Loading…

Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures

This study aims to compare clinically and functionally patients who had previously undergone tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF) procedure due to the diagnosis of Mayo type 2A olecranon fracture in our clinic. Data of 92 patients (51 males, 41 females; mean age 42.3±12.6 years; range, 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Joint diseases and related surgery 2021-01, Vol.32 (1), p.85-92
Main Authors: Çağlar, Ceyhun, Akçaalan, Serhat, Özaslan, Halil İbrahim, Yağar, Hilal, Uğurlu, Mahmut
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-8798dc84520efd67752e319e0152de4f9071e760255e6e3d60abb546973d49513
cites
container_end_page 92
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title Joint diseases and related surgery
container_volume 32
creator Çağlar, Ceyhun
Akçaalan, Serhat
Özaslan, Halil İbrahim
Yağar, Hilal
Uğurlu, Mahmut
description This study aims to compare clinically and functionally patients who had previously undergone tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF) procedure due to the diagnosis of Mayo type 2A olecranon fracture in our clinic. Data of 92 patients (51 males, 41 females; mean age 42.3±12.6 years; range, 16 to 75 years) operated on for olecranon fractures between January 2014 and December 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Forty-four patients received TBW and 48 patients received PF treatment. Their Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo scores and elbow range of motion (ROM) measurements were used for clinical and functional evaluations. Data including the time to return to work, revision rate, and follow-up time were also recorded. The mean follow-up time was 38.2±17.2 months. Patients returned to work in 9.2±4.1 weeks in the TBW group and 7.8±3.6 weeks in the PF group (p=0.279). The revision rate was 14% in the TBW group and 2% in the PF group (p=0.335). The mean DASH score was 10.0±1.8 in the TBW group and 7.7±1.2 in the PF group (p=0.001). The mean Mayo score was 84.0±9.3 in the TBW group and 88.3±9.1 in the PF group (p=0.049). For elbow flexion-extension ROM, 4° of difference was measured in favor of the PF group (p=0.043). Mean Mayo score, mean DASH score, and mean flexion-extension ROM values were statistically significantly different between the two groups. Both surgical techniques are suitable and reliable in the treatment of olecranon fractures. Although TBW treatment is low-cost and simple to apply, its biggest disadvantage is a high rate of secondary surgery for implant removal due to irritation of the skin.
doi_str_mv 10.5606/ehc.2021.75812
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8073451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2479038069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-8798dc84520efd67752e319e0152de4f9071e760255e6e3d60abb546973d49513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LAzEUDKJYqV49So5eWt_mc_cilOIXVLwoeAvp7lsb2SZrslX7791WLXp6AzNv3mOGkNMMxlKBusBFOWbAsrGWecb2yBFTuR4JXbD9Hc7FgJyk9AoArGBcAxySAedCccHYEXmehmVro0vB01DTDn1yPZxbX9EPF51_oRvYNrZDWrtP221o5-m9XQfarVukbEJDg2W0vmfqaMtuFTEdk4PaNglPfuaQPF1fPU5vR7OHm7vpZDYqhVTdKNdFXpW5kAywrpTWkiHPCoRMsgpFXYDOUCtgUqJCXimw87kUqtC8EoXM-JBcfvu2q_kSqxJ9F21j2uiWNq5NsM78Z7xbmJfwbnLQXGwNzn8MYnhbYerM0qUSm8Z6DKtkWJ8n8BxU0UvH39IyhpQi1rszGZhNI6ZvxGwaMdtG-oWzv8_t5L_58y_Ln4ck</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479038069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Çağlar, Ceyhun ; Akçaalan, Serhat ; Özaslan, Halil İbrahim ; Yağar, Hilal ; Uğurlu, Mahmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Çağlar, Ceyhun ; Akçaalan, Serhat ; Özaslan, Halil İbrahim ; Yağar, Hilal ; Uğurlu, Mahmut</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to compare clinically and functionally patients who had previously undergone tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF) procedure due to the diagnosis of Mayo type 2A olecranon fracture in our clinic. Data of 92 patients (51 males, 41 females; mean age 42.3±12.6 years; range, 16 to 75 years) operated on for olecranon fractures between January 2014 and December 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Forty-four patients received TBW and 48 patients received PF treatment. Their Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo scores and elbow range of motion (ROM) measurements were used for clinical and functional evaluations. Data including the time to return to work, revision rate, and follow-up time were also recorded. The mean follow-up time was 38.2±17.2 months. Patients returned to work in 9.2±4.1 weeks in the TBW group and 7.8±3.6 weeks in the PF group (p=0.279). The revision rate was 14% in the TBW group and 2% in the PF group (p=0.335). The mean DASH score was 10.0±1.8 in the TBW group and 7.7±1.2 in the PF group (p=0.001). The mean Mayo score was 84.0±9.3 in the TBW group and 88.3±9.1 in the PF group (p=0.049). For elbow flexion-extension ROM, 4° of difference was measured in favor of the PF group (p=0.043). Mean Mayo score, mean DASH score, and mean flexion-extension ROM values were statistically significantly different between the two groups. Both surgical techniques are suitable and reliable in the treatment of olecranon fractures. Although TBW treatment is low-cost and simple to apply, its biggest disadvantage is a high rate of secondary surgery for implant removal due to irritation of the skin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2687-4784</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2687-4792</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5606/ehc.2021.75812</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33463422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Bayçınar Medical Publishing</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Joint diseases and related surgery, 2021-01, Vol.32 (1), p.85-92</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation 2021 Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-8798dc84520efd67752e319e0152de4f9071e760255e6e3d60abb546973d49513</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073451/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073451/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33463422$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Çağlar, Ceyhun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçaalan, Serhat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özaslan, Halil İbrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yağar, Hilal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uğurlu, Mahmut</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures</title><title>Joint diseases and related surgery</title><addtitle>Jt Dis Relat Surg</addtitle><description>This study aims to compare clinically and functionally patients who had previously undergone tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF) procedure due to the diagnosis of Mayo type 2A olecranon fracture in our clinic. Data of 92 patients (51 males, 41 females; mean age 42.3±12.6 years; range, 16 to 75 years) operated on for olecranon fractures between January 2014 and December 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Forty-four patients received TBW and 48 patients received PF treatment. Their Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo scores and elbow range of motion (ROM) measurements were used for clinical and functional evaluations. Data including the time to return to work, revision rate, and follow-up time were also recorded. The mean follow-up time was 38.2±17.2 months. Patients returned to work in 9.2±4.1 weeks in the TBW group and 7.8±3.6 weeks in the PF group (p=0.279). The revision rate was 14% in the TBW group and 2% in the PF group (p=0.335). The mean DASH score was 10.0±1.8 in the TBW group and 7.7±1.2 in the PF group (p=0.001). The mean Mayo score was 84.0±9.3 in the TBW group and 88.3±9.1 in the PF group (p=0.049). For elbow flexion-extension ROM, 4° of difference was measured in favor of the PF group (p=0.043). Mean Mayo score, mean DASH score, and mean flexion-extension ROM values were statistically significantly different between the two groups. Both surgical techniques are suitable and reliable in the treatment of olecranon fractures. Although TBW treatment is low-cost and simple to apply, its biggest disadvantage is a high rate of secondary surgery for implant removal due to irritation of the skin.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2687-4784</issn><issn>2687-4792</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1LAzEUDKJYqV49So5eWt_mc_cilOIXVLwoeAvp7lsb2SZrslX7791WLXp6AzNv3mOGkNMMxlKBusBFOWbAsrGWecb2yBFTuR4JXbD9Hc7FgJyk9AoArGBcAxySAedCccHYEXmehmVro0vB01DTDn1yPZxbX9EPF51_oRvYNrZDWrtP221o5-m9XQfarVukbEJDg2W0vmfqaMtuFTEdk4PaNglPfuaQPF1fPU5vR7OHm7vpZDYqhVTdKNdFXpW5kAywrpTWkiHPCoRMsgpFXYDOUCtgUqJCXimw87kUqtC8EoXM-JBcfvu2q_kSqxJ9F21j2uiWNq5NsM78Z7xbmJfwbnLQXGwNzn8MYnhbYerM0qUSm8Z6DKtkWJ8n8BxU0UvH39IyhpQi1rszGZhNI6ZvxGwaMdtG-oWzv8_t5L_58y_Ln4ck</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Çağlar, Ceyhun</creator><creator>Akçaalan, Serhat</creator><creator>Özaslan, Halil İbrahim</creator><creator>Yağar, Hilal</creator><creator>Uğurlu, Mahmut</creator><general>Bayçınar Medical Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures</title><author>Çağlar, Ceyhun ; Akçaalan, Serhat ; Özaslan, Halil İbrahim ; Yağar, Hilal ; Uğurlu, Mahmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-8798dc84520efd67752e319e0152de4f9071e760255e6e3d60abb546973d49513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Çağlar, Ceyhun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçaalan, Serhat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özaslan, Halil İbrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yağar, Hilal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uğurlu, Mahmut</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Joint diseases and related surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Çağlar, Ceyhun</au><au>Akçaalan, Serhat</au><au>Özaslan, Halil İbrahim</au><au>Yağar, Hilal</au><au>Uğurlu, Mahmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures</atitle><jtitle>Joint diseases and related surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Jt Dis Relat Surg</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>85-92</pages><issn>2687-4784</issn><eissn>2687-4792</eissn><abstract>This study aims to compare clinically and functionally patients who had previously undergone tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF) procedure due to the diagnosis of Mayo type 2A olecranon fracture in our clinic. Data of 92 patients (51 males, 41 females; mean age 42.3±12.6 years; range, 16 to 75 years) operated on for olecranon fractures between January 2014 and December 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Forty-four patients received TBW and 48 patients received PF treatment. Their Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo scores and elbow range of motion (ROM) measurements were used for clinical and functional evaluations. Data including the time to return to work, revision rate, and follow-up time were also recorded. The mean follow-up time was 38.2±17.2 months. Patients returned to work in 9.2±4.1 weeks in the TBW group and 7.8±3.6 weeks in the PF group (p=0.279). The revision rate was 14% in the TBW group and 2% in the PF group (p=0.335). The mean DASH score was 10.0±1.8 in the TBW group and 7.7±1.2 in the PF group (p=0.001). The mean Mayo score was 84.0±9.3 in the TBW group and 88.3±9.1 in the PF group (p=0.049). For elbow flexion-extension ROM, 4° of difference was measured in favor of the PF group (p=0.043). Mean Mayo score, mean DASH score, and mean flexion-extension ROM values were statistically significantly different between the two groups. Both surgical techniques are suitable and reliable in the treatment of olecranon fractures. Although TBW treatment is low-cost and simple to apply, its biggest disadvantage is a high rate of secondary surgery for implant removal due to irritation of the skin.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Bayçınar Medical Publishing</pub><pmid>33463422</pmid><doi>10.5606/ehc.2021.75812</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2687-4784
ispartof Joint diseases and related surgery, 2021-01, Vol.32 (1), p.85-92
issn 2687-4784
2687-4792
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8073451
source PubMed Central Free
subjects Original
title Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A57%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20tension%20band%20wiring%20and%20plate%20fixation%20in%20Mayo%20type%202A%20olecranon%20fractures&rft.jtitle=Joint%20diseases%20and%20related%20surgery&rft.au=%C3%87a%C4%9Flar,%20Ceyhun&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=85-92&rft.issn=2687-4784&rft.eissn=2687-4792&rft_id=info:doi/10.5606/ehc.2021.75812&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2479038069%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-8798dc84520efd67752e319e0152de4f9071e760255e6e3d60abb546973d49513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479038069&rft_id=info:pmid/33463422&rfr_iscdi=true