Predictors of Patient Satisfaction in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

• Published in: World neurosurgery 2021-02, Vol.146, p.e1160-e1170
• Main Authors: Lehrich, Brandon M., Goshtasbi, Khodayar, Brown, Nolan J., Shahrestani, Shane, Lien, Brian V., Ransom, Seth C., Tafreshi, Ali R., Ransom, Ryan C., Chan, Alvin Y., Diaz-Aguilar, Luis D., Sahyouni, Ronald, Pham, Martin H., Osorio, Joseph A., Oh, Michael Y.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age Factors; Comorbidity; Depression; Ethnicity; HCAHPS; Humans; Length of Stay; Neurosurgery; Neurosurgical Procedures; Nurse-Patient Relations; Pain Measurement; Patient Readmission; Patient Satisfaction; Physician-Patient Relations; Postoperative Complications; Press Ganey; Professional-Patient Relations; Psychology; Satisfaction; Sex Factors; Spinal Diseases - physiopathology; Spinal Diseases - surgery; Spine surgery; Survey
• ISSN: 1878-8750; 1878-8769
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.125

Recently, there has been increased interest in patient satisfaction measures such as Press Ganey and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys. In this systematic review, the spine surgery literature is analyzed to evaluate factors predictive of patient satisfaction as measured by these surveys. A thorough literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. All English-language articles from database inception to July 2020 were screened for study inclusion according to PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-four of the 1899 published studies were included for qualitative analysis. There has been a statistically significant increase in the number of publications across years (P = 0.04). Overall, the studies evaluated the relationship between patient satisfaction and patient demographics (71%), preoperative and intraoperative clinical factors (21%), and postoperative factors (33%). Top positive predictors of patient satisfaction were patient and nursing/medical staff relationship (n = 4; 17%), physician–patient relationship (n = 4; 17%), managerial oversight of received care (n = 3; 13%), same sex/ethnicity between patient and physician (n = 2; 8%), and older age (n = 2; 8%). Top negative predictors of patient satisfaction were high Charlson Comorbidity Index/high disability/worse overall health functioning (n = 7; 29%), increased length of hospital stay (n = 4; 17%), high rating for pain/complications/readmissions (n = 4; 17%), and psychosocial factors (n = 3; 13%). There is heterogeneity in terms of different factors, both clinical and nonclinically related, that affect patient satisfaction ratings. More research is warranted to investigate the role of hospital consumer surveys in the spine surgical patient population.