Leveling the cost and carbon footprint of circular polymers that are chemically recycled to monomer

Mechanical recycling of polymers downgrades them such that they are unusable after a few cycles. Alternatively, chemical recycling to monomer offers a means to recover the embodied chemical feedstocks for remanufacturing. However, only a limited number of commodity polymers may be chemically recycle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science advances 2021-04, Vol.7 (15)
Main Authors: Vora, Nemi, Christensen, Peter R, Demarteau, Jérémy, Baral, Nawa Raj, Keasling, Jay D, Helms, Brett A, Scown, Corinne D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied Sciences and Engineering
INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Materials Science
SciAdv r-articles
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e5b717e803f12f88c565ac4f69f49b92eac672332d12b8661d812b52a7ecf7a03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e5b717e803f12f88c565ac4f69f49b92eac672332d12b8661d812b52a7ecf7a03
container_end_page
container_issue 15
container_start_page
container_title Science advances
container_volume 7
creator Vora, Nemi
Christensen, Peter R
Demarteau, Jérémy
Baral, Nawa Raj
Keasling, Jay D
Helms, Brett A
Scown, Corinne D
description Mechanical recycling of polymers downgrades them such that they are unusable after a few cycles. Alternatively, chemical recycling to monomer offers a means to recover the embodied chemical feedstocks for remanufacturing. However, only a limited number of commodity polymers may be chemically recycled, and the processes remain resource intensive. We use systems analysis to quantify the costs and life-cycle carbon footprints of virgin and chemically recycled polydiketoenamines (PDKs), next-generation polymers that depolymerize under ambient conditions in strong acid. The cost of producing virgin PDK resin using unoptimized processes is ~30-fold higher than recycling them, and the cost of recycled PDK resin ($1.5 kg ) is on par with PET and HDPE, and below that of polyurethanes. Virgin resin production is carbon intensive (86 kg CO e kg ), while chemical recycling emits only 2 kg CO e kg This cost and emissions disparity provides a strong incentive to recover and recycle future polymer waste.
doi_str_mv 10.1126/SCIADV.ABF0187
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8034859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2511242061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e5b717e803f12f88c565ac4f69f49b92eac672332d12b8661d812b52a7ecf7a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtvEzEUhUcIRKvSLUtksWKT1I_x2LNBCoHSSpFY8NhanjvXzSCPHWwnUv49jlKqsvKV_J1zfH2a5i2jS8Z4d_N9fb_6_Gu5-nRLmVYvmksulFxw2eqXz-aL5jrn35RS1nadZP3r5kIILRTV_LKBDR7QT-GBlC0SiLkQG0YCNg0xEBdj2aUpFBIdgSnB3ttEdtEfZ0y5SmzFU9VtcZ7Aen8kCeEIHkdSIpljiBV807xy1me8fjyvmp-3X36s7xabb1_v16vNAlqmygLloJhCTYVj3GkNspMWWtf1ru2HnqOFTnEh-Mj4oLuOjboOkluF4JSl4qr5ePbd7YcZR8BQkvWmLjDbdDTRTub_mzBtzUM8mBrZatlXg_dng_oNk8kwFYQtxBAQimFKSaZ1hT48pqT4Z4-5mHnKgN7bgHGfDZe1m5bTjlV0eUYhxZwTuqe3MGpODZ4y7HgwdnCnBqvg3fMNnvB_fYm_-HGZpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511242061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leveling the cost and carbon footprint of circular polymers that are chemically recycled to monomer</title><source>American Association for the Advancement of Science</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Vora, Nemi ; Christensen, Peter R ; Demarteau, Jérémy ; Baral, Nawa Raj ; Keasling, Jay D ; Helms, Brett A ; Scown, Corinne D</creator><creatorcontrib>Vora, Nemi ; Christensen, Peter R ; Demarteau, Jérémy ; Baral, Nawa Raj ; Keasling, Jay D ; Helms, Brett A ; Scown, Corinne D ; Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Mechanical recycling of polymers downgrades them such that they are unusable after a few cycles. Alternatively, chemical recycling to monomer offers a means to recover the embodied chemical feedstocks for remanufacturing. However, only a limited number of commodity polymers may be chemically recycled, and the processes remain resource intensive. We use systems analysis to quantify the costs and life-cycle carbon footprints of virgin and chemically recycled polydiketoenamines (PDKs), next-generation polymers that depolymerize under ambient conditions in strong acid. The cost of producing virgin PDK resin using unoptimized processes is ~30-fold higher than recycling them, and the cost of recycled PDK resin ($1.5 kg ) is on par with PET and HDPE, and below that of polyurethanes. Virgin resin production is carbon intensive (86 kg CO e kg ), while chemical recycling emits only 2 kg CO e kg This cost and emissions disparity provides a strong incentive to recover and recycle future polymer waste.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2375-2548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2375-2548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/SCIADV.ABF0187</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33837082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)</publisher><subject>Applied Sciences and Engineering ; INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY ; Materials Science ; SciAdv r-articles</subject><ispartof>Science advances, 2021-04, Vol.7 (15)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY). 2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e5b717e803f12f88c565ac4f69f49b92eac672332d12b8661d812b52a7ecf7a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e5b717e803f12f88c565ac4f69f49b92eac672332d12b8661d812b52a7ecf7a03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0311-3575 ; 0000-0002-7359-6728 ; 0000-0003-4170-6088 ; 0000-0003-2078-1126 ; 0000-0002-0942-9183 ; 0000-0003-3925-4174 ; 0000000203113575 ; 0000000339254174 ; 0000000273596728 ; 0000000320781126 ; 0000000341706088 ; 0000000209429183</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034859/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034859/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,2884,2885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33837082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1775188$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vora, Nemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demarteau, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baral, Nawa Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keasling, Jay D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Brett A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scown, Corinne D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Leveling the cost and carbon footprint of circular polymers that are chemically recycled to monomer</title><title>Science advances</title><addtitle>Sci Adv</addtitle><description>Mechanical recycling of polymers downgrades them such that they are unusable after a few cycles. Alternatively, chemical recycling to monomer offers a means to recover the embodied chemical feedstocks for remanufacturing. However, only a limited number of commodity polymers may be chemically recycled, and the processes remain resource intensive. We use systems analysis to quantify the costs and life-cycle carbon footprints of virgin and chemically recycled polydiketoenamines (PDKs), next-generation polymers that depolymerize under ambient conditions in strong acid. The cost of producing virgin PDK resin using unoptimized processes is ~30-fold higher than recycling them, and the cost of recycled PDK resin ($1.5 kg ) is on par with PET and HDPE, and below that of polyurethanes. Virgin resin production is carbon intensive (86 kg CO e kg ), while chemical recycling emits only 2 kg CO e kg This cost and emissions disparity provides a strong incentive to recover and recycle future polymer waste.</description><subject>Applied Sciences and Engineering</subject><subject>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>SciAdv r-articles</subject><issn>2375-2548</issn><issn>2375-2548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUtvEzEUhUcIRKvSLUtksWKT1I_x2LNBCoHSSpFY8NhanjvXzSCPHWwnUv49jlKqsvKV_J1zfH2a5i2jS8Z4d_N9fb_6_Gu5-nRLmVYvmksulFxw2eqXz-aL5jrn35RS1nadZP3r5kIILRTV_LKBDR7QT-GBlC0SiLkQG0YCNg0xEBdj2aUpFBIdgSnB3ttEdtEfZ0y5SmzFU9VtcZ7Aen8kCeEIHkdSIpljiBV807xy1me8fjyvmp-3X36s7xabb1_v16vNAlqmygLloJhCTYVj3GkNspMWWtf1ru2HnqOFTnEh-Mj4oLuOjboOkluF4JSl4qr5ePbd7YcZR8BQkvWmLjDbdDTRTub_mzBtzUM8mBrZatlXg_dng_oNk8kwFYQtxBAQimFKSaZ1hT48pqT4Z4-5mHnKgN7bgHGfDZe1m5bTjlV0eUYhxZwTuqe3MGpODZ4y7HgwdnCnBqvg3fMNnvB_fYm_-HGZpw</recordid><startdate>20210409</startdate><enddate>20210409</enddate><creator>Vora, Nemi</creator><creator>Christensen, Peter R</creator><creator>Demarteau, Jérémy</creator><creator>Baral, Nawa Raj</creator><creator>Keasling, Jay D</creator><creator>Helms, Brett A</creator><creator>Scown, Corinne D</creator><general>American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)</general><general>American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0311-3575</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7359-6728</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4170-6088</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2078-1126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0942-9183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3925-4174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000203113575</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000339254174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000273596728</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000320781126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000341706088</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000209429183</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210409</creationdate><title>Leveling the cost and carbon footprint of circular polymers that are chemically recycled to monomer</title><author>Vora, Nemi ; Christensen, Peter R ; Demarteau, Jérémy ; Baral, Nawa Raj ; Keasling, Jay D ; Helms, Brett A ; Scown, Corinne D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e5b717e803f12f88c565ac4f69f49b92eac672332d12b8661d812b52a7ecf7a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Applied Sciences and Engineering</topic><topic>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>SciAdv r-articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vora, Nemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demarteau, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baral, Nawa Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keasling, Jay D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Brett A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scown, Corinne D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Science advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vora, Nemi</au><au>Christensen, Peter R</au><au>Demarteau, Jérémy</au><au>Baral, Nawa Raj</au><au>Keasling, Jay D</au><au>Helms, Brett A</au><au>Scown, Corinne D</au><aucorp>Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leveling the cost and carbon footprint of circular polymers that are chemically recycled to monomer</atitle><jtitle>Science advances</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Adv</addtitle><date>2021-04-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>15</issue><issn>2375-2548</issn><eissn>2375-2548</eissn><abstract>Mechanical recycling of polymers downgrades them such that they are unusable after a few cycles. Alternatively, chemical recycling to monomer offers a means to recover the embodied chemical feedstocks for remanufacturing. However, only a limited number of commodity polymers may be chemically recycled, and the processes remain resource intensive. We use systems analysis to quantify the costs and life-cycle carbon footprints of virgin and chemically recycled polydiketoenamines (PDKs), next-generation polymers that depolymerize under ambient conditions in strong acid. The cost of producing virgin PDK resin using unoptimized processes is ~30-fold higher than recycling them, and the cost of recycled PDK resin ($1.5 kg ) is on par with PET and HDPE, and below that of polyurethanes. Virgin resin production is carbon intensive (86 kg CO e kg ), while chemical recycling emits only 2 kg CO e kg This cost and emissions disparity provides a strong incentive to recover and recycle future polymer waste.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)</pub><pmid>33837082</pmid><doi>10.1126/SCIADV.ABF0187</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0311-3575</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7359-6728</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4170-6088</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2078-1126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0942-9183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3925-4174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000203113575</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000339254174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000273596728</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000320781126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000341706088</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000209429183</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2375-2548
ispartof Science advances, 2021-04, Vol.7 (15)
issn 2375-2548
2375-2548
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8034859
source American Association for the Advancement of Science; PubMed Central
subjects Applied Sciences and Engineering
INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Materials Science
SciAdv r-articles
title Leveling the cost and carbon footprint of circular polymers that are chemically recycled to monomer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A27%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leveling%20the%20cost%20and%20carbon%20footprint%20of%20circular%20polymers%20that%20are%20chemically%20recycled%20to%20monomer&rft.jtitle=Science%20advances&rft.au=Vora,%20Nemi&rft.aucorp=Lawrence%20Berkeley%20National%20Lab.%20(LBNL),%20Berkeley,%20CA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2021-04-09&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=15&rft.issn=2375-2548&rft.eissn=2375-2548&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/SCIADV.ABF0187&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2511242061%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e5b717e803f12f88c565ac4f69f49b92eac672332d12b8661d812b52a7ecf7a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511242061&rft_id=info:pmid/33837082&rfr_iscdi=true