Loading…
Validating Species Distribution Models With Standardized Surveys for Ixodid Ticks in Mainland Florida
Tick-borne pathogens are of growing concern. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed guidelines standardizing surveys of tick vectors to better monitor the changes in their occurrences. Unbiased surveillance data, from standardized surveys, are presumed critical to genera...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of medical entomology 2021-05, Vol.58 (3), p.1345-1351 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b541t-688388a213864367498a0c867a11c9f4606fa194a4dcb705f63c38b1c4c3987e3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b541t-688388a213864367498a0c867a11c9f4606fa194a4dcb705f63c38b1c4c3987e3 |
| container_end_page | 1351 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 1345 |
| container_title | Journal of medical entomology |
| container_volume | 58 |
| creator | Glass, Gregory E. Ganser, Claudia Kessler, William H. |
| description | Tick-borne pathogens are of growing concern. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed guidelines standardizing surveys of tick vectors to better monitor the changes in their occurrences. Unbiased surveillance data, from standardized surveys, are presumed critical to generate valid species distribution models (SDMs). We tested previously generated SDMs from standardized protocols for three medically important ticks [Amblyomma americanum (Linnaeus, Ixodida, Ixodidae), Ixodes scapularis (Say, Ixodida, Ixodidae), and Dermacentor variabilis (Say, Ixodida, Ixodidae)]. These previous models ruled out a quarter to half of the state as having these species, with consensus occurrence in about a quarter of the state. New surveys performed throughout 2019 on 250 transects at 43 sites indicated the rule-out functions were 100% accurate for I. scapularis and D. variabilis and 91.9% for A. americanum. As SDM concordance increased, the proportion of transects yielding ticks increased. Independent surveys of SDMs provide external validation—an aspect missing from many SDM studies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jme/tjaa282 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8122235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A768751391</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/jme/tjaa282</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A768751391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b541t-688388a213864367498a0c867a11c9f4606fa194a4dcb705f63c38b1c4c3987e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9rFDEcxYModq2evEtAEEWmza-ZSS5CqVYLFQ9b9RgySWb7XWeSNZkp1r_elF2rFVFyCCSf78t74SH0mJIDShQ_XI_-cFobwyS7gxZUcVkxxeRdtCCEsYrVst5DD3JeE0IkFeo-2uOcy6bldIH8JzOAMxOEFV5uvAWf8WvIU4JuniAG_D46P2T8GaYLvJxMcCY5-O4dXs7p0l9l3MeET79FBw6fg_2SMZQhA2EoLD4ZYiryD9G93gzZP9rt--jjyZvz43fV2Ye3p8dHZ1VXCzpVjZRcSsNocSd40wolDbHFqaHUql40pOkNVcIIZ7uW1H3DLZcdtcJyJVvP99Grre5m7kbvrA9TMoPeJBhNutLRgL59E-BCr-KllpQxxusi8HwnkOLX2edJj5CtH0oYH-esmWiFFIozUdCnf6DrOKdQ4mlWc8oUoYT_olZm8BpCH8u79lpUH7WNbGvKFS3UwV-ospwfwcbgeyjntwZebgdsijkn399kpERft0KXVuhdKwr95PdvuWF_1qAAz7ZAnDf_UXqxBTuIxdY_2R9Yz82d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2531290103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating Species Distribution Models With Standardized Surveys for Ixodid Ticks in Mainland Florida</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Glass, Gregory E. ; Ganser, Claudia ; Kessler, William H.</creator><contributor>Diuk-Wasser, Maria</contributor><creatorcontrib>Glass, Gregory E. ; Ganser, Claudia ; Kessler, William H. ; Diuk-Wasser, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Tick-borne pathogens are of growing concern. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed guidelines standardizing surveys of tick vectors to better monitor the changes in their occurrences. Unbiased surveillance data, from standardized surveys, are presumed critical to generate valid species distribution models (SDMs). We tested previously generated SDMs from standardized protocols for three medically important ticks [Amblyomma americanum (Linnaeus, Ixodida, Ixodidae), Ixodes scapularis (Say, Ixodida, Ixodidae), and Dermacentor variabilis (Say, Ixodida, Ixodidae)]. These previous models ruled out a quarter to half of the state as having these species, with consensus occurrence in about a quarter of the state. New surveys performed throughout 2019 on 250 transects at 43 sites indicated the rule-out functions were 100% accurate for I. scapularis and D. variabilis and 91.9% for A. americanum. As SDM concordance increased, the proportion of transects yielding ticks increased. Independent surveys of SDMs provide external validation—an aspect missing from many SDM studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2928</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjaa282</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33386731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Amblyomma - growth & development ; Amblyomma - physiology ; Animal Distribution ; Animals ; Arachnids ; Biological monitoring ; Control ; Dermacentor - growth & development ; Dermacentor - physiology ; Destruction ; Disease control ; external validity ; Florida ; Geographical distribution ; Insects as carriers of disease ; Ixodes - growth & development ; Ixodes - physiology ; Ixodida ; Ixodidae ; Methods ; Nymph - growth & development ; Nymph - physiology ; Polls & surveys ; Risk factors ; Scientific surveys ; Species ; species distribution model ; surveillance ; tick ; Tick-borne diseases ; tickborne disease ; Ticks ; VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES, SURVEILLANCE, PREVENTION ; Vectors</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical entomology, 2021-05, Vol.58 (3), p.1345-1351</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b541t-688388a213864367498a0c867a11c9f4606fa194a4dcb705f63c38b1c4c3987e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b541t-688388a213864367498a0c867a11c9f4606fa194a4dcb705f63c38b1c4c3987e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3574-5400 ; 0000-0002-8560-2451</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33386731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Diuk-Wasser, Maria</contributor><creatorcontrib>Glass, Gregory E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganser, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, William H.</creatorcontrib><title>Validating Species Distribution Models With Standardized Surveys for Ixodid Ticks in Mainland Florida</title><title>Journal of medical entomology</title><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><description>Tick-borne pathogens are of growing concern. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed guidelines standardizing surveys of tick vectors to better monitor the changes in their occurrences. Unbiased surveillance data, from standardized surveys, are presumed critical to generate valid species distribution models (SDMs). We tested previously generated SDMs from standardized protocols for three medically important ticks [Amblyomma americanum (Linnaeus, Ixodida, Ixodidae), Ixodes scapularis (Say, Ixodida, Ixodidae), and Dermacentor variabilis (Say, Ixodida, Ixodidae)]. These previous models ruled out a quarter to half of the state as having these species, with consensus occurrence in about a quarter of the state. New surveys performed throughout 2019 on 250 transects at 43 sites indicated the rule-out functions were 100% accurate for I. scapularis and D. variabilis and 91.9% for A. americanum. As SDM concordance increased, the proportion of transects yielding ticks increased. Independent surveys of SDMs provide external validation—an aspect missing from many SDM studies.</description><subject>Amblyomma - growth & development</subject><subject>Amblyomma - physiology</subject><subject>Animal Distribution</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arachnids</subject><subject>Biological monitoring</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Dermacentor - growth & development</subject><subject>Dermacentor - physiology</subject><subject>Destruction</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>external validity</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Insects as carriers of disease</subject><subject>Ixodes - growth & development</subject><subject>Ixodes - physiology</subject><subject>Ixodida</subject><subject>Ixodidae</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nymph - growth & development</subject><subject>Nymph - physiology</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Scientific surveys</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species distribution model</subject><subject>surveillance</subject><subject>tick</subject><subject>Tick-borne diseases</subject><subject>tickborne disease</subject><subject>Ticks</subject><subject>VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES, SURVEILLANCE, PREVENTION</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><issn>0022-2585</issn><issn>1938-2928</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9rFDEcxYModq2evEtAEEWmza-ZSS5CqVYLFQ9b9RgySWb7XWeSNZkp1r_elF2rFVFyCCSf78t74SH0mJIDShQ_XI_-cFobwyS7gxZUcVkxxeRdtCCEsYrVst5DD3JeE0IkFeo-2uOcy6bldIH8JzOAMxOEFV5uvAWf8WvIU4JuniAG_D46P2T8GaYLvJxMcCY5-O4dXs7p0l9l3MeET79FBw6fg_2SMZQhA2EoLD4ZYiryD9G93gzZP9rt--jjyZvz43fV2Ye3p8dHZ1VXCzpVjZRcSsNocSd40wolDbHFqaHUql40pOkNVcIIZ7uW1H3DLZcdtcJyJVvP99Grre5m7kbvrA9TMoPeJBhNutLRgL59E-BCr-KllpQxxusi8HwnkOLX2edJj5CtH0oYH-esmWiFFIozUdCnf6DrOKdQ4mlWc8oUoYT_olZm8BpCH8u79lpUH7WNbGvKFS3UwV-ospwfwcbgeyjntwZebgdsijkn399kpERft0KXVuhdKwr95PdvuWF_1qAAz7ZAnDf_UXqxBTuIxdY_2R9Yz82d</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Glass, Gregory E.</creator><creator>Ganser, Claudia</creator><creator>Kessler, William H.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3574-5400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8560-2451</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Validating Species Distribution Models With Standardized Surveys for Ixodid Ticks in Mainland Florida</title><author>Glass, Gregory E. ; Ganser, Claudia ; Kessler, William H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b541t-688388a213864367498a0c867a11c9f4606fa194a4dcb705f63c38b1c4c3987e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amblyomma - growth & development</topic><topic>Amblyomma - physiology</topic><topic>Animal Distribution</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arachnids</topic><topic>Biological monitoring</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Dermacentor - growth & development</topic><topic>Dermacentor - physiology</topic><topic>Destruction</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>external validity</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Insects as carriers of disease</topic><topic>Ixodes - growth & development</topic><topic>Ixodes - physiology</topic><topic>Ixodida</topic><topic>Ixodidae</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nymph - growth & development</topic><topic>Nymph - physiology</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Scientific surveys</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species distribution model</topic><topic>surveillance</topic><topic>tick</topic><topic>Tick-borne diseases</topic><topic>tickborne disease</topic><topic>Ticks</topic><topic>VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES, SURVEILLANCE, PREVENTION</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glass, Gregory E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganser, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, William H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glass, Gregory E.</au><au>Ganser, Claudia</au><au>Kessler, William H.</au><au>Diuk-Wasser, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating Species Distribution Models With Standardized Surveys for Ixodid Ticks in Mainland Florida</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1345</spage><epage>1351</epage><pages>1345-1351</pages><issn>0022-2585</issn><eissn>1938-2928</eissn><abstract>Tick-borne pathogens are of growing concern. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed guidelines standardizing surveys of tick vectors to better monitor the changes in their occurrences. Unbiased surveillance data, from standardized surveys, are presumed critical to generate valid species distribution models (SDMs). We tested previously generated SDMs from standardized protocols for three medically important ticks [Amblyomma americanum (Linnaeus, Ixodida, Ixodidae), Ixodes scapularis (Say, Ixodida, Ixodidae), and Dermacentor variabilis (Say, Ixodida, Ixodidae)]. These previous models ruled out a quarter to half of the state as having these species, with consensus occurrence in about a quarter of the state. New surveys performed throughout 2019 on 250 transects at 43 sites indicated the rule-out functions were 100% accurate for I. scapularis and D. variabilis and 91.9% for A. americanum. As SDM concordance increased, the proportion of transects yielding ticks increased. Independent surveys of SDMs provide external validation—an aspect missing from many SDM studies.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>33386731</pmid><doi>10.1093/jme/tjaa282</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3574-5400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8560-2451</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-2585 |
| ispartof | Journal of medical entomology, 2021-05, Vol.58 (3), p.1345-1351 |
| issn | 0022-2585 1938-2928 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8122235 |
| source | Oxford Journals Online |
| subjects | Amblyomma - growth & development Amblyomma - physiology Animal Distribution Animals Arachnids Biological monitoring Control Dermacentor - growth & development Dermacentor - physiology Destruction Disease control external validity Florida Geographical distribution Insects as carriers of disease Ixodes - growth & development Ixodes - physiology Ixodida Ixodidae Methods Nymph - growth & development Nymph - physiology Polls & surveys Risk factors Scientific surveys Species species distribution model surveillance tick Tick-borne diseases tickborne disease Ticks VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES, SURVEILLANCE, PREVENTION Vectors |
| title | Validating Species Distribution Models With Standardized Surveys for Ixodid Ticks in Mainland Florida |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A41%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20Species%20Distribution%20Models%20With%20Standardized%20Surveys%20for%20Ixodid%20Ticks%20in%20Mainland%20Florida&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20entomology&rft.au=Glass,%20Gregory%20E.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1345&rft.epage=1351&rft.pages=1345-1351&rft.issn=0022-2585&rft.eissn=1938-2928&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jme/tjaa282&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA768751391%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b541t-688388a213864367498a0c867a11c9f4606fa194a4dcb705f63c38b1c4c3987e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2531290103&rft_id=info:pmid/33386731&rft_galeid=A768751391&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jme/tjaa282&rfr_iscdi=true |