Loading…

Food or just a free ride? A meta-analysis reveals the global diversity of the Plastisphere

It is now indisputable that plastics are ubiquitous and problematic in ecosystems globally. Many suggestions have been made about the role that biofilms colonizing plastics in the environment—termed the “Plastisphere”—may play in the transportation and ecological impact of these plastics. By collect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The ISME Journal 2021-03, Vol.15 (3), p.789-806
Main Authors: Wright, Robyn J., Langille, Morgan G. I., Walker, Tony R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f30acc0e8185d47c3d504c71bc84c7a7f2b0514cbbcd231fb62e3f74fa5f8e5a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f30acc0e8185d47c3d504c71bc84c7a7f2b0514cbbcd231fb62e3f74fa5f8e5a3
container_end_page 806
container_issue 3
container_start_page 789
container_title The ISME Journal
container_volume 15
creator Wright, Robyn J.
Langille, Morgan G. I.
Walker, Tony R.
description It is now indisputable that plastics are ubiquitous and problematic in ecosystems globally. Many suggestions have been made about the role that biofilms colonizing plastics in the environment—termed the “Plastisphere”—may play in the transportation and ecological impact of these plastics. By collecting and re-analyzing all raw 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metadata from 2,229 samples within 35 studies, we have performed the first meta-analysis of the Plastisphere in marine, freshwater, other aquatic (e.g., brackish or aquaculture) and terrestrial environments. We show that random forest models can be trained to differentiate between groupings of environmental factors as well as aspects of study design, but—crucially—also between plastics when compared with control biofilms and between different plastic types and community successional stages. Our meta-analysis confirms that potentially biodegrading Plastisphere members, the hydrocarbonoclastic Oceanospirillales and Alteromonadales are consistently more abundant in plastic than control biofilm samples across multiple studies and environments. This indicates the predilection of these organisms for plastics and confirms the urgent need for their ability to biodegrade plastics to be comprehensively tested. We also identified key knowledge gaps that should be addressed by future studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41396-020-00814-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8027867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2457303826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f30acc0e8185d47c3d504c71bc84c7a7f2b0514cbbcd231fb62e3f74fa5f8e5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTtPKzEQhS0E4v0HKK4s0dxmwa9dOw0IIV4SEhTQ0Fhe7zhxtFkHezdS_v01BMKFgmosz3fO2HMQOqLkhBKuTpOgfFQVhJGCEEVFMdpAu1SWtJBcks31uWI7aC-lKSGlrCq5jXY4z0olyS56uQ6hwSHi6ZB6bLCLADj6Bs7xBZ5BbwrTmXaZfMIRFmDahPsJ4HEbatPixi8gJt8vcXDv94-tSb1P8wlEOEBbLvNw-FH30fP11dPlbXH_cHN3eXFfWCFFXzhOjLUEFFVlI6TlTUmElbS2KhcjHatJSYWta9swTl1dMeBOCmdKp6A0fB-drXznQz2DxkLXR9PqefQzE5c6GK-_dzo_0eOw0IowqSqZDf5-GMTwOkDq9cwnC21rOghD0kyUkueFsyqjxz_QaRhi3tAbNcp2klKeKbaibAwpRXDrx1Ci36LTq-h0jk6_R6dHWfTn_2-sJZ9ZZYCvgJRb3Rji1-xfbP8Bf_6lbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492787113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Food or just a free ride? A meta-analysis reveals the global diversity of the Plastisphere</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)</source><creator>Wright, Robyn J. ; Langille, Morgan G. I. ; Walker, Tony R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wright, Robyn J. ; Langille, Morgan G. I. ; Walker, Tony R.</creatorcontrib><description>It is now indisputable that plastics are ubiquitous and problematic in ecosystems globally. Many suggestions have been made about the role that biofilms colonizing plastics in the environment—termed the “Plastisphere”—may play in the transportation and ecological impact of these plastics. By collecting and re-analyzing all raw 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metadata from 2,229 samples within 35 studies, we have performed the first meta-analysis of the Plastisphere in marine, freshwater, other aquatic (e.g., brackish or aquaculture) and terrestrial environments. We show that random forest models can be trained to differentiate between groupings of environmental factors as well as aspects of study design, but—crucially—also between plastics when compared with control biofilms and between different plastic types and community successional stages. Our meta-analysis confirms that potentially biodegrading Plastisphere members, the hydrocarbonoclastic Oceanospirillales and Alteromonadales are consistently more abundant in plastic than control biofilm samples across multiple studies and environments. This indicates the predilection of these organisms for plastics and confirms the urgent need for their ability to biodegrade plastics to be comprehensively tested. We also identified key knowledge gaps that should be addressed by future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-7362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7370</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-00814-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33139870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>38/23 ; 631/326/171/1818 ; 631/326/171/1878 ; 631/326/2565/2134 ; 631/326/2565/855 ; 704/158/855 ; Aquaculture ; Biofilms ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Environmental factors ; Evolutionary Biology ; Gene sequencing ; Life Sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Microbial Ecology ; Microbial Genetics and Genomics ; Microbiology ; Plastics ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; rRNA 16S ; Terrestrial environments</subject><ispartof>The ISME Journal, 2021-03, Vol.15 (3), p.789-806</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f30acc0e8185d47c3d504c71bc84c7a7f2b0514cbbcd231fb62e3f74fa5f8e5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f30acc0e8185d47c3d504c71bc84c7a7f2b0514cbbcd231fb62e3f74fa5f8e5a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0562-2610 ; 0000-0001-9008-0697</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027867/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027867/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33139870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wright, Robyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langille, Morgan G. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Tony R.</creatorcontrib><title>Food or just a free ride? A meta-analysis reveals the global diversity of the Plastisphere</title><title>The ISME Journal</title><addtitle>ISME J</addtitle><addtitle>ISME J</addtitle><description>It is now indisputable that plastics are ubiquitous and problematic in ecosystems globally. Many suggestions have been made about the role that biofilms colonizing plastics in the environment—termed the “Plastisphere”—may play in the transportation and ecological impact of these plastics. By collecting and re-analyzing all raw 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metadata from 2,229 samples within 35 studies, we have performed the first meta-analysis of the Plastisphere in marine, freshwater, other aquatic (e.g., brackish or aquaculture) and terrestrial environments. We show that random forest models can be trained to differentiate between groupings of environmental factors as well as aspects of study design, but—crucially—also between plastics when compared with control biofilms and between different plastic types and community successional stages. Our meta-analysis confirms that potentially biodegrading Plastisphere members, the hydrocarbonoclastic Oceanospirillales and Alteromonadales are consistently more abundant in plastic than control biofilm samples across multiple studies and environments. This indicates the predilection of these organisms for plastics and confirms the urgent need for their ability to biodegrade plastics to be comprehensively tested. We also identified key knowledge gaps that should be addressed by future studies.</description><subject>38/23</subject><subject>631/326/171/1818</subject><subject>631/326/171/1878</subject><subject>631/326/2565/2134</subject><subject>631/326/2565/855</subject><subject>704/158/855</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Microbial Ecology</subject><subject>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><issn>1751-7362</issn><issn>1751-7370</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kTtPKzEQhS0E4v0HKK4s0dxmwa9dOw0IIV4SEhTQ0Fhe7zhxtFkHezdS_v01BMKFgmosz3fO2HMQOqLkhBKuTpOgfFQVhJGCEEVFMdpAu1SWtJBcks31uWI7aC-lKSGlrCq5jXY4z0olyS56uQ6hwSHi6ZB6bLCLADj6Bs7xBZ5BbwrTmXaZfMIRFmDahPsJ4HEbatPixi8gJt8vcXDv94-tSb1P8wlEOEBbLvNw-FH30fP11dPlbXH_cHN3eXFfWCFFXzhOjLUEFFVlI6TlTUmElbS2KhcjHatJSYWta9swTl1dMeBOCmdKp6A0fB-drXznQz2DxkLXR9PqefQzE5c6GK-_dzo_0eOw0IowqSqZDf5-GMTwOkDq9cwnC21rOghD0kyUkueFsyqjxz_QaRhi3tAbNcp2klKeKbaibAwpRXDrx1Ci36LTq-h0jk6_R6dHWfTn_2-sJZ9ZZYCvgJRb3Rji1-xfbP8Bf_6lbA</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Wright, Robyn J.</creator><creator>Langille, Morgan G. I.</creator><creator>Walker, Tony R.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0562-2610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9008-0697</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Food or just a free ride? A meta-analysis reveals the global diversity of the Plastisphere</title><author>Wright, Robyn J. ; Langille, Morgan G. I. ; Walker, Tony R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f30acc0e8185d47c3d504c71bc84c7a7f2b0514cbbcd231fb62e3f74fa5f8e5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>38/23</topic><topic>631/326/171/1818</topic><topic>631/326/171/1878</topic><topic>631/326/2565/2134</topic><topic>631/326/2565/855</topic><topic>704/158/855</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Microbial Ecology</topic><topic>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wright, Robyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langille, Morgan G. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Tony R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medicine (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The ISME Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wright, Robyn J.</au><au>Langille, Morgan G. I.</au><au>Walker, Tony R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Food or just a free ride? A meta-analysis reveals the global diversity of the Plastisphere</atitle><jtitle>The ISME Journal</jtitle><stitle>ISME J</stitle><addtitle>ISME J</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>789</spage><epage>806</epage><pages>789-806</pages><issn>1751-7362</issn><eissn>1751-7370</eissn><abstract>It is now indisputable that plastics are ubiquitous and problematic in ecosystems globally. Many suggestions have been made about the role that biofilms colonizing plastics in the environment—termed the “Plastisphere”—may play in the transportation and ecological impact of these plastics. By collecting and re-analyzing all raw 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metadata from 2,229 samples within 35 studies, we have performed the first meta-analysis of the Plastisphere in marine, freshwater, other aquatic (e.g., brackish or aquaculture) and terrestrial environments. We show that random forest models can be trained to differentiate between groupings of environmental factors as well as aspects of study design, but—crucially—also between plastics when compared with control biofilms and between different plastic types and community successional stages. Our meta-analysis confirms that potentially biodegrading Plastisphere members, the hydrocarbonoclastic Oceanospirillales and Alteromonadales are consistently more abundant in plastic than control biofilm samples across multiple studies and environments. This indicates the predilection of these organisms for plastics and confirms the urgent need for their ability to biodegrade plastics to be comprehensively tested. We also identified key knowledge gaps that should be addressed by future studies.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>33139870</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41396-020-00814-9</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0562-2610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9008-0697</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-7362
ispartof The ISME Journal, 2021-03, Vol.15 (3), p.789-806
issn 1751-7362
1751-7370
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8027867
source PubMed Central Free; Springer Nature; Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)
subjects 38/23
631/326/171/1818
631/326/171/1878
631/326/2565/2134
631/326/2565/855
704/158/855
Aquaculture
Biofilms
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Ecology
Ecosystem
Environmental factors
Evolutionary Biology
Gene sequencing
Life Sciences
Meta-analysis
Microbial Ecology
Microbial Genetics and Genomics
Microbiology
Plastics
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
rRNA 16S
Terrestrial environments
title Food or just a free ride? A meta-analysis reveals the global diversity of the Plastisphere
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A57%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Food%20or%20just%20a%20free%20ride?%20A%20meta-analysis%20reveals%20the%20global%20diversity%20of%20the%20Plastisphere&rft.jtitle=The%20ISME%20Journal&rft.au=Wright,%20Robyn%20J.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=789&rft.epage=806&rft.pages=789-806&rft.issn=1751-7362&rft.eissn=1751-7370&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41396-020-00814-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2457303826%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f30acc0e8185d47c3d504c71bc84c7a7f2b0514cbbcd231fb62e3f74fa5f8e5a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492787113&rft_id=info:pmid/33139870&rfr_iscdi=true