Loading…

Vitamin D Status in Adolescents during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study

Vitamin D has been claimed to be effective in the response to infections, including the respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is supposed that lockdown measures and fear of SARS-CoV-2 infection might reduce vitamin D levels through the modification of lifestyle. However, very few data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nutrients 2021-04, Vol.13 (5), p.1467
Main Authors: Meoli, Martina, Muggli, Franco, Lava, Sebastiano A G, Bianchetti, Mario G, Agostoni, Carlo, Kocher, Claudine, Bührer, Thomas W, Ciliberti, Letizia, Simonetti, Giacomo D, Milani, Gregorio P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Vitamin D has been claimed to be effective in the response to infections, including the respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is supposed that lockdown measures and fear of SARS-CoV-2 infection might reduce vitamin D levels through the modification of lifestyle. However, very few data exist on the association between lockdown measures and vitamin D status in humans. For this cross-sectional comparative study, adolescents ( = 298) aged 18 to 19 years were enrolled during the compulsory military fitness-for-duty evaluation between July and December 2020 in Southern Switzerland. Beyond anthropometric measurements, participants filled in a structured questionnaire about their lifestyle and a blood specimen was sampled for the determination of total 25-hydroxy-vitamin D. The obtained data were compared with those of 437 adolescents enrolled at the military fitness-for-duty evaluation during the same period of the year in the context of the CENERI study (2014-2016). The anthropometric measures were similar between the two study groups. The levels of vitamin D were also comparable (77 (64-91) vs. 74 (60-92) nmol/L, = 0.50; median and interquartile range). A total of 38 (13%) and 43 (9.8%) subjects presented insufficient (
ISSN:2072-6643
2072-6643
DOI:10.3390/nu13051467