SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing among disadvantaged populations during epidemic intervals should be a priority strategy: results from a pilot experiment in Barcelona

• Published in: Public health (London) 2021-06, Vol.195, p.132-134
• Main Authors: Vallès, X., Roure, S., Valerio, L., López-Muñoz, I., Pérez-Quílez, O., Soldevila, L., Martín-Cano, L., Estrada, O., Palacín, M.D., Blanco, I., Orozco, J., Esquerrà, A., Villanova, X.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Chemical analysis; Confidence intervals; Contact Tracing; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 - epidemiology; COVID-19 - prevention & control; Cross cutting; Disadvantaged; Epidemics; Epidemics - prevention & control; Humans; Incidence; Infections; Male; Metropolitan areas; Middle Aged; Neighborhoods; Polymerase chain reaction; Reverse transcription; Risk analysis; Risk Factors; SARS-CoV-2; Secondary infection; Severe acute respiratory syndrome; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Short Communication; Social determinants; Social Determinants of Health; Spain - epidemiology; Urban areas; Viral diseases; Vulnerable Populations
• ISSN: 0033-3506; 1476-5616
• DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.04.027

The aim of this study was to trace contacts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalised patients and determine the risk factors of infection in urban areas. Longitudinal analysis of contacts identified from index cases. A contact tracing study was carried out in the Northern Metropolitan area of Barcelona, Spain, during the inter-epidemic lapse of May to July 2020, a period of low SARS-CoV-2 incidence. Index cases were notified from the referral hospital. Contacts were traced and followed up for 14 days. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed on day 0 and day 14 for contacts. In total, 368 contacts were identified from 81 index cases (median of seven contacts per index case), from which 308 were traced successfully. The median age of contacts was 28 years, 62% (223 of 368) were men. During the follow-up period, 100 contacts tested positive for COVID-19 (32.5% [95% confidence interval {CI} = 27.3–38.0]), with a secondary infection rate of 48.3% (95% CI = 40.8–55.9) among housemates. Clusters of index and respective contacts tended to aggregate within disadvantaged neighbourhoods (P