Loading…

Evaluation of Three Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays and Their Performance in Two-Test Algorithms

Sensitive and specific severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic assays are needed to inform diagnostic, therapeutic, and public health decision-making. We evaluated three commercial serologic assays as stand-alone tests and as components of two-test algorithms. Two nucl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2020-12, Vol.59 (1)
Main Authors: Turbett, Sarah E, Anahtar, Melis, Dighe, Anand S, Garcia Beltran, Wilfredo, Miller, Tyler, Scott, Hannah, Durbin, Sienna Marie, Bharadwaj, Maheetha, Thomas, Jason, Gogakos, Tasos S, Astudillo, Michael, Lennerz, Jochen, Rosenberg, Eric S, Branda, John A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-b5547421c064d8ad41ded5d1e6f9fe0e8406aa60bfeb303bd58b557f8673cc0e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-b5547421c064d8ad41ded5d1e6f9fe0e8406aa60bfeb303bd58b557f8673cc0e3
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Journal of clinical microbiology
container_volume 59
creator Turbett, Sarah E
Anahtar, Melis
Dighe, Anand S
Garcia Beltran, Wilfredo
Miller, Tyler
Scott, Hannah
Durbin, Sienna Marie
Bharadwaj, Maheetha
Thomas, Jason
Gogakos, Tasos S
Astudillo, Michael
Lennerz, Jochen
Rosenberg, Eric S
Branda, John A
description Sensitive and specific severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic assays are needed to inform diagnostic, therapeutic, and public health decision-making. We evaluated three commercial serologic assays as stand-alone tests and as components of two-test algorithms. Two nucleocapsid antibody tests (Abbott IgG and Roche total antibody) and one spike protein antibody test (DiaSorin IgG) were included. We assessed sensitivity using 128 serum samples from symptomatic PCR-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-infected patients and specificity using 1,204 samples submitted for routine serology prior to COVID-19's emergence, plus 64 pandemic-era samples from SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative patients with respiratory symptoms. Assays were evaluated as stand-alone tests and as components of a two-test algorithm in which positive results obtained using one assay were verified using a second assay. The two nucleocapsid antibody tests were more sensitive than the spike protein antibody test overall (70% and 70% versus 57%;  ≤ 0.003), with pronounced differences observed using samples collected 7 to 14 days after symptom onset. All three assays were comparably sensitive (≥89%;  ≥ 0.13) using samples collected >14 days after symptom onset. Specificity was higher using the nucleocapsid antibody tests (99.3% and 99.7%) than using the spike protein antibody test (97.8%;  ≤ 0.002). When any two assays were paired in a two-test algorithm, the specificity was 99.9% (  
doi_str_mv 10.1128/JCM.01892-20
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7771444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2448844549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-b5547421c064d8ad41ded5d1e6f9fe0e8406aa60bfeb303bd58b557f8673cc0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxa0K1G4LN87IRyrVZew4iXNBWkX9ABWB2AVxsxxnsusqiVs7adX_voYtFRw4zWF-743mPULecDjlXKj3n-rPp8BVJZiAPbLgUClWFPDzBVkAVDnjPCsPyGGM1wBcyjzfJwdZBiJpigXZnN2ZfjaT8yP1HV1vAyKt_TBgsM70dLX8tmK1_8EEXWHwvd84S5cxmodIzdgmAbpAv2LofBjMaJG6ka7vPVtjnOiy3_jgpu0QX5GXnekjvn6aR-T7-dm6vmRXXy4-1ssrZiRXE2vyXJZScAuFbJVpJW-xzVuORVd1CKgkFMYU0HTYZJA1ba6SpOxUUWbWAmZH5MPO92ZuBmwtjlMwvb4JbjDhQXvj9L-b0W31xt_psixTOjIZvHsyCP52Tk_owUWLfW9G9HPUQkqlUoyySujJDrXBxxiwez7DQf_qRqdu9O9utICEH-9wEwehr_0cxpTE_9i3f7_xbPynuOwRFE2Xfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448844549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Three Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays and Their Performance in Two-Test Algorithms</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Turbett, Sarah E ; Anahtar, Melis ; Dighe, Anand S ; Garcia Beltran, Wilfredo ; Miller, Tyler ; Scott, Hannah ; Durbin, Sienna Marie ; Bharadwaj, Maheetha ; Thomas, Jason ; Gogakos, Tasos S ; Astudillo, Michael ; Lennerz, Jochen ; Rosenberg, Eric S ; Branda, John A</creator><contributor>Caliendo, Angela M ; Caliendo, Angela M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Turbett, Sarah E ; Anahtar, Melis ; Dighe, Anand S ; Garcia Beltran, Wilfredo ; Miller, Tyler ; Scott, Hannah ; Durbin, Sienna Marie ; Bharadwaj, Maheetha ; Thomas, Jason ; Gogakos, Tasos S ; Astudillo, Michael ; Lennerz, Jochen ; Rosenberg, Eric S ; Branda, John A ; Caliendo, Angela M ; Caliendo, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><description>Sensitive and specific severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic assays are needed to inform diagnostic, therapeutic, and public health decision-making. We evaluated three commercial serologic assays as stand-alone tests and as components of two-test algorithms. Two nucleocapsid antibody tests (Abbott IgG and Roche total antibody) and one spike protein antibody test (DiaSorin IgG) were included. We assessed sensitivity using 128 serum samples from symptomatic PCR-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-infected patients and specificity using 1,204 samples submitted for routine serology prior to COVID-19's emergence, plus 64 pandemic-era samples from SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative patients with respiratory symptoms. Assays were evaluated as stand-alone tests and as components of a two-test algorithm in which positive results obtained using one assay were verified using a second assay. The two nucleocapsid antibody tests were more sensitive than the spike protein antibody test overall (70% and 70% versus 57%;  ≤ 0.003), with pronounced differences observed using samples collected 7 to 14 days after symptom onset. All three assays were comparably sensitive (≥89%;  ≥ 0.13) using samples collected &gt;14 days after symptom onset. Specificity was higher using the nucleocapsid antibody tests (99.3% and 99.7%) than using the spike protein antibody test (97.8%;  ≤ 0.002). When any two assays were paired in a two-test algorithm, the specificity was 99.9% (  &lt; 0.0001 to 0.25 compared with the individual assays), and the positive predictive value (PPV) improved substantially, with a minimal effect on the negative predictive value (NPV). In conclusion, two nucleocapsid antibody tests outperformed a spike protein antibody test. Pairing two different serologic tests in a two-test algorithm improves the PPV, compared with the individual assays alone, while maintaining the NPV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01892-20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33020186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods ; Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins - immunology ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods ; Humans ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020-12, Vol.59 (1)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. 2020 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-b5547421c064d8ad41ded5d1e6f9fe0e8406aa60bfeb303bd58b557f8673cc0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-b5547421c064d8ad41ded5d1e6f9fe0e8406aa60bfeb303bd58b557f8673cc0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3603-8110 ; 0000-0003-0309-368X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/JCM.01892-20$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasm2$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/JCM.01892-20$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasm2$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3188,27924,27925,52751,52752,52753,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Caliendo, Angela M</contributor><contributor>Caliendo, Angela M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Turbett, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anahtar, Melis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dighe, Anand S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Beltran, Wilfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durbin, Sienna Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharadwaj, Maheetha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gogakos, Tasos S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astudillo, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennerz, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Eric S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branda, John A</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Three Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays and Their Performance in Two-Test Algorithms</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Sensitive and specific severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic assays are needed to inform diagnostic, therapeutic, and public health decision-making. We evaluated three commercial serologic assays as stand-alone tests and as components of two-test algorithms. Two nucleocapsid antibody tests (Abbott IgG and Roche total antibody) and one spike protein antibody test (DiaSorin IgG) were included. We assessed sensitivity using 128 serum samples from symptomatic PCR-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-infected patients and specificity using 1,204 samples submitted for routine serology prior to COVID-19's emergence, plus 64 pandemic-era samples from SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative patients with respiratory symptoms. Assays were evaluated as stand-alone tests and as components of a two-test algorithm in which positive results obtained using one assay were verified using a second assay. The two nucleocapsid antibody tests were more sensitive than the spike protein antibody test overall (70% and 70% versus 57%;  ≤ 0.003), with pronounced differences observed using samples collected 7 to 14 days after symptom onset. All three assays were comparably sensitive (≥89%;  ≥ 0.13) using samples collected &gt;14 days after symptom onset. Specificity was higher using the nucleocapsid antibody tests (99.3% and 99.7%) than using the spike protein antibody test (97.8%;  ≤ 0.002). When any two assays were paired in a two-test algorithm, the specificity was 99.9% (  &lt; 0.0001 to 0.25 compared with the individual assays), and the positive predictive value (PPV) improved substantially, with a minimal effect on the negative predictive value (NPV). In conclusion, two nucleocapsid antibody tests outperformed a spike protein antibody test. Pairing two different serologic tests in a two-test algorithm improves the PPV, compared with the individual assays alone, while maintaining the NPV.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxa0K1G4LN87IRyrVZew4iXNBWkX9ABWB2AVxsxxnsusqiVs7adX_voYtFRw4zWF-743mPULecDjlXKj3n-rPp8BVJZiAPbLgUClWFPDzBVkAVDnjPCsPyGGM1wBcyjzfJwdZBiJpigXZnN2ZfjaT8yP1HV1vAyKt_TBgsM70dLX8tmK1_8EEXWHwvd84S5cxmodIzdgmAbpAv2LofBjMaJG6ka7vPVtjnOiy3_jgpu0QX5GXnekjvn6aR-T7-dm6vmRXXy4-1ssrZiRXE2vyXJZScAuFbJVpJW-xzVuORVd1CKgkFMYU0HTYZJA1ba6SpOxUUWbWAmZH5MPO92ZuBmwtjlMwvb4JbjDhQXvj9L-b0W31xt_psixTOjIZvHsyCP52Tk_owUWLfW9G9HPUQkqlUoyySujJDrXBxxiwez7DQf_qRqdu9O9utICEH-9wEwehr_0cxpTE_9i3f7_xbPynuOwRFE2Xfg</recordid><startdate>20201217</startdate><enddate>20201217</enddate><creator>Turbett, Sarah E</creator><creator>Anahtar, Melis</creator><creator>Dighe, Anand S</creator><creator>Garcia Beltran, Wilfredo</creator><creator>Miller, Tyler</creator><creator>Scott, Hannah</creator><creator>Durbin, Sienna Marie</creator><creator>Bharadwaj, Maheetha</creator><creator>Thomas, Jason</creator><creator>Gogakos, Tasos S</creator><creator>Astudillo, Michael</creator><creator>Lennerz, Jochen</creator><creator>Rosenberg, Eric S</creator><creator>Branda, John A</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3603-8110</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0309-368X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201217</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Three Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays and Their Performance in Two-Test Algorithms</title><author>Turbett, Sarah E ; Anahtar, Melis ; Dighe, Anand S ; Garcia Beltran, Wilfredo ; Miller, Tyler ; Scott, Hannah ; Durbin, Sienna Marie ; Bharadwaj, Maheetha ; Thomas, Jason ; Gogakos, Tasos S ; Astudillo, Michael ; Lennerz, Jochen ; Rosenberg, Eric S ; Branda, John A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-b5547421c064d8ad41ded5d1e6f9fe0e8406aa60bfeb303bd58b557f8673cc0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turbett, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anahtar, Melis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dighe, Anand S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Beltran, Wilfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durbin, Sienna Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharadwaj, Maheetha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gogakos, Tasos S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astudillo, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennerz, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Eric S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branda, John A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turbett, Sarah E</au><au>Anahtar, Melis</au><au>Dighe, Anand S</au><au>Garcia Beltran, Wilfredo</au><au>Miller, Tyler</au><au>Scott, Hannah</au><au>Durbin, Sienna Marie</au><au>Bharadwaj, Maheetha</au><au>Thomas, Jason</au><au>Gogakos, Tasos S</au><au>Astudillo, Michael</au><au>Lennerz, Jochen</au><au>Rosenberg, Eric S</au><au>Branda, John A</au><au>Caliendo, Angela M</au><au>Caliendo, Angela M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Three Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays and Their Performance in Two-Test Algorithms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2020-12-17</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>Sensitive and specific severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic assays are needed to inform diagnostic, therapeutic, and public health decision-making. We evaluated three commercial serologic assays as stand-alone tests and as components of two-test algorithms. Two nucleocapsid antibody tests (Abbott IgG and Roche total antibody) and one spike protein antibody test (DiaSorin IgG) were included. We assessed sensitivity using 128 serum samples from symptomatic PCR-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-infected patients and specificity using 1,204 samples submitted for routine serology prior to COVID-19's emergence, plus 64 pandemic-era samples from SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative patients with respiratory symptoms. Assays were evaluated as stand-alone tests and as components of a two-test algorithm in which positive results obtained using one assay were verified using a second assay. The two nucleocapsid antibody tests were more sensitive than the spike protein antibody test overall (70% and 70% versus 57%;  ≤ 0.003), with pronounced differences observed using samples collected 7 to 14 days after symptom onset. All three assays were comparably sensitive (≥89%;  ≥ 0.13) using samples collected &gt;14 days after symptom onset. Specificity was higher using the nucleocapsid antibody tests (99.3% and 99.7%) than using the spike protein antibody test (97.8%;  ≤ 0.002). When any two assays were paired in a two-test algorithm, the specificity was 99.9% (  &lt; 0.0001 to 0.25 compared with the individual assays), and the positive predictive value (PPV) improved substantially, with a minimal effect on the negative predictive value (NPV). In conclusion, two nucleocapsid antibody tests outperformed a spike protein antibody test. Pairing two different serologic tests in a two-test algorithm improves the PPV, compared with the individual assays alone, while maintaining the NPV.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>33020186</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.01892-20</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3603-8110</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0309-368X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020-12, Vol.59 (1)
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7771444
source American Society for Microbiology; PubMed Central
subjects Algorithms
Antibodies, Viral - blood
Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods
Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins - immunology
COVID-19
COVID-19 - diagnosis
COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods
Humans
SARS-CoV-2
Sensitivity and Specificity
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology
Virology
title Evaluation of Three Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays and Their Performance in Two-Test Algorithms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A13%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Three%20Commercial%20SARS-CoV-2%20Serologic%20Assays%20and%20Their%20Performance%20in%20Two-Test%20Algorithms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Turbett,%20Sarah%20E&rft.date=2020-12-17&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.01892-20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2448844549%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-b5547421c064d8ad41ded5d1e6f9fe0e8406aa60bfeb303bd58b557f8673cc0e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448844549&rft_id=info:pmid/33020186&rfr_iscdi=true