Assessing Strength of Evidence of Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Imaging Examinations

• Published in: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 2016-05, Vol.23 (3), p.649-653
• Main Authors: Lacson, Ronilda, Raja, Ali S, Osterbur, David, Ip, Ivan, Schneider, Louise, Bain, Paul, Mita, Carol, Whelan, Julia, Silveira, Patricia, Dement, David, Khorasani, Ramin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Brief Communication; Decision Support Systems, Clinical; Diagnostic Imaging - standards; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans
• ISSN: 1067-5027; 1527-974X
• DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv194

For health information technology tools to fully inform evidence-based decisions, recommendations must be reliably assessed for quality and strength of evidence. We aimed to create an annotation framework for grading recommendations regarding appropriate use of diagnostic imaging examinations. The annotation framework was created by an expert panel (clinicians in three medical specialties, medical librarians, and biomedical scientists) who developed a process for achieving consensus in assessing recommendations, and evaluated by measuring agreement in grading the strength of evidence for 120 empirically selected recommendations using the Oxford Levels of Evidence. Eighty-two percent of recommendations were assigned to Level 5 (expert opinion). Inter-annotator agreement was 0.70 on initial grading (κ = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.23-0.48). After systematic discussion utilizing the annotation framework, agreement increased significantly to 0.97 (κ = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.77-0.99). A novel annotation framework was effective for grading the strength of evidence supporting appropriate use criteria for diagnostic imaging exams.