Loading…

Cloud Occurrences and Cloud Radiative Effects (CREs) from CCCM and CloudSat Radar-Lidar Products

Two kinds of radar-lidar synergy cloud products are compared and analyzed in this study; CERES-CALIPSO-CloudSat-MODIS (CCCM) product and CloudSat radar-lidar (RL) product such as GEOPROF-LIDAR and FLXHR-LIDAR. Compared to GEOPROF-LIDAR, CCCM has more low-level (< 1 km) clouds over tropical oceans...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2017-08, Vol.122 (16), p.8852-8884
Main Authors: Ham, Seung-Hee, Kato, Seiji, Rose, Fred G, Winker, David, L'Ecuyer, Tristan, Mace, Gerald G, Painemal, David, Sun-Mack, Sunny, Chen, Yan, Miller, Walter F
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 8884
container_issue 16
container_start_page 8852
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres
container_volume 122
creator Ham, Seung-Hee
Kato, Seiji
Rose, Fred G
Winker, David
L'Ecuyer, Tristan
Mace, Gerald G
Painemal, David
Sun-Mack, Sunny
Chen, Yan
Miller, Walter F
description Two kinds of radar-lidar synergy cloud products are compared and analyzed in this study; CERES-CALIPSO-CloudSat-MODIS (CCCM) product and CloudSat radar-lidar (RL) product such as GEOPROF-LIDAR and FLXHR-LIDAR. Compared to GEOPROF-LIDAR, CCCM has more low-level (< 1 km) clouds over tropical oceans because CCCM uses a more relaxed threshold of Cloud-Aerosol Discrimination (CAD) score for Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) vertical feature mask (VFM) product. In contrast, GEOPROF-LIDAR has more mid-level (1-8 km) clouds than CCCM at high latitudes (> 40°). The difference occurs when hydrometeors are detected by CALIPSO lidar but are undetected by CloudSat radar, which may be related to precipitation. In the comparison of cloud radiative effects (CREs), global mean differences between CCCM and FLXHR-LIDAR are mostly smaller than 5 W m , while noticeable regional differences are found over three regions. First, CCCM has larger shortwave (SW) and longwave (LW) CREs than FXLHR-LIDAR along the west coasts of Africa and America. This might be caused by missing small-scale marine boundary layer clouds in FLXHR-LIDAR. Second, over tropical oceans where precipitation frequently occurs, SW and LW CREs from FLXHR-LIDAR are larger than those from CCCM partly because FLXHR-LIDAR algorithm includes the contribution of rainwater to total liquid water path. Third, over midlatitude storm-track regions, CCCM shows larger SW and LW CREs than FLXHR-LIDAR, due to CCCM biases caused by larger cloud optical depth or higher cloud effective height.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2017JD026725
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8051179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2515070414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1119-6d35925302bbc89cf8fb28f32f4eb5f775e438b0ae548b0a4740865b3b0437bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUEtLAzEQDqJYqb15lhzrYTXPTfYiyFpfVCpVwduaZBNd2UdNdgv-e7e0Vp3DfMPM94AB4AijU4wQOSMIi7tLRGJB-A44IDhOIpkk8e52Fi8DMArhA_UlEWWc7YMBpTKWUtID8JqWTZfDmTGd97Y2NkBV53C9nau8UG2xtHDinDVtgON0Pgkn0Pmmgmma3v-SH1W74isfTYu-wwff5F0vOQR7TpXBjjY4BM9Xk6f0JprOrm_Ti2m0wBgnUZxTnhBOEdHayMQ46TSRjhLHrOZOCG4ZlRopy9kKmGBIxlxTjRgV2tAhOF_7Ljpd2dzYuvWqzBa-qJT_yhpVZP8vdfGevTXLTCKOsUh6g_HGwDefnQ1tVhXB2LJUtW26kBGOORKIYdZTj_9mbUN-3kq_AbJkeVE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2515070414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cloud Occurrences and Cloud Radiative Effects (CREs) from CCCM and CloudSat Radar-Lidar Products</title><source>Wiley</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ham, Seung-Hee ; Kato, Seiji ; Rose, Fred G ; Winker, David ; L'Ecuyer, Tristan ; Mace, Gerald G ; Painemal, David ; Sun-Mack, Sunny ; Chen, Yan ; Miller, Walter F</creator><creatorcontrib>Ham, Seung-Hee ; Kato, Seiji ; Rose, Fred G ; Winker, David ; L'Ecuyer, Tristan ; Mace, Gerald G ; Painemal, David ; Sun-Mack, Sunny ; Chen, Yan ; Miller, Walter F</creatorcontrib><description>Two kinds of radar-lidar synergy cloud products are compared and analyzed in this study; CERES-CALIPSO-CloudSat-MODIS (CCCM) product and CloudSat radar-lidar (RL) product such as GEOPROF-LIDAR and FLXHR-LIDAR. Compared to GEOPROF-LIDAR, CCCM has more low-level (&lt; 1 km) clouds over tropical oceans because CCCM uses a more relaxed threshold of Cloud-Aerosol Discrimination (CAD) score for Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) vertical feature mask (VFM) product. In contrast, GEOPROF-LIDAR has more mid-level (1-8 km) clouds than CCCM at high latitudes (&gt; 40°). The difference occurs when hydrometeors are detected by CALIPSO lidar but are undetected by CloudSat radar, which may be related to precipitation. In the comparison of cloud radiative effects (CREs), global mean differences between CCCM and FLXHR-LIDAR are mostly smaller than 5 W m , while noticeable regional differences are found over three regions. First, CCCM has larger shortwave (SW) and longwave (LW) CREs than FXLHR-LIDAR along the west coasts of Africa and America. This might be caused by missing small-scale marine boundary layer clouds in FLXHR-LIDAR. Second, over tropical oceans where precipitation frequently occurs, SW and LW CREs from FLXHR-LIDAR are larger than those from CCCM partly because FLXHR-LIDAR algorithm includes the contribution of rainwater to total liquid water path. Third, over midlatitude storm-track regions, CCCM shows larger SW and LW CREs than FLXHR-LIDAR, due to CCCM biases caused by larger cloud optical depth or higher cloud effective height.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2017JD026725</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33868883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2017-08, Vol.122 (16), p.8852-8884</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ham, Seung-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Seiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Fred G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winker, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>L'Ecuyer, Tristan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mace, Gerald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painemal, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun-Mack, Sunny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Walter F</creatorcontrib><title>Cloud Occurrences and Cloud Radiative Effects (CREs) from CCCM and CloudSat Radar-Lidar Products</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J Geophys Res Atmos</addtitle><description>Two kinds of radar-lidar synergy cloud products are compared and analyzed in this study; CERES-CALIPSO-CloudSat-MODIS (CCCM) product and CloudSat radar-lidar (RL) product such as GEOPROF-LIDAR and FLXHR-LIDAR. Compared to GEOPROF-LIDAR, CCCM has more low-level (&lt; 1 km) clouds over tropical oceans because CCCM uses a more relaxed threshold of Cloud-Aerosol Discrimination (CAD) score for Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) vertical feature mask (VFM) product. In contrast, GEOPROF-LIDAR has more mid-level (1-8 km) clouds than CCCM at high latitudes (&gt; 40°). The difference occurs when hydrometeors are detected by CALIPSO lidar but are undetected by CloudSat radar, which may be related to precipitation. In the comparison of cloud radiative effects (CREs), global mean differences between CCCM and FLXHR-LIDAR are mostly smaller than 5 W m , while noticeable regional differences are found over three regions. First, CCCM has larger shortwave (SW) and longwave (LW) CREs than FXLHR-LIDAR along the west coasts of Africa and America. This might be caused by missing small-scale marine boundary layer clouds in FLXHR-LIDAR. Second, over tropical oceans where precipitation frequently occurs, SW and LW CREs from FLXHR-LIDAR are larger than those from CCCM partly because FLXHR-LIDAR algorithm includes the contribution of rainwater to total liquid water path. Third, over midlatitude storm-track regions, CCCM shows larger SW and LW CREs than FLXHR-LIDAR, due to CCCM biases caused by larger cloud optical depth or higher cloud effective height.</description><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUEtLAzEQDqJYqb15lhzrYTXPTfYiyFpfVCpVwduaZBNd2UdNdgv-e7e0Vp3DfMPM94AB4AijU4wQOSMIi7tLRGJB-A44IDhOIpkk8e52Fi8DMArhA_UlEWWc7YMBpTKWUtID8JqWTZfDmTGd97Y2NkBV53C9nau8UG2xtHDinDVtgON0Pgkn0Pmmgmma3v-SH1W74isfTYu-wwff5F0vOQR7TpXBjjY4BM9Xk6f0JprOrm_Ti2m0wBgnUZxTnhBOEdHayMQ46TSRjhLHrOZOCG4ZlRopy9kKmGBIxlxTjRgV2tAhOF_7Ljpd2dzYuvWqzBa-qJT_yhpVZP8vdfGevTXLTCKOsUh6g_HGwDefnQ1tVhXB2LJUtW26kBGOORKIYdZTj_9mbUN-3kq_AbJkeVE</recordid><startdate>20170827</startdate><enddate>20170827</enddate><creator>Ham, Seung-Hee</creator><creator>Kato, Seiji</creator><creator>Rose, Fred G</creator><creator>Winker, David</creator><creator>L'Ecuyer, Tristan</creator><creator>Mace, Gerald G</creator><creator>Painemal, David</creator><creator>Sun-Mack, Sunny</creator><creator>Chen, Yan</creator><creator>Miller, Walter F</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170827</creationdate><title>Cloud Occurrences and Cloud Radiative Effects (CREs) from CCCM and CloudSat Radar-Lidar Products</title><author>Ham, Seung-Hee ; Kato, Seiji ; Rose, Fred G ; Winker, David ; L'Ecuyer, Tristan ; Mace, Gerald G ; Painemal, David ; Sun-Mack, Sunny ; Chen, Yan ; Miller, Walter F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1119-6d35925302bbc89cf8fb28f32f4eb5f775e438b0ae548b0a4740865b3b0437bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ham, Seung-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Seiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Fred G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winker, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>L'Ecuyer, Tristan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mace, Gerald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painemal, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun-Mack, Sunny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Walter F</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ham, Seung-Hee</au><au>Kato, Seiji</au><au>Rose, Fred G</au><au>Winker, David</au><au>L'Ecuyer, Tristan</au><au>Mace, Gerald G</au><au>Painemal, David</au><au>Sun-Mack, Sunny</au><au>Chen, Yan</au><au>Miller, Walter F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cloud Occurrences and Cloud Radiative Effects (CREs) from CCCM and CloudSat Radar-Lidar Products</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J Geophys Res Atmos</addtitle><date>2017-08-27</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>8852</spage><epage>8884</epage><pages>8852-8884</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Two kinds of radar-lidar synergy cloud products are compared and analyzed in this study; CERES-CALIPSO-CloudSat-MODIS (CCCM) product and CloudSat radar-lidar (RL) product such as GEOPROF-LIDAR and FLXHR-LIDAR. Compared to GEOPROF-LIDAR, CCCM has more low-level (&lt; 1 km) clouds over tropical oceans because CCCM uses a more relaxed threshold of Cloud-Aerosol Discrimination (CAD) score for Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) vertical feature mask (VFM) product. In contrast, GEOPROF-LIDAR has more mid-level (1-8 km) clouds than CCCM at high latitudes (&gt; 40°). The difference occurs when hydrometeors are detected by CALIPSO lidar but are undetected by CloudSat radar, which may be related to precipitation. In the comparison of cloud radiative effects (CREs), global mean differences between CCCM and FLXHR-LIDAR are mostly smaller than 5 W m , while noticeable regional differences are found over three regions. First, CCCM has larger shortwave (SW) and longwave (LW) CREs than FXLHR-LIDAR along the west coasts of Africa and America. This might be caused by missing small-scale marine boundary layer clouds in FLXHR-LIDAR. Second, over tropical oceans where precipitation frequently occurs, SW and LW CREs from FLXHR-LIDAR are larger than those from CCCM partly because FLXHR-LIDAR algorithm includes the contribution of rainwater to total liquid water path. Third, over midlatitude storm-track regions, CCCM shows larger SW and LW CREs than FLXHR-LIDAR, due to CCCM biases caused by larger cloud optical depth or higher cloud effective height.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33868883</pmid><doi>10.1002/2017JD026725</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-897X
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2017-08, Vol.122 (16), p.8852-8884
issn 2169-897X
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8051179
source Wiley; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Cloud Occurrences and Cloud Radiative Effects (CREs) from CCCM and CloudSat Radar-Lidar Products
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A25%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cloud%20Occurrences%20and%20Cloud%20Radiative%20Effects%20(CREs)%20from%20CCCM%20and%20CloudSat%20Radar-Lidar%20Products&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Ham,%20Seung-Hee&rft.date=2017-08-27&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=8852&rft.epage=8884&rft.pages=8852-8884&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2017JD026725&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2515070414%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1119-6d35925302bbc89cf8fb28f32f4eb5f775e438b0ae548b0a4740865b3b0437bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2515070414&rft_id=info:pmid/33868883&rfr_iscdi=true