Occupational Radiation Exposure and Validity of National Dosimetry Registry among Korean Interventional Radiologists

The national dose registry (NDR) contains essential information to help protect radiation workers from radiation-related health risks and to facilitate epidemiological studies. However, direct validation of the reported doses has not been considered. We investigated the validity of the NDR with a pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-04, Vol.18 (8), p.4195
Main Authors: Ko, Seulki, Kim, Kwang Pyo, Cho, Sung Bum, Bang, Ye Jin, Ha, Yae Won, Lee, Won Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dosimeters
Dosimetry
Epidemiology
Health risk assessment
Health risks
Job classification
Occupational exposure
Questionnaires
Radiation
Radiation effects
Safety management
Statistical analysis
Validity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The national dose registry (NDR) contains essential information to help protect radiation workers from radiation-related health risks and to facilitate epidemiological studies. However, direct validation of the reported doses has not been considered. We investigated the validity of the NDR with a personal dosimeter monitoring conducted among Korean interventional radiologists. Among the 56 interventional radiologists, NDR quarterly doses were compared with actively monitored personal thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) doses as standard measures of validation. We conducted analyses with participants categorized according to compliance with TLD badge-wearing policies. A correlation between actively monitored doses and NDR doses was low (Spearman ρ = 0.06), and the mean actively monitored dose was significantly higher than the mean NDR dose (mean difference 0.98 mSv) in all participants. However, interventional radiologists who wore badges irregularly showed a large difference between actively monitored doses and NDR doses (mean difference 2.39 mSv), and participants who wore badges regularly showed no apparent difference between actively monitored doses and NDR doses (mean difference 0.26 mSv). This study indicated that NDR data underestimate the actual occupational radiation exposure, and the validity of these data varies according to compliance with badge-wearing policies. Considerable attention is required to interpret and utilize NDR data based on radiation workers' compliance with badge-wearing policies.
ISSN:1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
DOI:10.3390/ijerph18084195