Loading…
Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?
To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics. A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 32 patients in whom overbite reduction was achieved using a maxillary incisor intrusion arch (18 patients) or flat anterior bite plate (14 patients). Clinical and ce...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Angle orthodontist 2019-11, Vol.89 (6), p.847-854 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3 |
container_end_page | 854 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 847 |
container_title | The Angle orthodontist |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Hamdan, Ahmad M Lewis, Shannon M Kelleher, Kevin E Elhady, Sherif N Lindauer, Steven J |
description | To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics.
A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 32 patients in whom overbite reduction was achieved using a maxillary incisor intrusion arch (18 patients) or flat anterior bite plate (14 patients). Clinical and cephalometric records were compared pretreatment (T1), after overbite reduction (T2), and posttreatment (T3).
Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in overbite and maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination during treatment (T1-T3). The center of resistance of the maxillary incisor and the incisal edge was significantly intruded in the intrusion arch group during overbite reduction (T1-T2). However, most of the intrusion of the center of resistance was lost by the end of treatment (T2-T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in maxillary incisor display and flattening of the smile arc during overbite reduction.
Both overbite reduction methods caused a decrease in incisor display and flattening of the smile arc. Smiles were improved in some patients by the end of treatment. However, reduction in incisor display persisted. Clinicians should take precautions to prevent negative effects of overbite reduction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2319/030819-177.1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8109173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2258743420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkDtPwzAQxy0EoqWwMaOMDITe-VHHCwiVp1SJBWbLcc80KGlKnFTi25OqpYLphvvp_2LsHOGaCzRjEJChSVHrazxgQzRSpRpBHLIhAIhUcDQDdhLjJwBXSvJjNhAoYAJaD9n4vqaY1Gtq8qKlpKF559uiXiYuBPJtEquipIRiu6C28PH2lB0FV0Y6290Re398eJs-p7PXp5fp3Sz1IpPtJo1DLXiuJJpg_HxiMq7BcQzSBCV4Boa0AOOQlHdBaellrnLiWZYjD2LEbra6qy6vaO5p2TautKumqFzzbWtX2P-fZbGwH_XaZgimd-4FLncCTf3V9QVsVURPZemWVHfRcq4yLYXk0KNXW9Q3dYwNhb0Ngt1sbLcb276VxR6_-BttD_-OKn4A1x512w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2258743420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?</title><source>PubMed Central (Open access)</source><creator>Hamdan, Ahmad M ; Lewis, Shannon M ; Kelleher, Kevin E ; Elhady, Sherif N ; Lindauer, Steven J</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamdan, Ahmad M ; Lewis, Shannon M ; Kelleher, Kevin E ; Elhady, Sherif N ; Lindauer, Steven J</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics.
A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 32 patients in whom overbite reduction was achieved using a maxillary incisor intrusion arch (18 patients) or flat anterior bite plate (14 patients). Clinical and cephalometric records were compared pretreatment (T1), after overbite reduction (T2), and posttreatment (T3).
Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in overbite and maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination during treatment (T1-T3). The center of resistance of the maxillary incisor and the incisal edge was significantly intruded in the intrusion arch group during overbite reduction (T1-T2). However, most of the intrusion of the center of resistance was lost by the end of treatment (T2-T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in maxillary incisor display and flattening of the smile arc during overbite reduction.
Both overbite reduction methods caused a decrease in incisor display and flattening of the smile arc. Smiles were improved in some patients by the end of treatment. However, reduction in incisor display persisted. Clinicians should take precautions to prevent negative effects of overbite reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2319/030819-177.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31306077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</publisher><subject>Cephalometry ; Dentistry ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II ; Maxilla ; Original ; Overbite ; Prospective Studies ; Tooth Movement Techniques</subject><ispartof>The Angle orthodontist, 2019-11, Vol.89 (6), p.847-854</ispartof><rights>2019 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109173/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109173/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31306077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamdan, Ahmad M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Shannon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelleher, Kevin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhady, Sherif N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindauer, Steven J</creatorcontrib><title>Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?</title><title>The Angle orthodontist</title><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><description>To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics.
A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 32 patients in whom overbite reduction was achieved using a maxillary incisor intrusion arch (18 patients) or flat anterior bite plate (14 patients). Clinical and cephalometric records were compared pretreatment (T1), after overbite reduction (T2), and posttreatment (T3).
Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in overbite and maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination during treatment (T1-T3). The center of resistance of the maxillary incisor and the incisal edge was significantly intruded in the intrusion arch group during overbite reduction (T1-T2). However, most of the intrusion of the center of resistance was lost by the end of treatment (T2-T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in maxillary incisor display and flattening of the smile arc during overbite reduction.
Both overbite reduction methods caused a decrease in incisor display and flattening of the smile arc. Smiles were improved in some patients by the end of treatment. However, reduction in incisor display persisted. Clinicians should take precautions to prevent negative effects of overbite reduction.</description><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class II</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Overbite</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tooth Movement Techniques</subject><issn>0003-3219</issn><issn>1945-7103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkDtPwzAQxy0EoqWwMaOMDITe-VHHCwiVp1SJBWbLcc80KGlKnFTi25OqpYLphvvp_2LsHOGaCzRjEJChSVHrazxgQzRSpRpBHLIhAIhUcDQDdhLjJwBXSvJjNhAoYAJaD9n4vqaY1Gtq8qKlpKF559uiXiYuBPJtEquipIRiu6C28PH2lB0FV0Y6290Re398eJs-p7PXp5fp3Sz1IpPtJo1DLXiuJJpg_HxiMq7BcQzSBCV4Boa0AOOQlHdBaellrnLiWZYjD2LEbra6qy6vaO5p2TautKumqFzzbWtX2P-fZbGwH_XaZgimd-4FLncCTf3V9QVsVURPZemWVHfRcq4yLYXk0KNXW9Q3dYwNhb0Ngt1sbLcb276VxR6_-BttD_-OKn4A1x512w</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Hamdan, Ahmad M</creator><creator>Lewis, Shannon M</creator><creator>Kelleher, Kevin E</creator><creator>Elhady, Sherif N</creator><creator>Lindauer, Steven J</creator><general>Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?</title><author>Hamdan, Ahmad M ; Lewis, Shannon M ; Kelleher, Kevin E ; Elhady, Sherif N ; Lindauer, Steven J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class II</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Overbite</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tooth Movement Techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamdan, Ahmad M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Shannon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelleher, Kevin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhady, Sherif N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindauer, Steven J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamdan, Ahmad M</au><au>Lewis, Shannon M</au><au>Kelleher, Kevin E</au><au>Elhady, Sherif N</au><au>Lindauer, Steven J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?</atitle><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>847</spage><epage>854</epage><pages>847-854</pages><issn>0003-3219</issn><eissn>1945-7103</eissn><abstract>To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics.
A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 32 patients in whom overbite reduction was achieved using a maxillary incisor intrusion arch (18 patients) or flat anterior bite plate (14 patients). Clinical and cephalometric records were compared pretreatment (T1), after overbite reduction (T2), and posttreatment (T3).
Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in overbite and maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination during treatment (T1-T3). The center of resistance of the maxillary incisor and the incisal edge was significantly intruded in the intrusion arch group during overbite reduction (T1-T2). However, most of the intrusion of the center of resistance was lost by the end of treatment (T2-T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in maxillary incisor display and flattening of the smile arc during overbite reduction.
Both overbite reduction methods caused a decrease in incisor display and flattening of the smile arc. Smiles were improved in some patients by the end of treatment. However, reduction in incisor display persisted. Clinicians should take precautions to prevent negative effects of overbite reduction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</pub><pmid>31306077</pmid><doi>10.2319/030819-177.1</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3219 |
ispartof | The Angle orthodontist, 2019-11, Vol.89 (6), p.847-854 |
issn | 0003-3219 1945-7103 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8109173 |
source | PubMed Central (Open access) |
subjects | Cephalometry Dentistry Esthetics, Dental Humans Malocclusion, Angle Class II Maxilla Original Overbite Prospective Studies Tooth Movement Techniques |
title | Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A41%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20overbite%20reduction%20affect%20smile%20esthetics?&rft.jtitle=The%20Angle%20orthodontist&rft.au=Hamdan,%20Ahmad%20M&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=847&rft.epage=854&rft.pages=847-854&rft.issn=0003-3219&rft.eissn=1945-7103&rft_id=info:doi/10.2319/030819-177.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2258743420%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2258743420&rft_id=info:pmid/31306077&rfr_iscdi=true |