Loading…
Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial
Purpose The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2021-02, Vol.48 (2), p.509-520 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3 |
container_end_page | 520 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 509 |
container_title | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Jansen, B. H. E. Bodar, Y. J. L. Zwezerijnen, G. J. C. Meijer, D. van der Voorn, J. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A. Wondergem, M. Roeleveld, T. A. Boellaard, R. Hoekstra, O. S. van Moorselaar, R. J. A. Oprea-Lager, D. E. Vis, A. N. |
description | Purpose
The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used
68
gallium-labelled PSMA tracers,
18
fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of
18
F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa.
Methods
This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results.
Results
A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4–66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9–97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1–79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6–95.0%), respectively.
Conclusion
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00259-020-04974-w |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7835187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2480545988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFuEzEURUcIREvhB1hZYsPG9Hk8HtsbpCptClIkIhHWlmM_J64mnjCeNOQb-Om6JCoCJFbPks89evatqrcMPjAAeZkBaqEp1ECh0bKh-2fVOWuZphKUfv50lnBWvcr5DoCpWumX1RmvpdJC6_Pq5xy7--hId9hs1zT1Hkke7SqmFdnHcU2YmtLryXR-mJH5zeJysiDbIfYDGXuCP0ZMHj3Z_qPwMWd0Y-wTiekxsbHDocy-uEckziaHA6FkXCP5ejVbkHGItntdvQi2y_jmNC-qb9ObxeQTnX25_Ty5mlFX63ZPQyNAs8CWDlsPoQFba44NlygD8413ARgLApaK8dZ7rloheajVEq1tpQ_8ovp49G53yw16h2kcbGdOa5reRvPnTYprs-rvjVRcMCWL4P1JMPTfd5hHs4nZYdfZhP0um7rhDYiWgyjou7_Qu343pPK8QikQjdBKFao-Uq58UR4wPC3DwDx2bY5dm9K1-dW12ZcQP4ZygdMKh9_q_6QeANz9rKU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2480545988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Jansen, B. H. E. ; Bodar, Y. J. L. ; Zwezerijnen, G. J. C. ; Meijer, D. ; van der Voorn, J. P. ; Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A. ; Wondergem, M. ; Roeleveld, T. A. ; Boellaard, R. ; Hoekstra, O. S. ; van Moorselaar, R. J. A. ; Oprea-Lager, D. E. ; Vis, A. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jansen, B. H. E. ; Bodar, Y. J. L. ; Zwezerijnen, G. J. C. ; Meijer, D. ; van der Voorn, J. P. ; Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A. ; Wondergem, M. ; Roeleveld, T. A. ; Boellaard, R. ; Hoekstra, O. S. ; van Moorselaar, R. J. A. ; Oprea-Lager, D. E. ; Vis, A. N.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used
68
gallium-labelled PSMA tracers,
18
fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of
18
F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa.
Methods
This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results.
Results
A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4–66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9–97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1–79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6–95.0%), respectively.
Conclusion
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-7070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-7089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04974-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32789599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Antigens ; Cancer surgery ; Cardiology ; Computed tomography ; Confidence intervals ; Diagnostic systems ; Dissection ; Fluorine isotopes ; Imaging ; Lymph ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Nodes ; Nomograms ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Oncology – Genitourinary ; Original ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Physicians ; Positron emission ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Radiology ; Robots ; Sensitivity ; Statistical analysis ; Tomography ; Tracers ; Urological surgery</subject><ispartof>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021-02, Vol.48 (2), p.509-520</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2524-2538 ; 0000-0003-2107-145X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jansen, B. H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodar, Y. J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Voorn, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wondergem, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeleveld, T. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boellaard, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekstra, O. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Moorselaar, R. J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oprea-Lager, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vis, A. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial</title><title>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose
The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used
68
gallium-labelled PSMA tracers,
18
fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of
18
F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa.
Methods
This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results.
Results
A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4–66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9–97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1–79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6–95.0%), respectively.
Conclusion
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa.</description><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Fluorine isotopes</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Lymph</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Oncology – Genitourinary</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tracers</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><issn>1619-7070</issn><issn>1619-7089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFuEzEURUcIREvhB1hZYsPG9Hk8HtsbpCptClIkIhHWlmM_J64mnjCeNOQb-Om6JCoCJFbPks89evatqrcMPjAAeZkBaqEp1ECh0bKh-2fVOWuZphKUfv50lnBWvcr5DoCpWumX1RmvpdJC6_Pq5xy7--hId9hs1zT1Hkke7SqmFdnHcU2YmtLryXR-mJH5zeJysiDbIfYDGXuCP0ZMHj3Z_qPwMWd0Y-wTiekxsbHDocy-uEckziaHA6FkXCP5ejVbkHGItntdvQi2y_jmNC-qb9ObxeQTnX25_Ty5mlFX63ZPQyNAs8CWDlsPoQFba44NlygD8413ARgLApaK8dZ7rloheajVEq1tpQ_8ovp49G53yw16h2kcbGdOa5reRvPnTYprs-rvjVRcMCWL4P1JMPTfd5hHs4nZYdfZhP0um7rhDYiWgyjou7_Qu343pPK8QikQjdBKFao-Uq58UR4wPC3DwDx2bY5dm9K1-dW12ZcQP4ZygdMKh9_q_6QeANz9rKU</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Jansen, B. H. E.</creator><creator>Bodar, Y. J. L.</creator><creator>Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.</creator><creator>Meijer, D.</creator><creator>van der Voorn, J. P.</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.</creator><creator>Wondergem, M.</creator><creator>Roeleveld, T. A.</creator><creator>Boellaard, R.</creator><creator>Hoekstra, O. S.</creator><creator>van Moorselaar, R. J. A.</creator><creator>Oprea-Lager, D. E.</creator><creator>Vis, A. N.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2524-2538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-145X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial</title><author>Jansen, B. H. E. ; Bodar, Y. J. L. ; Zwezerijnen, G. J. C. ; Meijer, D. ; van der Voorn, J. P. ; Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A. ; Wondergem, M. ; Roeleveld, T. A. ; Boellaard, R. ; Hoekstra, O. S. ; van Moorselaar, R. J. A. ; Oprea-Lager, D. E. ; Vis, A. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Fluorine isotopes</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Lymph</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Oncology – Genitourinary</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tracers</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jansen, B. H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodar, Y. J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Voorn, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wondergem, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeleveld, T. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boellaard, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekstra, O. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Moorselaar, R. J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oprea-Lager, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vis, A. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jansen, B. H. E.</au><au>Bodar, Y. J. L.</au><au>Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.</au><au>Meijer, D.</au><au>van der Voorn, J. P.</au><au>Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.</au><au>Wondergem, M.</au><au>Roeleveld, T. A.</au><au>Boellaard, R.</au><au>Hoekstra, O. S.</au><au>van Moorselaar, R. J. A.</au><au>Oprea-Lager, D. E.</au><au>Vis, A. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial</atitle><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>509-520</pages><issn>1619-7070</issn><eissn>1619-7089</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used
68
gallium-labelled PSMA tracers,
18
fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of
18
F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa.
Methods
This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results.
Results
A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4–66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9–97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1–79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6–95.0%), respectively.
Conclusion
18
F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32789599</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00259-020-04974-w</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2524-2538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-145X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1619-7070 |
ispartof | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021-02, Vol.48 (2), p.509-520 |
issn | 1619-7070 1619-7089 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7835187 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Antigens Cancer surgery Cardiology Computed tomography Confidence intervals Diagnostic systems Dissection Fluorine isotopes Imaging Lymph Magnetic resonance imaging Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metastases Metastasis Nodes Nomograms Nuclear Medicine Oncology Oncology – Genitourinary Original Original Article Orthopedics Physicians Positron emission Prostate cancer Prostatectomy Radiology Robots Sensitivity Statistical analysis Tomography Tracers Urological surgery |
title | Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A34%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pelvic%20lymph-node%20staging%20with%2018F-DCFPyL%20PET/CT%20prior%20to%20extended%20pelvic%20lymph-node%20dissection%20in%20primary%20prostate%20cancer%20-%20the%20SALT%20trial&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Jansen,%20B.%20H.%20E.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=509-520&rft.issn=1619-7070&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00259-020-04974-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2480545988%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2480545988&rft_id=info:pmid/32789599&rfr_iscdi=true |