Relevant publications were reviewed for mention of IgG or neutralization assays for SARS-CoV-2, or both, and the methods of reporting assay results. ResultsQuantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG results have been reported from a limited number of studies; most studies used in-house laboratory-developed tests in limited settings, and only two semiquantitative tests have received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). As of November 6, 2020, there is only one SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay with FDA EUA. Relatively few studies have attempted correlation of quantitative IgG titers with neutralization results to estimate surrogates of protection. The number of individuals tested is small compared with the magnitude of the pandemic, and persons tested are not representative of disproportionately affected populations. Methods of reporting quantitative results are not standardized to enable comparisons and meta-analyses. ConclusionsLack of standardized SARS-CoV-2 quantitative IgG and neutralization assays precludes comparison of results from published studies. Interassay and interlaboratory validation and standardization of assays will support efforts to better understand antibody kinetics and longevity of humoral immune responses postillness, surrogates of immune protection, and vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy. Public–private partnerships could facilitate realization of these advances in the United States and worldwide.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa555</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33442555</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Review</subject><ispartof>Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2021-01, Vol.8 (1), p.ofaa555-ofaa555</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America 2020. 2020</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America 2020.</rights><rights>2020. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/coronavirus .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a74dd40b9392840543cdd4bf8b126ffa6fc5a7e969460f896e34cc4264c9d4013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a74dd40b9392840543cdd4bf8b126ffa6fc5a7e969460f896e34cc4264c9d4013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717402/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2461159497?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,313,314,723,776,780,788,881,1598,27899,27901,27902,38493,43871,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2461159497?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest$$FView_record_in_$$GProQuest</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33442555$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gundlapalli, Adi V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salerno, Reynolds M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Averhoff, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Lyle R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, L Clifford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iademarco, Michael F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CDC COVID-19 Response</creatorcontrib><title>SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assay Needs for the Next Phase of the US COVID-19 Pandemic Response</title><title>Open Forum Infectious Diseases</title><addtitle>Open Forum Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract BackgroundThere is a need for validated and standardized severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) quantitative immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralization assays that can be used to understand the immunology and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and support the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic response. MethodsLiterature searches were conducted to identify English language publications from peer-reviewed journals and preprints from January 2020 through November 6, 2020. Relevant publications were reviewed for mention of IgG or neutralization assays for SARS-CoV-2, or both, and the methods of reporting assay results. ResultsQuantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG results have been reported from a limited number of studies; most studies used in-house laboratory-developed tests in limited settings, and only two semiquantitative tests have received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). As of November 6, 2020, there is only one SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay with FDA EUA. Relatively few studies have attempted correlation of quantitative IgG titers with neutralization results to estimate surrogates of protection. The number of individuals tested is small compared with the magnitude of the pandemic, and persons tested are not representative of disproportionately affected populations. Methods of reporting quantitative results are not standardized to enable comparisons and meta-analyses. ConclusionsLack of standardized SARS-CoV-2 quantitative IgG and neutralization assays precludes comparison of results from published studies. Interassay and interlaboratory validation and standardization of assays will support efforts to better understand antibody kinetics and longevity of humoral immune responses postillness, surrogates of immune protection, and vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy. Public–private partnerships could facilitate realization of these advances in the United States and worldwide.</description><subject>Review</subject><issn>2328-8957</issn><issn>2328-8957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1PGzEQxa0KVBBw6xlZ6oEeWOrP9fpSKUopREIFkYJ6sxzvmCzarIO9i-C_r0NSBD30YnvGv_c0o4fQJ0pOKNH8a_BNnQ9rpZQf0C7jrCoqLdXWm_cOOkjpnhBCKZFE6Y9oh3MhWJbsot_T0fW0GIfbguEpxNCGu8bhUUr2Gf8EqBP2IeJ-Drl66vHV3CbAwb90bqZ4fHk7-V5Qja9sV8MiS68hLUOXYB9te9smONjce-jmx-mv8XlxcXk2GY8uCicp7QurRF0LMtNcs0oQKbjL9cxXM8pK723pnbQKdKlFSXylS-DCOcFK4XTWUb6Hvq19l8NsAbWDro-2NcvYLGx8NsE25v1P18zNXXg0SlElCMsGXzYGMTwMkHqzaJKDtrUdhCEZJlRFeEU0yejnf9D7MMQur5epklKphVaZOl5TLoaUIvjXYSgxq9TMKjWzSS3jh28XeIX_ZpSBozUQhuX_rf4AHkee0Q</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Gundlapalli, Adi V</creator><creator>Salerno, Reynolds M</creator><creator>Brooks, John T</creator><creator>Averhoff, Francisco</creator><creator>Petersen, Lyle R</creator><creator>McDonald, L Clifford</creator><creator>Iademarco, Michael F</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assay Needs for the Next Phase of the US COVID-19 Pandemic Response</title><author>Gundlapalli, Adi V ; Salerno, Reynolds M ; Brooks, John T ; Averhoff, Francisco ; Petersen, Lyle R ; McDonald, L Clifford ; Iademarco, Michael F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a74dd40b9392840543cdd4bf8b126ffa6fc5a7e969460f896e34cc4264c9d4013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gundlapalli, Adi V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salerno, Reynolds M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Averhoff, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Lyle R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, L Clifford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iademarco, Michael F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CDC COVID-19 Response</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Open Forum Infectious Diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gundlapalli, Adi V</au><au>Salerno, Reynolds M</au><au>Brooks, John T</au><au>Averhoff, Francisco</au><au>Petersen, Lyle R</au><au>McDonald, L Clifford</au><au>Iademarco, Michael F</au><aucorp>CDC COVID-19 Response</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assay Needs for the Next Phase of the US COVID-19 Pandemic Response</atitle><jtitle>Open Forum Infectious Diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Open Forum Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>ofaa555</spage><epage>ofaa555</epage><pages>ofaa555-ofaa555</pages><issn>2328-8957</issn><eissn>2328-8957</eissn><abstract>Abstract BackgroundThere is a need for validated and standardized severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) quantitative immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralization assays that can be used to understand the immunology and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and support the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic response. MethodsLiterature searches were conducted to identify English language publications from peer-reviewed journals and preprints from January 2020 through November 6, 2020. Relevant publications were reviewed for mention of IgG or neutralization assays for SARS-CoV-2, or both, and the methods of reporting assay results. ResultsQuantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG results have been reported from a limited number of studies; most studies used in-house laboratory-developed tests in limited settings, and only two semiquantitative tests have received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). As of November 6, 2020, there is only one SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay with FDA EUA. Relatively few studies have attempted correlation of quantitative IgG titers with neutralization results to estimate surrogates of protection. The number of individuals tested is small compared with the magnitude of the pandemic, and persons tested are not representative of disproportionately affected populations. Methods of reporting quantitative results are not standardized to enable comparisons and meta-analyses. ConclusionsLack of standardized SARS-CoV-2 quantitative IgG and neutralization assays precludes comparison of results from published studies. Interassay and interlaboratory validation and standardization of assays will support efforts to better understand antibody kinetics and longevity of humoral immune responses postillness, surrogates of immune protection, and vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy. Public–private partnerships could facilitate realization of these advances in the United States and worldwide.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33442555</pmid><doi>10.1093/ofid/ofaa555</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2328-8957
ispartof Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2021-01, Vol.8 (1), p.ofaa555-ofaa555
issn 2328-8957
2328-8957
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7717402
source Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Review
title SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assay Needs for the Next Phase of the US COVID-19 Pandemic Response
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T12%3A46%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_COVID&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SARS-CoV-2%20Serologic%20Assay%20Needs%20for%20the%20Next%20Phase%20of%20the%20US%20COVID-19%20Pandemic%20Response&rft.jtitle=Open%20Forum%20Infectious%20Diseases&rft.au=Gundlapalli,%20Adi%20V&rft.aucorp=CDC%20COVID-19%20Response&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=ofaa555&rft.epage=ofaa555&rft.pages=ofaa555-ofaa555&rft.issn=2328-8957&rft.eissn=2328-8957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ofid/ofaa555&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_COVID%3E2478038090%3C/proquest_COVID%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a74dd40b9392840543cdd4bf8b126ffa6fc5a7e969460f896e34cc4264c9d4013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2461159497&rft_id=info:pmid/33442555&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ofid/ofaa555&rfr_iscdi=true