Loading…
Use of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial
In the predictD-intervention, GPs used a personalised biopsychosocial programme to prevent depression. This reduced the incidence of major depression by 21.0%, although the results were not statistically significant. To determine whether the predictD-intervention is effective at preventing anxiety i...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of general practice 2021-02, Vol.71 (703), p.e95-e104 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-6ec1f6f43e401ab69e577551eb08ae22ba462cc9139f137f559771c9536e70833 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-6ec1f6f43e401ab69e577551eb08ae22ba462cc9139f137f559771c9536e70833 |
container_end_page | e104 |
container_issue | 703 |
container_start_page | e95 |
container_title | British journal of general practice |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Moreno-Peral, Patricia Conejo-Cerón, Sonia de Dios Luna, Juan King, Michael Nazareth, Irwin Martín-Pérez, Carlos Fernández-Alonso, Carmen Ballesta-Rodríguez, María Isabel Fernández, Anna Aiarzaguena, José María Montón-Franco, Carmen Bellón, Juan Ángel |
description | In the predictD-intervention, GPs used a personalised biopsychosocial programme to prevent depression. This reduced the incidence of major depression by 21.0%, although the results were not statistically significant.
To determine whether the predictD-intervention is effective at preventing anxiety in primary care patients without depression or anxiety.
Secondary study of a cluster randomised trial with practices randomly assigned to either the predictD-intervention or usual care. This study was conducted in seven Spanish cities from October 2010 to July 2012.
In each city, 10 practices and two GPs per practice, as well as four to six patients every recruiting day, were randomly selected until there were 26-27 eligible patients for each GP. The endpoint was cumulative incidence of anxiety as measured by the PRIME-MD screening tool over 18 months.
A total of 3326 patients without depression and 140 GPs from 70 practices consented and were eligible to participate; 328 of these patients were removed because they had an anxiety syndrome at baseline. Of the 2998 valid patients, 2597 (86.6%) were evaluated at the end of the study. At 18 months, 10.4% (95% CI = 8.7% to 12.1%) of the patients in the predictD-intervention group developed anxiety compared with 13.1% (95% CI = 11.4% to 14.8%) in the usual-care group (absolute difference = -2.7% [95% CI = -5.1% to -0.3%];
= 0.029).
A personalised intervention delivered by GPs for the prevention of depression provided a modest but statistically significant reduction in the incidence of anxiety. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3399/bjgp20X714041 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7846354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2490266614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-6ec1f6f43e401ab69e577551eb08ae22ba462cc9139f137f559771c9536e70833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhyBVZ4sIl4PFnzAGpqviSKvXSStwsx5mUrLJxsJOKPfLP67BLRXuyRvPo8bwzhLwG9l4Iaz8025uJsx8GJJPwhGxAmrpSXPKnZMOsZhVoKU7Ii5y3jHGugT0nJ0JIqzgTG_LnOiONHfV0wpTj6Ic-Y0tbnBLm3MeR9uOM6RbH-VDQKfU7n_Y0-IR0jqXGtUv9-LvHef-xqDKGOLYrlOel3R_8YVhyMdHkxzbu_v4yp94PL8mzzg8ZXx3fU3L95fPV-bfq4vLr9_OziypIUHOlMUCnOylQMvCNtqiMUQqwYbVHzhsvNQ_BgrAdCNMpZY2BYJXQaFgtxCn5dPBOS7PDNpSZkx_cMY6LvncPO2P_093EW2dqqYWSRfDuKEjx14J5diVFwGHwI8YlOy5rACaNgIK-fYRu45LKclfKMq61hlVYHaiQYs4Ju_thgLn1uO7BcQv_5v8E9_S_a4o7oc2isg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2490266614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Moreno-Peral, Patricia ; Conejo-Cerón, Sonia ; de Dios Luna, Juan ; King, Michael ; Nazareth, Irwin ; Martín-Pérez, Carlos ; Fernández-Alonso, Carmen ; Ballesta-Rodríguez, María Isabel ; Fernández, Anna ; Aiarzaguena, José María ; Montón-Franco, Carmen ; Bellón, Juan Ángel</creator><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Peral, Patricia ; Conejo-Cerón, Sonia ; de Dios Luna, Juan ; King, Michael ; Nazareth, Irwin ; Martín-Pérez, Carlos ; Fernández-Alonso, Carmen ; Ballesta-Rodríguez, María Isabel ; Fernández, Anna ; Aiarzaguena, José María ; Montón-Franco, Carmen ; Bellón, Juan Ángel</creatorcontrib><description>In the predictD-intervention, GPs used a personalised biopsychosocial programme to prevent depression. This reduced the incidence of major depression by 21.0%, although the results were not statistically significant.
To determine whether the predictD-intervention is effective at preventing anxiety in primary care patients without depression or anxiety.
Secondary study of a cluster randomised trial with practices randomly assigned to either the predictD-intervention or usual care. This study was conducted in seven Spanish cities from October 2010 to July 2012.
In each city, 10 practices and two GPs per practice, as well as four to six patients every recruiting day, were randomly selected until there were 26-27 eligible patients for each GP. The endpoint was cumulative incidence of anxiety as measured by the PRIME-MD screening tool over 18 months.
A total of 3326 patients without depression and 140 GPs from 70 practices consented and were eligible to participate; 328 of these patients were removed because they had an anxiety syndrome at baseline. Of the 2998 valid patients, 2597 (86.6%) were evaluated at the end of the study. At 18 months, 10.4% (95% CI = 8.7% to 12.1%) of the patients in the predictD-intervention group developed anxiety compared with 13.1% (95% CI = 11.4% to 14.8%) in the usual-care group (absolute difference = -2.7% [95% CI = -5.1% to -0.3%];
= 0.029).
A personalised intervention delivered by GPs for the prevention of depression provided a modest but statistically significant reduction in the incidence of anxiety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-5242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X714041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33495203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal College of General Practitioners</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Clinical trials ; Family physicians ; Intervention ; Mental depression</subject><ispartof>British journal of general practice, 2021-02, Vol.71 (703), p.e95-e104</ispartof><rights>The Authors.</rights><rights>Copyright Royal College of General Practitioners Feb 2021</rights><rights>The Authors 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-6ec1f6f43e401ab69e577551eb08ae22ba462cc9139f137f559771c9536e70833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-6ec1f6f43e401ab69e577551eb08ae22ba462cc9139f137f559771c9536e70833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846354/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846354/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33495203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Peral, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conejo-Cerón, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Dios Luna, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazareth, Irwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Pérez, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Alonso, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballesta-Rodríguez, María Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiarzaguena, José María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montón-Franco, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellón, Juan Ángel</creatorcontrib><title>Use of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial</title><title>British journal of general practice</title><addtitle>Br J Gen Pract</addtitle><description>In the predictD-intervention, GPs used a personalised biopsychosocial programme to prevent depression. This reduced the incidence of major depression by 21.0%, although the results were not statistically significant.
To determine whether the predictD-intervention is effective at preventing anxiety in primary care patients without depression or anxiety.
Secondary study of a cluster randomised trial with practices randomly assigned to either the predictD-intervention or usual care. This study was conducted in seven Spanish cities from October 2010 to July 2012.
In each city, 10 practices and two GPs per practice, as well as four to six patients every recruiting day, were randomly selected until there were 26-27 eligible patients for each GP. The endpoint was cumulative incidence of anxiety as measured by the PRIME-MD screening tool over 18 months.
A total of 3326 patients without depression and 140 GPs from 70 practices consented and were eligible to participate; 328 of these patients were removed because they had an anxiety syndrome at baseline. Of the 2998 valid patients, 2597 (86.6%) were evaluated at the end of the study. At 18 months, 10.4% (95% CI = 8.7% to 12.1%) of the patients in the predictD-intervention group developed anxiety compared with 13.1% (95% CI = 11.4% to 14.8%) in the usual-care group (absolute difference = -2.7% [95% CI = -5.1% to -0.3%];
= 0.029).
A personalised intervention delivered by GPs for the prevention of depression provided a modest but statistically significant reduction in the incidence of anxiety.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><issn>0960-1643</issn><issn>1478-5242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhyBVZ4sIl4PFnzAGpqviSKvXSStwsx5mUrLJxsJOKPfLP67BLRXuyRvPo8bwzhLwG9l4Iaz8025uJsx8GJJPwhGxAmrpSXPKnZMOsZhVoKU7Ii5y3jHGugT0nJ0JIqzgTG_LnOiONHfV0wpTj6Ic-Y0tbnBLm3MeR9uOM6RbH-VDQKfU7n_Y0-IR0jqXGtUv9-LvHef-xqDKGOLYrlOel3R_8YVhyMdHkxzbu_v4yp94PL8mzzg8ZXx3fU3L95fPV-bfq4vLr9_OziypIUHOlMUCnOylQMvCNtqiMUQqwYbVHzhsvNQ_BgrAdCNMpZY2BYJXQaFgtxCn5dPBOS7PDNpSZkx_cMY6LvncPO2P_093EW2dqqYWSRfDuKEjx14J5diVFwGHwI8YlOy5rACaNgIK-fYRu45LKclfKMq61hlVYHaiQYs4Ju_thgLn1uO7BcQv_5v8E9_S_a4o7oc2isg</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Moreno-Peral, Patricia</creator><creator>Conejo-Cerón, Sonia</creator><creator>de Dios Luna, Juan</creator><creator>King, Michael</creator><creator>Nazareth, Irwin</creator><creator>Martín-Pérez, Carlos</creator><creator>Fernández-Alonso, Carmen</creator><creator>Ballesta-Rodríguez, María Isabel</creator><creator>Fernández, Anna</creator><creator>Aiarzaguena, José María</creator><creator>Montón-Franco, Carmen</creator><creator>Bellón, Juan Ángel</creator><general>Royal College of General Practitioners</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Use of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial</title><author>Moreno-Peral, Patricia ; Conejo-Cerón, Sonia ; de Dios Luna, Juan ; King, Michael ; Nazareth, Irwin ; Martín-Pérez, Carlos ; Fernández-Alonso, Carmen ; Ballesta-Rodríguez, María Isabel ; Fernández, Anna ; Aiarzaguena, José María ; Montón-Franco, Carmen ; Bellón, Juan Ángel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-6ec1f6f43e401ab69e577551eb08ae22ba462cc9139f137f559771c9536e70833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Peral, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conejo-Cerón, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Dios Luna, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazareth, Irwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Pérez, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Alonso, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballesta-Rodríguez, María Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiarzaguena, José María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montón-Franco, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellón, Juan Ángel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of general practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moreno-Peral, Patricia</au><au>Conejo-Cerón, Sonia</au><au>de Dios Luna, Juan</au><au>King, Michael</au><au>Nazareth, Irwin</au><au>Martín-Pérez, Carlos</au><au>Fernández-Alonso, Carmen</au><au>Ballesta-Rodríguez, María Isabel</au><au>Fernández, Anna</au><au>Aiarzaguena, José María</au><au>Montón-Franco, Carmen</au><au>Bellón, Juan Ángel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial</atitle><jtitle>British journal of general practice</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Gen Pract</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>703</issue><spage>e95</spage><epage>e104</epage><pages>e95-e104</pages><issn>0960-1643</issn><eissn>1478-5242</eissn><abstract>In the predictD-intervention, GPs used a personalised biopsychosocial programme to prevent depression. This reduced the incidence of major depression by 21.0%, although the results were not statistically significant.
To determine whether the predictD-intervention is effective at preventing anxiety in primary care patients without depression or anxiety.
Secondary study of a cluster randomised trial with practices randomly assigned to either the predictD-intervention or usual care. This study was conducted in seven Spanish cities from October 2010 to July 2012.
In each city, 10 practices and two GPs per practice, as well as four to six patients every recruiting day, were randomly selected until there were 26-27 eligible patients for each GP. The endpoint was cumulative incidence of anxiety as measured by the PRIME-MD screening tool over 18 months.
A total of 3326 patients without depression and 140 GPs from 70 practices consented and were eligible to participate; 328 of these patients were removed because they had an anxiety syndrome at baseline. Of the 2998 valid patients, 2597 (86.6%) were evaluated at the end of the study. At 18 months, 10.4% (95% CI = 8.7% to 12.1%) of the patients in the predictD-intervention group developed anxiety compared with 13.1% (95% CI = 11.4% to 14.8%) in the usual-care group (absolute difference = -2.7% [95% CI = -5.1% to -0.3%];
= 0.029).
A personalised intervention delivered by GPs for the prevention of depression provided a modest but statistically significant reduction in the incidence of anxiety.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal College of General Practitioners</pub><pmid>33495203</pmid><doi>10.3399/bjgp20X714041</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-1643 |
ispartof | British journal of general practice, 2021-02, Vol.71 (703), p.e95-e104 |
issn | 0960-1643 1478-5242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7846354 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Anxiety Clinical trials Family physicians Intervention Mental depression |
title | Use of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A50%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20a%20personalised%20depression%20intervention%20in%20primary%20care%20to%20prevent%20anxiety:%20a%20secondary%20study%20of%20a%20cluster%20randomised%20trial&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20general%20practice&rft.au=Moreno-Peral,%20Patricia&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=703&rft.spage=e95&rft.epage=e104&rft.pages=e95-e104&rft.issn=0960-1643&rft.eissn=1478-5242&rft_id=info:doi/10.3399/bjgp20X714041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2490266614%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-6ec1f6f43e401ab69e577551eb08ae22ba462cc9139f137f559771c9536e70833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2490266614&rft_id=info:pmid/33495203&rfr_iscdi=true |