Conceptualizing Mental Health Through Bhutanese Refugee Lens: Findings from a Mixed Methods Study

Despite the rapidly growing need to understand mental health challenges faced by refugee subpopulations, there is a dearth of literature exploring mental health conceptualization through the unique refugee lens. Guided by historical trauma theory, we gathered data using a two-phase explanatory seque...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Community mental health journal 2022-02, Vol.58 (2), p.376-393
Main Authors: Maleku, Arati, Soukenik, Eliza, Haran, Hanna, Kirsch, Jaclyn, Pyakurel, Sudarshan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adaptation, Psychological
Bhutan
Community and Environmental Psychology
Concept formation
Coping strategies
Cultural factors
Cultural sensitivity
Healing
Health problems
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental disorders
Mental Health
Mental health services
Mixed methods research
Original Paper
Protective factors
Psychiatry
Refugees
Refugees - psychology
Self evaluation
Trauma
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Despite the rapidly growing need to understand mental health challenges faced by refugee subpopulations, there is a dearth of literature exploring mental health conceptualization through the unique refugee lens. Guided by historical trauma theory, we gathered data using a two-phase explanatory sequential mixed-methods study (quantitative: n  = 40; qualitative: n  = 6) in a Midwestern U.S. region to understand mental health conceptualization from the Bhutanese refugee perspective by examining the cultural meaning and perception of mental health, describing experiences of mental health problems, and examining cultural protective factors and coping strategies. We argue that recognition of refugees’ conceptualization of mental health and identification of cultural protective factors is paramount to healing. Findings emphasize the need to understand historical and cultural perspectives in cross-cultural contexts for the development and implementation of culturally responsive services. Our study also contributes to emerging knowledge on methodological rigor in research among understudied, hard-to-reach, small populations.
ISSN:0010-3853
1573-2789
DOI:10.1007/s10597-021-00835-4