External Multicenter Study of Reliability and Reproducibility for Lower Cervical Spine Injuries Classification Systems—Part 2: An Analysis of the Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification and Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score Scale

• Published in: Global spine journal 2021-01, Vol.11 (1), p.99-107
• Main Authors: Grin, Andrey, Krylov, Vladimir, Lvov, Ivan, Talypov, Aleksandr, Dzukaev, Dmitriy, Kordonskiy, Anton, Smirnov, Vladimir, Karanadze, Vasily, Abdukhalikov, Boburmirzo, Khushnazarov, Ulugbek, Airapetyan, Artem, Dmitriev, Aleksandr, Kaykov, Aleksandr, Peyker, Alexander, Semchenko, Vitaliy, Aksenov, Andrey, Borzenkov, Anton, Gulyy, Vladimir, Torchinov, Soslan, Bagaev, Sergey, Toporskiy, Anton, Kalandari, Alik, Kasatkin, Denis, Sytnik, Aleksey, Lebedev, Valeriy, Epifanov, Dmitry, Hovrin, Dmitriy, Feniksov, Victor, Choriev, Daniyar
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Back surgery; Original; Reproducibility; Spine; Trauma
• ISSN: 2192-5682; 2192-5690
• DOI: 10.1177/2192568219896546

Study Design: A multicenter observational survey. Objective: To quantify and compare inter- and intraobserver reliability of the subaxial cervical spine injury classification (SLIC) and the cervical spine injury severity score (CSISS) in a multicentric survey of neurosurgeons with different experience levels. Methods: Data concerning 64 consecutive patients who had undergone cervical spine surgery between 2013 and 2017 was evaluated, and we surveyed 37 neurosurgeons from 7 different clinics. All raters were divided into 3 groups depending on their level of experience. Two assessment procedures were performed. Results: For the SLIC, we observed excellent agreement regarding management among experienced surgeons, whereas agreement among less experienced neurosurgeons was moderate and almost twice as unlikely. The sensitivity of SLIC relating to treatment tactics reached as high as 92.2%. For the CSISS, agreement regarding management ranged from medium to substantial, depending on a neurosurgeon’s experience. For less experienced neurosurgeons, the level of agreement concerning surgical management was the same as for the SLIC in not exceeding a moderate level. However, this scale had insufficient sensitivity (slightly exceeding 50%). The reproducibility of both scales was excellent among all raters regardless of their experience level. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated better management reliability, sensitivity, and reproducibility for the SLIC, which provided moderate interrater agreement with moderate to excellent intraclass correlation coefficient indicators for all raters. The CSISS demonstrated high reproducibility; however, large variability in answers prevented raters from reaching a moderate level of agreement. Magnetic resonance imaging integration may increase sensitivity of CSISS in relation to fracture management.