Loading…

Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric

Imaging self-referral is increasingly cited as a contributor to diagnostic imaging overuse. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ownership of MR imaging equipment by ordering physicians influences the frequency of negative cervical spine MR imaging findings. A retrospective review was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR 2014-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2248-2253
Main Authors: Amrhein, T J, Paxton, B E, Lungren, M P, Befera, N T, Collins, H R, Yurko, C, Eastwood, J D, Kilani, R K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613
container_end_page 2253
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2248
container_title American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR
container_volume 35
creator Amrhein, T J
Paxton, B E
Lungren, M P
Befera, N T
Collins, H R
Yurko, C
Eastwood, J D
Kilani, R K
description Imaging self-referral is increasingly cited as a contributor to diagnostic imaging overuse. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ownership of MR imaging equipment by ordering physicians influences the frequency of negative cervical spine MR imaging findings. A retrospective review was performed of 500 consecutive cervical spine MRIs ordered by 2 separate referring-physician groups serving the same geographic community. The first group owned the scanners used and received technical fees for their use, while the second group did not. Final reports were reviewed, and for each group, the percentage of negative study findings and the frequency of abnormalities were calculated. The number of concomitant shoulder MRIs was recorded. Five hundred MRIs meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed (250 with financial interest, 250 with no financial interest). Three hundred fifty-two had negative findings (190 with financial interest, 162 with no financial interest); there were 17.3% more scans with negative findings in the financial interest group (P = .006). Among scans with positive findings, there was no significant difference in the mean number of lesions per scan, controlled for age (1.90 with financial interest, 2.19 with no financial interest; P = .23). Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging (24 with financial interest, 11 with no financial interest; P = .02). Cervical spine MRIs referred by physicians with a financial interest in the imaging equipment used were significantly more likely to have negative findings. There was otherwise a highly similar distribution and severity of disease between the 2 patient samples. Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging.
doi_str_mv 10.3174/ajnr.A4076
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7965304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808670683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFLHTEQxoO06OurF_8AybEU1k42m2zSQ0GktoKiSAveQl528ozsZrfJvgfvvzdWK-2pl5nD_OZjvvkIOWJwwlnbfLIPMZ2cNtDKPbJgmstKC333hiyAaVFJBuqAvMv5AQCEbut9clALBk2t2gXZ3tzvcnDBRpqx91VCjynZntrY0TDYdYhruslI7TSlcUrBzhgx58804trOYYvUYdoGV1byFCLSq9sL6hP-2mB0O2pzUSo1l50B40wHnFNw78lbb_uMhy99SX6ef_1x9r26vP52cXZ6WbmGsbmSimnLOXQr6R13HlByCco72bHaM-YEQC1WnS-lQWE16k7XCgvGsZaML8mXZ91psxqwc-WCYs4UH4NNOzPaYP6dxHBv1uPWtFoKDk0R-PAikMZiKc9mCNlh39uI4yYbpkDJFqTi_0clb4VQTWGX5OMz6tKYc_n560UMzFOm5ilT8zvTAh__7eEV_RMifwS0t6BL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1637558468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Amrhein, T J ; Paxton, B E ; Lungren, M P ; Befera, N T ; Collins, H R ; Yurko, C ; Eastwood, J D ; Kilani, R K</creator><creatorcontrib>Amrhein, T J ; Paxton, B E ; Lungren, M P ; Befera, N T ; Collins, H R ; Yurko, C ; Eastwood, J D ; Kilani, R K</creatorcontrib><description>Imaging self-referral is increasingly cited as a contributor to diagnostic imaging overuse. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ownership of MR imaging equipment by ordering physicians influences the frequency of negative cervical spine MR imaging findings. A retrospective review was performed of 500 consecutive cervical spine MRIs ordered by 2 separate referring-physician groups serving the same geographic community. The first group owned the scanners used and received technical fees for their use, while the second group did not. Final reports were reviewed, and for each group, the percentage of negative study findings and the frequency of abnormalities were calculated. The number of concomitant shoulder MRIs was recorded. Five hundred MRIs meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed (250 with financial interest, 250 with no financial interest). Three hundred fifty-two had negative findings (190 with financial interest, 162 with no financial interest); there were 17.3% more scans with negative findings in the financial interest group (P = .006). Among scans with positive findings, there was no significant difference in the mean number of lesions per scan, controlled for age (1.90 with financial interest, 2.19 with no financial interest; P = .23). Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging (24 with financial interest, 11 with no financial interest; P = .02). Cervical spine MRIs referred by physicians with a financial interest in the imaging equipment used were significantly more likely to have negative findings. There was otherwise a highly similar distribution and severity of disease between the 2 patient samples. Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-959X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4076</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25104287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Neuroradiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cervical Vertebrae ; Editor's Choice ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuroimaging - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Ownership ; Physician Self-Referral - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Practice s ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2014-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2248-2253</ispartof><rights>2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.</rights><rights>2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 American Journal of Neuroradiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7965304/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7965304/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25104287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amrhein, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paxton, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lungren, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Befera, N T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, H R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yurko, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastwood, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilani, R K</creatorcontrib><title>Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric</title><title>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</title><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><description>Imaging self-referral is increasingly cited as a contributor to diagnostic imaging overuse. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ownership of MR imaging equipment by ordering physicians influences the frequency of negative cervical spine MR imaging findings. A retrospective review was performed of 500 consecutive cervical spine MRIs ordered by 2 separate referring-physician groups serving the same geographic community. The first group owned the scanners used and received technical fees for their use, while the second group did not. Final reports were reviewed, and for each group, the percentage of negative study findings and the frequency of abnormalities were calculated. The number of concomitant shoulder MRIs was recorded. Five hundred MRIs meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed (250 with financial interest, 250 with no financial interest). Three hundred fifty-two had negative findings (190 with financial interest, 162 with no financial interest); there were 17.3% more scans with negative findings in the financial interest group (P = .006). Among scans with positive findings, there was no significant difference in the mean number of lesions per scan, controlled for age (1.90 with financial interest, 2.19 with no financial interest; P = .23). Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging (24 with financial interest, 11 with no financial interest; P = .02). Cervical spine MRIs referred by physicians with a financial interest in the imaging equipment used were significantly more likely to have negative findings. There was otherwise a highly similar distribution and severity of disease between the 2 patient samples. Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae</subject><subject>Editor's Choice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuroimaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Physician Self-Referral - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Practice s</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0195-6108</issn><issn>1936-959X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFLHTEQxoO06OurF_8AybEU1k42m2zSQ0GktoKiSAveQl528ozsZrfJvgfvvzdWK-2pl5nD_OZjvvkIOWJwwlnbfLIPMZ2cNtDKPbJgmstKC333hiyAaVFJBuqAvMv5AQCEbut9clALBk2t2gXZ3tzvcnDBRpqx91VCjynZntrY0TDYdYhruslI7TSlcUrBzhgx58804trOYYvUYdoGV1byFCLSq9sL6hP-2mB0O2pzUSo1l50B40wHnFNw78lbb_uMhy99SX6ef_1x9r26vP52cXZ6WbmGsbmSimnLOXQr6R13HlByCco72bHaM-YEQC1WnS-lQWE16k7XCgvGsZaML8mXZ91psxqwc-WCYs4UH4NNOzPaYP6dxHBv1uPWtFoKDk0R-PAikMZiKc9mCNlh39uI4yYbpkDJFqTi_0clb4VQTWGX5OMz6tKYc_n560UMzFOm5ilT8zvTAh__7eEV_RMifwS0t6BL</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Amrhein, T J</creator><creator>Paxton, B E</creator><creator>Lungren, M P</creator><creator>Befera, N T</creator><creator>Collins, H R</creator><creator>Yurko, C</creator><creator>Eastwood, J D</creator><creator>Kilani, R K</creator><general>American Society of Neuroradiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric</title><author>Amrhein, T J ; Paxton, B E ; Lungren, M P ; Befera, N T ; Collins, H R ; Yurko, C ; Eastwood, J D ; Kilani, R K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae</topic><topic>Editor's Choice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuroimaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Physician Self-Referral - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Practice s</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amrhein, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paxton, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lungren, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Befera, N T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, H R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yurko, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastwood, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilani, R K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amrhein, T J</au><au>Paxton, B E</au><au>Lungren, M P</au><au>Befera, N T</au><au>Collins, H R</au><au>Yurko, C</au><au>Eastwood, J D</au><au>Kilani, R K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric</atitle><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2248</spage><epage>2253</epage><pages>2248-2253</pages><issn>0195-6108</issn><eissn>1936-959X</eissn><abstract>Imaging self-referral is increasingly cited as a contributor to diagnostic imaging overuse. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ownership of MR imaging equipment by ordering physicians influences the frequency of negative cervical spine MR imaging findings. A retrospective review was performed of 500 consecutive cervical spine MRIs ordered by 2 separate referring-physician groups serving the same geographic community. The first group owned the scanners used and received technical fees for their use, while the second group did not. Final reports were reviewed, and for each group, the percentage of negative study findings and the frequency of abnormalities were calculated. The number of concomitant shoulder MRIs was recorded. Five hundred MRIs meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed (250 with financial interest, 250 with no financial interest). Three hundred fifty-two had negative findings (190 with financial interest, 162 with no financial interest); there were 17.3% more scans with negative findings in the financial interest group (P = .006). Among scans with positive findings, there was no significant difference in the mean number of lesions per scan, controlled for age (1.90 with financial interest, 2.19 with no financial interest; P = .23). Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging (24 with financial interest, 11 with no financial interest; P = .02). Cervical spine MRIs referred by physicians with a financial interest in the imaging equipment used were significantly more likely to have negative findings. There was otherwise a highly similar distribution and severity of disease between the 2 patient samples. Patients in the financial interest group were more likely to undergo concomitant shoulder MR imaging.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Neuroradiology</pub><pmid>25104287</pmid><doi>10.3174/ajnr.A4076</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6108
ispartof American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2014-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2248-2253
issn 0195-6108
1936-959X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7965304
source PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Cervical Vertebrae
Editor's Choice
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Neuroimaging - statistics & numerical data
Ownership
Physician Self-Referral - statistics & numerical data
Practice s
Retrospective Studies
title Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A56%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physician%20self-referral%20and%20imaging%20use%20appropriateness:%20negative%20cervical%20spine%20MRI%20frequency%20as%20an%20assessment%20metric&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20neuroradiology%20:%20AJNR&rft.au=Amrhein,%20T%20J&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2248&rft.epage=2253&rft.pages=2248-2253&rft.issn=0195-6108&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3174/ajnr.A4076&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1808670683%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6819a330db6fc3cf0e63608fc6d12f11c50025bdf25b4e5a9e9d928ee633e2613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637558468&rft_id=info:pmid/25104287&rfr_iscdi=true