Loading…

Acute effects of vagus nerve stimulation parameters on gastric motility assessed with magnetic resonance imaging

Background Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an emerging bioelectronic therapy for regulating food intake and controlling gastric motility. However, the effects of different VNS parameters and polarity on postprandial gastric motility remain incompletely characterized. Methods In anesthetized rats (N...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurogastroenterology and motility 2020-07, Vol.32 (7), p.e13853-n/a
Main Authors: Lu, Kun‐Han, Cao, Jiayue, Phillips, Robert, Powley, Terry L., Liu, Zhongming
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4433-5cff71aa05a3d7d1ea9d2a280f7000c6ab9178da4415af3326e6c18def7b7293
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4433-5cff71aa05a3d7d1ea9d2a280f7000c6ab9178da4415af3326e6c18def7b7293
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page e13853
container_title Neurogastroenterology and motility
container_volume 32
creator Lu, Kun‐Han
Cao, Jiayue
Phillips, Robert
Powley, Terry L.
Liu, Zhongming
description Background Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an emerging bioelectronic therapy for regulating food intake and controlling gastric motility. However, the effects of different VNS parameters and polarity on postprandial gastric motility remain incompletely characterized. Methods In anesthetized rats (N = 3), we applied monophasic electrical stimuli to the left cervical vagus and recorded compound nerve action potential (CNAP) as a measure of nerve response. We evaluated to what extent afferent or efferent pathway could be selectively activated by monophasic VNS. In a different group of rats (N = 13), we fed each rat a gadolinium‐labeled meal and scanned the rat stomach with oral contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while the rat was anesthetized. We evaluated the antral and pyloric motility as a function of pulse amplitude (0.13, 0.25, 0.5, 1 mA), width (0.13, 0.25, 0.5 ms), frequency (5, 10 Hz), and polarity of VNS. Key Results Monophasic VNS activated efferent and afferent pathways with about 67% and 82% selectivity, respectively. Primarily afferent VNS increased antral motility across a wide range of parameters. Primarily efferent VNS induced a significant decrease in antral motility as the stimulus intensity increased (R = −.93, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nmo.13853
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7872206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2390643751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4433-5cff71aa05a3d7d1ea9d2a280f7000c6ab9178da4415af3326e6c18def7b7293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhoMotlYv_AMS8EYvts3XbnZvhFL8gmpveh_mZCfblN3kmGRPOf_e1FOLCg6BGTIPL-_wEvKas1Ne6yws8ZTLvpVPyDGXXduIoRdP7-eWNXwQ7RF5kfMtY6wTqntOjqQQg1ZMHZPtuV0LUnQObck0OrqDac00YNohzcUv6wzFx0C3kGDBgqlSgU6QS_KWLrH42Zc9hZyxvpHe-XJDF5gClrpPmGOAYJH6-ufD9JI8czBnfPXQT8j1p4_XF1-ay6vPXy_OLxurlJRNa53THIC1IEc9coRhFCB65nQ9w3awGbjuR1CKt-CkFB12lvcjOr3RYpAn5MNBdrtuFhwthpJgNttUbaS9ieDN35vgb8wUd0b3WgjWVYF3DwIp_lgxF7P4bHGeIWBcsxFyYJ2SuuUVffsPehvXFOp1Rije9bxXuq3U-wNlU8w5oXs0w5m5j9HUGM2vGCv75k_3j-Tv3CpwdgDu_Iz7_yuZ79-uDpI_AY0lqiI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416818475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acute effects of vagus nerve stimulation parameters on gastric motility assessed with magnetic resonance imaging</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Lu, Kun‐Han ; Cao, Jiayue ; Phillips, Robert ; Powley, Terry L. ; Liu, Zhongming</creator><creatorcontrib>Lu, Kun‐Han ; Cao, Jiayue ; Phillips, Robert ; Powley, Terry L. ; Liu, Zhongming</creatorcontrib><description>Background Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an emerging bioelectronic therapy for regulating food intake and controlling gastric motility. However, the effects of different VNS parameters and polarity on postprandial gastric motility remain incompletely characterized. Methods In anesthetized rats (N = 3), we applied monophasic electrical stimuli to the left cervical vagus and recorded compound nerve action potential (CNAP) as a measure of nerve response. We evaluated to what extent afferent or efferent pathway could be selectively activated by monophasic VNS. In a different group of rats (N = 13), we fed each rat a gadolinium‐labeled meal and scanned the rat stomach with oral contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while the rat was anesthetized. We evaluated the antral and pyloric motility as a function of pulse amplitude (0.13, 0.25, 0.5, 1 mA), width (0.13, 0.25, 0.5 ms), frequency (5, 10 Hz), and polarity of VNS. Key Results Monophasic VNS activated efferent and afferent pathways with about 67% and 82% selectivity, respectively. Primarily afferent VNS increased antral motility across a wide range of parameters. Primarily efferent VNS induced a significant decrease in antral motility as the stimulus intensity increased (R = −.93, P &lt; .05 for 5 Hz, R = −.85, P &lt; .05 for 10 Hz). The VNS with either polarity tended to promote pyloric motility to a greater extent given increasing stimulus intensity. Conclusions and Inferences Monophasic VNS biased toward the afferent pathway is potentially more effective for facilitating occlusive contractions than that biased toward the efferent pathway. We investigated a possible differential effect of primarily afferent versus efferent cervical VNS on gastric motility under a range of VNS parameters. Gastric MRI data revealed that primarily afferent VNS induced stronger antral contractions relative to primarily efferent VNS. These results could serve as an index for optimizing VNS parameters for promoting gastric motility. </description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-1925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2982</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13853</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32297404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Action potential ; Acute effects ; Electrical stimuli ; Food intake ; Gadolinium ; Gastric motility ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Motility ; Polarity ; rat ; Rodents ; Sensory neurons ; Vagus nerve ; vagus nerve stimulation</subject><ispartof>Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2020-07, Vol.32 (7), p.e13853-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4433-5cff71aa05a3d7d1ea9d2a280f7000c6ab9178da4415af3326e6c18def7b7293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4433-5cff71aa05a3d7d1ea9d2a280f7000c6ab9178da4415af3326e6c18def7b7293</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6689-7058 ; 0000-0002-8773-4204 ; 0000-0002-0355-8515</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27906,27907</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32297404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lu, Kun‐Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Jiayue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powley, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhongming</creatorcontrib><title>Acute effects of vagus nerve stimulation parameters on gastric motility assessed with magnetic resonance imaging</title><title>Neurogastroenterology and motility</title><addtitle>Neurogastroenterol Motil</addtitle><description>Background Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an emerging bioelectronic therapy for regulating food intake and controlling gastric motility. However, the effects of different VNS parameters and polarity on postprandial gastric motility remain incompletely characterized. Methods In anesthetized rats (N = 3), we applied monophasic electrical stimuli to the left cervical vagus and recorded compound nerve action potential (CNAP) as a measure of nerve response. We evaluated to what extent afferent or efferent pathway could be selectively activated by monophasic VNS. In a different group of rats (N = 13), we fed each rat a gadolinium‐labeled meal and scanned the rat stomach with oral contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while the rat was anesthetized. We evaluated the antral and pyloric motility as a function of pulse amplitude (0.13, 0.25, 0.5, 1 mA), width (0.13, 0.25, 0.5 ms), frequency (5, 10 Hz), and polarity of VNS. Key Results Monophasic VNS activated efferent and afferent pathways with about 67% and 82% selectivity, respectively. Primarily afferent VNS increased antral motility across a wide range of parameters. Primarily efferent VNS induced a significant decrease in antral motility as the stimulus intensity increased (R = −.93, P &lt; .05 for 5 Hz, R = −.85, P &lt; .05 for 10 Hz). The VNS with either polarity tended to promote pyloric motility to a greater extent given increasing stimulus intensity. Conclusions and Inferences Monophasic VNS biased toward the afferent pathway is potentially more effective for facilitating occlusive contractions than that biased toward the efferent pathway. We investigated a possible differential effect of primarily afferent versus efferent cervical VNS on gastric motility under a range of VNS parameters. Gastric MRI data revealed that primarily afferent VNS induced stronger antral contractions relative to primarily efferent VNS. These results could serve as an index for optimizing VNS parameters for promoting gastric motility. </description><subject>Action potential</subject><subject>Acute effects</subject><subject>Electrical stimuli</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Gadolinium</subject><subject>Gastric motility</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Motility</subject><subject>Polarity</subject><subject>rat</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Sensory neurons</subject><subject>Vagus nerve</subject><subject>vagus nerve stimulation</subject><issn>1350-1925</issn><issn>1365-2982</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhoMotlYv_AMS8EYvts3XbnZvhFL8gmpveh_mZCfblN3kmGRPOf_e1FOLCg6BGTIPL-_wEvKas1Ne6yws8ZTLvpVPyDGXXduIoRdP7-eWNXwQ7RF5kfMtY6wTqntOjqQQg1ZMHZPtuV0LUnQObck0OrqDac00YNohzcUv6wzFx0C3kGDBgqlSgU6QS_KWLrH42Zc9hZyxvpHe-XJDF5gClrpPmGOAYJH6-ufD9JI8czBnfPXQT8j1p4_XF1-ay6vPXy_OLxurlJRNa53THIC1IEc9coRhFCB65nQ9w3awGbjuR1CKt-CkFB12lvcjOr3RYpAn5MNBdrtuFhwthpJgNttUbaS9ieDN35vgb8wUd0b3WgjWVYF3DwIp_lgxF7P4bHGeIWBcsxFyYJ2SuuUVffsPehvXFOp1Rije9bxXuq3U-wNlU8w5oXs0w5m5j9HUGM2vGCv75k_3j-Tv3CpwdgDu_Iz7_yuZ79-uDpI_AY0lqiI</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Lu, Kun‐Han</creator><creator>Cao, Jiayue</creator><creator>Phillips, Robert</creator><creator>Powley, Terry L.</creator><creator>Liu, Zhongming</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6689-7058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8773-4204</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0355-8515</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Acute effects of vagus nerve stimulation parameters on gastric motility assessed with magnetic resonance imaging</title><author>Lu, Kun‐Han ; Cao, Jiayue ; Phillips, Robert ; Powley, Terry L. ; Liu, Zhongming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4433-5cff71aa05a3d7d1ea9d2a280f7000c6ab9178da4415af3326e6c18def7b7293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Action potential</topic><topic>Acute effects</topic><topic>Electrical stimuli</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Gadolinium</topic><topic>Gastric motility</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Motility</topic><topic>Polarity</topic><topic>rat</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Sensory neurons</topic><topic>Vagus nerve</topic><topic>vagus nerve stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, Kun‐Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Jiayue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powley, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhongming</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neurogastroenterology and motility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, Kun‐Han</au><au>Cao, Jiayue</au><au>Phillips, Robert</au><au>Powley, Terry L.</au><au>Liu, Zhongming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acute effects of vagus nerve stimulation parameters on gastric motility assessed with magnetic resonance imaging</atitle><jtitle>Neurogastroenterology and motility</jtitle><addtitle>Neurogastroenterol Motil</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e13853</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13853-n/a</pages><issn>1350-1925</issn><eissn>1365-2982</eissn><abstract>Background Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an emerging bioelectronic therapy for regulating food intake and controlling gastric motility. However, the effects of different VNS parameters and polarity on postprandial gastric motility remain incompletely characterized. Methods In anesthetized rats (N = 3), we applied monophasic electrical stimuli to the left cervical vagus and recorded compound nerve action potential (CNAP) as a measure of nerve response. We evaluated to what extent afferent or efferent pathway could be selectively activated by monophasic VNS. In a different group of rats (N = 13), we fed each rat a gadolinium‐labeled meal and scanned the rat stomach with oral contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while the rat was anesthetized. We evaluated the antral and pyloric motility as a function of pulse amplitude (0.13, 0.25, 0.5, 1 mA), width (0.13, 0.25, 0.5 ms), frequency (5, 10 Hz), and polarity of VNS. Key Results Monophasic VNS activated efferent and afferent pathways with about 67% and 82% selectivity, respectively. Primarily afferent VNS increased antral motility across a wide range of parameters. Primarily efferent VNS induced a significant decrease in antral motility as the stimulus intensity increased (R = −.93, P &lt; .05 for 5 Hz, R = −.85, P &lt; .05 for 10 Hz). The VNS with either polarity tended to promote pyloric motility to a greater extent given increasing stimulus intensity. Conclusions and Inferences Monophasic VNS biased toward the afferent pathway is potentially more effective for facilitating occlusive contractions than that biased toward the efferent pathway. We investigated a possible differential effect of primarily afferent versus efferent cervical VNS on gastric motility under a range of VNS parameters. Gastric MRI data revealed that primarily afferent VNS induced stronger antral contractions relative to primarily efferent VNS. These results could serve as an index for optimizing VNS parameters for promoting gastric motility. </abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32297404</pmid><doi>10.1111/nmo.13853</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6689-7058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8773-4204</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0355-8515</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-1925
ispartof Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2020-07, Vol.32 (7), p.e13853-n/a
issn 1350-1925
1365-2982
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7872206
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects Action potential
Acute effects
Electrical stimuli
Food intake
Gadolinium
Gastric motility
Magnetic resonance imaging
Motility
Polarity
rat
Rodents
Sensory neurons
Vagus nerve
vagus nerve stimulation
title Acute effects of vagus nerve stimulation parameters on gastric motility assessed with magnetic resonance imaging
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A17%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acute%20effects%20of%20vagus%20nerve%20stimulation%20parameters%20on%20gastric%20motility%20assessed%20with%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Neurogastroenterology%20and%20motility&rft.au=Lu,%20Kun%E2%80%90Han&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e13853&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13853-n/a&rft.issn=1350-1925&rft.eissn=1365-2982&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nmo.13853&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2390643751%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4433-5cff71aa05a3d7d1ea9d2a280f7000c6ab9178da4415af3326e6c18def7b7293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416818475&rft_id=info:pmid/32297404&rfr_iscdi=true