Loading…

A159 ANTI-TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR THERAPY PERSISTENCE IN PATIENTS WITH PERIANAL CROHN’S DISEASE AND LUMINAL CROHN’S DISEASE: A COMPARATIVE COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy has revolutionized the management of Crohn’s disease. Despite its effectiveness, a substantial proportion of patients discontinue therapy over time. Evaluating drug persistence rates reveals a real-world pattern of biologic use. Perianal Crohn’s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology 2021-03, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.166-167
Main Authors: Fung, M, Chin Koon Siw, K, McCurdy, J D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 167
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 166
container_title Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
container_volume 4
creator Fung, M
Chin Koon Siw, K
McCurdy, J D
description Abstract Background Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy has revolutionized the management of Crohn’s disease. Despite its effectiveness, a substantial proportion of patients discontinue therapy over time. Evaluating drug persistence rates reveals a real-world pattern of biologic use. Perianal Crohn’s disease (PCD) is considered one of the most difficult phenotypes of Crohn’s disease (CD) to treat. Therefore, we hypothesized that patients with PCD have a shorter biologic persistence time due to refractory disease. Aims Our aim is to compare drug persistence rates of anti-TNF therapy between PCD and LCD patients. Methods We performed a retrospective, comparative cohort study at a tertiary care center between Nov 2019 and July 2020. Patients with CD were identified by our institutional data-base, using the ICD-10 code K50.90. A longitudinal chart review determine anti-TNF utilization and classified patients based on luminal CD only [LCD] or PCD. Patients with PCD were matched (1:1) to patients with LCD based on sex, age, and year of first anti-TNF initiation within 5 years. Time to discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups by Log-rank test. Results A total of 142 patients with PCD (55% male, 38.7 ± 13.7 years old at anti-TNF start) were matched to 142 patients with LCD (55% male, 38.7 ± 14.0 years old at anti-TNF start). The initial treatments included infliximab (67.6% vs. 57.7%) and adalimumab (32.4% vs. 42.3%) for patients with PCD and LCD respectively. Concomitant immunomodulator were used in 61.3% of patients with PCD and 54.9% of patients with LCD. The cumulative persistence of the initial anti-TNF therapy was similar between cohorts (Log rank, p = 0.633; Figure 1): mean time to discontinuation was 27.7 ± 26.8 months for patients with PCD and 26.5 ± 23.0 months for patients with LCD. The reasons for treatment discontinuation included: refractory disease (19% vs. 16%), anti-drug antibodies (6% vs. 12%), and side effects (12.7% vs. 16.2%) in patients PCD and LCD respectively. Of the patients who discontinued their first anti-TNF therapy, 36 patients (55.4%) with PCD and 42 patients (60.9%) with LCD were treated with a second anti-TNF therapy. Discontinuation of the second-line anti-TNF therapy occurred in 18 patients (50%) with PCD and 18 patients (42.9%) with LCD: mean time to discontinuation was 17.3 ± 14.3 months and 27.8 ± 28.8 months respectively. Conclusions In this single-center, observatio
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jcag/gwab002.157
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7958712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jcag/gwab002.157</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jcag/gwab002.157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1747-f0653c06d820c08247868f15cc06b6b12bc71dc19bb372f76dae43f52c7cc373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1Kw0AUhYMoWGr3LmcvqTOTTCZxIQzp1Ay0SUmmSldDMk1qS_9IrOLO1-jr-SROaSkIgqt77zn3fJtjWbcIdhEMnPuFzmf3s4-8gBB3EaEXVgsTRGwMA3x53n332uo0zQKaL-RC6pCWtWeIBIDFUthyPExSEPMwTTKRgT4LpbllxFM2moART40qeRxyIGIwYlLwWGbgRcjoYAoWswEw2Sj-_tpnoCcyzjJu0D0wGA_Fn-4DYCBMhiOWGtwzN3uUpBJkctyb3FhXVb5sys5pti3Z5zKM7EHyJEI2sDWiLrUr6BFHQ2_qY6ihj13qe36FiDZa4RUIF5qiqUZBUTgUV9Sb5qXrVARrqrVDnbb1eMRud8WqnOpy_VbnS7Wt56u8_lSbfK5-O-v5q5pt3hUNiE8RNgB4BOh60zR1WZ2zCKpDO-rQjjq1o0w7JnJ3jGx22_-_fwBIMIqV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A159 ANTI-TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR THERAPY PERSISTENCE IN PATIENTS WITH PERIANAL CROHN’S DISEASE AND LUMINAL CROHN’S DISEASE: A COMPARATIVE COHORT STUDY</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Open Access</source><creator>Fung, M ; Chin Koon Siw, K ; McCurdy, J D</creator><creatorcontrib>Fung, M ; Chin Koon Siw, K ; McCurdy, J D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy has revolutionized the management of Crohn’s disease. Despite its effectiveness, a substantial proportion of patients discontinue therapy over time. Evaluating drug persistence rates reveals a real-world pattern of biologic use. Perianal Crohn’s disease (PCD) is considered one of the most difficult phenotypes of Crohn’s disease (CD) to treat. Therefore, we hypothesized that patients with PCD have a shorter biologic persistence time due to refractory disease. Aims Our aim is to compare drug persistence rates of anti-TNF therapy between PCD and LCD patients. Methods We performed a retrospective, comparative cohort study at a tertiary care center between Nov 2019 and July 2020. Patients with CD were identified by our institutional data-base, using the ICD-10 code K50.90. A longitudinal chart review determine anti-TNF utilization and classified patients based on luminal CD only [LCD] or PCD. Patients with PCD were matched (1:1) to patients with LCD based on sex, age, and year of first anti-TNF initiation within 5 years. Time to discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups by Log-rank test. Results A total of 142 patients with PCD (55% male, 38.7 ± 13.7 years old at anti-TNF start) were matched to 142 patients with LCD (55% male, 38.7 ± 14.0 years old at anti-TNF start). The initial treatments included infliximab (67.6% vs. 57.7%) and adalimumab (32.4% vs. 42.3%) for patients with PCD and LCD respectively. Concomitant immunomodulator were used in 61.3% of patients with PCD and 54.9% of patients with LCD. The cumulative persistence of the initial anti-TNF therapy was similar between cohorts (Log rank, p = 0.633; Figure 1): mean time to discontinuation was 27.7 ± 26.8 months for patients with PCD and 26.5 ± 23.0 months for patients with LCD. The reasons for treatment discontinuation included: refractory disease (19% vs. 16%), anti-drug antibodies (6% vs. 12%), and side effects (12.7% vs. 16.2%) in patients PCD and LCD respectively. Of the patients who discontinued their first anti-TNF therapy, 36 patients (55.4%) with PCD and 42 patients (60.9%) with LCD were treated with a second anti-TNF therapy. Discontinuation of the second-line anti-TNF therapy occurred in 18 patients (50%) with PCD and 18 patients (42.9%) with LCD: mean time to discontinuation was 17.3 ± 14.3 months and 27.8 ± 28.8 months respectively. Conclusions In this single-center, observational study a substantial percentage of patients discontinue anti-TNF therapy overtime, and there does not appear to be a difference between patients with PCD and LCD. Figure 1: Cumulative persistence of the initial anti-TNF therapy in patients with PCD and LCD Funding Agencies None</description><identifier>ISSN: 2515-2084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2515-2092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab002.157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Poster of Distinction</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021-03, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.166-167</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958712/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958712/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fung, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin Koon Siw, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCurdy, J D</creatorcontrib><title>A159 ANTI-TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR THERAPY PERSISTENCE IN PATIENTS WITH PERIANAL CROHN’S DISEASE AND LUMINAL CROHN’S DISEASE: A COMPARATIVE COHORT STUDY</title><title>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology</title><description>Abstract Background Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy has revolutionized the management of Crohn’s disease. Despite its effectiveness, a substantial proportion of patients discontinue therapy over time. Evaluating drug persistence rates reveals a real-world pattern of biologic use. Perianal Crohn’s disease (PCD) is considered one of the most difficult phenotypes of Crohn’s disease (CD) to treat. Therefore, we hypothesized that patients with PCD have a shorter biologic persistence time due to refractory disease. Aims Our aim is to compare drug persistence rates of anti-TNF therapy between PCD and LCD patients. Methods We performed a retrospective, comparative cohort study at a tertiary care center between Nov 2019 and July 2020. Patients with CD were identified by our institutional data-base, using the ICD-10 code K50.90. A longitudinal chart review determine anti-TNF utilization and classified patients based on luminal CD only [LCD] or PCD. Patients with PCD were matched (1:1) to patients with LCD based on sex, age, and year of first anti-TNF initiation within 5 years. Time to discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups by Log-rank test. Results A total of 142 patients with PCD (55% male, 38.7 ± 13.7 years old at anti-TNF start) were matched to 142 patients with LCD (55% male, 38.7 ± 14.0 years old at anti-TNF start). The initial treatments included infliximab (67.6% vs. 57.7%) and adalimumab (32.4% vs. 42.3%) for patients with PCD and LCD respectively. Concomitant immunomodulator were used in 61.3% of patients with PCD and 54.9% of patients with LCD. The cumulative persistence of the initial anti-TNF therapy was similar between cohorts (Log rank, p = 0.633; Figure 1): mean time to discontinuation was 27.7 ± 26.8 months for patients with PCD and 26.5 ± 23.0 months for patients with LCD. The reasons for treatment discontinuation included: refractory disease (19% vs. 16%), anti-drug antibodies (6% vs. 12%), and side effects (12.7% vs. 16.2%) in patients PCD and LCD respectively. Of the patients who discontinued their first anti-TNF therapy, 36 patients (55.4%) with PCD and 42 patients (60.9%) with LCD were treated with a second anti-TNF therapy. Discontinuation of the second-line anti-TNF therapy occurred in 18 patients (50%) with PCD and 18 patients (42.9%) with LCD: mean time to discontinuation was 17.3 ± 14.3 months and 27.8 ± 28.8 months respectively. Conclusions In this single-center, observational study a substantial percentage of patients discontinue anti-TNF therapy overtime, and there does not appear to be a difference between patients with PCD and LCD. Figure 1: Cumulative persistence of the initial anti-TNF therapy in patients with PCD and LCD Funding Agencies None</description><subject>Poster of Distinction</subject><issn>2515-2084</issn><issn>2515-2092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1Kw0AUhYMoWGr3LmcvqTOTTCZxIQzp1Ay0SUmmSldDMk1qS_9IrOLO1-jr-SROaSkIgqt77zn3fJtjWbcIdhEMnPuFzmf3s4-8gBB3EaEXVgsTRGwMA3x53n332uo0zQKaL-RC6pCWtWeIBIDFUthyPExSEPMwTTKRgT4LpbllxFM2moART40qeRxyIGIwYlLwWGbgRcjoYAoWswEw2Sj-_tpnoCcyzjJu0D0wGA_Fn-4DYCBMhiOWGtwzN3uUpBJkctyb3FhXVb5sys5pti3Z5zKM7EHyJEI2sDWiLrUr6BFHQ2_qY6ihj13qe36FiDZa4RUIF5qiqUZBUTgUV9Sb5qXrVARrqrVDnbb1eMRud8WqnOpy_VbnS7Wt56u8_lSbfK5-O-v5q5pt3hUNiE8RNgB4BOh60zR1WZ2zCKpDO-rQjjq1o0w7JnJ3jGx22_-_fwBIMIqV</recordid><startdate>20210304</startdate><enddate>20210304</enddate><creator>Fung, M</creator><creator>Chin Koon Siw, K</creator><creator>McCurdy, J D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210304</creationdate><title>A159 ANTI-TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR THERAPY PERSISTENCE IN PATIENTS WITH PERIANAL CROHN’S DISEASE AND LUMINAL CROHN’S DISEASE: A COMPARATIVE COHORT STUDY</title><author>Fung, M ; Chin Koon Siw, K ; McCurdy, J D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1747-f0653c06d820c08247868f15cc06b6b12bc71dc19bb372f76dae43f52c7cc373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Poster of Distinction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fung, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin Koon Siw, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCurdy, J D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fung, M</au><au>Chin Koon Siw, K</au><au>McCurdy, J D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A159 ANTI-TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR THERAPY PERSISTENCE IN PATIENTS WITH PERIANAL CROHN’S DISEASE AND LUMINAL CROHN’S DISEASE: A COMPARATIVE COHORT STUDY</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology</jtitle><date>2021-03-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>166-167</pages><issn>2515-2084</issn><eissn>2515-2092</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy has revolutionized the management of Crohn’s disease. Despite its effectiveness, a substantial proportion of patients discontinue therapy over time. Evaluating drug persistence rates reveals a real-world pattern of biologic use. Perianal Crohn’s disease (PCD) is considered one of the most difficult phenotypes of Crohn’s disease (CD) to treat. Therefore, we hypothesized that patients with PCD have a shorter biologic persistence time due to refractory disease. Aims Our aim is to compare drug persistence rates of anti-TNF therapy between PCD and LCD patients. Methods We performed a retrospective, comparative cohort study at a tertiary care center between Nov 2019 and July 2020. Patients with CD were identified by our institutional data-base, using the ICD-10 code K50.90. A longitudinal chart review determine anti-TNF utilization and classified patients based on luminal CD only [LCD] or PCD. Patients with PCD were matched (1:1) to patients with LCD based on sex, age, and year of first anti-TNF initiation within 5 years. Time to discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups by Log-rank test. Results A total of 142 patients with PCD (55% male, 38.7 ± 13.7 years old at anti-TNF start) were matched to 142 patients with LCD (55% male, 38.7 ± 14.0 years old at anti-TNF start). The initial treatments included infliximab (67.6% vs. 57.7%) and adalimumab (32.4% vs. 42.3%) for patients with PCD and LCD respectively. Concomitant immunomodulator were used in 61.3% of patients with PCD and 54.9% of patients with LCD. The cumulative persistence of the initial anti-TNF therapy was similar between cohorts (Log rank, p = 0.633; Figure 1): mean time to discontinuation was 27.7 ± 26.8 months for patients with PCD and 26.5 ± 23.0 months for patients with LCD. The reasons for treatment discontinuation included: refractory disease (19% vs. 16%), anti-drug antibodies (6% vs. 12%), and side effects (12.7% vs. 16.2%) in patients PCD and LCD respectively. Of the patients who discontinued their first anti-TNF therapy, 36 patients (55.4%) with PCD and 42 patients (60.9%) with LCD were treated with a second anti-TNF therapy. Discontinuation of the second-line anti-TNF therapy occurred in 18 patients (50%) with PCD and 18 patients (42.9%) with LCD: mean time to discontinuation was 17.3 ± 14.3 months and 27.8 ± 28.8 months respectively. Conclusions In this single-center, observational study a substantial percentage of patients discontinue anti-TNF therapy overtime, and there does not appear to be a difference between patients with PCD and LCD. Figure 1: Cumulative persistence of the initial anti-TNF therapy in patients with PCD and LCD Funding Agencies None</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jcag/gwab002.157</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2515-2084
ispartof Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021-03, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.166-167
issn 2515-2084
2515-2092
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7958712
source PubMed (Medline); Oxford University Press Journals Open Access
subjects Poster of Distinction
title A159 ANTI-TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR THERAPY PERSISTENCE IN PATIENTS WITH PERIANAL CROHN’S DISEASE AND LUMINAL CROHN’S DISEASE: A COMPARATIVE COHORT STUDY
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A46%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A159%20ANTI-TUMOR%20NECROSIS%20FACTOR%20THERAPY%20PERSISTENCE%20IN%20PATIENTS%20WITH%20PERIANAL%20CROHN%E2%80%99S%20DISEASE%20AND%20LUMINAL%20CROHN%E2%80%99S%20DISEASE:%20A%20COMPARATIVE%20COHORT%20STUDY&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Canadian%20Association%20of%20Gastroenterology&rft.au=Fung,%20M&rft.date=2021-03-04&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=166-167&rft.issn=2515-2084&rft.eissn=2515-2092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jcag/gwab002.157&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/jcag/gwab002.157%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1747-f0653c06d820c08247868f15cc06b6b12bc71dc19bb372f76dae43f52c7cc373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jcag/gwab002.157&rfr_iscdi=true