Disclosure, Privacy and Workplace Accommodation of Episodic Disabilities: Organizational Perspectives on Disability Communication-Support Processes to Sustain Employment

• Published in: Journal of occupational rehabilitation 2021-03, Vol.31 (1), p.153-165
• Main Authors: Gignac, Monique A. M., Bowring, Julie, Jetha, Arif, Beaton, Dorcas E., Breslin, F. Curtis, Franche, Renee-Louise, Irvin, Emma, Macdermid, Joy C., Shaw, William S., Smith, Peter M., Thompson, Aaron, Tompa, Emile, Van Eerd, Dwayne, Saunders, Ron
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Arthritis; Clinical Psychology; Colitis; Communication; Community involvement; Content analysis; Data collection; Disabilities; Disability; Disclosure of information; Employers; Employment; Environmental Health; Handicapped accessibility; Health aspects; Health Psychology; Labor unions; Legislation; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mental disorders; Mental health; Occupational health; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine; Orthopedics; Personal health; Privacy; Privacy, Right of; Qualitative analysis; Rehabilitation; Supervisors; Workers; Workplaces
• ISSN: 1053-0487; 1573-3688
• DOI: 10.1007/s10926-020-09901-2

Purpose Employers increasingly are asked to accommodate workers living with physical and mental health conditions that cause episodic disability, where periods of wellness are punctuated by intermittent and often unpredictable activity limitations (e.g., depression, anxiety, arthritis, colitis). Episodic disabilities may be challenging for workplaces which must comply with legislation protecting the privacy of health information while believing they would benefit from personal health details to meet a worker’s accommodation needs. This research aimed to understand organizational perspectives on disability communication-support processes. Methods Twenty-seven participants from diverse employment sectors and who had responsibilities for supporting workers living with episodic disabilities (e.g., supervisors, disability managers, union representatives, occupational health representatives, labour lawyers) were interviewed. Five participants also had lived experience of a physical or mental health episodic disability. Participants were recruited through organizational associations, community networks and advertising. Semi-structured interviews and qualitative content analysis framed data collection and analyses, and mapped communication-support processes. Results Seven themes underpinned communication-support process: (1) similarities and differences among physical and mental health episodic disabilities; (2) cultures of workplace support, including contrasting medical and biopsychosocial perspectives; (3) misgivings about others and their role in communication-support processes; (4) that subjective perceptions matter; (5) the inherent complexity of the response process; (6) challenges arising when a worker denies a disability; and (7) casting disability as a performance problem. Conclusions This study identifies a conceptual framework and areas where workplace disability support processes could be enhanced to improve inclusion and the sustainability of employment among workers living with episodic disabilities.