Loading…

To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers

Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of the initial ASRM COVID-19 recommendations for infertility treatment held by women’s health providers within varying subspecialties, as well as their attitudes toward pregnancy and fertility during this time. Methods An electronic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2021-03, Vol.38 (3), p.621-626
Main Authors: Wiltshire, Ashley, Jackson-Bey, Tia, Walker, Zachary, Chiang, Jasmine L., MacLennan, Paul A., Gunn, Deidre, Hurd, William W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73
container_end_page 626
container_issue 3
container_start_page 621
container_title Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
container_volume 38
creator Wiltshire, Ashley
Jackson-Bey, Tia
Walker, Zachary
Chiang, Jasmine L.
MacLennan, Paul A.
Gunn, Deidre
Hurd, William W.
description Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of the initial ASRM COVID-19 recommendations for infertility treatment held by women’s health providers within varying subspecialties, as well as their attitudes toward pregnancy and fertility during this time. Methods An electronic survey was sent to all women’s healthcare providers, including physicians, mid-level providers and nurses, in all subspecialties of obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) at a large tertiary care university-affiliated hospital. Results Of the 278 eligible providers, the survey response rate was 45% ( n  = 127). Participants represented 8 Ob/Gyn subspecialties and all professional levels. Participants age 18–30 years were significantly more likely to feel that women should have access to infertility treatment despite the burden level of COVID-19 in respective community/states ( p  = 0.0058). Participants within the subspecialties of general Ob/Gyn, maternal foetal medicine and gynecologic oncology were significantly more likely to disagree that all women should refrain from planned conception during the COVID-19 pandemic, in comparison to those in urogynecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility ( p  = 0.0003). Conclusions Considering the immediate and unknown long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility care delivery, a better understanding of perceptions regarding infertility management during this time is important. Our study shows overall support for the initial ASRM recommendations, representing a wide spectrum of women’s health providers.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10815-021-02064-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7808700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2478586986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsAjeJE9sskKqBQqWiSlDYWo5zM-MqsVPbmVF3fY2-Hk-CIUP5WbCwbN_7nWNfnSx7WsDLAoC9CgXwos6hLNKChua7e9lhUbMqZ1UF99MZap4DbfhB9iiESwAQvKweZgdVRSkTVBxmtxeORI8qEueJdZHE_f01mdBrnKJxNhDXk7hBYqyJRg3keERvtLLks9MG4zXpk_oTTt51s45mi-QjdkYbi2R1_vX0bV4I4lG7cUTbqcVSjc6uyc6l0reb20A2qIa4Icljazr04XH2oFdDwCf7_Sj7cvLuYvUhPzt_f7o6Pss1ZTTmZcsoFQJrpaBuAFtADR3qtqHQpppuoBJ9wYDXrUgSrZHTHqmomWJ9y6qj7M3iO83tiJ1GG70a5OTNqPy1dMrIvzvWbOTabSXjwBlAMnixN_DuasYQ5WiCxmFQFt0cZEkZr3kjeJPQ5_-gl272No2XKFExYA3liSoXSnsXgsf-7jMFyB_JyyV5mZKXP5OXuyR69ucYd5JfUSegWoCQWnaN_vfb_7H9DtU4vlw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493707648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wiltshire, Ashley ; Jackson-Bey, Tia ; Walker, Zachary ; Chiang, Jasmine L. ; MacLennan, Paul A. ; Gunn, Deidre ; Hurd, William W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiltshire, Ashley ; Jackson-Bey, Tia ; Walker, Zachary ; Chiang, Jasmine L. ; MacLennan, Paul A. ; Gunn, Deidre ; Hurd, William W.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of the initial ASRM COVID-19 recommendations for infertility treatment held by women’s health providers within varying subspecialties, as well as their attitudes toward pregnancy and fertility during this time. Methods An electronic survey was sent to all women’s healthcare providers, including physicians, mid-level providers and nurses, in all subspecialties of obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) at a large tertiary care university-affiliated hospital. Results Of the 278 eligible providers, the survey response rate was 45% ( n  = 127). Participants represented 8 Ob/Gyn subspecialties and all professional levels. Participants age 18–30 years were significantly more likely to feel that women should have access to infertility treatment despite the burden level of COVID-19 in respective community/states ( p  = 0.0058). Participants within the subspecialties of general Ob/Gyn, maternal foetal medicine and gynecologic oncology were significantly more likely to disagree that all women should refrain from planned conception during the COVID-19 pandemic, in comparison to those in urogynecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility ( p  = 0.0003). Conclusions Considering the immediate and unknown long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility care delivery, a better understanding of perceptions regarding infertility management during this time is important. Our study shows overall support for the initial ASRM recommendations, representing a wide spectrum of women’s health providers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02064-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33447949</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Assisted Reproduction Technologies ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - psychology ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Fertility ; Gynecology ; Gynecology - methods ; Health Personnel - psychology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Infertility ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Obstetrics ; Pandemics ; Perception - physiology ; Reproductive health ; Reproductive Medicine ; Reproductive Medicine - methods ; SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Women's Health ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021-03, Vol.38 (3), p.621-626</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5250-2059</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808700/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808700/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447949$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiltshire, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson-Bey, Tia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Jasmine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLennan, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Deidre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurd, William W.</creatorcontrib><title>To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of the initial ASRM COVID-19 recommendations for infertility treatment held by women’s health providers within varying subspecialties, as well as their attitudes toward pregnancy and fertility during this time. Methods An electronic survey was sent to all women’s healthcare providers, including physicians, mid-level providers and nurses, in all subspecialties of obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) at a large tertiary care university-affiliated hospital. Results Of the 278 eligible providers, the survey response rate was 45% ( n  = 127). Participants represented 8 Ob/Gyn subspecialties and all professional levels. Participants age 18–30 years were significantly more likely to feel that women should have access to infertility treatment despite the burden level of COVID-19 in respective community/states ( p  = 0.0058). Participants within the subspecialties of general Ob/Gyn, maternal foetal medicine and gynecologic oncology were significantly more likely to disagree that all women should refrain from planned conception during the COVID-19 pandemic, in comparison to those in urogynecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility ( p  = 0.0003). Conclusions Considering the immediate and unknown long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility care delivery, a better understanding of perceptions regarding infertility management during this time is important. Our study shows overall support for the initial ASRM recommendations, representing a wide spectrum of women’s health providers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Assisted Reproduction Technologies</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - psychology</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Gynecology - methods</subject><subject>Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine - methods</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Women's Health</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsAjeJE9sskKqBQqWiSlDYWo5zM-MqsVPbmVF3fY2-Hk-CIUP5WbCwbN_7nWNfnSx7WsDLAoC9CgXwos6hLNKChua7e9lhUbMqZ1UF99MZap4DbfhB9iiESwAQvKweZgdVRSkTVBxmtxeORI8qEueJdZHE_f01mdBrnKJxNhDXk7hBYqyJRg3keERvtLLks9MG4zXpk_oTTt51s45mi-QjdkYbi2R1_vX0bV4I4lG7cUTbqcVSjc6uyc6l0reb20A2qIa4Icljazr04XH2oFdDwCf7_Sj7cvLuYvUhPzt_f7o6Pss1ZTTmZcsoFQJrpaBuAFtADR3qtqHQpppuoBJ9wYDXrUgSrZHTHqmomWJ9y6qj7M3iO83tiJ1GG70a5OTNqPy1dMrIvzvWbOTabSXjwBlAMnixN_DuasYQ5WiCxmFQFt0cZEkZr3kjeJPQ5_-gl272No2XKFExYA3liSoXSnsXgsf-7jMFyB_JyyV5mZKXP5OXuyR69ucYd5JfUSegWoCQWnaN_vfb_7H9DtU4vlw</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Wiltshire, Ashley</creator><creator>Jackson-Bey, Tia</creator><creator>Walker, Zachary</creator><creator>Chiang, Jasmine L.</creator><creator>MacLennan, Paul A.</creator><creator>Gunn, Deidre</creator><creator>Hurd, William W.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5250-2059</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers</title><author>Wiltshire, Ashley ; Jackson-Bey, Tia ; Walker, Zachary ; Chiang, Jasmine L. ; MacLennan, Paul A. ; Gunn, Deidre ; Hurd, William W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Assisted Reproduction Technologies</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - psychology</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Gynecology - methods</topic><topic>Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine - methods</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Women's Health</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiltshire, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson-Bey, Tia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Jasmine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLennan, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Deidre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurd, William W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiltshire, Ashley</au><au>Jackson-Bey, Tia</au><au>Walker, Zachary</au><au>Chiang, Jasmine L.</au><au>MacLennan, Paul A.</au><au>Gunn, Deidre</au><au>Hurd, William W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><stitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</stitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>626</epage><pages>621-626</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><abstract>Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of the initial ASRM COVID-19 recommendations for infertility treatment held by women’s health providers within varying subspecialties, as well as their attitudes toward pregnancy and fertility during this time. Methods An electronic survey was sent to all women’s healthcare providers, including physicians, mid-level providers and nurses, in all subspecialties of obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) at a large tertiary care university-affiliated hospital. Results Of the 278 eligible providers, the survey response rate was 45% ( n  = 127). Participants represented 8 Ob/Gyn subspecialties and all professional levels. Participants age 18–30 years were significantly more likely to feel that women should have access to infertility treatment despite the burden level of COVID-19 in respective community/states ( p  = 0.0058). Participants within the subspecialties of general Ob/Gyn, maternal foetal medicine and gynecologic oncology were significantly more likely to disagree that all women should refrain from planned conception during the COVID-19 pandemic, in comparison to those in urogynecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility ( p  = 0.0003). Conclusions Considering the immediate and unknown long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility care delivery, a better understanding of perceptions regarding infertility management during this time is important. Our study shows overall support for the initial ASRM recommendations, representing a wide spectrum of women’s health providers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33447949</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10815-021-02064-w</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5250-2059</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0468
ispartof Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021-03, Vol.38 (3), p.621-626
issn 1058-0468
1573-7330
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7808700
source Springer Nature; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Assisted Reproduction Technologies
Attitude of Health Personnel
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
COVID-19 - epidemiology
COVID-19 - psychology
Endocrinology
Female
Fertility
Gynecology
Gynecology - methods
Health Personnel - psychology
Human Genetics
Humans
Infertility
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Obstetrics
Pandemics
Perception - physiology
Reproductive health
Reproductive Medicine
Reproductive Medicine - methods
SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification
Surveys and Questionnaires
Women's Health
Womens health
title To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A56%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20treat%20or%20not%20to%20treat:%20perceptions%20of%20the%20initial%20American%20Society%20for%20Reproductive%20Medicine%20COVID-19%20recommendations%20among%20women%E2%80%99s%20health%20providers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=Wiltshire,%20Ashley&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=626&rft.pages=621-626&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10815-021-02064-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2478586986%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2b74499e5aa0560eb0ec0decb640baa0c6039f17085b9c47cce84fe4957a7fb73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493707648&rft_id=info:pmid/33447949&rfr_iscdi=true