Loading…
To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers
Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of the initial ASRM COVID-19 recommendations for infertility treatment held by women’s health providers within varying subspecialties, as well as their attitudes toward pregnancy and fertility during this time. Methods An electronic...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2021-03, Vol.38 (3), p.621-626 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73 |
container_end_page | 626 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 621 |
container_title | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Wiltshire, Ashley Jackson-Bey, Tia Walker, Zachary Chiang, Jasmine L. MacLennan, Paul A. Gunn, Deidre Hurd, William W. |
description | Purpose
The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of the initial ASRM COVID-19 recommendations for infertility treatment held by women’s health providers within varying subspecialties, as well as their attitudes toward pregnancy and fertility during this time.
Methods
An electronic survey was sent to all women’s healthcare providers, including physicians, mid-level providers and nurses, in all subspecialties of obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) at a large tertiary care university-affiliated hospital.
Results
Of the 278 eligible providers, the survey response rate was 45% (
n
= 127). Participants represented 8 Ob/Gyn subspecialties and all professional levels. Participants age 18–30 years were significantly more likely to feel that women should have access to infertility treatment despite the burden level of COVID-19 in respective community/states (
p
= 0.0058). Participants within the subspecialties of general Ob/Gyn, maternal foetal medicine and gynecologic oncology were significantly more likely to disagree that all women should refrain from planned conception during the COVID-19 pandemic, in comparison to those in urogynecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility (
p
= 0.0003).
Conclusions
Considering the immediate and unknown long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility care delivery, a better understanding of perceptions regarding infertility management during this time is important. Our study shows overall support for the initial ASRM recommendations, representing a wide spectrum of women’s health providers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10815-021-02064-w |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7808700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2478586986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsAjeJE9sskKqBQqWiSlDYWo5zM-MqsVPbmVF3fY2-Hk-CIUP5WbCwbN_7nWNfnSx7WsDLAoC9CgXwos6hLNKChua7e9lhUbMqZ1UF99MZap4DbfhB9iiESwAQvKweZgdVRSkTVBxmtxeORI8qEueJdZHE_f01mdBrnKJxNhDXk7hBYqyJRg3keERvtLLks9MG4zXpk_oTTt51s45mi-QjdkYbi2R1_vX0bV4I4lG7cUTbqcVSjc6uyc6l0reb20A2qIa4Icljazr04XH2oFdDwCf7_Sj7cvLuYvUhPzt_f7o6Pss1ZTTmZcsoFQJrpaBuAFtADR3qtqHQpppuoBJ9wYDXrUgSrZHTHqmomWJ9y6qj7M3iO83tiJ1GG70a5OTNqPy1dMrIvzvWbOTabSXjwBlAMnixN_DuasYQ5WiCxmFQFt0cZEkZr3kjeJPQ5_-gl272No2XKFExYA3liSoXSnsXgsf-7jMFyB_JyyV5mZKXP5OXuyR69ucYd5JfUSegWoCQWnaN_vfb_7H9DtU4vlw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493707648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wiltshire, Ashley ; Jackson-Bey, Tia ; Walker, Zachary ; Chiang, Jasmine L. ; MacLennan, Paul A. ; Gunn, Deidre ; Hurd, William W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiltshire, Ashley ; Jackson-Bey, Tia ; Walker, Zachary ; Chiang, Jasmine L. ; MacLennan, Paul A. ; Gunn, Deidre ; Hurd, William W.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of the initial ASRM COVID-19 recommendations for infertility treatment held by women’s health providers within varying subspecialties, as well as their attitudes toward pregnancy and fertility during this time.
Methods
An electronic survey was sent to all women’s healthcare providers, including physicians, mid-level providers and nurses, in all subspecialties of obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) at a large tertiary care university-affiliated hospital.
Results
Of the 278 eligible providers, the survey response rate was 45% (
n
= 127). Participants represented 8 Ob/Gyn subspecialties and all professional levels. Participants age 18–30 years were significantly more likely to feel that women should have access to infertility treatment despite the burden level of COVID-19 in respective community/states (
p
= 0.0058). Participants within the subspecialties of general Ob/Gyn, maternal foetal medicine and gynecologic oncology were significantly more likely to disagree that all women should refrain from planned conception during the COVID-19 pandemic, in comparison to those in urogynecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility (
p
= 0.0003).
Conclusions
Considering the immediate and unknown long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility care delivery, a better understanding of perceptions regarding infertility management during this time is important. Our study shows overall support for the initial ASRM recommendations, representing a wide spectrum of women’s health providers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02064-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33447949</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Assisted Reproduction Technologies ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - psychology ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Fertility ; Gynecology ; Gynecology - methods ; Health Personnel - psychology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Infertility ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Obstetrics ; Pandemics ; Perception - physiology ; Reproductive health ; Reproductive Medicine ; Reproductive Medicine - methods ; SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Women's Health ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021-03, Vol.38 (3), p.621-626</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5250-2059</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808700/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808700/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447949$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiltshire, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson-Bey, Tia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Jasmine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLennan, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Deidre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurd, William W.</creatorcontrib><title>To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Purpose
The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of the initial ASRM COVID-19 recommendations for infertility treatment held by women’s health providers within varying subspecialties, as well as their attitudes toward pregnancy and fertility during this time.
Methods
An electronic survey was sent to all women’s healthcare providers, including physicians, mid-level providers and nurses, in all subspecialties of obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) at a large tertiary care university-affiliated hospital.
Results
Of the 278 eligible providers, the survey response rate was 45% (
n
= 127). Participants represented 8 Ob/Gyn subspecialties and all professional levels. Participants age 18–30 years were significantly more likely to feel that women should have access to infertility treatment despite the burden level of COVID-19 in respective community/states (
p
= 0.0058). Participants within the subspecialties of general Ob/Gyn, maternal foetal medicine and gynecologic oncology were significantly more likely to disagree that all women should refrain from planned conception during the COVID-19 pandemic, in comparison to those in urogynecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility (
p
= 0.0003).
Conclusions
Considering the immediate and unknown long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility care delivery, a better understanding of perceptions regarding infertility management during this time is important. Our study shows overall support for the initial ASRM recommendations, representing a wide spectrum of women’s health providers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Assisted Reproduction Technologies</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - psychology</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Gynecology - methods</subject><subject>Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine - methods</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Women's Health</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsAjeJE9sskKqBQqWiSlDYWo5zM-MqsVPbmVF3fY2-Hk-CIUP5WbCwbN_7nWNfnSx7WsDLAoC9CgXwos6hLNKChua7e9lhUbMqZ1UF99MZap4DbfhB9iiESwAQvKweZgdVRSkTVBxmtxeORI8qEueJdZHE_f01mdBrnKJxNhDXk7hBYqyJRg3keERvtLLks9MG4zXpk_oTTt51s45mi-QjdkYbi2R1_vX0bV4I4lG7cUTbqcVSjc6uyc6l0reb20A2qIa4Icljazr04XH2oFdDwCf7_Sj7cvLuYvUhPzt_f7o6Pss1ZTTmZcsoFQJrpaBuAFtADR3qtqHQpppuoBJ9wYDXrUgSrZHTHqmomWJ9y6qj7M3iO83tiJ1GG70a5OTNqPy1dMrIvzvWbOTabSXjwBlAMnixN_DuasYQ5WiCxmFQFt0cZEkZr3kjeJPQ5_-gl272No2XKFExYA3liSoXSnsXgsf-7jMFyB_JyyV5mZKXP5OXuyR69ucYd5JfUSegWoCQWnaN_vfb_7H9DtU4vlw</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Wiltshire, Ashley</creator><creator>Jackson-Bey, Tia</creator><creator>Walker, Zachary</creator><creator>Chiang, Jasmine L.</creator><creator>MacLennan, Paul A.</creator><creator>Gunn, Deidre</creator><creator>Hurd, William W.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5250-2059</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers</title><author>Wiltshire, Ashley ; Jackson-Bey, Tia ; Walker, Zachary ; Chiang, Jasmine L. ; MacLennan, Paul A. ; Gunn, Deidre ; Hurd, William W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Assisted Reproduction Technologies</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - psychology</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Gynecology - methods</topic><topic>Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine - methods</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Women's Health</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiltshire, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson-Bey, Tia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Jasmine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLennan, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Deidre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurd, William W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiltshire, Ashley</au><au>Jackson-Bey, Tia</au><au>Walker, Zachary</au><au>Chiang, Jasmine L.</au><au>MacLennan, Paul A.</au><au>Gunn, Deidre</au><au>Hurd, William W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><stitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</stitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>626</epage><pages>621-626</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of the initial ASRM COVID-19 recommendations for infertility treatment held by women’s health providers within varying subspecialties, as well as their attitudes toward pregnancy and fertility during this time.
Methods
An electronic survey was sent to all women’s healthcare providers, including physicians, mid-level providers and nurses, in all subspecialties of obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) at a large tertiary care university-affiliated hospital.
Results
Of the 278 eligible providers, the survey response rate was 45% (
n
= 127). Participants represented 8 Ob/Gyn subspecialties and all professional levels. Participants age 18–30 years were significantly more likely to feel that women should have access to infertility treatment despite the burden level of COVID-19 in respective community/states (
p
= 0.0058). Participants within the subspecialties of general Ob/Gyn, maternal foetal medicine and gynecologic oncology were significantly more likely to disagree that all women should refrain from planned conception during the COVID-19 pandemic, in comparison to those in urogynecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility (
p
= 0.0003).
Conclusions
Considering the immediate and unknown long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility care delivery, a better understanding of perceptions regarding infertility management during this time is important. Our study shows overall support for the initial ASRM recommendations, representing a wide spectrum of women’s health providers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33447949</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10815-021-02064-w</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5250-2059</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-0468 |
ispartof | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021-03, Vol.38 (3), p.621-626 |
issn | 1058-0468 1573-7330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7808700 |
source | Springer Nature; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Assisted Reproduction Technologies Attitude of Health Personnel Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - psychology Endocrinology Female Fertility Gynecology Gynecology - methods Health Personnel - psychology Human Genetics Humans Infertility Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Obstetrics Pandemics Perception - physiology Reproductive health Reproductive Medicine Reproductive Medicine - methods SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification Surveys and Questionnaires Women's Health Womens health |
title | To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A56%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20treat%20or%20not%20to%20treat:%20perceptions%20of%20the%20initial%20American%20Society%20for%20Reproductive%20Medicine%20COVID-19%20recommendations%20among%20women%E2%80%99s%20health%20providers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=Wiltshire,%20Ashley&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=626&rft.pages=621-626&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10815-021-02064-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2478586986%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493707648&rft_id=info:pmid/33447949&rfr_iscdi=true |