Loading…

Improving the quantitative classification of Erlenmeyer flask deformities

The Erlenmeyer flask deformity is a common skeletal modeling deformity, but current classification systems are binary and may restrict its utility as a predictor of associated skeletal conditions. A quantifiable 3-point system of severity classification could improve its predictive potential in dise...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Skeletal radiology 2021-02, Vol.50 (2), p.361-369
Main Authors: Adusumilli, Gautam, Kaggie, Joshua D., D’Amore, Simona, Cox, Timothy M., Deegan, Patrick, MacKay, James W., McDonald, Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7e05a3adb40c65b9fdc0e97d7eb79e1ca4cd15fd674085ea4a175f8af661f64b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7e05a3adb40c65b9fdc0e97d7eb79e1ca4cd15fd674085ea4a175f8af661f64b3
container_end_page 369
container_issue 2
container_start_page 361
container_title Skeletal radiology
container_volume 50
creator Adusumilli, Gautam
Kaggie, Joshua D.
D’Amore, Simona
Cox, Timothy M.
Deegan, Patrick
MacKay, James W.
McDonald, Scott
description The Erlenmeyer flask deformity is a common skeletal modeling deformity, but current classification systems are binary and may restrict its utility as a predictor of associated skeletal conditions. A quantifiable 3-point system of severity classification could improve its predictive potential in disease. Ratios were derived from volumes of regions of interests drawn in 50 Gaucher’s disease patients. ROIs were drawn from the distal physis to 2 cm proximal, 2 cm to 4 cm, and 4 cm to 6 cm. Width was also measured at each of these boundaries. Two readers rated these 100 femurs using a 3-point scale of severity classification. Weighted kappa indicated reliability and one-way analysis of variance characterized ratio differences across the severity scale. Accuracy analyses allowed determination of clinical cutoffs for each ratio. Pearson’s correlations assessed the associations of volume and width with a shape-based concavity metric of the femur. The volume ratio incorporating the metaphyseal region from 0 to 2 cm and the diametaphyseal region at 4–6 cm was most accurate at distinguishing femurs on the 3-point scale. Receiver operating characteristic curves for this ratio indicated areas of 0.95 to distinguish normal and mild femurs and 0.93 to distinguish mild and severe femurs. Volume was moderately associated with the degree of femur concavity. The proposed volume ratio method is an objective, proficient method at distinguishing severities of the Erlenmeyer flask deformity with the potential for automation. This may have application across diseases associated with the deformity and deficient osteoclast-mediated modeling of growing bone.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00256-020-03561-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7736022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A731361629</galeid><sourcerecordid>A731361629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7e05a3adb40c65b9fdc0e97d7eb79e1ca4cd15fd674085ea4a175f8af661f64b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxS1ERZctX4ADisSFS8r4T-zNBamqCqxUiUt7thxnvHVJ7K2drNRvXy9bWooQ8sGy5zdv9OxHyHsKpxRAfc4ArJE1MKiBN5LW7BVZUMFZzaikr8kCuBQ142J1TN7mfAtAlWrkG3LMmeKCK7Yg6_W4TXHnw6aabrC6m02Y_GQmv8PKDiZn77wtxxiq6KqLNGAY8R5T5UrxZ9Wji2n0k8d8Qo6cGTK-e9yX5PrrxdX59_ryx7f1-dllbRtBp1ohNIabvhNgZdO1rreAreoVdqpFao2wPW1cL5WAVYNGGKoatzJOSuqk6PiSfDnobuduxN5imJIZ9Db50aR7HY3XLyvB3-hN3GmluATGisCnR4EU72bMkx59tjgMJmCcs2aCtUoBX_GCfvwLvY1zCsVeoRTnrOWKPlMbM6D2wcUy1-5F9ZnilEsqC7gkp_-gyupx9DYGdL7cv2hghwabYs4J3ZNHCnofAH0IgC4B0L8CoPfmPvz5Ok8tv3-8APwA5FIKG0zPlv4j-wDx9LvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473329371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving the quantitative classification of Erlenmeyer flask deformities</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Adusumilli, Gautam ; Kaggie, Joshua D. ; D’Amore, Simona ; Cox, Timothy M. ; Deegan, Patrick ; MacKay, James W. ; McDonald, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Adusumilli, Gautam ; Kaggie, Joshua D. ; D’Amore, Simona ; Cox, Timothy M. ; Deegan, Patrick ; MacKay, James W. ; McDonald, Scott ; GAUCHERITE Consortium ; The GAUCHERITE Consortium</creatorcontrib><description>The Erlenmeyer flask deformity is a common skeletal modeling deformity, but current classification systems are binary and may restrict its utility as a predictor of associated skeletal conditions. A quantifiable 3-point system of severity classification could improve its predictive potential in disease. Ratios were derived from volumes of regions of interests drawn in 50 Gaucher’s disease patients. ROIs were drawn from the distal physis to 2 cm proximal, 2 cm to 4 cm, and 4 cm to 6 cm. Width was also measured at each of these boundaries. Two readers rated these 100 femurs using a 3-point scale of severity classification. Weighted kappa indicated reliability and one-way analysis of variance characterized ratio differences across the severity scale. Accuracy analyses allowed determination of clinical cutoffs for each ratio. Pearson’s correlations assessed the associations of volume and width with a shape-based concavity metric of the femur. The volume ratio incorporating the metaphyseal region from 0 to 2 cm and the diametaphyseal region at 4–6 cm was most accurate at distinguishing femurs on the 3-point scale. Receiver operating characteristic curves for this ratio indicated areas of 0.95 to distinguish normal and mild femurs and 0.93 to distinguish mild and severe femurs. Volume was moderately associated with the degree of femur concavity. The proposed volume ratio method is an objective, proficient method at distinguishing severities of the Erlenmeyer flask deformity with the potential for automation. This may have application across diseases associated with the deformity and deficient osteoclast-mediated modeling of growing bone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-2348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2161</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03561-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32734372</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Achondroplasia ; Automation ; Biomedical materials ; Classification ; Classification systems ; Concavity ; Femur ; Imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Modelling ; Nuclear Medicine ; Orthopedics ; Pathology ; Radiology ; Reliability analysis ; Scale (ratio) ; Scientific ; Scientific Article ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Skeletal radiology, 2021-02, Vol.50 (2), p.361-369</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7e05a3adb40c65b9fdc0e97d7eb79e1ca4cd15fd674085ea4a175f8af661f64b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7e05a3adb40c65b9fdc0e97d7eb79e1ca4cd15fd674085ea4a175f8af661f64b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1707-6370</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32734372$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adusumilli, Gautam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaggie, Joshua D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Amore, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deegan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKay, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAUCHERITE Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The GAUCHERITE Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Improving the quantitative classification of Erlenmeyer flask deformities</title><title>Skeletal radiology</title><addtitle>Skeletal Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Skeletal Radiol</addtitle><description>The Erlenmeyer flask deformity is a common skeletal modeling deformity, but current classification systems are binary and may restrict its utility as a predictor of associated skeletal conditions. A quantifiable 3-point system of severity classification could improve its predictive potential in disease. Ratios were derived from volumes of regions of interests drawn in 50 Gaucher’s disease patients. ROIs were drawn from the distal physis to 2 cm proximal, 2 cm to 4 cm, and 4 cm to 6 cm. Width was also measured at each of these boundaries. Two readers rated these 100 femurs using a 3-point scale of severity classification. Weighted kappa indicated reliability and one-way analysis of variance characterized ratio differences across the severity scale. Accuracy analyses allowed determination of clinical cutoffs for each ratio. Pearson’s correlations assessed the associations of volume and width with a shape-based concavity metric of the femur. The volume ratio incorporating the metaphyseal region from 0 to 2 cm and the diametaphyseal region at 4–6 cm was most accurate at distinguishing femurs on the 3-point scale. Receiver operating characteristic curves for this ratio indicated areas of 0.95 to distinguish normal and mild femurs and 0.93 to distinguish mild and severe femurs. Volume was moderately associated with the degree of femur concavity. The proposed volume ratio method is an objective, proficient method at distinguishing severities of the Erlenmeyer flask deformity with the potential for automation. This may have application across diseases associated with the deformity and deficient osteoclast-mediated modeling of growing bone.</description><subject>Achondroplasia</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classification systems</subject><subject>Concavity</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Scale (ratio)</subject><subject>Scientific</subject><subject>Scientific Article</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0364-2348</issn><issn>1432-2161</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxS1ERZctX4ADisSFS8r4T-zNBamqCqxUiUt7thxnvHVJ7K2drNRvXy9bWooQ8sGy5zdv9OxHyHsKpxRAfc4ArJE1MKiBN5LW7BVZUMFZzaikr8kCuBQ142J1TN7mfAtAlWrkG3LMmeKCK7Yg6_W4TXHnw6aabrC6m02Y_GQmv8PKDiZn77wtxxiq6KqLNGAY8R5T5UrxZ9Wji2n0k8d8Qo6cGTK-e9yX5PrrxdX59_ryx7f1-dllbRtBp1ohNIabvhNgZdO1rreAreoVdqpFao2wPW1cL5WAVYNGGKoatzJOSuqk6PiSfDnobuduxN5imJIZ9Db50aR7HY3XLyvB3-hN3GmluATGisCnR4EU72bMkx59tjgMJmCcs2aCtUoBX_GCfvwLvY1zCsVeoRTnrOWKPlMbM6D2wcUy1-5F9ZnilEsqC7gkp_-gyupx9DYGdL7cv2hghwabYs4J3ZNHCnofAH0IgC4B0L8CoPfmPvz5Ok8tv3-8APwA5FIKG0zPlv4j-wDx9LvQ</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Adusumilli, Gautam</creator><creator>Kaggie, Joshua D.</creator><creator>D’Amore, Simona</creator><creator>Cox, Timothy M.</creator><creator>Deegan, Patrick</creator><creator>MacKay, James W.</creator><creator>McDonald, Scott</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1707-6370</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Improving the quantitative classification of Erlenmeyer flask deformities</title><author>Adusumilli, Gautam ; Kaggie, Joshua D. ; D’Amore, Simona ; Cox, Timothy M. ; Deegan, Patrick ; MacKay, James W. ; McDonald, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7e05a3adb40c65b9fdc0e97d7eb79e1ca4cd15fd674085ea4a175f8af661f64b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Achondroplasia</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classification systems</topic><topic>Concavity</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Scale (ratio)</topic><topic>Scientific</topic><topic>Scientific Article</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adusumilli, Gautam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaggie, Joshua D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Amore, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deegan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKay, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAUCHERITE Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The GAUCHERITE Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Skeletal radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adusumilli, Gautam</au><au>Kaggie, Joshua D.</au><au>D’Amore, Simona</au><au>Cox, Timothy M.</au><au>Deegan, Patrick</au><au>MacKay, James W.</au><au>McDonald, Scott</au><aucorp>GAUCHERITE Consortium</aucorp><aucorp>The GAUCHERITE Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving the quantitative classification of Erlenmeyer flask deformities</atitle><jtitle>Skeletal radiology</jtitle><stitle>Skeletal Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Skeletal Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>369</epage><pages>361-369</pages><issn>0364-2348</issn><eissn>1432-2161</eissn><abstract>The Erlenmeyer flask deformity is a common skeletal modeling deformity, but current classification systems are binary and may restrict its utility as a predictor of associated skeletal conditions. A quantifiable 3-point system of severity classification could improve its predictive potential in disease. Ratios were derived from volumes of regions of interests drawn in 50 Gaucher’s disease patients. ROIs were drawn from the distal physis to 2 cm proximal, 2 cm to 4 cm, and 4 cm to 6 cm. Width was also measured at each of these boundaries. Two readers rated these 100 femurs using a 3-point scale of severity classification. Weighted kappa indicated reliability and one-way analysis of variance characterized ratio differences across the severity scale. Accuracy analyses allowed determination of clinical cutoffs for each ratio. Pearson’s correlations assessed the associations of volume and width with a shape-based concavity metric of the femur. The volume ratio incorporating the metaphyseal region from 0 to 2 cm and the diametaphyseal region at 4–6 cm was most accurate at distinguishing femurs on the 3-point scale. Receiver operating characteristic curves for this ratio indicated areas of 0.95 to distinguish normal and mild femurs and 0.93 to distinguish mild and severe femurs. Volume was moderately associated with the degree of femur concavity. The proposed volume ratio method is an objective, proficient method at distinguishing severities of the Erlenmeyer flask deformity with the potential for automation. This may have application across diseases associated with the deformity and deficient osteoclast-mediated modeling of growing bone.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32734372</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00256-020-03561-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1707-6370</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-2348
ispartof Skeletal radiology, 2021-02, Vol.50 (2), p.361-369
issn 0364-2348
1432-2161
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7736022
source Springer Nature
subjects Achondroplasia
Automation
Biomedical materials
Classification
Classification systems
Concavity
Femur
Imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Modelling
Nuclear Medicine
Orthopedics
Pathology
Radiology
Reliability analysis
Scale (ratio)
Scientific
Scientific Article
Variance analysis
title Improving the quantitative classification of Erlenmeyer flask deformities
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A07%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20the%20quantitative%20classification%20of%20Erlenmeyer%20flask%20deformities&rft.jtitle=Skeletal%20radiology&rft.au=Adusumilli,%20Gautam&rft.aucorp=GAUCHERITE%20Consortium&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=369&rft.pages=361-369&rft.issn=0364-2348&rft.eissn=1432-2161&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00256-020-03561-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA731361629%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7e05a3adb40c65b9fdc0e97d7eb79e1ca4cd15fd674085ea4a175f8af661f64b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473329371&rft_id=info:pmid/32734372&rft_galeid=A731361629&rfr_iscdi=true