Loading…

Is There a Need for Abdominal CT Scan in Trauma Patients With a Low-Risk Mechanism of Injury and Normal Vital Signs?

Background Clinically significant injuries are often missed in trauma patients with low-risk mechanisms of injury and lack of "red flags," such as abnormal vital signs. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of computed axial tomography (CT) for identifying...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2020-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e11628-e11628
Main Authors: Ledrick, David, Payvandi, Alexander, Murray, Adam C, Leskovan, John J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab48f4fa1bbfd6b80a2e1a2ce92af816377851fa8d5ae36abf7fdebe60397fa43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab48f4fa1bbfd6b80a2e1a2ce92af816377851fa8d5ae36abf7fdebe60397fa43
container_end_page e11628
container_issue 11
container_start_page e11628
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 12
creator Ledrick, David
Payvandi, Alexander
Murray, Adam C
Leskovan, John J
description Background Clinically significant injuries are often missed in trauma patients with low-risk mechanisms of injury and lack of "red flags," such as abnormal vital signs. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of computed axial tomography (CT) for identifying occult injuries in a high-volume trauma center. Methods Records from our institutional trauma registry were retrospectively extracted, examining encounters from January 2015 to October 2019. Those patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who were referred to the trauma team with a CT scan of the abdomen and had low-risk mechanisms of injury, a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15, and normal vital signs at presentation were included. Patients in the lowest trauma categorization (Level Three, Consult) met the study definition for the low-risk mechanism of injury. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted for all patients. For this analysis, patients were divided into two groups based on age (18 - 40 years or 40 - 65 years). Injuries found on CT, their clinical significance, and the likelihood of being missed without CT were determined. Results Of 2,103 blunt trauma patients that received a CT scan of the abdomen from January 2015 to October 2019, 134/2,103 (6.4%) met the inclusion criteria (mean age: 44.6 years; 72.3% male). Patients between the ages of 40 and 65 years comprised 61.2% (82/134) of the study population. Of the included patients, 17.2% (23/134) had at least one acute traumatic injury identified after CT imaging of the torso. Occult injuries found on CT included rib fracture with associated lung injuries (10/23, 43.5%), splenic laceration (4/23, 17.4%), liver laceration (3/23, 13.0%), gluteal hematoma with active bleeding (1/23, 4.3%), sternal fractures (3/23, 13.0%), and thoracic or lumbar spine fractures (2/23, 8.7%). An independent review of the medical records determined that 9.0% (12/134) of these patients had traumatic injuries that would have been missed based on clinical examination without CT. Conclusions Based on our experience, utilizing CT imaging of at least the abdomen as a routine screening measure for all trauma consults - even low-risk patients with normal vital signs - can rapidly and accurately identify clinically significant injuries that would have been otherwise missed in a notable portion of the population.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.11628
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7755665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473903762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab48f4fa1bbfd6b80a2e1a2ce92af816377851fa8d5ae36abf7fdebe60397fa43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0EolXpjTPykQMp_khs5wKqVlBWWgqiCxytSTLuuiR2sROq_nsMW6pymRlp3nlmNC8hzzk70bppX_dLwiWfcK6EeUQOBVemMtzUjx_UB-Q45yvGGGdaMM2ekgMppVaqFodkXme63WFCCvQccaAuJnraDXHyAUa62tKLHgL1gW4TLBPQzzB7DHOm3_28K0ObeFN98fkH_Yj9DoLPE42OrsPVkm4phIGexzQV0jc_l3jhL0N--4w8cTBmPL7LR-Tr-3fb1Ydq8-lsvTrdVL3k9VxBVxtXO-Bd5wbVGQYCOYgeWwHOcCW1Ng13YIYGUCronHYDdqiYbLWDWh6RN3vu9dJNOPTl7gSjvU5-gnRrI3j7fyf4nb2Mv2z5baNUUwAv7wAp_lwwz3byucdxhIBxyVbUWras_FIU6au9tE8x54Tufg1nf3it3Xtl_3pV5C8ennYv_ueM_A2r4ZIu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473903762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is There a Need for Abdominal CT Scan in Trauma Patients With a Low-Risk Mechanism of Injury and Normal Vital Signs?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ledrick, David ; Payvandi, Alexander ; Murray, Adam C ; Leskovan, John J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ledrick, David ; Payvandi, Alexander ; Murray, Adam C ; Leskovan, John J</creatorcontrib><description>Background Clinically significant injuries are often missed in trauma patients with low-risk mechanisms of injury and lack of "red flags," such as abnormal vital signs. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of computed axial tomography (CT) for identifying occult injuries in a high-volume trauma center. Methods Records from our institutional trauma registry were retrospectively extracted, examining encounters from January 2015 to October 2019. Those patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who were referred to the trauma team with a CT scan of the abdomen and had low-risk mechanisms of injury, a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15, and normal vital signs at presentation were included. Patients in the lowest trauma categorization (Level Three, Consult) met the study definition for the low-risk mechanism of injury. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted for all patients. For this analysis, patients were divided into two groups based on age (18 - 40 years or 40 - 65 years). Injuries found on CT, their clinical significance, and the likelihood of being missed without CT were determined. Results Of 2,103 blunt trauma patients that received a CT scan of the abdomen from January 2015 to October 2019, 134/2,103 (6.4%) met the inclusion criteria (mean age: 44.6 years; 72.3% male). Patients between the ages of 40 and 65 years comprised 61.2% (82/134) of the study population. Of the included patients, 17.2% (23/134) had at least one acute traumatic injury identified after CT imaging of the torso. Occult injuries found on CT included rib fracture with associated lung injuries (10/23, 43.5%), splenic laceration (4/23, 17.4%), liver laceration (3/23, 13.0%), gluteal hematoma with active bleeding (1/23, 4.3%), sternal fractures (3/23, 13.0%), and thoracic or lumbar spine fractures (2/23, 8.7%). An independent review of the medical records determined that 9.0% (12/134) of these patients had traumatic injuries that would have been missed based on clinical examination without CT. Conclusions Based on our experience, utilizing CT imaging of at least the abdomen as a routine screening measure for all trauma consults - even low-risk patients with normal vital signs - can rapidly and accurately identify clinically significant injuries that would have been otherwise missed in a notable portion of the population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11628</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33376642</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus</publisher><subject>Emergency Medicine ; Radiology ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2020-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e11628-e11628</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020, Ledrick et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020, Ledrick et al. 2020 Ledrick et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab48f4fa1bbfd6b80a2e1a2ce92af816377851fa8d5ae36abf7fdebe60397fa43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab48f4fa1bbfd6b80a2e1a2ce92af816377851fa8d5ae36abf7fdebe60397fa43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755665/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755665/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376642$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ledrick, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payvandi, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Adam C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leskovan, John J</creatorcontrib><title>Is There a Need for Abdominal CT Scan in Trauma Patients With a Low-Risk Mechanism of Injury and Normal Vital Signs?</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Background Clinically significant injuries are often missed in trauma patients with low-risk mechanisms of injury and lack of "red flags," such as abnormal vital signs. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of computed axial tomography (CT) for identifying occult injuries in a high-volume trauma center. Methods Records from our institutional trauma registry were retrospectively extracted, examining encounters from January 2015 to October 2019. Those patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who were referred to the trauma team with a CT scan of the abdomen and had low-risk mechanisms of injury, a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15, and normal vital signs at presentation were included. Patients in the lowest trauma categorization (Level Three, Consult) met the study definition for the low-risk mechanism of injury. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted for all patients. For this analysis, patients were divided into two groups based on age (18 - 40 years or 40 - 65 years). Injuries found on CT, their clinical significance, and the likelihood of being missed without CT were determined. Results Of 2,103 blunt trauma patients that received a CT scan of the abdomen from January 2015 to October 2019, 134/2,103 (6.4%) met the inclusion criteria (mean age: 44.6 years; 72.3% male). Patients between the ages of 40 and 65 years comprised 61.2% (82/134) of the study population. Of the included patients, 17.2% (23/134) had at least one acute traumatic injury identified after CT imaging of the torso. Occult injuries found on CT included rib fracture with associated lung injuries (10/23, 43.5%), splenic laceration (4/23, 17.4%), liver laceration (3/23, 13.0%), gluteal hematoma with active bleeding (1/23, 4.3%), sternal fractures (3/23, 13.0%), and thoracic or lumbar spine fractures (2/23, 8.7%). An independent review of the medical records determined that 9.0% (12/134) of these patients had traumatic injuries that would have been missed based on clinical examination without CT. Conclusions Based on our experience, utilizing CT imaging of at least the abdomen as a routine screening measure for all trauma consults - even low-risk patients with normal vital signs - can rapidly and accurately identify clinically significant injuries that would have been otherwise missed in a notable portion of the population.</description><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0EolXpjTPykQMp_khs5wKqVlBWWgqiCxytSTLuuiR2sROq_nsMW6pymRlp3nlmNC8hzzk70bppX_dLwiWfcK6EeUQOBVemMtzUjx_UB-Q45yvGGGdaMM2ekgMppVaqFodkXme63WFCCvQccaAuJnraDXHyAUa62tKLHgL1gW4TLBPQzzB7DHOm3_28K0ObeFN98fkH_Yj9DoLPE42OrsPVkm4phIGexzQV0jc_l3jhL0N--4w8cTBmPL7LR-Tr-3fb1Ydq8-lsvTrdVL3k9VxBVxtXO-Bd5wbVGQYCOYgeWwHOcCW1Ng13YIYGUCronHYDdqiYbLWDWh6RN3vu9dJNOPTl7gSjvU5-gnRrI3j7fyf4nb2Mv2z5baNUUwAv7wAp_lwwz3byucdxhIBxyVbUWras_FIU6au9tE8x54Tufg1nf3it3Xtl_3pV5C8ennYv_ueM_A2r4ZIu</recordid><startdate>20201122</startdate><enddate>20201122</enddate><creator>Ledrick, David</creator><creator>Payvandi, Alexander</creator><creator>Murray, Adam C</creator><creator>Leskovan, John J</creator><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201122</creationdate><title>Is There a Need for Abdominal CT Scan in Trauma Patients With a Low-Risk Mechanism of Injury and Normal Vital Signs?</title><author>Ledrick, David ; Payvandi, Alexander ; Murray, Adam C ; Leskovan, John J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab48f4fa1bbfd6b80a2e1a2ce92af816377851fa8d5ae36abf7fdebe60397fa43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ledrick, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payvandi, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Adam C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leskovan, John J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ledrick, David</au><au>Payvandi, Alexander</au><au>Murray, Adam C</au><au>Leskovan, John J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is There a Need for Abdominal CT Scan in Trauma Patients With a Low-Risk Mechanism of Injury and Normal Vital Signs?</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2020-11-22</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e11628</spage><epage>e11628</epage><pages>e11628-e11628</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Background Clinically significant injuries are often missed in trauma patients with low-risk mechanisms of injury and lack of "red flags," such as abnormal vital signs. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of computed axial tomography (CT) for identifying occult injuries in a high-volume trauma center. Methods Records from our institutional trauma registry were retrospectively extracted, examining encounters from January 2015 to October 2019. Those patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who were referred to the trauma team with a CT scan of the abdomen and had low-risk mechanisms of injury, a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15, and normal vital signs at presentation were included. Patients in the lowest trauma categorization (Level Three, Consult) met the study definition for the low-risk mechanism of injury. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted for all patients. For this analysis, patients were divided into two groups based on age (18 - 40 years or 40 - 65 years). Injuries found on CT, their clinical significance, and the likelihood of being missed without CT were determined. Results Of 2,103 blunt trauma patients that received a CT scan of the abdomen from January 2015 to October 2019, 134/2,103 (6.4%) met the inclusion criteria (mean age: 44.6 years; 72.3% male). Patients between the ages of 40 and 65 years comprised 61.2% (82/134) of the study population. Of the included patients, 17.2% (23/134) had at least one acute traumatic injury identified after CT imaging of the torso. Occult injuries found on CT included rib fracture with associated lung injuries (10/23, 43.5%), splenic laceration (4/23, 17.4%), liver laceration (3/23, 13.0%), gluteal hematoma with active bleeding (1/23, 4.3%), sternal fractures (3/23, 13.0%), and thoracic or lumbar spine fractures (2/23, 8.7%). An independent review of the medical records determined that 9.0% (12/134) of these patients had traumatic injuries that would have been missed based on clinical examination without CT. Conclusions Based on our experience, utilizing CT imaging of at least the abdomen as a routine screening measure for all trauma consults - even low-risk patients with normal vital signs - can rapidly and accurately identify clinically significant injuries that would have been otherwise missed in a notable portion of the population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus</pub><pmid>33376642</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.11628</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2020-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e11628-e11628
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7755665
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Emergency Medicine
Radiology
Trauma
title Is There a Need for Abdominal CT Scan in Trauma Patients With a Low-Risk Mechanism of Injury and Normal Vital Signs?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A14%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20There%20a%20Need%20for%20Abdominal%20CT%20Scan%20in%20Trauma%20Patients%20With%20a%20Low-Risk%20Mechanism%20of%20Injury%20and%20Normal%20Vital%20Signs?&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Ledrick,%20David&rft.date=2020-11-22&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e11628&rft.epage=e11628&rft.pages=e11628-e11628&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.11628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2473903762%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab48f4fa1bbfd6b80a2e1a2ce92af816377851fa8d5ae36abf7fdebe60397fa43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473903762&rft_id=info:pmid/33376642&rfr_iscdi=true