Loading…

Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Acute Ischemia: Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Signal Intensity Thresholds in Predicting Tissue at Risk and Final Infarct Size

Identifying tissue at risk for infarction is an important goal of stroke imaging. This study was performed to determine whether pixel-based apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and signal intensity ratio are helpful diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging metrics to predict tissue at risk for infarction. Tw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR 2004-09, Vol.25 (8), p.1331-1336
Main Authors: Na, Dong Gyu, Thijs, Vincent N, Albers, Gregory W, Moseley, Michael E, Marks, Michael P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1336
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1331
container_title American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR
container_volume 25
creator Na, Dong Gyu
Thijs, Vincent N
Albers, Gregory W
Moseley, Michael E
Marks, Michael P
description Identifying tissue at risk for infarction is an important goal of stroke imaging. This study was performed to determine whether pixel-based apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and signal intensity ratio are helpful diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging metrics to predict tissue at risk for infarction. Twelve patients presenting with acute hemispheric strokes underwent DW imaging within 7 hours of symptom onset. Region of interest (ROI), pixel-based ADC, and signal intensity analyses were performed at initial DW imaging to assess area of infarct growth, final infarct area, and normal tissue. Pixel-based analysis was less accurate than ROI-based analysis for evaluating infarct growth or final infarct with ADC, ADC ratio, and signal intensity ratios. In pixel-based analysis, signal intensity ratios were better than ADCs or ADC ratios for identifying tissue at risk (accuracy, 67.4%) and for predicting final infarct (accuracy, 79.9%). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between lesion volume on quantitative DW images or ADC maps and final infarct volume (P < .001). When receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal cutoffs for ADC and DW image values, the region of infarct growth was significantly correlated with only the mismatch between initial qualitative DW image and quantitative DW image signal intensity ratio (cutoff value, 1.19; R = 0.652; P = .022). Pixel-based thresholds applied to ADC or DW image signal intensity maps were not accurate prognostic measures of tissue at risk. Quantitative DW images or ADC maps may provide added information not obtained by visual inspection of the qualitative DW image map.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7975462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66933629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h325t-e4f3eb7d265f6ad17a4e0c949df891e18e58d806e18ca614bff7aba591a7e4c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9u1DAQxiMEotvCKyBf4BYpjmMn5oC0WiisVAQqy5-bNeuME4PjbO2EVftMPCReurRwmtHMN79PM_MgW1DJRC65_PYwWxRU8lzQojnJTmP8XhQFl3X5ODuhvBKClfUi-_XaGjNHO_r8K9qun7Al7y_JeoDO-o5YT5Z6npCso-5xsPCSfAE3IxkNWe52ENBP5A5BViMaY7U9VMG35JPtPDiy9hP6aKdrsukDxn50bTygPwZsrZ4ORhsbY8LCRC5t_PFn-NzezhoIekqoG3ySPTLgIj49xrPs8_mbzepdfvHh7Xq1vMh7VvIpx8ow3NZtKbgR0NIaKiy0rGRrGkmRNsibtilEyjQIWm2NqWELXFKosdKMnWWvbrm7eTtgq9M6AZzaBTtAuFYjWPV_x9tedeNPVcs6XbZMgBdHQBivZoyTGmzU6Bx4HOeohJCMiVIm4bN_ne4s_j4oCZ4fBRA1OBPAaxvvdYLyUsrq3rFPT9zbgCoO4FzCUrXf70uuGkUZo-w3cUqsQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66933629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Acute Ischemia: Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Signal Intensity Thresholds in Predicting Tissue at Risk and Final Infarct Size</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Na, Dong Gyu ; Thijs, Vincent N ; Albers, Gregory W ; Moseley, Michael E ; Marks, Michael P</creator><creatorcontrib>Na, Dong Gyu ; Thijs, Vincent N ; Albers, Gregory W ; Moseley, Michael E ; Marks, Michael P</creatorcontrib><description>Identifying tissue at risk for infarction is an important goal of stroke imaging. This study was performed to determine whether pixel-based apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and signal intensity ratio are helpful diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging metrics to predict tissue at risk for infarction. Twelve patients presenting with acute hemispheric strokes underwent DW imaging within 7 hours of symptom onset. Region of interest (ROI), pixel-based ADC, and signal intensity analyses were performed at initial DW imaging to assess area of infarct growth, final infarct area, and normal tissue. Pixel-based analysis was less accurate than ROI-based analysis for evaluating infarct growth or final infarct with ADC, ADC ratio, and signal intensity ratios. In pixel-based analysis, signal intensity ratios were better than ADCs or ADC ratios for identifying tissue at risk (accuracy, 67.4%) and for predicting final infarct (accuracy, 79.9%). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between lesion volume on quantitative DW images or ADC maps and final infarct volume (P &lt; .001). When receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal cutoffs for ADC and DW image values, the region of infarct growth was significantly correlated with only the mismatch between initial qualitative DW image and quantitative DW image signal intensity ratio (cutoff value, 1.19; R = 0.652; P = .022). Pixel-based thresholds applied to ADC or DW image signal intensity maps were not accurate prognostic measures of tissue at risk. Quantitative DW images or ADC maps may provide added information not obtained by visual inspection of the qualitative DW image map.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-959X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15466327</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJNDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oak Brook, IL: Am Soc Neuroradiology</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain ; Brain - pathology ; Brain Ischemia - diagnosis ; Cerebral Infarction - diagnosis ; Differential Threshold ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Linear Models ; Medical sciences ; Nervous system ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2004-09, Vol.25 (8), p.1331-1336</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7975462/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7975462/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16152994$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15466327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Na, Dong Gyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijs, Vincent N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albers, Gregory W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moseley, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Michael P</creatorcontrib><title>Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Acute Ischemia: Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Signal Intensity Thresholds in Predicting Tissue at Risk and Final Infarct Size</title><title>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</title><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><description>Identifying tissue at risk for infarction is an important goal of stroke imaging. This study was performed to determine whether pixel-based apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and signal intensity ratio are helpful diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging metrics to predict tissue at risk for infarction. Twelve patients presenting with acute hemispheric strokes underwent DW imaging within 7 hours of symptom onset. Region of interest (ROI), pixel-based ADC, and signal intensity analyses were performed at initial DW imaging to assess area of infarct growth, final infarct area, and normal tissue. Pixel-based analysis was less accurate than ROI-based analysis for evaluating infarct growth or final infarct with ADC, ADC ratio, and signal intensity ratios. In pixel-based analysis, signal intensity ratios were better than ADCs or ADC ratios for identifying tissue at risk (accuracy, 67.4%) and for predicting final infarct (accuracy, 79.9%). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between lesion volume on quantitative DW images or ADC maps and final infarct volume (P &lt; .001). When receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal cutoffs for ADC and DW image values, the region of infarct growth was significantly correlated with only the mismatch between initial qualitative DW image and quantitative DW image signal intensity ratio (cutoff value, 1.19; R = 0.652; P = .022). Pixel-based thresholds applied to ADC or DW image signal intensity maps were not accurate prognostic measures of tissue at risk. Quantitative DW images or ADC maps may provide added information not obtained by visual inspection of the qualitative DW image map.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Brain Ischemia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cerebral Infarction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Differential Threshold</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0195-6108</issn><issn>1936-959X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc9u1DAQxiMEotvCKyBf4BYpjmMn5oC0WiisVAQqy5-bNeuME4PjbO2EVftMPCReurRwmtHMN79PM_MgW1DJRC65_PYwWxRU8lzQojnJTmP8XhQFl3X5ODuhvBKClfUi-_XaGjNHO_r8K9qun7Al7y_JeoDO-o5YT5Z6npCso-5xsPCSfAE3IxkNWe52ENBP5A5BViMaY7U9VMG35JPtPDiy9hP6aKdrsukDxn50bTygPwZsrZ4ORhsbY8LCRC5t_PFn-NzezhoIekqoG3ySPTLgIj49xrPs8_mbzepdfvHh7Xq1vMh7VvIpx8ow3NZtKbgR0NIaKiy0rGRrGkmRNsibtilEyjQIWm2NqWELXFKosdKMnWWvbrm7eTtgq9M6AZzaBTtAuFYjWPV_x9tedeNPVcs6XbZMgBdHQBivZoyTGmzU6Bx4HOeohJCMiVIm4bN_ne4s_j4oCZ4fBRA1OBPAaxvvdYLyUsrq3rFPT9zbgCoO4FzCUrXf70uuGkUZo-w3cUqsQQ</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Na, Dong Gyu</creator><creator>Thijs, Vincent N</creator><creator>Albers, Gregory W</creator><creator>Moseley, Michael E</creator><creator>Marks, Michael P</creator><general>Am Soc Neuroradiology</general><general>American Society of Neuroradiology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Acute Ischemia: Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Signal Intensity Thresholds in Predicting Tissue at Risk and Final Infarct Size</title><author>Na, Dong Gyu ; Thijs, Vincent N ; Albers, Gregory W ; Moseley, Michael E ; Marks, Michael P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h325t-e4f3eb7d265f6ad17a4e0c949df891e18e58d806e18ca614bff7aba591a7e4c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Brain Ischemia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cerebral Infarction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Differential Threshold</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Na, Dong Gyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijs, Vincent N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albers, Gregory W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moseley, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Michael P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Na, Dong Gyu</au><au>Thijs, Vincent N</au><au>Albers, Gregory W</au><au>Moseley, Michael E</au><au>Marks, Michael P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Acute Ischemia: Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Signal Intensity Thresholds in Predicting Tissue at Risk and Final Infarct Size</atitle><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1331</spage><epage>1336</epage><pages>1331-1336</pages><issn>0195-6108</issn><eissn>1936-959X</eissn><coden>AAJNDL</coden><abstract>Identifying tissue at risk for infarction is an important goal of stroke imaging. This study was performed to determine whether pixel-based apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and signal intensity ratio are helpful diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging metrics to predict tissue at risk for infarction. Twelve patients presenting with acute hemispheric strokes underwent DW imaging within 7 hours of symptom onset. Region of interest (ROI), pixel-based ADC, and signal intensity analyses were performed at initial DW imaging to assess area of infarct growth, final infarct area, and normal tissue. Pixel-based analysis was less accurate than ROI-based analysis for evaluating infarct growth or final infarct with ADC, ADC ratio, and signal intensity ratios. In pixel-based analysis, signal intensity ratios were better than ADCs or ADC ratios for identifying tissue at risk (accuracy, 67.4%) and for predicting final infarct (accuracy, 79.9%). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between lesion volume on quantitative DW images or ADC maps and final infarct volume (P &lt; .001). When receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal cutoffs for ADC and DW image values, the region of infarct growth was significantly correlated with only the mismatch between initial qualitative DW image and quantitative DW image signal intensity ratio (cutoff value, 1.19; R = 0.652; P = .022). Pixel-based thresholds applied to ADC or DW image signal intensity maps were not accurate prognostic measures of tissue at risk. Quantitative DW images or ADC maps may provide added information not obtained by visual inspection of the qualitative DW image map.</abstract><cop>Oak Brook, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Neuroradiology</pub><pmid>15466327</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6108
ispartof American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2004-09, Vol.25 (8), p.1331-1336
issn 0195-6108
1936-959X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7975462
source PubMed Central
subjects Acute Disease
Biological and medical sciences
Brain
Brain - pathology
Brain Ischemia - diagnosis
Cerebral Infarction - diagnosis
Differential Threshold
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Linear Models
Medical sciences
Nervous system
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
ROC Curve
Time Factors
title Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Acute Ischemia: Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Signal Intensity Thresholds in Predicting Tissue at Risk and Final Infarct Size
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A35%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diffusion-Weighted%20MR%20Imaging%20in%20Acute%20Ischemia:%20Value%20of%20Apparent%20Diffusion%20Coefficient%20and%20Signal%20Intensity%20Thresholds%20in%20Predicting%20Tissue%20at%20Risk%20and%20Final%20Infarct%20Size&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20neuroradiology%20:%20AJNR&rft.au=Na,%20Dong%20Gyu&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1331&rft.epage=1336&rft.pages=1331-1336&rft.issn=0195-6108&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft.coden=AAJNDL&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E66933629%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h325t-e4f3eb7d265f6ad17a4e0c949df891e18e58d806e18ca614bff7aba591a7e4c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66933629&rft_id=info:pmid/15466327&rfr_iscdi=true