Loading…

A158 THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE AND ITS ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Abstract Background Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) corrects tissue hypoxia, mobilizes stem cells and has immunomodulatory effects, all of which are key mechanisms for healing wounds. A number of studies have suggested that HBOT may be effective for healing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Aims Ou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology 2021-03, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.164-166
Main Authors: Chin Koon Siw, K, Kandel, R, Rosenfeld, G, Boet, S, Larrigan, S, McCurdy, J D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 166
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 164
container_title Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
container_volume 4
creator Chin Koon Siw, K
Kandel, R
Rosenfeld, G
Boet, S
Larrigan, S
McCurdy, J D
description Abstract Background Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) corrects tissue hypoxia, mobilizes stem cells and has immunomodulatory effects, all of which are key mechanisms for healing wounds. A number of studies have suggested that HBOT may be effective for healing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Aims Our systematic review aimed to quantify the effectiveness and safety of HBOT in IBD and its associated conditions. Methods We performed a proportional meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from inception through November 2020 with no language restriction. We included randomized controlled studies, cohort studies and case series that contained a minimum of three patients and reported effectiveness and/or safety outcomes for HBOT in patients with IBD. Studies were stratified by IBD phenotype and weighted summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for clinical response and remission using random-effects models. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and a modified version of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) checklist for observational studies. Results Nineteen studies met our study criteria: 3 randomized controlled trials and 16 case series. The studies reported outcomes for luminal ulcerative colitis (UC) (n=373), luminal Crohn’s disease (CD) (n=250), enterocutaneous fistulae (ECF) (n=21), perianal CD (n=115), pouch disorders (n=60), pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) (n=5) and perianal sinus/metastatic CD (n=7). Rates of clinical response were 86% (95% CI, 66–95%) for luminal UC, 86% (95% CI, 81–90%) for luminal CD, 85% (95% CI, 61–95%) for ECF, 80% (95% CI, 70–87%) for perianal CD, 65% (95% CI, 52–76%) for pouch disorders, 92% (95% CI, 38–99%) for PG and 79% (95% CI, 36–96%) for perianal sinus/metastatic CD. Rates of clinical remission were 87% (95% CI, 10–100%) for luminal UC, 88% for luminal CD (95% CI, 46–98%), 50% for ECF (95% CI, 12–88%), 64% (95% CI, 52–75%) for perianal CD, 31% (95% CI, 16–50%) for pouch disorders, 92% (95% CI, 38–100%) for PG and 65% (95% CI, 10–97%) for perianal sinus/metastatic CD. Of the ten studies that reported on safety of HBOT, 19 patients (10.5%) had minor adverse events and no major event was reported. Study quality was low in the majority of studies due to an absence of comparator arms, inadequate description of interventions, and poorly defined outcomes. Conclusions
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jcag/gwab002.156
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7958794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jcag/gwab002.156</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jcag/gwab002.156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1746-5c180ff7990cd707a5f498e8644d326480b234ef2fdf9c588c7b5ed490b774323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhosoKOrdY-5STdpkk3gQYjd1A912aeJHT6Gf64q6S-sH_hz_qVl3ETwJAzMw8zwMvJ53guAZgjw8f6zL-fn8o6wgDM4QGe14BwFBxA8gD3Z_Z4b3veNheITuCmFIQ3LgfQlEGDATCWQcy8ioW5lKrYFIx0CLWJoCZDGYFDOZX4lcRSC7L65luiZyMSuASl3FiZhOhcnyAlxldzIBY6Wl0PLHooyzaZ1FShg5BlGWjpVRWaovgAC60EY61Ilzeavk3Q8ylUb4IhVJoZU-8va68mloj7f90Ltxb0UTP8muVSQSv0YUj3xSIwa7jnIO64ZCWpIOc9ayEcZNGIwwg1UQ4rYLuqbjNWGsphVpG8xhRSkOg_DQu9x4V2_Vc9vU7ctrXz7ZVb94LvtPuywX9u_mZfFg58t3SzlhlGMngBtB3S-HoW-7XxZBu47JrmOy25isi8khpxtk-bb6__obXVKKNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A158 THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE AND ITS ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chin Koon Siw, K ; Kandel, R ; Rosenfeld, G ; Boet, S ; Larrigan, S ; McCurdy, J D</creator><creatorcontrib>Chin Koon Siw, K ; Kandel, R ; Rosenfeld, G ; Boet, S ; Larrigan, S ; McCurdy, J D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) corrects tissue hypoxia, mobilizes stem cells and has immunomodulatory effects, all of which are key mechanisms for healing wounds. A number of studies have suggested that HBOT may be effective for healing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Aims Our systematic review aimed to quantify the effectiveness and safety of HBOT in IBD and its associated conditions. Methods We performed a proportional meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from inception through November 2020 with no language restriction. We included randomized controlled studies, cohort studies and case series that contained a minimum of three patients and reported effectiveness and/or safety outcomes for HBOT in patients with IBD. Studies were stratified by IBD phenotype and weighted summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for clinical response and remission using random-effects models. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and a modified version of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) checklist for observational studies. Results Nineteen studies met our study criteria: 3 randomized controlled trials and 16 case series. The studies reported outcomes for luminal ulcerative colitis (UC) (n=373), luminal Crohn’s disease (CD) (n=250), enterocutaneous fistulae (ECF) (n=21), perianal CD (n=115), pouch disorders (n=60), pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) (n=5) and perianal sinus/metastatic CD (n=7). Rates of clinical response were 86% (95% CI, 66–95%) for luminal UC, 86% (95% CI, 81–90%) for luminal CD, 85% (95% CI, 61–95%) for ECF, 80% (95% CI, 70–87%) for perianal CD, 65% (95% CI, 52–76%) for pouch disorders, 92% (95% CI, 38–99%) for PG and 79% (95% CI, 36–96%) for perianal sinus/metastatic CD. Rates of clinical remission were 87% (95% CI, 10–100%) for luminal UC, 88% for luminal CD (95% CI, 46–98%), 50% for ECF (95% CI, 12–88%), 64% (95% CI, 52–75%) for perianal CD, 31% (95% CI, 16–50%) for pouch disorders, 92% (95% CI, 38–100%) for PG and 65% (95% CI, 10–97%) for perianal sinus/metastatic CD. Of the ten studies that reported on safety of HBOT, 19 patients (10.5%) had minor adverse events and no major event was reported. Study quality was low in the majority of studies due to an absence of comparator arms, inadequate description of interventions, and poorly defined outcomes. Conclusions Limited high-quality evidence suggest that HBOT is safe and associated with high rates of clinical response and remission for luminal IBD, perianal CD and pouch disorders. A well-designed large multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm the benefit of HBOT in IBD. doi:10.17605/osf.io/gpz6d Funding Agencies None</description><identifier>ISSN: 2515-2084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2515-2092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab002.156</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Poster of Distinction</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021-03, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.164-166</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958794/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958794/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chin Koon Siw, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandel, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boet, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larrigan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCurdy, J D</creatorcontrib><title>A158 THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE AND ITS ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS</title><title>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology</title><description>Abstract Background Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) corrects tissue hypoxia, mobilizes stem cells and has immunomodulatory effects, all of which are key mechanisms for healing wounds. A number of studies have suggested that HBOT may be effective for healing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Aims Our systematic review aimed to quantify the effectiveness and safety of HBOT in IBD and its associated conditions. Methods We performed a proportional meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from inception through November 2020 with no language restriction. We included randomized controlled studies, cohort studies and case series that contained a minimum of three patients and reported effectiveness and/or safety outcomes for HBOT in patients with IBD. Studies were stratified by IBD phenotype and weighted summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for clinical response and remission using random-effects models. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and a modified version of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) checklist for observational studies. Results Nineteen studies met our study criteria: 3 randomized controlled trials and 16 case series. The studies reported outcomes for luminal ulcerative colitis (UC) (n=373), luminal Crohn’s disease (CD) (n=250), enterocutaneous fistulae (ECF) (n=21), perianal CD (n=115), pouch disorders (n=60), pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) (n=5) and perianal sinus/metastatic CD (n=7). Rates of clinical response were 86% (95% CI, 66–95%) for luminal UC, 86% (95% CI, 81–90%) for luminal CD, 85% (95% CI, 61–95%) for ECF, 80% (95% CI, 70–87%) for perianal CD, 65% (95% CI, 52–76%) for pouch disorders, 92% (95% CI, 38–99%) for PG and 79% (95% CI, 36–96%) for perianal sinus/metastatic CD. Rates of clinical remission were 87% (95% CI, 10–100%) for luminal UC, 88% for luminal CD (95% CI, 46–98%), 50% for ECF (95% CI, 12–88%), 64% (95% CI, 52–75%) for perianal CD, 31% (95% CI, 16–50%) for pouch disorders, 92% (95% CI, 38–100%) for PG and 65% (95% CI, 10–97%) for perianal sinus/metastatic CD. Of the ten studies that reported on safety of HBOT, 19 patients (10.5%) had minor adverse events and no major event was reported. Study quality was low in the majority of studies due to an absence of comparator arms, inadequate description of interventions, and poorly defined outcomes. Conclusions Limited high-quality evidence suggest that HBOT is safe and associated with high rates of clinical response and remission for luminal IBD, perianal CD and pouch disorders. A well-designed large multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm the benefit of HBOT in IBD. doi:10.17605/osf.io/gpz6d Funding Agencies None</description><subject>Poster of Distinction</subject><issn>2515-2084</issn><issn>2515-2092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhosoKOrdY-5STdpkk3gQYjd1A912aeJHT6Gf64q6S-sH_hz_qVl3ETwJAzMw8zwMvJ53guAZgjw8f6zL-fn8o6wgDM4QGe14BwFBxA8gD3Z_Z4b3veNheITuCmFIQ3LgfQlEGDATCWQcy8ioW5lKrYFIx0CLWJoCZDGYFDOZX4lcRSC7L65luiZyMSuASl3FiZhOhcnyAlxldzIBY6Wl0PLHooyzaZ1FShg5BlGWjpVRWaovgAC60EY61Ilzeavk3Q8ylUb4IhVJoZU-8va68mloj7f90Ltxb0UTP8muVSQSv0YUj3xSIwa7jnIO64ZCWpIOc9ayEcZNGIwwg1UQ4rYLuqbjNWGsphVpG8xhRSkOg_DQu9x4V2_Vc9vU7ctrXz7ZVb94LvtPuywX9u_mZfFg58t3SzlhlGMngBtB3S-HoW-7XxZBu47JrmOy25isi8khpxtk-bb6__obXVKKNQ</recordid><startdate>20210304</startdate><enddate>20210304</enddate><creator>Chin Koon Siw, K</creator><creator>Kandel, R</creator><creator>Rosenfeld, G</creator><creator>Boet, S</creator><creator>Larrigan, S</creator><creator>McCurdy, J D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210304</creationdate><title>A158 THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE AND ITS ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS</title><author>Chin Koon Siw, K ; Kandel, R ; Rosenfeld, G ; Boet, S ; Larrigan, S ; McCurdy, J D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1746-5c180ff7990cd707a5f498e8644d326480b234ef2fdf9c588c7b5ed490b774323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Poster of Distinction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chin Koon Siw, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandel, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boet, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larrigan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCurdy, J D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chin Koon Siw, K</au><au>Kandel, R</au><au>Rosenfeld, G</au><au>Boet, S</au><au>Larrigan, S</au><au>McCurdy, J D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A158 THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE AND ITS ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology</jtitle><date>2021-03-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>164-166</pages><issn>2515-2084</issn><eissn>2515-2092</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) corrects tissue hypoxia, mobilizes stem cells and has immunomodulatory effects, all of which are key mechanisms for healing wounds. A number of studies have suggested that HBOT may be effective for healing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Aims Our systematic review aimed to quantify the effectiveness and safety of HBOT in IBD and its associated conditions. Methods We performed a proportional meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from inception through November 2020 with no language restriction. We included randomized controlled studies, cohort studies and case series that contained a minimum of three patients and reported effectiveness and/or safety outcomes for HBOT in patients with IBD. Studies were stratified by IBD phenotype and weighted summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for clinical response and remission using random-effects models. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and a modified version of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) checklist for observational studies. Results Nineteen studies met our study criteria: 3 randomized controlled trials and 16 case series. The studies reported outcomes for luminal ulcerative colitis (UC) (n=373), luminal Crohn’s disease (CD) (n=250), enterocutaneous fistulae (ECF) (n=21), perianal CD (n=115), pouch disorders (n=60), pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) (n=5) and perianal sinus/metastatic CD (n=7). Rates of clinical response were 86% (95% CI, 66–95%) for luminal UC, 86% (95% CI, 81–90%) for luminal CD, 85% (95% CI, 61–95%) for ECF, 80% (95% CI, 70–87%) for perianal CD, 65% (95% CI, 52–76%) for pouch disorders, 92% (95% CI, 38–99%) for PG and 79% (95% CI, 36–96%) for perianal sinus/metastatic CD. Rates of clinical remission were 87% (95% CI, 10–100%) for luminal UC, 88% for luminal CD (95% CI, 46–98%), 50% for ECF (95% CI, 12–88%), 64% (95% CI, 52–75%) for perianal CD, 31% (95% CI, 16–50%) for pouch disorders, 92% (95% CI, 38–100%) for PG and 65% (95% CI, 10–97%) for perianal sinus/metastatic CD. Of the ten studies that reported on safety of HBOT, 19 patients (10.5%) had minor adverse events and no major event was reported. Study quality was low in the majority of studies due to an absence of comparator arms, inadequate description of interventions, and poorly defined outcomes. Conclusions Limited high-quality evidence suggest that HBOT is safe and associated with high rates of clinical response and remission for luminal IBD, perianal CD and pouch disorders. A well-designed large multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm the benefit of HBOT in IBD. doi:10.17605/osf.io/gpz6d Funding Agencies None</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jcag/gwab002.156</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2515-2084
ispartof Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021-03, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.164-166
issn 2515-2084
2515-2092
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7958794
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central
subjects Poster of Distinction
title A158 THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE AND ITS ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T13%3A51%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A158%20THE%20EFFECTIVENESS%20AND%20SAFETY%20OF%20HYPERBARIC%20OXYGEN%20THERAPY%20IN%20INFLAMMATORY%20BOWEL%20DISEASE%20AND%20ITS%20ASSOCIATED%20CONDITIONS:%20A%20SYSTEMATIC%20REVIEW%20AND%20META-ANALYSIS&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Canadian%20Association%20of%20Gastroenterology&rft.au=Chin%20Koon%20Siw,%20K&rft.date=2021-03-04&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=164-166&rft.issn=2515-2084&rft.eissn=2515-2092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jcag/gwab002.156&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/jcag/gwab002.156%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1746-5c180ff7990cd707a5f498e8644d326480b234ef2fdf9c588c7b5ed490b774323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jcag/gwab002.156&rfr_iscdi=true