Validation of brief screening measures for depression and anxiety in young people with substance use disorders

• Published in: Journal of affective disorders 2021-03, Vol.282, p.1021-1029
• Main Authors: Bentley, Kate H., Sakurai, Hitoshi, Lowman, Kelsey L., Rines-Toth, Lisa, McKowen, James, Pedrelli, Paola, Evins, A. Eden, Yule, Amy M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adolescents; Adult; Anxiety; Anxiety Disorders - diagnosis; Depression; Humans; Mass Screening; Patient Health Questionnaire; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Screening; Substance use disorder; Substance-Related Disorders - diagnosis; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult; Young adults
• ISSN: 0165-0327; 1573-2517
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.005

•Depression and anxiety screening in young people with substance use is critical.•PHQ-9/2 and GAD-7/2 had good convergent and acceptable discriminant validity.•Classification accuracy was similar across brief (two-item) and full measures.•The two-item versions may have comparable clinical utility to the full measures. It is critical to promptly identify and monitor mood and anxiety symptoms in young people with SUD. The primary aim of this study was to conduct a psychometric validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) for depression and anxiety screening in young people seeking outpatient treatment for SUD. Our secondary aim was to compare the performance of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 to their briefer two-item versions (PHQ-2 and GAD-2) in terms of detecting probable mood and anxiety disorders. Data were extracted from the electronic health records of patients (ages 14 to 26) who received a diagnostic evaluation following clinical implementation of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 at a hospital-based outpatient SUD treatment program (N=121, average age 19.1 ± 3.1 years). The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 showed excellent internal consistency. A PHQ-9 cut score of 7 or 8 (PHQ-2 cut score: 2) and GAD-7 cut score of 6 (GAD-2 cut score: 2) had the best balance of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive power in these data. These measures also showed good convergent and acceptable discriminant validity. The sample was predominantly White and non-Hispanic, and a validated (semi-)structured diagnostic interview was not used to establish mood and anxiety disorder diagnoses. Results suggest the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 are reliable and potentially clinically useful screening tools for depression and anxiety in young people with SUD, and that the two-item versions may have similar clinical utility as the full measures.