Loading…
Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany
Objectives This study aimed to survey dentists in Germany to identify their favored materials for the fabrication of tooth-supported single crowns (SCs) depending on the location of the abutment teeth and the preparation margin. Materials and methods The survey included questions regarding demograph...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Clinical oral investigations 2021-01, Vol.25 (1), p.283-293 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-d60a94d133141f1a3df85d88980c203fc096b34049c1484093e83fe73bf0b8783 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-d60a94d133141f1a3df85d88980c203fc096b34049c1484093e83fe73bf0b8783 |
| container_end_page | 293 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 283 |
| container_title | Clinical oral investigations |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Rauch, Angelika Schrock, Annett Schierz, Oliver Hahnel, Sebastian |
| description | Objectives
This study aimed to survey dentists in Germany to identify their favored materials for the fabrication of tooth-supported single crowns (SCs) depending on the location of the abutment teeth and the preparation margin.
Materials and methods
The survey included questions regarding demographic characteristics of dentists/their dental practice and preferred restorative materials for the fabrication of SCs for abutment teeth 16, 11, 34, and 36 with either supra- or subgingival preparation margins.
Results
Between August 2019 and February 2020, 721 dentists participated in the survey; responses from 33 dentists were excluded from data analysis because the dentists did not work in Germany or provided less than one fixed dental prosthesis/month. Dentists favored ceramic materials independent of the location of the abutment tooth and preparation margin (56.6–92.2%). CAD/CAM resin composites or full metals were preferred by only a few participants. A significantly higher proportion of dentists recommended porcelain fused to metal for subgingival preparation margins than for supragingival margins (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00784-020-03363-9 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7785551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2415289633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-d60a94d133141f1a3df85d88980c203fc096b34049c1484093e83fe73bf0b8783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbtuFTEQhlcIRELgBSiQJRoak_GOrw0SiiAgJaKBgsry2fWeONq1D_ZuotPlIfKEPAlOTkiAgsZjab755_I3zUsGbxmAOiz10ZxCCxQQJVLzqNlnHCVFpdjj239LpdFsr3lWyjkA41Lh02YPWyGklLDffD91s8_BjaT40XdzSJEMKZM5pfmMlmWzSXn2PSkhrkdPupwuY_l5de1IWfKF3xI3pbgmvY9zKHMhIZJjnycXt8-bJ4Mbi39xFw-abx8_fD36RE--HH8-en9CO8Fhpr0EZ3jPEBlnA3PYD1r0WhsNXQs4dGDkCjlw0zGuORj0GgevcDXASiuNB827ne5mWU2-7-ok2Y12k8Pk8tYmF-zfmRjO7DpdWKW0EIJVgTd3Ajn9WHyZ7RRK58fRRZ-WYlvORKuNRKzo63_Q87TkWNerlBItABpVqXZH1WuVkv1wPwwDe-Oc3Tlnq3P21jlratGrP9e4L_ltVQVwB5SaimufH3r_R_YX3oqlrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2475200397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Rauch, Angelika ; Schrock, Annett ; Schierz, Oliver ; Hahnel, Sebastian</creator><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Angelika ; Schrock, Annett ; Schierz, Oliver ; Hahnel, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
This study aimed to survey dentists in Germany to identify their favored materials for the fabrication of tooth-supported single crowns (SCs) depending on the location of the abutment teeth and the preparation margin.
Materials and methods
The survey included questions regarding demographic characteristics of dentists/their dental practice and preferred restorative materials for the fabrication of SCs for abutment teeth 16, 11, 34, and 36 with either supra- or subgingival preparation margins.
Results
Between August 2019 and February 2020, 721 dentists participated in the survey; responses from 33 dentists were excluded from data analysis because the dentists did not work in Germany or provided less than one fixed dental prosthesis/month. Dentists favored ceramic materials independent of the location of the abutment tooth and preparation margin (56.6–92.2%). CAD/CAM resin composites or full metals were preferred by only a few participants. A significantly higher proportion of dentists recommended porcelain fused to metal for subgingival preparation margins than for supragingival margins (
p
< 0.001). Characteristics of dentists/dental practices influenced a single scenario (11 subgingival) that was dependent on the dentist’s time since graduation. When asked to specify the ceramic materials, numerous participants wrote a free response (5.7–7.8%) or did not answer (0.7–4.8%).
Conclusions
Dentists in Germany selected restorative materials for SCs depending on the clinical scenario. Since numerous dentists did not specify the ceramic materials, postgraduate information and education might help to extend expertise.
Clinical relevance
The results of this survey provide insight into the favored materials of dentists for the fabrication of tooth-supported SCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03363-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32556660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Composite materials ; Crowns ; Dental Porcelain ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental restorative materials ; Dentistry ; Dentists ; Germany ; Gingiva ; Humans ; Medicine ; Metals ; Original ; Original Article ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2021-01, Vol.25 (1), p.283-293</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-d60a94d133141f1a3df85d88980c203fc096b34049c1484093e83fe73bf0b8783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-d60a94d133141f1a3df85d88980c203fc096b34049c1484093e83fe73bf0b8783</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3881-0549</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32556660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrock, Annett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schierz, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahnel, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><title>Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objectives
This study aimed to survey dentists in Germany to identify their favored materials for the fabrication of tooth-supported single crowns (SCs) depending on the location of the abutment teeth and the preparation margin.
Materials and methods
The survey included questions regarding demographic characteristics of dentists/their dental practice and preferred restorative materials for the fabrication of SCs for abutment teeth 16, 11, 34, and 36 with either supra- or subgingival preparation margins.
Results
Between August 2019 and February 2020, 721 dentists participated in the survey; responses from 33 dentists were excluded from data analysis because the dentists did not work in Germany or provided less than one fixed dental prosthesis/month. Dentists favored ceramic materials independent of the location of the abutment tooth and preparation margin (56.6–92.2%). CAD/CAM resin composites or full metals were preferred by only a few participants. A significantly higher proportion of dentists recommended porcelain fused to metal for subgingival preparation margins than for supragingival margins (
p
< 0.001). Characteristics of dentists/dental practices influenced a single scenario (11 subgingival) that was dependent on the dentist’s time since graduation. When asked to specify the ceramic materials, numerous participants wrote a free response (5.7–7.8%) or did not answer (0.7–4.8%).
Conclusions
Dentists in Germany selected restorative materials for SCs depending on the clinical scenario. Since numerous dentists did not specify the ceramic materials, postgraduate information and education might help to extend expertise.
Clinical relevance
The results of this survey provide insight into the favored materials of dentists for the fabrication of tooth-supported SCs.</description><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Gingiva</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kbtuFTEQhlcIRELgBSiQJRoak_GOrw0SiiAgJaKBgsry2fWeONq1D_ZuotPlIfKEPAlOTkiAgsZjab755_I3zUsGbxmAOiz10ZxCCxQQJVLzqNlnHCVFpdjj239LpdFsr3lWyjkA41Lh02YPWyGklLDffD91s8_BjaT40XdzSJEMKZM5pfmMlmWzSXn2PSkhrkdPupwuY_l5de1IWfKF3xI3pbgmvY9zKHMhIZJjnycXt8-bJ4Mbi39xFw-abx8_fD36RE--HH8-en9CO8Fhpr0EZ3jPEBlnA3PYD1r0WhsNXQs4dGDkCjlw0zGuORj0GgevcDXASiuNB827ne5mWU2-7-ok2Y12k8Pk8tYmF-zfmRjO7DpdWKW0EIJVgTd3Ajn9WHyZ7RRK58fRRZ-WYlvORKuNRKzo63_Q87TkWNerlBItABpVqXZH1WuVkv1wPwwDe-Oc3Tlnq3P21jlratGrP9e4L_ltVQVwB5SaimufH3r_R_YX3oqlrg</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Rauch, Angelika</creator><creator>Schrock, Annett</creator><creator>Schierz, Oliver</creator><creator>Hahnel, Sebastian</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3881-0549</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany</title><author>Rauch, Angelika ; Schrock, Annett ; Schierz, Oliver ; Hahnel, Sebastian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-d60a94d133141f1a3df85d88980c203fc096b34049c1484093e83fe73bf0b8783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Gingiva</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrock, Annett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schierz, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahnel, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rauch, Angelika</au><au>Schrock, Annett</au><au>Schierz, Oliver</au><au>Hahnel, Sebastian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>283-293</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objectives
This study aimed to survey dentists in Germany to identify their favored materials for the fabrication of tooth-supported single crowns (SCs) depending on the location of the abutment teeth and the preparation margin.
Materials and methods
The survey included questions regarding demographic characteristics of dentists/their dental practice and preferred restorative materials for the fabrication of SCs for abutment teeth 16, 11, 34, and 36 with either supra- or subgingival preparation margins.
Results
Between August 2019 and February 2020, 721 dentists participated in the survey; responses from 33 dentists were excluded from data analysis because the dentists did not work in Germany or provided less than one fixed dental prosthesis/month. Dentists favored ceramic materials independent of the location of the abutment tooth and preparation margin (56.6–92.2%). CAD/CAM resin composites or full metals were preferred by only a few participants. A significantly higher proportion of dentists recommended porcelain fused to metal for subgingival preparation margins than for supragingival margins (
p
< 0.001). Characteristics of dentists/dental practices influenced a single scenario (11 subgingival) that was dependent on the dentist’s time since graduation. When asked to specify the ceramic materials, numerous participants wrote a free response (5.7–7.8%) or did not answer (0.7–4.8%).
Conclusions
Dentists in Germany selected restorative materials for SCs depending on the clinical scenario. Since numerous dentists did not specify the ceramic materials, postgraduate information and education might help to extend expertise.
Clinical relevance
The results of this survey provide insight into the favored materials of dentists for the fabrication of tooth-supported SCs.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32556660</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-020-03363-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3881-0549</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1432-6981 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral investigations, 2021-01, Vol.25 (1), p.283-293 |
| issn | 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7785551 |
| source | Springer Nature |
| subjects | Composite materials Crowns Dental Porcelain Dental Prosthesis Design Dental restorative materials Dentistry Dentists Germany Gingiva Humans Medicine Metals Original Original Article Surveys and Questionnaires Teeth |
| title | Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Material%20selection%20for%20tooth-supported%20single%20crowns%E2%80%94a%20survey%20among%20dentists%20in%20Germany&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=Rauch,%20Angelika&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=283-293&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-020-03363-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2415289633%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-d60a94d133141f1a3df85d88980c203fc096b34049c1484093e83fe73bf0b8783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2475200397&rft_id=info:pmid/32556660&rfr_iscdi=true |