Loading…

Association between PPAR-γ2 gene polymorphisms and diabetic retinopathy risk: a meta-analysis

A close association between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ2 (PPAR-γ2) and the development of diabetic retinopathy (DR) has been previously suggested. Herein, a meta-analysis was conducted to explore the association between polymorphisms and DR risk by performing a systematic search and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aging (Albany, NY.) NY.), 2021-02, Vol.13 (4), p.5136-5149
Main Authors: Li, Xue-Feng, Jiang, Guang-Bin, Cheng, Shi-Yan, Song, Ya-Feng, Deng, Cai, Niu, Yu-Ming, Cai, Jun-Wei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A close association between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ2 (PPAR-γ2) and the development of diabetic retinopathy (DR) has been previously suggested. Herein, a meta-analysis was conducted to explore the association between polymorphisms and DR risk by performing a systematic search and quantitative analysis. Overall, fourteen articles involving 10,527 subjects were included. The pooled results did not reveal an association between rs1801282 C/G and DR susceptibility in the overall population (e.g., the dominant model: CG+GG vs. CC, OR=0.85, 95% CI=0.69-1.06, P=0.15, I =62.9%). Furthermore, heterogeneity tests, cumulative analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias analyses were conducted and showed that the results were robust. Similarly, race-based subgroup analyses and other subgroup analyses did not reveal an association between the rs1801282 C/G and DR susceptibility. In addition, no significant association was observed between rs3856806 C/T polymorphism and DR risk (e.g., the dominant model: CT+TT vs. CC, OR=1.12, 95%CI=0.91-1.37, P=0.28, I =27.0%). Overall, based on the current sample size and the level of evidence presented in the study, the results suggest that gene polymorphisms are not associated with DR risk.
ISSN:1945-4589
1945-4589
DOI:10.18632/aging.202433