Loading…
Type of anaesthesia for caesarean section and failure rate in Princess Marina Hospital, Botswana's largest referral hospital
Background: Caesarean Section (CS) is a mode of delivery to decrease maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the type of anaesthesia used for CS among live-birth deliveries; and the failure rate of spinal anaesthesia (SA) in Princess Marina Referral Hospital, Botswana....
Saved in:
Published in: | African health sciences 2020-09, Vol.20 (3), p.1229-1236 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Caesarean Section (CS) is a mode of delivery to decrease
maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine
the type of anaesthesia used for CS among live-birth deliveries; and
the failure rate of spinal anaesthesia (SA) in Princess Marina Referral
Hospital, Botswana. Methods: Women who underwent CS from May-December
2017 were enrolled in the study. Data were recorded from anaesthesia
charts and abstracted using Excel spreadsheet. We established the type
of anaesthesia used, comparing the rate of elective versus emergency
indications, and failure rate of SA using STATA. Fisher's exact
test used to compare results. Results: Among 2775 live-birth
deliveries, 30.2% (837/2775) was by CS. Of those, 95.2% (797/837) had
had SA and 4.8% (40/837) were GA. Under SA, 27.4% (218/797) were
elective, and 72.6% (579/797) were emergency. Under GA 10% (4/40) were
elective and 90.0% (36/40) were emergency. The overall failure rate of
SA was 2% (16/813), that is 0.9% (2/220) for elective and 2.4% (14/593)
among emergency indications; Fisher's exact test p = 0.2959.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that single shot SA is the most
commonly preferred type of anaesthesia for both elective and emergency
CS. The overall failure rate of SA was less common in our settings than
previously reported. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1680-6905 1729-0503 1680-6905 |
DOI: | 10.4314/ahs.v20i3.26 |