Loading…

Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia

Abstract Background Choice of empiric therapy for pneumonia depends on risk for antimicrobial resistance. Models to predict resistance are derived from blood and respiratory culture results. We compared these results to understand if organisms and resistance patterns differed by site. We also compar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical infectious diseases 2020-10, Vol.71 (7), p.1604-1612
Main Authors: Haessler, Sarah, Lindenauer, Peter K, Zilberberg, Marya D, Imrey, Peter B, Yu, Pei-Chun, Higgins, Tom, Deshpande, Abhishek, Rothberg, Michael B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53
container_end_page 1612
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1604
container_title Clinical infectious diseases
container_volume 71
creator Haessler, Sarah
Lindenauer, Peter K
Zilberberg, Marya D
Imrey, Peter B
Yu, Pei-Chun
Higgins, Tom
Deshpande, Abhishek
Rothberg, Michael B
description Abstract Background Choice of empiric therapy for pneumonia depends on risk for antimicrobial resistance. Models to predict resistance are derived from blood and respiratory culture results. We compared these results to understand if organisms and resistance patterns differed by site. We also compared characteristics and outcomes of patients with positive cultures by site. Methods We studied adult patients discharged from 177 US hospitals from July 2010 through June 2015, with principal diagnoses of pneumonia, or principal diagnoses of respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory arrest, or sepsis with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia, and who had blood or respiratory cultures performed. Demographics, treatment, microbiologic results, and outcomes were examined. Results Among 138 561 hospitalizations of patients with pneumonia who had blood or respiratory cultures obtained at admission, 12 888 (9.3%) yielded positive cultures: 6438 respiratory cultures, 5992 blood cultures, and 458 both respiratory and blood cultures. Forty-two percent had isolates resistant to first-line therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Isolates from respiratory samples were more often resistant than were isolates from blood (54.2% vs 26.6%; P < .001). Patients with both culture sites positive had higher case-fatality, longer lengths of stay, and higher costs than patients who had only blood or respiratory cultures positive. Among respiratory cultures, the most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (34%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%), whereas blood cultures most commonly grew Streptococcus pneumoniae (33%), followed by S. aureus (22%). Conclusions Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures, and resistance patterns differ by source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source. Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures and the resistance patterns differ by culture source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cid/ciz1049
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7882190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cid/ciz1049</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2310720745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYxoMobk5P3qUnEaSapEnTeBB0fjNQRHcNaZpopG1q0irzr7djc-jFw_sB74_neXkA2EXwCEGeHCtb9PWFIOFrYIhowuKUcrTe75BmMcmSbAC2QniDEKEM0k0wSFCaUkz4ENydl84V0bgr287rEE21D12IHnVorJet87PV7STC0YU1Rntdt9HU6s8QORM91LqrXG3lNtgwsgx6ZzlH4Pnq8ml8E0_ur2_HZ5NYEZa1McJKFmluKM4LlePE8FwqDiWhnChpGO67TCFhmstUFoQxmia5NJzTAqWaJiNwutBturzSheq_8bIUjbeV9DPhpBV_L7V9FS_uQ7Asw4jDXuBgKeDde6dDKyoblC5LWWvXBYETBBmGjMy9Dheo8i4Er83KBkExT1_06Ytl-j299_uzFfsTdw_sLwDXNf8qfQPTK4_n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310720745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Haessler, Sarah ; Lindenauer, Peter K ; Zilberberg, Marya D ; Imrey, Peter B ; Yu, Pei-Chun ; Higgins, Tom ; Deshpande, Abhishek ; Rothberg, Michael B</creator><creatorcontrib>Haessler, Sarah ; Lindenauer, Peter K ; Zilberberg, Marya D ; Imrey, Peter B ; Yu, Pei-Chun ; Higgins, Tom ; Deshpande, Abhishek ; Rothberg, Michael B</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Choice of empiric therapy for pneumonia depends on risk for antimicrobial resistance. Models to predict resistance are derived from blood and respiratory culture results. We compared these results to understand if organisms and resistance patterns differed by site. We also compared characteristics and outcomes of patients with positive cultures by site. Methods We studied adult patients discharged from 177 US hospitals from July 2010 through June 2015, with principal diagnoses of pneumonia, or principal diagnoses of respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory arrest, or sepsis with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia, and who had blood or respiratory cultures performed. Demographics, treatment, microbiologic results, and outcomes were examined. Results Among 138 561 hospitalizations of patients with pneumonia who had blood or respiratory cultures obtained at admission, 12 888 (9.3%) yielded positive cultures: 6438 respiratory cultures, 5992 blood cultures, and 458 both respiratory and blood cultures. Forty-two percent had isolates resistant to first-line therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Isolates from respiratory samples were more often resistant than were isolates from blood (54.2% vs 26.6%; P &lt; .001). Patients with both culture sites positive had higher case-fatality, longer lengths of stay, and higher costs than patients who had only blood or respiratory cultures positive. Among respiratory cultures, the most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (34%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%), whereas blood cultures most commonly grew Streptococcus pneumoniae (33%), followed by S. aureus (22%). Conclusions Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures, and resistance patterns differ by source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source. Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures and the resistance patterns differ by culture source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz1049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31665249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Blood Culture ; Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Humans ; Pneumonia - drug therapy ; Pneumonia - epidemiology ; Staphylococcus aureus</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2020-10, Vol.71 (7), p.1604-1612</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31665249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haessler, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenauer, Peter K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberberg, Marya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imrey, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Pei-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshpande, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, Michael B</creatorcontrib><title>Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Choice of empiric therapy for pneumonia depends on risk for antimicrobial resistance. Models to predict resistance are derived from blood and respiratory culture results. We compared these results to understand if organisms and resistance patterns differed by site. We also compared characteristics and outcomes of patients with positive cultures by site. Methods We studied adult patients discharged from 177 US hospitals from July 2010 through June 2015, with principal diagnoses of pneumonia, or principal diagnoses of respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory arrest, or sepsis with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia, and who had blood or respiratory cultures performed. Demographics, treatment, microbiologic results, and outcomes were examined. Results Among 138 561 hospitalizations of patients with pneumonia who had blood or respiratory cultures obtained at admission, 12 888 (9.3%) yielded positive cultures: 6438 respiratory cultures, 5992 blood cultures, and 458 both respiratory and blood cultures. Forty-two percent had isolates resistant to first-line therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Isolates from respiratory samples were more often resistant than were isolates from blood (54.2% vs 26.6%; P &lt; .001). Patients with both culture sites positive had higher case-fatality, longer lengths of stay, and higher costs than patients who had only blood or respiratory cultures positive. Among respiratory cultures, the most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (34%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%), whereas blood cultures most commonly grew Streptococcus pneumoniae (33%), followed by S. aureus (22%). Conclusions Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures, and resistance patterns differ by source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source. Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures and the resistance patterns differ by culture source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Blood Culture</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Microbial</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pneumonia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pneumonia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYxoMobk5P3qUnEaSapEnTeBB0fjNQRHcNaZpopG1q0irzr7djc-jFw_sB74_neXkA2EXwCEGeHCtb9PWFIOFrYIhowuKUcrTe75BmMcmSbAC2QniDEKEM0k0wSFCaUkz4ENydl84V0bgr287rEE21D12IHnVorJet87PV7STC0YU1Rntdt9HU6s8QORM91LqrXG3lNtgwsgx6ZzlH4Pnq8ml8E0_ur2_HZ5NYEZa1McJKFmluKM4LlePE8FwqDiWhnChpGO67TCFhmstUFoQxmia5NJzTAqWaJiNwutBturzSheq_8bIUjbeV9DPhpBV_L7V9FS_uQ7Asw4jDXuBgKeDde6dDKyoblC5LWWvXBYETBBmGjMy9Dheo8i4Er83KBkExT1_06Ytl-j299_uzFfsTdw_sLwDXNf8qfQPTK4_n</recordid><startdate>20201023</startdate><enddate>20201023</enddate><creator>Haessler, Sarah</creator><creator>Lindenauer, Peter K</creator><creator>Zilberberg, Marya D</creator><creator>Imrey, Peter B</creator><creator>Yu, Pei-Chun</creator><creator>Higgins, Tom</creator><creator>Deshpande, Abhishek</creator><creator>Rothberg, Michael B</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201023</creationdate><title>Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia</title><author>Haessler, Sarah ; Lindenauer, Peter K ; Zilberberg, Marya D ; Imrey, Peter B ; Yu, Pei-Chun ; Higgins, Tom ; Deshpande, Abhishek ; Rothberg, Michael B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Blood Culture</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Microbial</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pneumonia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pneumonia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haessler, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenauer, Peter K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberberg, Marya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imrey, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Pei-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshpande, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, Michael B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haessler, Sarah</au><au>Lindenauer, Peter K</au><au>Zilberberg, Marya D</au><au>Imrey, Peter B</au><au>Yu, Pei-Chun</au><au>Higgins, Tom</au><au>Deshpande, Abhishek</au><au>Rothberg, Michael B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2020-10-23</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1604</spage><epage>1612</epage><pages>1604-1612</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Choice of empiric therapy for pneumonia depends on risk for antimicrobial resistance. Models to predict resistance are derived from blood and respiratory culture results. We compared these results to understand if organisms and resistance patterns differed by site. We also compared characteristics and outcomes of patients with positive cultures by site. Methods We studied adult patients discharged from 177 US hospitals from July 2010 through June 2015, with principal diagnoses of pneumonia, or principal diagnoses of respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory arrest, or sepsis with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia, and who had blood or respiratory cultures performed. Demographics, treatment, microbiologic results, and outcomes were examined. Results Among 138 561 hospitalizations of patients with pneumonia who had blood or respiratory cultures obtained at admission, 12 888 (9.3%) yielded positive cultures: 6438 respiratory cultures, 5992 blood cultures, and 458 both respiratory and blood cultures. Forty-two percent had isolates resistant to first-line therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Isolates from respiratory samples were more often resistant than were isolates from blood (54.2% vs 26.6%; P &lt; .001). Patients with both culture sites positive had higher case-fatality, longer lengths of stay, and higher costs than patients who had only blood or respiratory cultures positive. Among respiratory cultures, the most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (34%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%), whereas blood cultures most commonly grew Streptococcus pneumoniae (33%), followed by S. aureus (22%). Conclusions Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures, and resistance patterns differ by source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source. Patients with positive respiratory tract cultures are clinically different from those with positive blood cultures and the resistance patterns differ by culture source. Models of antibiotic resistance should account for culture source.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>31665249</pmid><doi>10.1093/cid/ciz1049</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-4838
ispartof Clinical infectious diseases, 2020-10, Vol.71 (7), p.1604-1612
issn 1058-4838
1537-6591
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7882190
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adult
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Blood Culture
Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy
Drug Resistance, Microbial
Humans
Pneumonia - drug therapy
Pneumonia - epidemiology
Staphylococcus aureus
title Blood Cultures Versus Respiratory Cultures: 2 Different Views of Pneumonia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A29%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blood%20Cultures%20Versus%20Respiratory%20Cultures:%202%20Different%20Views%20of%20Pneumonia&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Haessler,%20Sarah&rft.date=2020-10-23&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1604&rft.epage=1612&rft.pages=1604-1612&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cid/ciz1049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2310720745%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-12cad6bf52bdcb23f9bac90a4594caf724caa6047e9a6ad477563baf995d16e53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310720745&rft_id=info:pmid/31665249&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cid/ciz1049&rfr_iscdi=true