Loading…
Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection
Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy 2021-07, Vol.27 (7), p.1058-1062 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823 |
container_end_page | 1062 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1058 |
container_title | Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Uwamino, Yoshifumi Nagata, Mika Aoki, Wataru Nakagawa, Terumichi Inose, Rika Yokota, Hiromitsu Furusawa, Yuri Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko Kawaoka, Yoshihiro Hasegawa, Naoki Murata, Mitsuru |
description | Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD for testing of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with the RT-PCR tests and viral culture for detecting viable virus.
One hundred seventeen nasopharyngeal swab specimens and 73 saliva samples with positive results on RT-PCR were used. Residual samples were assayed using a commercially available RAD test immediately, and its positivity was determined at various time points during the clinical course. The concordance between 54 nasopharyngeal swab samples and saliva samples that were collected simultaneously was determined. Viral culture was performed on 117 samples and compared with the results of the RAD test.
The positive rate of RAD test using saliva samples was low throughout the clinical course. Poor concordance was observed between nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples (75.9%, kappa coefficient 0.310). However, a substantially high concordance between the RAD test and viral culture was observed in both nasopharyngeal swab specimens (86.8%, kappa coefficient 0.680) and saliva samples (95.1%, kappa coefficient 0.643).
The sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD test was insufficient, particularly for saliva samples. However, a substantially high concordance with viral culture suggests its potential utility as an auxiliary test for estimating SARS-CoV-2 viability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.04.010 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8052479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1341321X21001173</els_id><sourcerecordid>2521496319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRAVLYUfYIG8ZJPUjzxsCSGNRgUqVWo1LYid5dg3Mx4ldrCTqfo7fCmeTltgw-pa8nnde7LsHcEFwaQ-2xZbq3RBMSUFLgtM8IvshJSsyZuG45fpzUqSM0p-HGevY9xiTJqK81fZMWOClYLik-zXQus5KH2PfIeCGq1Byk12DQ4ZmEBP1js0QZxQ5wNyKvpxo8K9W4PqUbxTLYojaDuAi4loUFS93ak0hrGHiKxD2g-jCjYmnTs7bdDqNr9erh7AOxuSip77aQ7wYHCzWN3kS_89p3_s32RHneojvH2cp9m3z-e3y6_55dWXi-XiMtdlI6bcCFMLUeuKE8OFrg2olpekqylrSwUd56xTmpuOt3XV1m3DK1YJagxpjBGcstPs00F3nNsBjAY3pXhyDHZIG0uvrPz3x9mNXPud5LiiKUIS-PAoEPzPOd1MDjZq6HvlwM9R0oqSUtSM7KH0ANXBxxige7YhWO7LlVu5L1fuy5W4lKncRHr_d8BnylObCfDxAIB0pp2FIKO24DQYG9ItpfH2f_q_AQ_fueg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2521496319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Uwamino, Yoshifumi ; Nagata, Mika ; Aoki, Wataru ; Nakagawa, Terumichi ; Inose, Rika ; Yokota, Hiromitsu ; Furusawa, Yuri ; Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko ; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko ; Kawaoka, Yoshihiro ; Hasegawa, Naoki ; Murata, Mitsuru</creator><creatorcontrib>Uwamino, Yoshifumi ; Nagata, Mika ; Aoki, Wataru ; Nakagawa, Terumichi ; Inose, Rika ; Yokota, Hiromitsu ; Furusawa, Yuri ; Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko ; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko ; Kawaoka, Yoshihiro ; Hasegawa, Naoki ; Murata, Mitsuru ; Keio Donner Project Members</creatorcontrib><description>Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD for testing of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with the RT-PCR tests and viral culture for detecting viable virus.
One hundred seventeen nasopharyngeal swab specimens and 73 saliva samples with positive results on RT-PCR were used. Residual samples were assayed using a commercially available RAD test immediately, and its positivity was determined at various time points during the clinical course. The concordance between 54 nasopharyngeal swab samples and saliva samples that were collected simultaneously was determined. Viral culture was performed on 117 samples and compared with the results of the RAD test.
The positive rate of RAD test using saliva samples was low throughout the clinical course. Poor concordance was observed between nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples (75.9%, kappa coefficient 0.310). However, a substantially high concordance between the RAD test and viral culture was observed in both nasopharyngeal swab specimens (86.8%, kappa coefficient 0.680) and saliva samples (95.1%, kappa coefficient 0.643).
The sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD test was insufficient, particularly for saliva samples. However, a substantially high concordance with viral culture suggests its potential utility as an auxiliary test for estimating SARS-CoV-2 viability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-321X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-7780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.04.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33934920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; Humans ; Nasopharyngeal swabs ; Nasopharynx ; Original ; Rapid antigen detection test ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Saliva ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Viral culture</subject><ispartof>Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2021-07, Vol.27 (7), p.1058-1062</ispartof><rights>2021 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2021 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9398-9599 ; 0000-0002-8266-020X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uwamino, Yoshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Terumichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inose, Rika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokota, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furusawa, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaoka, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keio Donner Project Members</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection</title><title>Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J Infect Chemother</addtitle><description>Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD for testing of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with the RT-PCR tests and viral culture for detecting viable virus.
One hundred seventeen nasopharyngeal swab specimens and 73 saliva samples with positive results on RT-PCR were used. Residual samples were assayed using a commercially available RAD test immediately, and its positivity was determined at various time points during the clinical course. The concordance between 54 nasopharyngeal swab samples and saliva samples that were collected simultaneously was determined. Viral culture was performed on 117 samples and compared with the results of the RAD test.
The positive rate of RAD test using saliva samples was low throughout the clinical course. Poor concordance was observed between nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples (75.9%, kappa coefficient 0.310). However, a substantially high concordance between the RAD test and viral culture was observed in both nasopharyngeal swab specimens (86.8%, kappa coefficient 0.680) and saliva samples (95.1%, kappa coefficient 0.643).
The sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD test was insufficient, particularly for saliva samples. However, a substantially high concordance with viral culture suggests its potential utility as an auxiliary test for estimating SARS-CoV-2 viability.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nasopharyngeal swabs</subject><subject>Nasopharynx</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Rapid antigen detection test</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Viral culture</subject><issn>1341-321X</issn><issn>1437-7780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRAVLYUfYIG8ZJPUjzxsCSGNRgUqVWo1LYid5dg3Mx4ldrCTqfo7fCmeTltgw-pa8nnde7LsHcEFwaQ-2xZbq3RBMSUFLgtM8IvshJSsyZuG45fpzUqSM0p-HGevY9xiTJqK81fZMWOClYLik-zXQus5KH2PfIeCGq1Byk12DQ4ZmEBP1js0QZxQ5wNyKvpxo8K9W4PqUbxTLYojaDuAi4loUFS93ak0hrGHiKxD2g-jCjYmnTs7bdDqNr9erh7AOxuSip77aQ7wYHCzWN3kS_89p3_s32RHneojvH2cp9m3z-e3y6_55dWXi-XiMtdlI6bcCFMLUeuKE8OFrg2olpekqylrSwUd56xTmpuOt3XV1m3DK1YJagxpjBGcstPs00F3nNsBjAY3pXhyDHZIG0uvrPz3x9mNXPud5LiiKUIS-PAoEPzPOd1MDjZq6HvlwM9R0oqSUtSM7KH0ANXBxxige7YhWO7LlVu5L1fuy5W4lKncRHr_d8BnylObCfDxAIB0pp2FIKO24DQYG9ItpfH2f_q_AQ_fueg</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Uwamino, Yoshifumi</creator><creator>Nagata, Mika</creator><creator>Aoki, Wataru</creator><creator>Nakagawa, Terumichi</creator><creator>Inose, Rika</creator><creator>Yokota, Hiromitsu</creator><creator>Furusawa, Yuri</creator><creator>Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko</creator><creator>Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko</creator><creator>Kawaoka, Yoshihiro</creator><creator>Hasegawa, Naoki</creator><creator>Murata, Mitsuru</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9398-9599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8266-020X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection</title><author>Uwamino, Yoshifumi ; Nagata, Mika ; Aoki, Wataru ; Nakagawa, Terumichi ; Inose, Rika ; Yokota, Hiromitsu ; Furusawa, Yuri ; Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko ; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko ; Kawaoka, Yoshihiro ; Hasegawa, Naoki ; Murata, Mitsuru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nasopharyngeal swabs</topic><topic>Nasopharynx</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Rapid antigen detection test</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Viral culture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uwamino, Yoshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Terumichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inose, Rika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokota, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furusawa, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaoka, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keio Donner Project Members</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uwamino, Yoshifumi</au><au>Nagata, Mika</au><au>Aoki, Wataru</au><au>Nakagawa, Terumichi</au><au>Inose, Rika</au><au>Yokota, Hiromitsu</au><au>Furusawa, Yuri</au><au>Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko</au><au>Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko</au><au>Kawaoka, Yoshihiro</au><au>Hasegawa, Naoki</au><au>Murata, Mitsuru</au><aucorp>Keio Donner Project Members</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Infect Chemother</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1058</spage><epage>1062</epage><pages>1058-1062</pages><issn>1341-321X</issn><eissn>1437-7780</eissn><abstract>Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD for testing of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with the RT-PCR tests and viral culture for detecting viable virus.
One hundred seventeen nasopharyngeal swab specimens and 73 saliva samples with positive results on RT-PCR were used. Residual samples were assayed using a commercially available RAD test immediately, and its positivity was determined at various time points during the clinical course. The concordance between 54 nasopharyngeal swab samples and saliva samples that were collected simultaneously was determined. Viral culture was performed on 117 samples and compared with the results of the RAD test.
The positive rate of RAD test using saliva samples was low throughout the clinical course. Poor concordance was observed between nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples (75.9%, kappa coefficient 0.310). However, a substantially high concordance between the RAD test and viral culture was observed in both nasopharyngeal swab specimens (86.8%, kappa coefficient 0.680) and saliva samples (95.1%, kappa coefficient 0.643).
The sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD test was insufficient, particularly for saliva samples. However, a substantially high concordance with viral culture suggests its potential utility as an auxiliary test for estimating SARS-CoV-2 viability.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33934920</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jiac.2021.04.010</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9398-9599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8266-020X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1341-321X |
ispartof | Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2021-07, Vol.27 (7), p.1058-1062 |
issn | 1341-321X 1437-7780 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8052479 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | COVID-19 Humans Nasopharyngeal swabs Nasopharynx Original Rapid antigen detection test Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Saliva SARS-CoV-2 Viral culture |
title | Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A31%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20rapid%20antigen%20detection%20test%20for%20nasopharyngeal%20swab%20specimens%20and%20saliva%20samples%20in%20comparison%20with%20RT-PCR%20and%20viral%20culture%20for%20SARS-CoV-2%20detection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20infection%20and%20chemotherapy%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20Japan%20Society%20of%20Chemotherapy&rft.au=Uwamino,%20Yoshifumi&rft.aucorp=Keio%20Donner%20Project%20Members&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1058&rft.epage=1062&rft.pages=1058-1062&rft.issn=1341-321X&rft.eissn=1437-7780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jiac.2021.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2521496319%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2521496319&rft_id=info:pmid/33934920&rfr_iscdi=true |