Loading…
Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing
This study evaluates the possibility of recovery of high-quality valuable fish oil and proteins from fish co-streams by traditional means or a combination of several technologies. A techno-economically feasible and sustainable zero-waste process is needed for full utilisation of this co-stream'...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-02, Vol.18 (5), p.2358 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2358 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Venslauskas, Kęstutis Navickas, Kęstutis Nappa, Marja Kangas, Petteri Mozūraitytė, Revilija Šližytė, Rasa Župerka, Vidmantas |
description | This study evaluates the possibility of recovery of high-quality valuable fish oil and proteins from fish co-streams by traditional means or a combination of several technologies. A techno-economically feasible and sustainable zero-waste process is needed for full utilisation of this co-stream's potential. This study aims to determine the energy efficiency and economic feasibility of four different zero-waste bio-refineries based on salmon filleting co-streams. The study covers four concepts: (I) biogas and fertiliser production from salmon co-streams, (II) fish silage production, (III) thermal processing of salmon co-streams for producing oil, protein concentrate, and meal, and (IV) novel two-stage thermal and enzymatic process for producing high-quality oil and protein hydrolysate, while the solid residue is converted to biogas and fertilisers. Monte Carlo simulation is used to evaluate uncertainties in economic evaluation. The results show that the two-stage processing of fish co-streams leads to recovery of both high-quality marine oil and proteins, showing the largest profitability and return on investment during the economic analysis. It is a more tempting option than the currently used thermal treatment or traditional silage processes. The possibility of producing food-grade fish protein hydrolysate is the biggest benefit here. Concepts studied are examples of zero-waste processing of bioproducts and illustrate the possibilities and benefits of fully utilising the different fractions of fish as fillets, oil, protein, fertilisers, and energy production. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph18052358 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7967757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2497209068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdFLwzAQxoMoTqevPkrBF186k6ZJkxdBxtSBoKAi-BKy9LpltMlM2oH_vR3qmD7dHfe77-74EDojeESpxFd2CWG1IAKzjDKxh44I5zjNOSb7O_kAHce4xJiKnMtDNKCUF1gyfISmEwdhDq01iXZlMjHe-aYvJmtdd7q13iW-St4h-PRNxxaSWxsXydinz20A3SRPwRuI0br5CTqodB3h9CcO0evt5GV8nz483k3HNw-pyYloU0ZNLgmdaVMRyapSk4wChYobbErQWW6I6JGKlZnWGRVCElwWnOKKSpGXlA7R9bfuqps1UBpwbdC1WgXb6PCpvLbqb8fZhZr7tSokLwpW9AKXPwLBf3QQW9XYaKCutQPfRZXl_SIpGSM9evEPXfouuP69DVVkWGIuemr0TZngYwxQbY8hWG1cUn9d6gfOd1_Y4r-20C_qY46k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2497209068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Venslauskas, Kęstutis ; Navickas, Kęstutis ; Nappa, Marja ; Kangas, Petteri ; Mozūraitytė, Revilija ; Šližytė, Rasa ; Župerka, Vidmantas</creator><creatorcontrib>Venslauskas, Kęstutis ; Navickas, Kęstutis ; Nappa, Marja ; Kangas, Petteri ; Mozūraitytė, Revilija ; Šližytė, Rasa ; Župerka, Vidmantas</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluates the possibility of recovery of high-quality valuable fish oil and proteins from fish co-streams by traditional means or a combination of several technologies. A techno-economically feasible and sustainable zero-waste process is needed for full utilisation of this co-stream's potential. This study aims to determine the energy efficiency and economic feasibility of four different zero-waste bio-refineries based on salmon filleting co-streams. The study covers four concepts: (I) biogas and fertiliser production from salmon co-streams, (II) fish silage production, (III) thermal processing of salmon co-streams for producing oil, protein concentrate, and meal, and (IV) novel two-stage thermal and enzymatic process for producing high-quality oil and protein hydrolysate, while the solid residue is converted to biogas and fertilisers. Monte Carlo simulation is used to evaluate uncertainties in economic evaluation. The results show that the two-stage processing of fish co-streams leads to recovery of both high-quality marine oil and proteins, showing the largest profitability and return on investment during the economic analysis. It is a more tempting option than the currently used thermal treatment or traditional silage processes. The possibility of producing food-grade fish protein hydrolysate is the biggest benefit here. Concepts studied are examples of zero-waste processing of bioproducts and illustrate the possibilities and benefits of fully utilising the different fractions of fish as fillets, oil, protein, fertilisers, and energy production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33670950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Animals ; Aquaculture ; Barley ; Biofuels ; Biogas ; Biomass ; Cattle ; Consumption ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Economic analysis ; Economics ; Energy conversion efficiency ; Energy efficiency ; Farms ; Feasibility ; Feeds ; Fertilizers ; Filleting ; Fish ; Fish oils ; Fishes ; Food ; Heat treatment ; Hydrolysates ; Manures ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Potassium ; Proteins ; Refineries ; Refinery wastes ; Return on investment ; Rivers ; Salmon ; Seafood ; Silage ; Streams ; Waste disposal</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-02, Vol.18 (5), p.2358</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8200-1442 ; 0000-0001-5990-0773 ; 0000-0002-6868-0503</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2497209068/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2497209068?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Venslauskas, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navickas, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nappa, Marja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kangas, Petteri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozūraitytė, Revilija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šližytė, Rasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Župerka, Vidmantas</creatorcontrib><title>Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>This study evaluates the possibility of recovery of high-quality valuable fish oil and proteins from fish co-streams by traditional means or a combination of several technologies. A techno-economically feasible and sustainable zero-waste process is needed for full utilisation of this co-stream's potential. This study aims to determine the energy efficiency and economic feasibility of four different zero-waste bio-refineries based on salmon filleting co-streams. The study covers four concepts: (I) biogas and fertiliser production from salmon co-streams, (II) fish silage production, (III) thermal processing of salmon co-streams for producing oil, protein concentrate, and meal, and (IV) novel two-stage thermal and enzymatic process for producing high-quality oil and protein hydrolysate, while the solid residue is converted to biogas and fertilisers. Monte Carlo simulation is used to evaluate uncertainties in economic evaluation. The results show that the two-stage processing of fish co-streams leads to recovery of both high-quality marine oil and proteins, showing the largest profitability and return on investment during the economic analysis. It is a more tempting option than the currently used thermal treatment or traditional silage processes. The possibility of producing food-grade fish protein hydrolysate is the biggest benefit here. Concepts studied are examples of zero-waste processing of bioproducts and illustrate the possibilities and benefits of fully utilising the different fractions of fish as fillets, oil, protein, fertilisers, and energy production.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy conversion efficiency</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Filleting</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish oils</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Heat treatment</subject><subject>Hydrolysates</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Refineries</subject><subject>Refinery wastes</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Seafood</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdFLwzAQxoMoTqevPkrBF186k6ZJkxdBxtSBoKAi-BKy9LpltMlM2oH_vR3qmD7dHfe77-74EDojeESpxFd2CWG1IAKzjDKxh44I5zjNOSb7O_kAHce4xJiKnMtDNKCUF1gyfISmEwdhDq01iXZlMjHe-aYvJmtdd7q13iW-St4h-PRNxxaSWxsXydinz20A3SRPwRuI0br5CTqodB3h9CcO0evt5GV8nz483k3HNw-pyYloU0ZNLgmdaVMRyapSk4wChYobbErQWW6I6JGKlZnWGRVCElwWnOKKSpGXlA7R9bfuqps1UBpwbdC1WgXb6PCpvLbqb8fZhZr7tSokLwpW9AKXPwLBf3QQW9XYaKCutQPfRZXl_SIpGSM9evEPXfouuP69DVVkWGIuemr0TZngYwxQbY8hWG1cUn9d6gfOd1_Y4r-20C_qY46k</recordid><startdate>20210228</startdate><enddate>20210228</enddate><creator>Venslauskas, Kęstutis</creator><creator>Navickas, Kęstutis</creator><creator>Nappa, Marja</creator><creator>Kangas, Petteri</creator><creator>Mozūraitytė, Revilija</creator><creator>Šližytė, Rasa</creator><creator>Župerka, Vidmantas</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-1442</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-0773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-0503</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210228</creationdate><title>Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing</title><author>Venslauskas, Kęstutis ; Navickas, Kęstutis ; Nappa, Marja ; Kangas, Petteri ; Mozūraitytė, Revilija ; Šližytė, Rasa ; Župerka, Vidmantas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy conversion efficiency</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Filleting</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish oils</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Heat treatment</topic><topic>Hydrolysates</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Refineries</topic><topic>Refinery wastes</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Seafood</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Venslauskas, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navickas, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nappa, Marja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kangas, Petteri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozūraitytė, Revilija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šližytė, Rasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Župerka, Vidmantas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Venslauskas, Kęstutis</au><au>Navickas, Kęstutis</au><au>Nappa, Marja</au><au>Kangas, Petteri</au><au>Mozūraitytė, Revilija</au><au>Šližytė, Rasa</au><au>Župerka, Vidmantas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2021-02-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2358</spage><pages>2358-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>This study evaluates the possibility of recovery of high-quality valuable fish oil and proteins from fish co-streams by traditional means or a combination of several technologies. A techno-economically feasible and sustainable zero-waste process is needed for full utilisation of this co-stream's potential. This study aims to determine the energy efficiency and economic feasibility of four different zero-waste bio-refineries based on salmon filleting co-streams. The study covers four concepts: (I) biogas and fertiliser production from salmon co-streams, (II) fish silage production, (III) thermal processing of salmon co-streams for producing oil, protein concentrate, and meal, and (IV) novel two-stage thermal and enzymatic process for producing high-quality oil and protein hydrolysate, while the solid residue is converted to biogas and fertilisers. Monte Carlo simulation is used to evaluate uncertainties in economic evaluation. The results show that the two-stage processing of fish co-streams leads to recovery of both high-quality marine oil and proteins, showing the largest profitability and return on investment during the economic analysis. It is a more tempting option than the currently used thermal treatment or traditional silage processes. The possibility of producing food-grade fish protein hydrolysate is the biggest benefit here. Concepts studied are examples of zero-waste processing of bioproducts and illustrate the possibilities and benefits of fully utilising the different fractions of fish as fillets, oil, protein, fertilisers, and energy production.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33670950</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph18052358</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-1442</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-0773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-0503</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-02, Vol.18 (5), p.2358 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7967757 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Animals Aquaculture Barley Biofuels Biogas Biomass Cattle Consumption Cost-Benefit Analysis Economic analysis Economics Energy conversion efficiency Energy efficiency Farms Feasibility Feeds Fertilizers Filleting Fish Fish oils Fishes Food Heat treatment Hydrolysates Manures Monte Carlo simulation Potassium Proteins Refineries Refinery wastes Return on investment Rivers Salmon Seafood Silage Streams Waste disposal |
title | Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T13%3A24%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energetic%20and%20Economic%20Evaluation%20of%20Zero-Waste%20Fish%20Co-Stream%20Processing&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Venslauskas,%20K%C4%99stutis&rft.date=2021-02-28&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2358&rft.pages=2358-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph18052358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2497209068%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2497209068&rft_id=info:pmid/33670950&rfr_iscdi=true |