Loading…

Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection

Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy 2021-07, Vol.27 (7), p.1058-1062
Main Authors: Uwamino, Yoshifumi, Nagata, Mika, Aoki, Wataru, Nakagawa, Terumichi, Inose, Rika, Yokota, Hiromitsu, Furusawa, Yuri, Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko, Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko, Kawaoka, Yoshihiro, Hasegawa, Naoki, Murata, Mitsuru
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823
container_end_page 1062
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1058
container_title Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy
container_volume 27
creator Uwamino, Yoshifumi
Nagata, Mika
Aoki, Wataru
Nakagawa, Terumichi
Inose, Rika
Yokota, Hiromitsu
Furusawa, Yuri
Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko
Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko
Kawaoka, Yoshihiro
Hasegawa, Naoki
Murata, Mitsuru
description Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD for testing of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with the RT-PCR tests and viral culture for detecting viable virus. One hundred seventeen nasopharyngeal swab specimens and 73 saliva samples with positive results on RT-PCR were used. Residual samples were assayed using a commercially available RAD test immediately, and its positivity was determined at various time points during the clinical course. The concordance between 54 nasopharyngeal swab samples and saliva samples that were collected simultaneously was determined. Viral culture was performed on 117 samples and compared with the results of the RAD test. The positive rate of RAD test using saliva samples was low throughout the clinical course. Poor concordance was observed between nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples (75.9%, kappa coefficient 0.310). However, a substantially high concordance between the RAD test and viral culture was observed in both nasopharyngeal swab specimens (86.8%, kappa coefficient 0.680) and saliva samples (95.1%, kappa coefficient 0.643). The sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD test was insufficient, particularly for saliva samples. However, a substantially high concordance with viral culture suggests its potential utility as an auxiliary test for estimating SARS-CoV-2 viability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.04.010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8052479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1341321X21001173</els_id><sourcerecordid>2521496319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRAVLYUfYIG8ZJPUjzxsCSGNRgUqVWo1LYid5dg3Mx4ldrCTqfo7fCmeTltgw-pa8nnde7LsHcEFwaQ-2xZbq3RBMSUFLgtM8IvshJSsyZuG45fpzUqSM0p-HGevY9xiTJqK81fZMWOClYLik-zXQus5KH2PfIeCGq1Byk12DQ4ZmEBP1js0QZxQ5wNyKvpxo8K9W4PqUbxTLYojaDuAi4loUFS93ak0hrGHiKxD2g-jCjYmnTs7bdDqNr9erh7AOxuSip77aQ7wYHCzWN3kS_89p3_s32RHneojvH2cp9m3z-e3y6_55dWXi-XiMtdlI6bcCFMLUeuKE8OFrg2olpekqylrSwUd56xTmpuOt3XV1m3DK1YJagxpjBGcstPs00F3nNsBjAY3pXhyDHZIG0uvrPz3x9mNXPud5LiiKUIS-PAoEPzPOd1MDjZq6HvlwM9R0oqSUtSM7KH0ANXBxxige7YhWO7LlVu5L1fuy5W4lKncRHr_d8BnylObCfDxAIB0pp2FIKO24DQYG9ItpfH2f_q_AQ_fueg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2521496319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Uwamino, Yoshifumi ; Nagata, Mika ; Aoki, Wataru ; Nakagawa, Terumichi ; Inose, Rika ; Yokota, Hiromitsu ; Furusawa, Yuri ; Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko ; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko ; Kawaoka, Yoshihiro ; Hasegawa, Naoki ; Murata, Mitsuru</creator><creatorcontrib>Uwamino, Yoshifumi ; Nagata, Mika ; Aoki, Wataru ; Nakagawa, Terumichi ; Inose, Rika ; Yokota, Hiromitsu ; Furusawa, Yuri ; Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko ; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko ; Kawaoka, Yoshihiro ; Hasegawa, Naoki ; Murata, Mitsuru ; Keio Donner Project Members</creatorcontrib><description>Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD for testing of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with the RT-PCR tests and viral culture for detecting viable virus. One hundred seventeen nasopharyngeal swab specimens and 73 saliva samples with positive results on RT-PCR were used. Residual samples were assayed using a commercially available RAD test immediately, and its positivity was determined at various time points during the clinical course. The concordance between 54 nasopharyngeal swab samples and saliva samples that were collected simultaneously was determined. Viral culture was performed on 117 samples and compared with the results of the RAD test. The positive rate of RAD test using saliva samples was low throughout the clinical course. Poor concordance was observed between nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples (75.9%, kappa coefficient 0.310). However, a substantially high concordance between the RAD test and viral culture was observed in both nasopharyngeal swab specimens (86.8%, kappa coefficient 0.680) and saliva samples (95.1%, kappa coefficient 0.643). The sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD test was insufficient, particularly for saliva samples. However, a substantially high concordance with viral culture suggests its potential utility as an auxiliary test for estimating SARS-CoV-2 viability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-321X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-7780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.04.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33934920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; Humans ; Nasopharyngeal swabs ; Nasopharynx ; Original ; Rapid antigen detection test ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Saliva ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Viral culture</subject><ispartof>Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2021-07, Vol.27 (7), p.1058-1062</ispartof><rights>2021 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2021 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9398-9599 ; 0000-0002-8266-020X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uwamino, Yoshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Terumichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inose, Rika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokota, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furusawa, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaoka, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keio Donner Project Members</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection</title><title>Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J Infect Chemother</addtitle><description>Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD for testing of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with the RT-PCR tests and viral culture for detecting viable virus. One hundred seventeen nasopharyngeal swab specimens and 73 saliva samples with positive results on RT-PCR were used. Residual samples were assayed using a commercially available RAD test immediately, and its positivity was determined at various time points during the clinical course. The concordance between 54 nasopharyngeal swab samples and saliva samples that were collected simultaneously was determined. Viral culture was performed on 117 samples and compared with the results of the RAD test. The positive rate of RAD test using saliva samples was low throughout the clinical course. Poor concordance was observed between nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples (75.9%, kappa coefficient 0.310). However, a substantially high concordance between the RAD test and viral culture was observed in both nasopharyngeal swab specimens (86.8%, kappa coefficient 0.680) and saliva samples (95.1%, kappa coefficient 0.643). The sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD test was insufficient, particularly for saliva samples. However, a substantially high concordance with viral culture suggests its potential utility as an auxiliary test for estimating SARS-CoV-2 viability.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nasopharyngeal swabs</subject><subject>Nasopharynx</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Rapid antigen detection test</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Viral culture</subject><issn>1341-321X</issn><issn>1437-7780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRAVLYUfYIG8ZJPUjzxsCSGNRgUqVWo1LYid5dg3Mx4ldrCTqfo7fCmeTltgw-pa8nnde7LsHcEFwaQ-2xZbq3RBMSUFLgtM8IvshJSsyZuG45fpzUqSM0p-HGevY9xiTJqK81fZMWOClYLik-zXQus5KH2PfIeCGq1Byk12DQ4ZmEBP1js0QZxQ5wNyKvpxo8K9W4PqUbxTLYojaDuAi4loUFS93ak0hrGHiKxD2g-jCjYmnTs7bdDqNr9erh7AOxuSip77aQ7wYHCzWN3kS_89p3_s32RHneojvH2cp9m3z-e3y6_55dWXi-XiMtdlI6bcCFMLUeuKE8OFrg2olpekqylrSwUd56xTmpuOt3XV1m3DK1YJagxpjBGcstPs00F3nNsBjAY3pXhyDHZIG0uvrPz3x9mNXPud5LiiKUIS-PAoEPzPOd1MDjZq6HvlwM9R0oqSUtSM7KH0ANXBxxige7YhWO7LlVu5L1fuy5W4lKncRHr_d8BnylObCfDxAIB0pp2FIKO24DQYG9ItpfH2f_q_AQ_fueg</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Uwamino, Yoshifumi</creator><creator>Nagata, Mika</creator><creator>Aoki, Wataru</creator><creator>Nakagawa, Terumichi</creator><creator>Inose, Rika</creator><creator>Yokota, Hiromitsu</creator><creator>Furusawa, Yuri</creator><creator>Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko</creator><creator>Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko</creator><creator>Kawaoka, Yoshihiro</creator><creator>Hasegawa, Naoki</creator><creator>Murata, Mitsuru</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9398-9599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8266-020X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection</title><author>Uwamino, Yoshifumi ; Nagata, Mika ; Aoki, Wataru ; Nakagawa, Terumichi ; Inose, Rika ; Yokota, Hiromitsu ; Furusawa, Yuri ; Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko ; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko ; Kawaoka, Yoshihiro ; Hasegawa, Naoki ; Murata, Mitsuru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nasopharyngeal swabs</topic><topic>Nasopharynx</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Rapid antigen detection test</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Viral culture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uwamino, Yoshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Terumichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inose, Rika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokota, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furusawa, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaoka, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keio Donner Project Members</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uwamino, Yoshifumi</au><au>Nagata, Mika</au><au>Aoki, Wataru</au><au>Nakagawa, Terumichi</au><au>Inose, Rika</au><au>Yokota, Hiromitsu</au><au>Furusawa, Yuri</au><au>Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko</au><au>Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko</au><au>Kawaoka, Yoshihiro</au><au>Hasegawa, Naoki</au><au>Murata, Mitsuru</au><aucorp>Keio Donner Project Members</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Infect Chemother</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1058</spage><epage>1062</epage><pages>1058-1062</pages><issn>1341-321X</issn><eissn>1437-7780</eissn><abstract>Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD for testing of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with the RT-PCR tests and viral culture for detecting viable virus. One hundred seventeen nasopharyngeal swab specimens and 73 saliva samples with positive results on RT-PCR were used. Residual samples were assayed using a commercially available RAD test immediately, and its positivity was determined at various time points during the clinical course. The concordance between 54 nasopharyngeal swab samples and saliva samples that were collected simultaneously was determined. Viral culture was performed on 117 samples and compared with the results of the RAD test. The positive rate of RAD test using saliva samples was low throughout the clinical course. Poor concordance was observed between nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples (75.9%, kappa coefficient 0.310). However, a substantially high concordance between the RAD test and viral culture was observed in both nasopharyngeal swab specimens (86.8%, kappa coefficient 0.680) and saliva samples (95.1%, kappa coefficient 0.643). The sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD test was insufficient, particularly for saliva samples. However, a substantially high concordance with viral culture suggests its potential utility as an auxiliary test for estimating SARS-CoV-2 viability.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33934920</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jiac.2021.04.010</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9398-9599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8266-020X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1341-321X
ispartof Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2021-07, Vol.27 (7), p.1058-1062
issn 1341-321X
1437-7780
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8052479
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects COVID-19
Humans
Nasopharyngeal swabs
Nasopharynx
Original
Rapid antigen detection test
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Saliva
SARS-CoV-2
Viral culture
title Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A31%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20rapid%20antigen%20detection%20test%20for%20nasopharyngeal%20swab%20specimens%20and%20saliva%20samples%20in%20comparison%20with%20RT-PCR%20and%20viral%20culture%20for%20SARS-CoV-2%20detection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20infection%20and%20chemotherapy%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20Japan%20Society%20of%20Chemotherapy&rft.au=Uwamino,%20Yoshifumi&rft.aucorp=Keio%20Donner%20Project%20Members&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1058&rft.epage=1062&rft.pages=1058-1062&rft.issn=1341-321X&rft.eissn=1437-7780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jiac.2021.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2521496319%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d9d6996c581d89c6deab841f623b4aef883fac8df8b65b6b7853592dd17dd9823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2521496319&rft_id=info:pmid/33934920&rfr_iscdi=true