Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has a long-standing commitment to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for vulnerable populations. In 2005, the CDC began a demonstration in five states and, with lessons learned, launched a national program, the Colorectal Cancer Control Pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health promotion practice 2020-11, Vol.21 (6), p.877-883
Main Authors: Tangka, Florence K. L., Subramanian, Sujha, Hoover, Sonja, DeGroff, Amy, Joseph, Djenaba, Wong, Faye L., Richardson, Lisa C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Cost analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Early Detection of Cancer
Evidence based research
Health facilities
Humans
Intervention
Mass Screening
Medical screening
National programmes
United States
Uptake
Vulnerability
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has a long-standing commitment to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for vulnerable populations. In 2005, the CDC began a demonstration in five states and, with lessons learned, launched a national program, the Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP), in 2009. The CRCCP continues today and its current emphasis is the implementation of evidence-based interventions to promote CRC screening. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of four CRCCP awardees and their federally qualified health center partners as an introduction to the accompanying series of research briefs where we present individual findings on impacts of evidence-based interventions on CRC screening uptake for each awardee. We also include in this article the conceptual framework used to guide our research. Our findings contribute to the evidence base and guide future program implementation to improve sustainability, increase CRC screening, and address disparities in screening uptake.
ISSN:1524-8399
1552-6372
DOI:10.1177/1524839920954168