Loading…

Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial

Purpose The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2021-02, Vol.48 (2), p.509-520
Main Authors: Jansen, B. H. E., Bodar, Y. J. L., Zwezerijnen, G. J. C., Meijer, D., van der Voorn, J. P., Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A., Wondergem, M., Roeleveld, T. A., Boellaard, R., Hoekstra, O. S., van Moorselaar, R. J. A., Oprea-Lager, D. E., Vis, A. N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3
container_end_page 520
container_issue 2
container_start_page 509
container_title European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
container_volume 48
creator Jansen, B. H. E.
Bodar, Y. J. L.
Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.
Meijer, D.
van der Voorn, J. P.
Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.
Wondergem, M.
Roeleveld, T. A.
Boellaard, R.
Hoekstra, O. S.
van Moorselaar, R. J. A.
Oprea-Lager, D. E.
Vis, A. N.
description Purpose The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used 68 gallium-labelled PSMA tracers, 18 fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of 18 F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa. Methods This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results. Results A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4–66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9–97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1–79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6–95.0%), respectively. Conclusion 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00259-020-04974-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7835187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2480545988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFuEzEURUcIREvhB1hZYsPG9Hk8HtsbpCptClIkIhHWlmM_J64mnjCeNOQb-Om6JCoCJFbPks89evatqrcMPjAAeZkBaqEp1ECh0bKh-2fVOWuZphKUfv50lnBWvcr5DoCpWumX1RmvpdJC6_Pq5xy7--hId9hs1zT1Hkke7SqmFdnHcU2YmtLryXR-mJH5zeJysiDbIfYDGXuCP0ZMHj3Z_qPwMWd0Y-wTiekxsbHDocy-uEckziaHA6FkXCP5ejVbkHGItntdvQi2y_jmNC-qb9ObxeQTnX25_Ty5mlFX63ZPQyNAs8CWDlsPoQFba44NlygD8413ARgLApaK8dZ7rloheajVEq1tpQ_8ovp49G53yw16h2kcbGdOa5reRvPnTYprs-rvjVRcMCWL4P1JMPTfd5hHs4nZYdfZhP0um7rhDYiWgyjou7_Qu343pPK8QikQjdBKFao-Uq58UR4wPC3DwDx2bY5dm9K1-dW12ZcQP4ZygdMKh9_q_6QeANz9rKU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2480545988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Jansen, B. H. E. ; Bodar, Y. J. L. ; Zwezerijnen, G. J. C. ; Meijer, D. ; van der Voorn, J. P. ; Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A. ; Wondergem, M. ; Roeleveld, T. A. ; Boellaard, R. ; Hoekstra, O. S. ; van Moorselaar, R. J. A. ; Oprea-Lager, D. E. ; Vis, A. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jansen, B. H. E. ; Bodar, Y. J. L. ; Zwezerijnen, G. J. C. ; Meijer, D. ; van der Voorn, J. P. ; Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A. ; Wondergem, M. ; Roeleveld, T. A. ; Boellaard, R. ; Hoekstra, O. S. ; van Moorselaar, R. J. A. ; Oprea-Lager, D. E. ; Vis, A. N.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used 68 gallium-labelled PSMA tracers, 18 fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of 18 F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa. Methods This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results. Results A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4–66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9–97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1–79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6–95.0%), respectively. Conclusion 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-7070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-7089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04974-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32789599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Antigens ; Cancer surgery ; Cardiology ; Computed tomography ; Confidence intervals ; Diagnostic systems ; Dissection ; Fluorine isotopes ; Imaging ; Lymph ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Nodes ; Nomograms ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Oncology – Genitourinary ; Original ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Physicians ; Positron emission ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Radiology ; Robots ; Sensitivity ; Statistical analysis ; Tomography ; Tracers ; Urological surgery</subject><ispartof>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021-02, Vol.48 (2), p.509-520</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2524-2538 ; 0000-0003-2107-145X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jansen, B. H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodar, Y. J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Voorn, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wondergem, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeleveld, T. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boellaard, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekstra, O. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Moorselaar, R. J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oprea-Lager, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vis, A. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial</title><title>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used 68 gallium-labelled PSMA tracers, 18 fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of 18 F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa. Methods This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results. Results A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4–66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9–97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1–79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6–95.0%), respectively. Conclusion 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa.</description><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Fluorine isotopes</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Lymph</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Oncology – Genitourinary</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tracers</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><issn>1619-7070</issn><issn>1619-7089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFuEzEURUcIREvhB1hZYsPG9Hk8HtsbpCptClIkIhHWlmM_J64mnjCeNOQb-Om6JCoCJFbPks89evatqrcMPjAAeZkBaqEp1ECh0bKh-2fVOWuZphKUfv50lnBWvcr5DoCpWumX1RmvpdJC6_Pq5xy7--hId9hs1zT1Hkke7SqmFdnHcU2YmtLryXR-mJH5zeJysiDbIfYDGXuCP0ZMHj3Z_qPwMWd0Y-wTiekxsbHDocy-uEckziaHA6FkXCP5ejVbkHGItntdvQi2y_jmNC-qb9ObxeQTnX25_Ty5mlFX63ZPQyNAs8CWDlsPoQFba44NlygD8413ARgLApaK8dZ7rloheajVEq1tpQ_8ovp49G53yw16h2kcbGdOa5reRvPnTYprs-rvjVRcMCWL4P1JMPTfd5hHs4nZYdfZhP0um7rhDYiWgyjou7_Qu343pPK8QikQjdBKFao-Uq58UR4wPC3DwDx2bY5dm9K1-dW12ZcQP4ZygdMKh9_q_6QeANz9rKU</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Jansen, B. H. E.</creator><creator>Bodar, Y. J. L.</creator><creator>Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.</creator><creator>Meijer, D.</creator><creator>van der Voorn, J. P.</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.</creator><creator>Wondergem, M.</creator><creator>Roeleveld, T. A.</creator><creator>Boellaard, R.</creator><creator>Hoekstra, O. S.</creator><creator>van Moorselaar, R. J. A.</creator><creator>Oprea-Lager, D. E.</creator><creator>Vis, A. N.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2524-2538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-145X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial</title><author>Jansen, B. H. E. ; Bodar, Y. J. L. ; Zwezerijnen, G. J. C. ; Meijer, D. ; van der Voorn, J. P. ; Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A. ; Wondergem, M. ; Roeleveld, T. A. ; Boellaard, R. ; Hoekstra, O. S. ; van Moorselaar, R. J. A. ; Oprea-Lager, D. E. ; Vis, A. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Fluorine isotopes</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Lymph</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Oncology – Genitourinary</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tracers</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jansen, B. H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodar, Y. J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Voorn, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wondergem, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeleveld, T. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boellaard, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekstra, O. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Moorselaar, R. J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oprea-Lager, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vis, A. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jansen, B. H. E.</au><au>Bodar, Y. J. L.</au><au>Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.</au><au>Meijer, D.</au><au>van der Voorn, J. P.</au><au>Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.</au><au>Wondergem, M.</au><au>Roeleveld, T. A.</au><au>Boellaard, R.</au><au>Hoekstra, O. S.</au><au>van Moorselaar, R. J. A.</au><au>Oprea-Lager, D. E.</au><au>Vis, A. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial</atitle><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>509-520</pages><issn>1619-7070</issn><eissn>1619-7089</eissn><abstract>Purpose The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used 68 gallium-labelled PSMA tracers, 18 fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of 18 F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa. Methods This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results. Results A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4–66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9–97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1–79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6–95.0%), respectively. Conclusion 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32789599</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00259-020-04974-w</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2524-2538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-145X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1619-7070
ispartof European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021-02, Vol.48 (2), p.509-520
issn 1619-7070
1619-7089
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7835187
source Springer Nature
subjects Antigens
Cancer surgery
Cardiology
Computed tomography
Confidence intervals
Diagnostic systems
Dissection
Fluorine isotopes
Imaging
Lymph
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastases
Metastasis
Nodes
Nomograms
Nuclear Medicine
Oncology
Oncology – Genitourinary
Original
Original Article
Orthopedics
Physicians
Positron emission
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
Radiology
Robots
Sensitivity
Statistical analysis
Tomography
Tracers
Urological surgery
title Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A34%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pelvic%20lymph-node%20staging%20with%2018F-DCFPyL%20PET/CT%20prior%20to%20extended%20pelvic%20lymph-node%20dissection%20in%20primary%20prostate%20cancer%20-%20the%20SALT%20trial&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Jansen,%20B.%20H.%20E.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=509-520&rft.issn=1619-7070&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00259-020-04974-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2480545988%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296w-f45091f1bce6d0f40a293e437e7f1d4dcf011f50b8136dd386573f28beaa67df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2480545988&rft_id=info:pmid/32789599&rfr_iscdi=true