Loading…
Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia
Abstract Background Choice of empiric therapy for pneumonia depends on risk for antimicrobial resistance. Models to predict resistance are derived from blood and respiratory culture results. We compared these results to understand if organisms and resistance patterns differed by site. We also compar...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical infectious diseases 2020-10, Vol.71 (7), p.1604-1612 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53 |
container_end_page | 1612 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1604 |
container_title | Clinical infectious diseases |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Haessler, Sarah Lindenauer, Peter K Zilberberg, Marya D Imrey, Peter B Yu, Pei-Chun Higgins, Tom Deshpande, Abhishek Rothberg, Michael B |
description | Abstract
Background
Choice of empiric therapy for pneumonia depends on risk for antimicrobial resistance. Models to predict resistance are derived from blood and respiratory culture results. We compared these results to understand if organisms and resistance patterns differed by site. We also compared characteristics and outcomes of patients with positive cultures by site.
Methods
We studied adult patients discharged from 177 US hospitals from July 2010 through June 2015, with principal diagnoses of pneumonia, or principal diagnoses of respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory arrest, or sepsis with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia, and who had blood or respiratory cultures performed. Demographics, treatment, microbiologic results, and outcomes were examined.
Results
Among 138 561 hospitalizations of patients with pneumonia who had blood or respiratory cultures obtained at admission, 12 888 (9.3%) yielded positive cultures: 6438 respiratory cultures, 5992 blood cultures, and 458 both respiratory and blood cultures. Forty-two percent had isolates resistant to first-line therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Isolates from respiratory samples were more often resistant than were isolates from blood (54.2% vs 26.6%; P < .001). Patients with both culture sites positive had higher case-fatality, longer lengths of stay, and higher costs than patients who had only blood or respiratory cultures positive. Among respiratory cultures, the most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (34%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%), whereas blood cultures most commonly grew Streptococcus pneumoniae (33%), followed by S. aureus (22%).
Conclusions
Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures, and resistance patterns differ by source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source.
Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures and the resistance patterns differ by culture source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/cid/ciz1049 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7882190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cid/ciz1049</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2310720745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYxoMobk5P3qUnEaSapEnTeBB0fjNQRHcNaZpopG1q0irzr7djc-jFw_sB74_neXkA2EXwCEGeHCtb9PWFIOFrYIhowuKUcrTe75BmMcmSbAC2QniDEKEM0k0wSFCaUkz4ENydl84V0bgr287rEE21D12IHnVorJet87PV7STC0YU1Rntdt9HU6s8QORM91LqrXG3lNtgwsgx6ZzlH4Pnq8ml8E0_ur2_HZ5NYEZa1McJKFmluKM4LlePE8FwqDiWhnChpGO67TCFhmstUFoQxmia5NJzTAqWaJiNwutBturzSheq_8bIUjbeV9DPhpBV_L7V9FS_uQ7Asw4jDXuBgKeDde6dDKyoblC5LWWvXBYETBBmGjMy9Dheo8i4Er83KBkExT1_06Ytl-j299_uzFfsTdw_sLwDXNf8qfQPTK4_n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310720745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Haessler, Sarah ; Lindenauer, Peter K ; Zilberberg, Marya D ; Imrey, Peter B ; Yu, Pei-Chun ; Higgins, Tom ; Deshpande, Abhishek ; Rothberg, Michael B</creator><creatorcontrib>Haessler, Sarah ; Lindenauer, Peter K ; Zilberberg, Marya D ; Imrey, Peter B ; Yu, Pei-Chun ; Higgins, Tom ; Deshpande, Abhishek ; Rothberg, Michael B</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Choice of empiric therapy for pneumonia depends on risk for antimicrobial resistance. Models to predict resistance are derived from blood and respiratory culture results. We compared these results to understand if organisms and resistance patterns differed by site. We also compared characteristics and outcomes of patients with positive cultures by site.
Methods
We studied adult patients discharged from 177 US hospitals from July 2010 through June 2015, with principal diagnoses of pneumonia, or principal diagnoses of respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory arrest, or sepsis with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia, and who had blood or respiratory cultures performed. Demographics, treatment, microbiologic results, and outcomes were examined.
Results
Among 138 561 hospitalizations of patients with pneumonia who had blood or respiratory cultures obtained at admission, 12 888 (9.3%) yielded positive cultures: 6438 respiratory cultures, 5992 blood cultures, and 458 both respiratory and blood cultures. Forty-two percent had isolates resistant to first-line therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Isolates from respiratory samples were more often resistant than were isolates from blood (54.2% vs 26.6%; P < .001). Patients with both culture sites positive had higher case-fatality, longer lengths of stay, and higher costs than patients who had only blood or respiratory cultures positive. Among respiratory cultures, the most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (34%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%), whereas blood cultures most commonly grew Streptococcus pneumoniae (33%), followed by S. aureus (22%).
Conclusions
Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures, and resistance patterns differ by source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source.
Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures and the resistance patterns differ by culture source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz1049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31665249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Blood Culture ; Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Humans ; Pneumonia - drug therapy ; Pneumonia - epidemiology ; Staphylococcus aureus</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2020-10, Vol.71 (7), p.1604-1612</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31665249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haessler, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenauer, Peter K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberberg, Marya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imrey, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Pei-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshpande, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, Michael B</creatorcontrib><title>Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
Choice of empiric therapy for pneumonia depends on risk for antimicrobial resistance. Models to predict resistance are derived from blood and respiratory culture results. We compared these results to understand if organisms and resistance patterns differed by site. We also compared characteristics and outcomes of patients with positive cultures by site.
Methods
We studied adult patients discharged from 177 US hospitals from July 2010 through June 2015, with principal diagnoses of pneumonia, or principal diagnoses of respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory arrest, or sepsis with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia, and who had blood or respiratory cultures performed. Demographics, treatment, microbiologic results, and outcomes were examined.
Results
Among 138 561 hospitalizations of patients with pneumonia who had blood or respiratory cultures obtained at admission, 12 888 (9.3%) yielded positive cultures: 6438 respiratory cultures, 5992 blood cultures, and 458 both respiratory and blood cultures. Forty-two percent had isolates resistant to first-line therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Isolates from respiratory samples were more often resistant than were isolates from blood (54.2% vs 26.6%; P < .001). Patients with both culture sites positive had higher case-fatality, longer lengths of stay, and higher costs than patients who had only blood or respiratory cultures positive. Among respiratory cultures, the most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (34%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%), whereas blood cultures most commonly grew Streptococcus pneumoniae (33%), followed by S. aureus (22%).
Conclusions
Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures, and resistance patterns differ by source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source.
Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures and the resistance patterns differ by culture source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Blood Culture</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Microbial</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pneumonia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pneumonia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYxoMobk5P3qUnEaSapEnTeBB0fjNQRHcNaZpopG1q0irzr7djc-jFw_sB74_neXkA2EXwCEGeHCtb9PWFIOFrYIhowuKUcrTe75BmMcmSbAC2QniDEKEM0k0wSFCaUkz4ENydl84V0bgr287rEE21D12IHnVorJet87PV7STC0YU1Rntdt9HU6s8QORM91LqrXG3lNtgwsgx6ZzlH4Pnq8ml8E0_ur2_HZ5NYEZa1McJKFmluKM4LlePE8FwqDiWhnChpGO67TCFhmstUFoQxmia5NJzTAqWaJiNwutBturzSheq_8bIUjbeV9DPhpBV_L7V9FS_uQ7Asw4jDXuBgKeDde6dDKyoblC5LWWvXBYETBBmGjMy9Dheo8i4Er83KBkExT1_06Ytl-j299_uzFfsTdw_sLwDXNf8qfQPTK4_n</recordid><startdate>20201023</startdate><enddate>20201023</enddate><creator>Haessler, Sarah</creator><creator>Lindenauer, Peter K</creator><creator>Zilberberg, Marya D</creator><creator>Imrey, Peter B</creator><creator>Yu, Pei-Chun</creator><creator>Higgins, Tom</creator><creator>Deshpande, Abhishek</creator><creator>Rothberg, Michael B</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201023</creationdate><title>Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia</title><author>Haessler, Sarah ; Lindenauer, Peter K ; Zilberberg, Marya D ; Imrey, Peter B ; Yu, Pei-Chun ; Higgins, Tom ; Deshpande, Abhishek ; Rothberg, Michael B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Blood Culture</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Microbial</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pneumonia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pneumonia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haessler, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenauer, Peter K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberberg, Marya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imrey, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Pei-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshpande, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, Michael B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haessler, Sarah</au><au>Lindenauer, Peter K</au><au>Zilberberg, Marya D</au><au>Imrey, Peter B</au><au>Yu, Pei-Chun</au><au>Higgins, Tom</au><au>Deshpande, Abhishek</au><au>Rothberg, Michael B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2020-10-23</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1604</spage><epage>1612</epage><pages>1604-1612</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Choice of empiric therapy for pneumonia depends on risk for antimicrobial resistance. Models to predict resistance are derived from blood and respiratory culture results. We compared these results to understand if organisms and resistance patterns differed by site. We also compared characteristics and outcomes of patients with positive cultures by site.
Methods
We studied adult patients discharged from 177 US hospitals from July 2010 through June 2015, with principal diagnoses of pneumonia, or principal diagnoses of respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory arrest, or sepsis with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia, and who had blood or respiratory cultures performed. Demographics, treatment, microbiologic results, and outcomes were examined.
Results
Among 138 561 hospitalizations of patients with pneumonia who had blood or respiratory cultures obtained at admission, 12 888 (9.3%) yielded positive cultures: 6438 respiratory cultures, 5992 blood cultures, and 458 both respiratory and blood cultures. Forty-two percent had isolates resistant to first-line therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Isolates from respiratory samples were more often resistant than were isolates from blood (54.2% vs 26.6%; P < .001). Patients with both culture sites positive had higher case-fatality, longer lengths of stay, and higher costs than patients who had only blood or respiratory cultures positive. Among respiratory cultures, the most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (34%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%), whereas blood cultures most commonly grew Streptococcus pneumoniae (33%), followed by S. aureus (22%).
Conclusions
Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures, and resistance patterns differ by source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source.
Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures and the resistance patterns differ by culture source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>31665249</pmid><doi>10.1093/cid/ciz1049</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-4838 |
ispartof | Clinical infectious diseases, 2020-10, Vol.71 (7), p.1604-1612 |
issn | 1058-4838 1537-6591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7882190 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Adult Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Blood Culture Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy Drug Resistance, Microbial Humans Pneumonia - drug therapy Pneumonia - epidemiology Staphylococcus aureus |
title | Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A29%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blood%20Cultures%20Versus%20Respiratory%20Cultures:%202%20Different%20Views%20of%20Pneumonia&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Haessler,%20Sarah&rft.date=2020-10-23&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1604&rft.epage=1612&rft.pages=1604-1612&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cid/ciz1049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2310720745%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310720745&rft_id=info:pmid/31665249&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cid/ciz1049&rfr_iscdi=true |