Loading…

Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing

This study evaluates the possibility of recovery of high-quality valuable fish oil and proteins from fish co-streams by traditional means or a combination of several technologies. A techno-economically feasible and sustainable zero-waste process is needed for full utilisation of this co-stream'...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-02, Vol.18 (5), p.2358
Main Authors: Venslauskas, Kęstutis, Navickas, Kęstutis, Nappa, Marja, Kangas, Petteri, Mozūraitytė, Revilija, Šližytė, Rasa, Župerka, Vidmantas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2358
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 18
creator Venslauskas, Kęstutis
Navickas, Kęstutis
Nappa, Marja
Kangas, Petteri
Mozūraitytė, Revilija
Šližytė, Rasa
Župerka, Vidmantas
description This study evaluates the possibility of recovery of high-quality valuable fish oil and proteins from fish co-streams by traditional means or a combination of several technologies. A techno-economically feasible and sustainable zero-waste process is needed for full utilisation of this co-stream's potential. This study aims to determine the energy efficiency and economic feasibility of four different zero-waste bio-refineries based on salmon filleting co-streams. The study covers four concepts: (I) biogas and fertiliser production from salmon co-streams, (II) fish silage production, (III) thermal processing of salmon co-streams for producing oil, protein concentrate, and meal, and (IV) novel two-stage thermal and enzymatic process for producing high-quality oil and protein hydrolysate, while the solid residue is converted to biogas and fertilisers. Monte Carlo simulation is used to evaluate uncertainties in economic evaluation. The results show that the two-stage processing of fish co-streams leads to recovery of both high-quality marine oil and proteins, showing the largest profitability and return on investment during the economic analysis. It is a more tempting option than the currently used thermal treatment or traditional silage processes. The possibility of producing food-grade fish protein hydrolysate is the biggest benefit here. Concepts studied are examples of zero-waste processing of bioproducts and illustrate the possibilities and benefits of fully utilising the different fractions of fish as fillets, oil, protein, fertilisers, and energy production.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph18052358
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7967757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2497209068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdFLwzAQxoMoTqevPkrBF186k6ZJkxdBxtSBoKAi-BKy9LpltMlM2oH_vR3qmD7dHfe77-74EDojeESpxFd2CWG1IAKzjDKxh44I5zjNOSb7O_kAHce4xJiKnMtDNKCUF1gyfISmEwdhDq01iXZlMjHe-aYvJmtdd7q13iW-St4h-PRNxxaSWxsXydinz20A3SRPwRuI0br5CTqodB3h9CcO0evt5GV8nz483k3HNw-pyYloU0ZNLgmdaVMRyapSk4wChYobbErQWW6I6JGKlZnWGRVCElwWnOKKSpGXlA7R9bfuqps1UBpwbdC1WgXb6PCpvLbqb8fZhZr7tSokLwpW9AKXPwLBf3QQW9XYaKCutQPfRZXl_SIpGSM9evEPXfouuP69DVVkWGIuemr0TZngYwxQbY8hWG1cUn9d6gfOd1_Y4r-20C_qY46k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2497209068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Venslauskas, Kęstutis ; Navickas, Kęstutis ; Nappa, Marja ; Kangas, Petteri ; Mozūraitytė, Revilija ; Šližytė, Rasa ; Župerka, Vidmantas</creator><creatorcontrib>Venslauskas, Kęstutis ; Navickas, Kęstutis ; Nappa, Marja ; Kangas, Petteri ; Mozūraitytė, Revilija ; Šližytė, Rasa ; Župerka, Vidmantas</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluates the possibility of recovery of high-quality valuable fish oil and proteins from fish co-streams by traditional means or a combination of several technologies. A techno-economically feasible and sustainable zero-waste process is needed for full utilisation of this co-stream's potential. This study aims to determine the energy efficiency and economic feasibility of four different zero-waste bio-refineries based on salmon filleting co-streams. The study covers four concepts: (I) biogas and fertiliser production from salmon co-streams, (II) fish silage production, (III) thermal processing of salmon co-streams for producing oil, protein concentrate, and meal, and (IV) novel two-stage thermal and enzymatic process for producing high-quality oil and protein hydrolysate, while the solid residue is converted to biogas and fertilisers. Monte Carlo simulation is used to evaluate uncertainties in economic evaluation. The results show that the two-stage processing of fish co-streams leads to recovery of both high-quality marine oil and proteins, showing the largest profitability and return on investment during the economic analysis. It is a more tempting option than the currently used thermal treatment or traditional silage processes. The possibility of producing food-grade fish protein hydrolysate is the biggest benefit here. Concepts studied are examples of zero-waste processing of bioproducts and illustrate the possibilities and benefits of fully utilising the different fractions of fish as fillets, oil, protein, fertilisers, and energy production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33670950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Animals ; Aquaculture ; Barley ; Biofuels ; Biogas ; Biomass ; Cattle ; Consumption ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Economic analysis ; Economics ; Energy conversion efficiency ; Energy efficiency ; Farms ; Feasibility ; Feeds ; Fertilizers ; Filleting ; Fish ; Fish oils ; Fishes ; Food ; Heat treatment ; Hydrolysates ; Manures ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Potassium ; Proteins ; Refineries ; Refinery wastes ; Return on investment ; Rivers ; Salmon ; Seafood ; Silage ; Streams ; Waste disposal</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-02, Vol.18 (5), p.2358</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8200-1442 ; 0000-0001-5990-0773 ; 0000-0002-6868-0503</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2497209068/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2497209068?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Venslauskas, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navickas, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nappa, Marja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kangas, Petteri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozūraitytė, Revilija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šližytė, Rasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Župerka, Vidmantas</creatorcontrib><title>Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>This study evaluates the possibility of recovery of high-quality valuable fish oil and proteins from fish co-streams by traditional means or a combination of several technologies. A techno-economically feasible and sustainable zero-waste process is needed for full utilisation of this co-stream's potential. This study aims to determine the energy efficiency and economic feasibility of four different zero-waste bio-refineries based on salmon filleting co-streams. The study covers four concepts: (I) biogas and fertiliser production from salmon co-streams, (II) fish silage production, (III) thermal processing of salmon co-streams for producing oil, protein concentrate, and meal, and (IV) novel two-stage thermal and enzymatic process for producing high-quality oil and protein hydrolysate, while the solid residue is converted to biogas and fertilisers. Monte Carlo simulation is used to evaluate uncertainties in economic evaluation. The results show that the two-stage processing of fish co-streams leads to recovery of both high-quality marine oil and proteins, showing the largest profitability and return on investment during the economic analysis. It is a more tempting option than the currently used thermal treatment or traditional silage processes. The possibility of producing food-grade fish protein hydrolysate is the biggest benefit here. Concepts studied are examples of zero-waste processing of bioproducts and illustrate the possibilities and benefits of fully utilising the different fractions of fish as fillets, oil, protein, fertilisers, and energy production.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy conversion efficiency</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Filleting</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish oils</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Heat treatment</subject><subject>Hydrolysates</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Refineries</subject><subject>Refinery wastes</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Seafood</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdFLwzAQxoMoTqevPkrBF186k6ZJkxdBxtSBoKAi-BKy9LpltMlM2oH_vR3qmD7dHfe77-74EDojeESpxFd2CWG1IAKzjDKxh44I5zjNOSb7O_kAHce4xJiKnMtDNKCUF1gyfISmEwdhDq01iXZlMjHe-aYvJmtdd7q13iW-St4h-PRNxxaSWxsXydinz20A3SRPwRuI0br5CTqodB3h9CcO0evt5GV8nz483k3HNw-pyYloU0ZNLgmdaVMRyapSk4wChYobbErQWW6I6JGKlZnWGRVCElwWnOKKSpGXlA7R9bfuqps1UBpwbdC1WgXb6PCpvLbqb8fZhZr7tSokLwpW9AKXPwLBf3QQW9XYaKCutQPfRZXl_SIpGSM9evEPXfouuP69DVVkWGIuemr0TZngYwxQbY8hWG1cUn9d6gfOd1_Y4r-20C_qY46k</recordid><startdate>20210228</startdate><enddate>20210228</enddate><creator>Venslauskas, Kęstutis</creator><creator>Navickas, Kęstutis</creator><creator>Nappa, Marja</creator><creator>Kangas, Petteri</creator><creator>Mozūraitytė, Revilija</creator><creator>Šližytė, Rasa</creator><creator>Župerka, Vidmantas</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-1442</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-0773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-0503</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210228</creationdate><title>Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing</title><author>Venslauskas, Kęstutis ; Navickas, Kęstutis ; Nappa, Marja ; Kangas, Petteri ; Mozūraitytė, Revilija ; Šližytė, Rasa ; Župerka, Vidmantas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy conversion efficiency</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Filleting</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish oils</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Heat treatment</topic><topic>Hydrolysates</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Refineries</topic><topic>Refinery wastes</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Seafood</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Venslauskas, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navickas, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nappa, Marja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kangas, Petteri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozūraitytė, Revilija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šližytė, Rasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Župerka, Vidmantas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Venslauskas, Kęstutis</au><au>Navickas, Kęstutis</au><au>Nappa, Marja</au><au>Kangas, Petteri</au><au>Mozūraitytė, Revilija</au><au>Šližytė, Rasa</au><au>Župerka, Vidmantas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2021-02-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2358</spage><pages>2358-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>This study evaluates the possibility of recovery of high-quality valuable fish oil and proteins from fish co-streams by traditional means or a combination of several technologies. A techno-economically feasible and sustainable zero-waste process is needed for full utilisation of this co-stream's potential. This study aims to determine the energy efficiency and economic feasibility of four different zero-waste bio-refineries based on salmon filleting co-streams. The study covers four concepts: (I) biogas and fertiliser production from salmon co-streams, (II) fish silage production, (III) thermal processing of salmon co-streams for producing oil, protein concentrate, and meal, and (IV) novel two-stage thermal and enzymatic process for producing high-quality oil and protein hydrolysate, while the solid residue is converted to biogas and fertilisers. Monte Carlo simulation is used to evaluate uncertainties in economic evaluation. The results show that the two-stage processing of fish co-streams leads to recovery of both high-quality marine oil and proteins, showing the largest profitability and return on investment during the economic analysis. It is a more tempting option than the currently used thermal treatment or traditional silage processes. The possibility of producing food-grade fish protein hydrolysate is the biggest benefit here. Concepts studied are examples of zero-waste processing of bioproducts and illustrate the possibilities and benefits of fully utilising the different fractions of fish as fillets, oil, protein, fertilisers, and energy production.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33670950</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph18052358</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-1442</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-0773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-0503</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-02, Vol.18 (5), p.2358
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7967757
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Alternative energy sources
Animals
Aquaculture
Barley
Biofuels
Biogas
Biomass
Cattle
Consumption
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Economic analysis
Economics
Energy conversion efficiency
Energy efficiency
Farms
Feasibility
Feeds
Fertilizers
Filleting
Fish
Fish oils
Fishes
Food
Heat treatment
Hydrolysates
Manures
Monte Carlo simulation
Potassium
Proteins
Refineries
Refinery wastes
Return on investment
Rivers
Salmon
Seafood
Silage
Streams
Waste disposal
title Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T13%3A24%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energetic%20and%20Economic%20Evaluation%20of%20Zero-Waste%20Fish%20Co-Stream%20Processing&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Venslauskas,%20K%C4%99stutis&rft.date=2021-02-28&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2358&rft.pages=2358-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph18052358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2497209068%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-53c4913bacf195fda123e3ef6c0cdea24c183c4f5d2aa2388910d7630f3984d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2497209068&rft_id=info:pmid/33670950&rfr_iscdi=true