Loading…

Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?

To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics. A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 32 patients in whom overbite reduction was achieved using a maxillary incisor intrusion arch (18 patients) or flat anterior bite plate (14 patients). Clinical and ce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Angle orthodontist 2019-11, Vol.89 (6), p.847-854
Main Authors: Hamdan, Ahmad M, Lewis, Shannon M, Kelleher, Kevin E, Elhady, Sherif N, Lindauer, Steven J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3
container_end_page 854
container_issue 6
container_start_page 847
container_title The Angle orthodontist
container_volume 89
creator Hamdan, Ahmad M
Lewis, Shannon M
Kelleher, Kevin E
Elhady, Sherif N
Lindauer, Steven J
description To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics. A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 32 patients in whom overbite reduction was achieved using a maxillary incisor intrusion arch (18 patients) or flat anterior bite plate (14 patients). Clinical and cephalometric records were compared pretreatment (T1), after overbite reduction (T2), and posttreatment (T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in overbite and maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination during treatment (T1-T3). The center of resistance of the maxillary incisor and the incisal edge was significantly intruded in the intrusion arch group during overbite reduction (T1-T2). However, most of the intrusion of the center of resistance was lost by the end of treatment (T2-T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in maxillary incisor display and flattening of the smile arc during overbite reduction. Both overbite reduction methods caused a decrease in incisor display and flattening of the smile arc. Smiles were improved in some patients by the end of treatment. However, reduction in incisor display persisted. Clinicians should take precautions to prevent negative effects of overbite reduction.
doi_str_mv 10.2319/030819-177.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8109173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2258743420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkDtPwzAQxy0EoqWwMaOMDITe-VHHCwiVp1SJBWbLcc80KGlKnFTi25OqpYLphvvp_2LsHOGaCzRjEJChSVHrazxgQzRSpRpBHLIhAIhUcDQDdhLjJwBXSvJjNhAoYAJaD9n4vqaY1Gtq8qKlpKF559uiXiYuBPJtEquipIRiu6C28PH2lB0FV0Y6290Re398eJs-p7PXp5fp3Sz1IpPtJo1DLXiuJJpg_HxiMq7BcQzSBCV4Boa0AOOQlHdBaellrnLiWZYjD2LEbra6qy6vaO5p2TautKumqFzzbWtX2P-fZbGwH_XaZgimd-4FLncCTf3V9QVsVURPZemWVHfRcq4yLYXk0KNXW9Q3dYwNhb0Ngt1sbLcb276VxR6_-BttD_-OKn4A1x512w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2258743420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?</title><source>PubMed Central (Open access)</source><creator>Hamdan, Ahmad M ; Lewis, Shannon M ; Kelleher, Kevin E ; Elhady, Sherif N ; Lindauer, Steven J</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamdan, Ahmad M ; Lewis, Shannon M ; Kelleher, Kevin E ; Elhady, Sherif N ; Lindauer, Steven J</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics. A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 32 patients in whom overbite reduction was achieved using a maxillary incisor intrusion arch (18 patients) or flat anterior bite plate (14 patients). Clinical and cephalometric records were compared pretreatment (T1), after overbite reduction (T2), and posttreatment (T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in overbite and maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination during treatment (T1-T3). The center of resistance of the maxillary incisor and the incisal edge was significantly intruded in the intrusion arch group during overbite reduction (T1-T2). However, most of the intrusion of the center of resistance was lost by the end of treatment (T2-T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in maxillary incisor display and flattening of the smile arc during overbite reduction. Both overbite reduction methods caused a decrease in incisor display and flattening of the smile arc. Smiles were improved in some patients by the end of treatment. However, reduction in incisor display persisted. Clinicians should take precautions to prevent negative effects of overbite reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2319/030819-177.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31306077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</publisher><subject>Cephalometry ; Dentistry ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II ; Maxilla ; Original ; Overbite ; Prospective Studies ; Tooth Movement Techniques</subject><ispartof>The Angle orthodontist, 2019-11, Vol.89 (6), p.847-854</ispartof><rights>2019 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109173/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109173/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31306077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamdan, Ahmad M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Shannon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelleher, Kevin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhady, Sherif N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindauer, Steven J</creatorcontrib><title>Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?</title><title>The Angle orthodontist</title><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><description>To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics. A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 32 patients in whom overbite reduction was achieved using a maxillary incisor intrusion arch (18 patients) or flat anterior bite plate (14 patients). Clinical and cephalometric records were compared pretreatment (T1), after overbite reduction (T2), and posttreatment (T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in overbite and maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination during treatment (T1-T3). The center of resistance of the maxillary incisor and the incisal edge was significantly intruded in the intrusion arch group during overbite reduction (T1-T2). However, most of the intrusion of the center of resistance was lost by the end of treatment (T2-T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in maxillary incisor display and flattening of the smile arc during overbite reduction. Both overbite reduction methods caused a decrease in incisor display and flattening of the smile arc. Smiles were improved in some patients by the end of treatment. However, reduction in incisor display persisted. Clinicians should take precautions to prevent negative effects of overbite reduction.</description><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class II</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Overbite</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tooth Movement Techniques</subject><issn>0003-3219</issn><issn>1945-7103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkDtPwzAQxy0EoqWwMaOMDITe-VHHCwiVp1SJBWbLcc80KGlKnFTi25OqpYLphvvp_2LsHOGaCzRjEJChSVHrazxgQzRSpRpBHLIhAIhUcDQDdhLjJwBXSvJjNhAoYAJaD9n4vqaY1Gtq8qKlpKF559uiXiYuBPJtEquipIRiu6C28PH2lB0FV0Y6290Re398eJs-p7PXp5fp3Sz1IpPtJo1DLXiuJJpg_HxiMq7BcQzSBCV4Boa0AOOQlHdBaellrnLiWZYjD2LEbra6qy6vaO5p2TautKumqFzzbWtX2P-fZbGwH_XaZgimd-4FLncCTf3V9QVsVURPZemWVHfRcq4yLYXk0KNXW9Q3dYwNhb0Ngt1sbLcb276VxR6_-BttD_-OKn4A1x512w</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Hamdan, Ahmad M</creator><creator>Lewis, Shannon M</creator><creator>Kelleher, Kevin E</creator><creator>Elhady, Sherif N</creator><creator>Lindauer, Steven J</creator><general>Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?</title><author>Hamdan, Ahmad M ; Lewis, Shannon M ; Kelleher, Kevin E ; Elhady, Sherif N ; Lindauer, Steven J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class II</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Overbite</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tooth Movement Techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamdan, Ahmad M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Shannon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelleher, Kevin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhady, Sherif N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindauer, Steven J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamdan, Ahmad M</au><au>Lewis, Shannon M</au><au>Kelleher, Kevin E</au><au>Elhady, Sherif N</au><au>Lindauer, Steven J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?</atitle><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>847</spage><epage>854</epage><pages>847-854</pages><issn>0003-3219</issn><eissn>1945-7103</eissn><abstract>To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics. A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 32 patients in whom overbite reduction was achieved using a maxillary incisor intrusion arch (18 patients) or flat anterior bite plate (14 patients). Clinical and cephalometric records were compared pretreatment (T1), after overbite reduction (T2), and posttreatment (T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in overbite and maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination during treatment (T1-T3). The center of resistance of the maxillary incisor and the incisal edge was significantly intruded in the intrusion arch group during overbite reduction (T1-T2). However, most of the intrusion of the center of resistance was lost by the end of treatment (T2-T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in maxillary incisor display and flattening of the smile arc during overbite reduction. Both overbite reduction methods caused a decrease in incisor display and flattening of the smile arc. Smiles were improved in some patients by the end of treatment. However, reduction in incisor display persisted. Clinicians should take precautions to prevent negative effects of overbite reduction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</pub><pmid>31306077</pmid><doi>10.2319/030819-177.1</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3219
ispartof The Angle orthodontist, 2019-11, Vol.89 (6), p.847-854
issn 0003-3219
1945-7103
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8109173
source PubMed Central (Open access)
subjects Cephalometry
Dentistry
Esthetics, Dental
Humans
Malocclusion, Angle Class II
Maxilla
Original
Overbite
Prospective Studies
Tooth Movement Techniques
title Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A41%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20overbite%20reduction%20affect%20smile%20esthetics?&rft.jtitle=The%20Angle%20orthodontist&rft.au=Hamdan,%20Ahmad%20M&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=847&rft.epage=854&rft.pages=847-854&rft.issn=0003-3219&rft.eissn=1945-7103&rft_id=info:doi/10.2319/030819-177.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2258743420%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-177a1732b5419f9cd698270a21f49f532809e7309a1e5caf574c4b5be288b12f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2258743420&rft_id=info:pmid/31306077&rfr_iscdi=true