Loading…
Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric
Imaging self-referral is increasingly cited as a contributor to diagnostic imaging overuse. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ownership of MR imaging equipment by ordering physicians influences the frequency of negative cervical spine MR imaging findings. A retrospective review was...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR 2014-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2248-2253 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613 |
container_end_page | 2253 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2248 |
container_title | American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Amrhein, T J Paxton, B E Lungren, M P Befera, N T Collins, H R Yurko, C Eastwood, J D Kilani, R K |
description | Imaging self-referral is increasingly cited as a contributor to diagnostic imaging overuse. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ownership of MR imaging equipment by ordering physicians influences the frequency of negative cervical spine MR imaging findings.
A retrospective review was performed of 500 consecutive cervical spine MRIs ordered by 2 separate referring-physician groups serving the same geographic community. The first group owned the scanners used and received technical fees for their use, while the second group did not. Final reports were reviewed, and for each group, the percentage of negative study findings and the frequency of abnormalities were calculated. The number of concomitant shoulder MRIs was recorded.
Five hundred MRIs meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed (250 with financial interest, 250 with no financial interest). Three hundred fifty-two had negative findings (190 with financial interest, 162 with no financial interest); there were 17.3% more scans with negative findings in the financial interest group (P = .006). Among scans with positive findings, there was no significant difference in the mean number of lesions per scan, controlled for age (1.90 with financial interest, 2.19 with no financial interest; P = .23). Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging (24 with financial interest, 11 with no financial interest; P = .02).
Cervical spine MRIs referred by physicians with a financial interest in the imaging equipment used were significantly more likely to have negative findings. There was otherwise a highly similar distribution and severity of disease between the 2 patient samples. Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3174/ajnr.A4076 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7965304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808670683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFLHTEQxoO06OurF_8AybEU1k42m2zSQ0GktoKiSAveQl528ozsZrfJvgfvvzdWK-2pl5nD_OZjvvkIOWJwwlnbfLIPMZ2cNtDKPbJgmstKC333hiyAaVFJBuqAvMv5AQCEbut9clALBk2t2gXZ3tzvcnDBRpqx91VCjynZntrY0TDYdYhruslI7TSlcUrBzhgx58804trOYYvUYdoGV1byFCLSq9sL6hP-2mB0O2pzUSo1l50B40wHnFNw78lbb_uMhy99SX6ef_1x9r26vP52cXZ6WbmGsbmSimnLOXQr6R13HlByCco72bHaM-YEQC1WnS-lQWE16k7XCgvGsZaML8mXZ91psxqwc-WCYs4UH4NNOzPaYP6dxHBv1uPWtFoKDk0R-PAikMZiKc9mCNlh39uI4yYbpkDJFqTi_0clb4VQTWGX5OMz6tKYc_n560UMzFOm5ilT8zvTAh__7eEV_RMifwS0t6BL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1637558468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Amrhein, T J ; Paxton, B E ; Lungren, M P ; Befera, N T ; Collins, H R ; Yurko, C ; Eastwood, J D ; Kilani, R K</creator><creatorcontrib>Amrhein, T J ; Paxton, B E ; Lungren, M P ; Befera, N T ; Collins, H R ; Yurko, C ; Eastwood, J D ; Kilani, R K</creatorcontrib><description>Imaging self-referral is increasingly cited as a contributor to diagnostic imaging overuse. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ownership of MR imaging equipment by ordering physicians influences the frequency of negative cervical spine MR imaging findings.
A retrospective review was performed of 500 consecutive cervical spine MRIs ordered by 2 separate referring-physician groups serving the same geographic community. The first group owned the scanners used and received technical fees for their use, while the second group did not. Final reports were reviewed, and for each group, the percentage of negative study findings and the frequency of abnormalities were calculated. The number of concomitant shoulder MRIs was recorded.
Five hundred MRIs meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed (250 with financial interest, 250 with no financial interest). Three hundred fifty-two had negative findings (190 with financial interest, 162 with no financial interest); there were 17.3% more scans with negative findings in the financial interest group (P = .006). Among scans with positive findings, there was no significant difference in the mean number of lesions per scan, controlled for age (1.90 with financial interest, 2.19 with no financial interest; P = .23). Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging (24 with financial interest, 11 with no financial interest; P = .02).
Cervical spine MRIs referred by physicians with a financial interest in the imaging equipment used were significantly more likely to have negative findings. There was otherwise a highly similar distribution and severity of disease between the 2 patient samples. Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-959X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4076</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25104287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Neuroradiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cervical Vertebrae ; Editor's Choice ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuroimaging - statistics & numerical data ; Ownership ; Physician Self-Referral - statistics & numerical data ; Practice s ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2014-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2248-2253</ispartof><rights>2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.</rights><rights>2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 American Journal of Neuroradiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7965304/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7965304/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25104287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amrhein, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paxton, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lungren, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Befera, N T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, H R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yurko, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastwood, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilani, R K</creatorcontrib><title>Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric</title><title>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</title><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><description>Imaging self-referral is increasingly cited as a contributor to diagnostic imaging overuse. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ownership of MR imaging equipment by ordering physicians influences the frequency of negative cervical spine MR imaging findings.
A retrospective review was performed of 500 consecutive cervical spine MRIs ordered by 2 separate referring-physician groups serving the same geographic community. The first group owned the scanners used and received technical fees for their use, while the second group did not. Final reports were reviewed, and for each group, the percentage of negative study findings and the frequency of abnormalities were calculated. The number of concomitant shoulder MRIs was recorded.
Five hundred MRIs meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed (250 with financial interest, 250 with no financial interest). Three hundred fifty-two had negative findings (190 with financial interest, 162 with no financial interest); there were 17.3% more scans with negative findings in the financial interest group (P = .006). Among scans with positive findings, there was no significant difference in the mean number of lesions per scan, controlled for age (1.90 with financial interest, 2.19 with no financial interest; P = .23). Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging (24 with financial interest, 11 with no financial interest; P = .02).
Cervical spine MRIs referred by physicians with a financial interest in the imaging equipment used were significantly more likely to have negative findings. There was otherwise a highly similar distribution and severity of disease between the 2 patient samples. Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae</subject><subject>Editor's Choice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuroimaging - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Physician Self-Referral - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Practice s</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0195-6108</issn><issn>1936-959X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFLHTEQxoO06OurF_8AybEU1k42m2zSQ0GktoKiSAveQl528ozsZrfJvgfvvzdWK-2pl5nD_OZjvvkIOWJwwlnbfLIPMZ2cNtDKPbJgmstKC333hiyAaVFJBuqAvMv5AQCEbut9clALBk2t2gXZ3tzvcnDBRpqx91VCjynZntrY0TDYdYhruslI7TSlcUrBzhgx58804trOYYvUYdoGV1byFCLSq9sL6hP-2mB0O2pzUSo1l50B40wHnFNw78lbb_uMhy99SX6ef_1x9r26vP52cXZ6WbmGsbmSimnLOXQr6R13HlByCco72bHaM-YEQC1WnS-lQWE16k7XCgvGsZaML8mXZ91psxqwc-WCYs4UH4NNOzPaYP6dxHBv1uPWtFoKDk0R-PAikMZiKc9mCNlh39uI4yYbpkDJFqTi_0clb4VQTWGX5OMz6tKYc_n560UMzFOm5ilT8zvTAh__7eEV_RMifwS0t6BL</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Amrhein, T J</creator><creator>Paxton, B E</creator><creator>Lungren, M P</creator><creator>Befera, N T</creator><creator>Collins, H R</creator><creator>Yurko, C</creator><creator>Eastwood, J D</creator><creator>Kilani, R K</creator><general>American Society of Neuroradiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric</title><author>Amrhein, T J ; Paxton, B E ; Lungren, M P ; Befera, N T ; Collins, H R ; Yurko, C ; Eastwood, J D ; Kilani, R K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae</topic><topic>Editor's Choice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuroimaging - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Physician Self-Referral - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Practice s</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amrhein, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paxton, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lungren, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Befera, N T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, H R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yurko, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastwood, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilani, R K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amrhein, T J</au><au>Paxton, B E</au><au>Lungren, M P</au><au>Befera, N T</au><au>Collins, H R</au><au>Yurko, C</au><au>Eastwood, J D</au><au>Kilani, R K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric</atitle><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2248</spage><epage>2253</epage><pages>2248-2253</pages><issn>0195-6108</issn><eissn>1936-959X</eissn><abstract>Imaging self-referral is increasingly cited as a contributor to diagnostic imaging overuse. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ownership of MR imaging equipment by ordering physicians influences the frequency of negative cervical spine MR imaging findings.
A retrospective review was performed of 500 consecutive cervical spine MRIs ordered by 2 separate referring-physician groups serving the same geographic community. The first group owned the scanners used and received technical fees for their use, while the second group did not. Final reports were reviewed, and for each group, the percentage of negative study findings and the frequency of abnormalities were calculated. The number of concomitant shoulder MRIs was recorded.
Five hundred MRIs meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed (250 with financial interest, 250 with no financial interest). Three hundred fifty-two had negative findings (190 with financial interest, 162 with no financial interest); there were 17.3% more scans with negative findings in the financial interest group (P = .006). Among scans with positive findings, there was no significant difference in the mean number of lesions per scan, controlled for age (1.90 with financial interest, 2.19 with no financial interest; P = .23). Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging (24 with financial interest, 11 with no financial interest; P = .02).
Cervical spine MRIs referred by physicians with a financial interest in the imaging equipment used were significantly more likely to have negative findings. There was otherwise a highly similar distribution and severity of disease between the 2 patient samples. Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Neuroradiology</pub><pmid>25104287</pmid><doi>10.3174/ajnr.A4076</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6108 |
ispartof | American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2014-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2248-2253 |
issn | 0195-6108 1936-959X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7965304 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Cervical Vertebrae Editor's Choice Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data Male Middle Aged Neuroimaging - statistics & numerical data Ownership Physician Self-Referral - statistics & numerical data Practice s Retrospective Studies |
title | Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A56%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physician%20self-referral%20and%20imaging%20use%20appropriateness:%20negative%20cervical%20spine%20MRI%20frequency%20as%20an%20assessment%20metric&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20neuroradiology%20:%20AJNR&rft.au=Amrhein,%20T%20J&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2248&rft.epage=2253&rft.pages=2248-2253&rft.issn=0195-6108&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3174/ajnr.A4076&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1808670683%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637558468&rft_id=info:pmid/25104287&rfr_iscdi=true |