Failure to replicate a robust Down syndrome advantage for maternal well‐being

• Published in: Journal of intellectual disability research 2021-03, Vol.65 (3), p.262-271
• Main Authors: Jess, M., Flynn, S., Bailey, T., Hastings, R. P., Totsika, V.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Advantages; Caregiving; Children & youth; Children with disabilities; Down syndrome; Down syndrome advantage; Effect Size; Families & family life; Family (Sociological Unit); Intellectual disabilities; intellectual disability; Life satisfaction; Mental health; Mothers; Original Manuscript; Original Manuscripts; Poverty; Psychological distress; psychological well‐being; Relatives
• ISSN: 0964-2633; 1365-2788
• DOI: 10.1111/jir.12808

Background Family members caring for children with intellectual disability (ID) routinely report heightened levels of psychological distress. However, families of children with Down syndrome typically report better outcomes (known as the Down syndrome advantage). We examined whether the Down syndrome advantage would be present for maternal psychological distress, impact of caregiving, life satisfaction and perceived positive impact of the child with ID when controlling for external variables. Methods Mothers of children with Down syndrome (n = 111) and mothers of children with ID of mixed aetiologies (n = 196) completed measures about their own mental health, perceived impact of caregiving, life satisfaction and perceived positive impact of their child on themselves and the family unit. Results A series of group comparisons revealed small to moderate differences supporting the presence of a putative Down syndrome advantage in relation to personal maternal well‐being outcomes. However, when child‐related characteristics and external variables were controlled, the Down syndrome advantage was no longer present, with reduced, small effect sizes observed for all maternal outcomes. Conclusions Initial group differences in psychological distress and life satisfaction were largely associated with family poverty, indicating that the Down syndrome advantage may be less robust than previously thought. Future research should seek to move beyond examining the existence of the putative Down syndrome advantage and focus on how families of children with Down syndrome experience family life, including longitudinal research exploring responses to life cycle and transition challenges.