Loading…
Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures
This study aims to compare clinically and functionally patients who had previously undergone tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF) procedure due to the diagnosis of Mayo type 2A olecranon fracture in our clinic. Data of 92 patients (51 males, 41 females; mean age 42.3±12.6 years; range, 1...
Saved in:
Published in: | Joint diseases and related surgery 2021-01, Vol.32 (1), p.85-92 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-8798dc84520efd67752e319e0152de4f9071e760255e6e3d60abb546973d49513 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 92 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | Joint diseases and related surgery |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Çağlar, Ceyhun Akçaalan, Serhat Özaslan, Halil İbrahim Yağar, Hilal Uğurlu, Mahmut |
description | This study aims to compare clinically and functionally patients who had previously undergone tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF) procedure due to the diagnosis of Mayo type 2A olecranon fracture in our clinic.
Data of 92 patients (51 males, 41 females; mean age 42.3±12.6 years; range, 16 to 75 years) operated on for olecranon fractures between January 2014 and December 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Forty-four patients received TBW and 48 patients received PF treatment. Their Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo scores and elbow range of motion (ROM) measurements were used for clinical and functional evaluations. Data including the time to return to work, revision rate, and follow-up time were also recorded.
The mean follow-up time was 38.2±17.2 months. Patients returned to work in 9.2±4.1 weeks in the TBW group and 7.8±3.6 weeks in the PF group (p=0.279). The revision rate was 14% in the TBW group and 2% in the PF group (p=0.335). The mean DASH score was 10.0±1.8 in the TBW group and 7.7±1.2 in the PF group (p=0.001). The mean Mayo score was 84.0±9.3 in the TBW group and 88.3±9.1 in the PF group (p=0.049). For elbow flexion-extension ROM, 4° of difference was measured in favor of the PF group (p=0.043). Mean Mayo score, mean DASH score, and mean flexion-extension ROM values were statistically significantly different between the two groups.
Both surgical techniques are suitable and reliable in the treatment of olecranon fractures. Although TBW treatment is low-cost and simple to apply, its biggest disadvantage is a high rate of secondary surgery for implant removal due to irritation of the skin. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5606/ehc.2021.75812 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8073451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2479038069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-8798dc84520efd67752e319e0152de4f9071e760255e6e3d60abb546973d49513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LAzEUDKJYqV49So5eWt_mc_cilOIXVLwoeAvp7lsb2SZrslX7791WLXp6AzNv3mOGkNMMxlKBusBFOWbAsrGWecb2yBFTuR4JXbD9Hc7FgJyk9AoArGBcAxySAedCccHYEXmehmVro0vB01DTDn1yPZxbX9EPF51_oRvYNrZDWrtP221o5-m9XQfarVukbEJDg2W0vmfqaMtuFTEdk4PaNglPfuaQPF1fPU5vR7OHm7vpZDYqhVTdKNdFXpW5kAywrpTWkiHPCoRMsgpFXYDOUCtgUqJCXimw87kUqtC8EoXM-JBcfvu2q_kSqxJ9F21j2uiWNq5NsM78Z7xbmJfwbnLQXGwNzn8MYnhbYerM0qUSm8Z6DKtkWJ8n8BxU0UvH39IyhpQi1rszGZhNI6ZvxGwaMdtG-oWzv8_t5L_58y_Ln4ck</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479038069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Çağlar, Ceyhun ; Akçaalan, Serhat ; Özaslan, Halil İbrahim ; Yağar, Hilal ; Uğurlu, Mahmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Çağlar, Ceyhun ; Akçaalan, Serhat ; Özaslan, Halil İbrahim ; Yağar, Hilal ; Uğurlu, Mahmut</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to compare clinically and functionally patients who had previously undergone tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF) procedure due to the diagnosis of Mayo type 2A olecranon fracture in our clinic.
Data of 92 patients (51 males, 41 females; mean age 42.3±12.6 years; range, 16 to 75 years) operated on for olecranon fractures between January 2014 and December 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Forty-four patients received TBW and 48 patients received PF treatment. Their Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo scores and elbow range of motion (ROM) measurements were used for clinical and functional evaluations. Data including the time to return to work, revision rate, and follow-up time were also recorded.
The mean follow-up time was 38.2±17.2 months. Patients returned to work in 9.2±4.1 weeks in the TBW group and 7.8±3.6 weeks in the PF group (p=0.279). The revision rate was 14% in the TBW group and 2% in the PF group (p=0.335). The mean DASH score was 10.0±1.8 in the TBW group and 7.7±1.2 in the PF group (p=0.001). The mean Mayo score was 84.0±9.3 in the TBW group and 88.3±9.1 in the PF group (p=0.049). For elbow flexion-extension ROM, 4° of difference was measured in favor of the PF group (p=0.043). Mean Mayo score, mean DASH score, and mean flexion-extension ROM values were statistically significantly different between the two groups.
Both surgical techniques are suitable and reliable in the treatment of olecranon fractures. Although TBW treatment is low-cost and simple to apply, its biggest disadvantage is a high rate of secondary surgery for implant removal due to irritation of the skin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2687-4784</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2687-4792</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5606/ehc.2021.75812</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33463422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Bayçınar Medical Publishing</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Joint diseases and related surgery, 2021-01, Vol.32 (1), p.85-92</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation 2021 Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-8798dc84520efd67752e319e0152de4f9071e760255e6e3d60abb546973d49513</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073451/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073451/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33463422$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Çağlar, Ceyhun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçaalan, Serhat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özaslan, Halil İbrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yağar, Hilal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uğurlu, Mahmut</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures</title><title>Joint diseases and related surgery</title><addtitle>Jt Dis Relat Surg</addtitle><description>This study aims to compare clinically and functionally patients who had previously undergone tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF) procedure due to the diagnosis of Mayo type 2A olecranon fracture in our clinic.
Data of 92 patients (51 males, 41 females; mean age 42.3±12.6 years; range, 16 to 75 years) operated on for olecranon fractures between January 2014 and December 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Forty-four patients received TBW and 48 patients received PF treatment. Their Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo scores and elbow range of motion (ROM) measurements were used for clinical and functional evaluations. Data including the time to return to work, revision rate, and follow-up time were also recorded.
The mean follow-up time was 38.2±17.2 months. Patients returned to work in 9.2±4.1 weeks in the TBW group and 7.8±3.6 weeks in the PF group (p=0.279). The revision rate was 14% in the TBW group and 2% in the PF group (p=0.335). The mean DASH score was 10.0±1.8 in the TBW group and 7.7±1.2 in the PF group (p=0.001). The mean Mayo score was 84.0±9.3 in the TBW group and 88.3±9.1 in the PF group (p=0.049). For elbow flexion-extension ROM, 4° of difference was measured in favor of the PF group (p=0.043). Mean Mayo score, mean DASH score, and mean flexion-extension ROM values were statistically significantly different between the two groups.
Both surgical techniques are suitable and reliable in the treatment of olecranon fractures. Although TBW treatment is low-cost and simple to apply, its biggest disadvantage is a high rate of secondary surgery for implant removal due to irritation of the skin.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2687-4784</issn><issn>2687-4792</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1LAzEUDKJYqV49So5eWt_mc_cilOIXVLwoeAvp7lsb2SZrslX7791WLXp6AzNv3mOGkNMMxlKBusBFOWbAsrGWecb2yBFTuR4JXbD9Hc7FgJyk9AoArGBcAxySAedCccHYEXmehmVro0vB01DTDn1yPZxbX9EPF51_oRvYNrZDWrtP221o5-m9XQfarVukbEJDg2W0vmfqaMtuFTEdk4PaNglPfuaQPF1fPU5vR7OHm7vpZDYqhVTdKNdFXpW5kAywrpTWkiHPCoRMsgpFXYDOUCtgUqJCXimw87kUqtC8EoXM-JBcfvu2q_kSqxJ9F21j2uiWNq5NsM78Z7xbmJfwbnLQXGwNzn8MYnhbYerM0qUSm8Z6DKtkWJ8n8BxU0UvH39IyhpQi1rszGZhNI6ZvxGwaMdtG-oWzv8_t5L_58y_Ln4ck</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Çağlar, Ceyhun</creator><creator>Akçaalan, Serhat</creator><creator>Özaslan, Halil İbrahim</creator><creator>Yağar, Hilal</creator><creator>Uğurlu, Mahmut</creator><general>Bayçınar Medical Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures</title><author>Çağlar, Ceyhun ; Akçaalan, Serhat ; Özaslan, Halil İbrahim ; Yağar, Hilal ; Uğurlu, Mahmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-8798dc84520efd67752e319e0152de4f9071e760255e6e3d60abb546973d49513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Çağlar, Ceyhun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçaalan, Serhat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özaslan, Halil İbrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yağar, Hilal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uğurlu, Mahmut</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Joint diseases and related surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Çağlar, Ceyhun</au><au>Akçaalan, Serhat</au><au>Özaslan, Halil İbrahim</au><au>Yağar, Hilal</au><au>Uğurlu, Mahmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures</atitle><jtitle>Joint diseases and related surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Jt Dis Relat Surg</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>85-92</pages><issn>2687-4784</issn><eissn>2687-4792</eissn><abstract>This study aims to compare clinically and functionally patients who had previously undergone tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF) procedure due to the diagnosis of Mayo type 2A olecranon fracture in our clinic.
Data of 92 patients (51 males, 41 females; mean age 42.3±12.6 years; range, 16 to 75 years) operated on for olecranon fractures between January 2014 and December 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Forty-four patients received TBW and 48 patients received PF treatment. Their Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo scores and elbow range of motion (ROM) measurements were used for clinical and functional evaluations. Data including the time to return to work, revision rate, and follow-up time were also recorded.
The mean follow-up time was 38.2±17.2 months. Patients returned to work in 9.2±4.1 weeks in the TBW group and 7.8±3.6 weeks in the PF group (p=0.279). The revision rate was 14% in the TBW group and 2% in the PF group (p=0.335). The mean DASH score was 10.0±1.8 in the TBW group and 7.7±1.2 in the PF group (p=0.001). The mean Mayo score was 84.0±9.3 in the TBW group and 88.3±9.1 in the PF group (p=0.049). For elbow flexion-extension ROM, 4° of difference was measured in favor of the PF group (p=0.043). Mean Mayo score, mean DASH score, and mean flexion-extension ROM values were statistically significantly different between the two groups.
Both surgical techniques are suitable and reliable in the treatment of olecranon fractures. Although TBW treatment is low-cost and simple to apply, its biggest disadvantage is a high rate of secondary surgery for implant removal due to irritation of the skin.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Bayçınar Medical Publishing</pub><pmid>33463422</pmid><doi>10.5606/ehc.2021.75812</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2687-4784 |
ispartof | Joint diseases and related surgery, 2021-01, Vol.32 (1), p.85-92 |
issn | 2687-4784 2687-4792 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8073451 |
source | PubMed Central Free |
subjects | Original |
title | Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A57%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20tension%20band%20wiring%20and%20plate%20fixation%20in%20Mayo%20type%202A%20olecranon%20fractures&rft.jtitle=Joint%20diseases%20and%20related%20surgery&rft.au=%C3%87a%C4%9Flar,%20Ceyhun&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=85-92&rft.issn=2687-4784&rft.eissn=2687-4792&rft_id=info:doi/10.5606/ehc.2021.75812&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2479038069%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-8798dc84520efd67752e319e0152de4f9071e760255e6e3d60abb546973d49513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479038069&rft_id=info:pmid/33463422&rfr_iscdi=true |