Clinical evaluation of rapid point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection

• Published in: European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 2021-09, Vol.40 (9), p.1975-1981
• Main Authors: Koeleman, Johannes G. M., Brand, Henk, de Man, Stijn J., Ong, David S. Y.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antigens; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Emergency medical care; Emergency medical services; Health care; Internal Medicine; Medical Microbiology; Medical personnel; Original; Original Article; Patients; Population studies; Sensitivity; Sensitivity analysis; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Viral diseases
• ISSN: 0934-9723; 1435-4373
• DOI: 10.1007/s10096-021-04274-7

The RT-qPCR in respiratory specimens is the gold standard for diagnosing acute COVID-19 infections. However, this test takes considerable time before test results become available, thereby delaying patients from being diagnosed, treated, and isolated immediately. Rapid antigen tests could overcome this problem. In the first study, clinical performances of five rapid antigen tests were compared to RT-qPCR in upper respiratory specimens from 40 patients with positive and 40 with negative RTq-PCR results. In the second study, the rapid antigen test with one of the best test characteristics (Romed) was evaluated in a large prospective collection of upper respiratory specimens from 900 different COVID-19-suspected patients (300 emergency room patients, 300 nursing home patients, and 300 health care workers). Test specificities ranged from 87.5 to 100.0%, and test sensitivities from 55.0 to 80.0%. The clinical specificity of the Romed test was 99.8% (95% CI 98.9–100). Overall clinical sensitivity in the study population was 73.3% (95% CI 67.9–78.2), whereas sensitivity in the different patient groups varied from 65.3 to 86.7%. Sensitivity was 83.0 to 86.7% in patients with short duration of symptoms. In a population with a COVID-19 prevalence of 1%, the negative predictive value in all patients was 99.7%. There is a large variability in diagnostic performance between rapid antigen tests. The Romed rapid antigen test showed a good clinical performance in patients with high viral loads (RT-qPCR cycle threshold ≤30), which makes this antigen test suitable for rapid identification of COVID-19-infected health care workers and patients.