Loading…
Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach
Purpose With the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS...
Saved in:
Published in: | Abdominal imaging 2020-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2726-2735 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83 |
container_end_page | 2735 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2726 |
container_title | Abdominal imaging |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Fehrenbach, Uli Gül-Klein, Safak de Sousa Mendes, Miguel Steffen, Ingo Stern, Julienne Geisel, Dominik Puhl, Gero Denecke, Timm |
description | Purpose
With the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS approach.
Material and methods
Forty-four patients who underwent PSSS (2002 to 2013) were examined by contrast-enhanced CT (
n
= 33) and/or MRI (
n
= 15) prior to surgery. Imaging was analyzed independently by two observers (O1 and O2) with different levels of experience (O1 > O2). They recommended two shunting techniques (vessels and anastomotic variant) for each patient and ranked them according to their appropriateness and complexity. Findings were compared with the actually performed shunt procedure and its outcome.
Results
The first two choices taken together covered the performed PSSS regarding vessels in 88%/100% (CT/MRI, O1) and 76%/73% (O2); and vessels + anastomosis in 79%/73% (O1) and 67%/60% (O2). The prediction of complex surgical procedures (resection of interposing structures, additional thrombectomy, use of a collateral vessel, and use of a graft interposition) was confirmed in 87%, resulting in 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Larger shunt vessel distances were associated with therapy failure (
p
= 0.030) and a vessel distance of ≥ 20 mm was identified as optimal cutoff, in which a graft interposition was used. There was no significant difference between MRI and CT in predicting the intraoperative decisions (
p
= 0.294 to 1.000).
Conclusion
Preoperative imaging and an experienced radiologist can guide surgeons in PSSS. CT and MRI provide the information necessary to identify technically feasible variants and complicating factors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00261-020-02599-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8197708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2540280881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVoyC5J_kBPgl56cTKSJVnqoVCWpg0EEkgCvQlZlncdvJIr2YXNr6_cDQnNYQ-DRsz3HjM8hD4SuCAA1WUCoIIUQCEXV6p4PkJLWgpRAHD54bVnvxboPKUnACCCE0L5CVqUlAMjJSyRvgtxDGmXRrftLE6byY84TXHt4g53Ho8bh100OLT44fru_gvutmbd-XVRm-QaPPTG-_yd5zM6KztremyGIQZjN2fouDV9cucv7yl6vPr-sPpZ3Nz-uF59uyksq9RY1FwZXtlaUUVdzZxqwYBQllfQSNkIaltpRKMaIdumpsYpq6g1kkngltayPEVf977DVG9dY50fo-n1EPO-caeD6fT_E99t9Dr80ZKoqoLZ4POLQQy_J5dGve2SdX0-0IUpacoIlEIKJjL66R36FKbo83macgZUgpTkIMVKKiQrxUzRPWVjSCm69nVlAnoOWu-D1jlo_S9o_ZxF5V6UMuxzVG_WB1R_AW78qqo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2432684361</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Fehrenbach, Uli ; Gül-Klein, Safak ; de Sousa Mendes, Miguel ; Steffen, Ingo ; Stern, Julienne ; Geisel, Dominik ; Puhl, Gero ; Denecke, Timm</creator><creatorcontrib>Fehrenbach, Uli ; Gül-Klein, Safak ; de Sousa Mendes, Miguel ; Steffen, Ingo ; Stern, Julienne ; Geisel, Dominik ; Puhl, Gero ; Denecke, Timm</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
With the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS approach.
Material and methods
Forty-four patients who underwent PSSS (2002 to 2013) were examined by contrast-enhanced CT (
n
= 33) and/or MRI (
n
= 15) prior to surgery. Imaging was analyzed independently by two observers (O1 and O2) with different levels of experience (O1 > O2). They recommended two shunting techniques (vessels and anastomotic variant) for each patient and ranked them according to their appropriateness and complexity. Findings were compared with the actually performed shunt procedure and its outcome.
Results
The first two choices taken together covered the performed PSSS regarding vessels in 88%/100% (CT/MRI, O1) and 76%/73% (O2); and vessels + anastomosis in 79%/73% (O1) and 67%/60% (O2). The prediction of complex surgical procedures (resection of interposing structures, additional thrombectomy, use of a collateral vessel, and use of a graft interposition) was confirmed in 87%, resulting in 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Larger shunt vessel distances were associated with therapy failure (
p
= 0.030) and a vessel distance of ≥ 20 mm was identified as optimal cutoff, in which a graft interposition was used. There was no significant difference between MRI and CT in predicting the intraoperative decisions (
p
= 0.294 to 1.000).
Conclusion
Preoperative imaging and an experienced radiologist can guide surgeons in PSSS. CT and MRI provide the information necessary to identify technically feasible variants and complicating factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2366-004X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-0058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02599-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32504130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Anastomosis ; Blood vessels ; Bypasses ; Catheters ; Complex patients ; Complexity ; Computed tomography ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Hepatobiliary ; Hepatology ; Hypertension ; Imaging ; Liver ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Radiology ; Shunts ; Surgery ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Abdominal imaging, 2020-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2726-2735</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2021</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3622-3268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fehrenbach, Uli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gül-Klein, Safak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sousa Mendes, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffen, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Julienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geisel, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puhl, Gero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denecke, Timm</creatorcontrib><title>Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach</title><title>Abdominal imaging</title><addtitle>Abdom Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose
With the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS approach.
Material and methods
Forty-four patients who underwent PSSS (2002 to 2013) were examined by contrast-enhanced CT (
n
= 33) and/or MRI (
n
= 15) prior to surgery. Imaging was analyzed independently by two observers (O1 and O2) with different levels of experience (O1 > O2). They recommended two shunting techniques (vessels and anastomotic variant) for each patient and ranked them according to their appropriateness and complexity. Findings were compared with the actually performed shunt procedure and its outcome.
Results
The first two choices taken together covered the performed PSSS regarding vessels in 88%/100% (CT/MRI, O1) and 76%/73% (O2); and vessels + anastomosis in 79%/73% (O1) and 67%/60% (O2). The prediction of complex surgical procedures (resection of interposing structures, additional thrombectomy, use of a collateral vessel, and use of a graft interposition) was confirmed in 87%, resulting in 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Larger shunt vessel distances were associated with therapy failure (
p
= 0.030) and a vessel distance of ≥ 20 mm was identified as optimal cutoff, in which a graft interposition was used. There was no significant difference between MRI and CT in predicting the intraoperative decisions (
p
= 0.294 to 1.000).
Conclusion
Preoperative imaging and an experienced radiologist can guide surgeons in PSSS. CT and MRI provide the information necessary to identify technically feasible variants and complicating factors.</description><subject>Anastomosis</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Bypasses</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Complex patients</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Hepatobiliary</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Shunts</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2366-004X</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVoyC5J_kBPgl56cTKSJVnqoVCWpg0EEkgCvQlZlncdvJIr2YXNr6_cDQnNYQ-DRsz3HjM8hD4SuCAA1WUCoIIUQCEXV6p4PkJLWgpRAHD54bVnvxboPKUnACCCE0L5CVqUlAMjJSyRvgtxDGmXRrftLE6byY84TXHt4g53Ho8bh100OLT44fru_gvutmbd-XVRm-QaPPTG-_yd5zM6KztremyGIQZjN2fouDV9cucv7yl6vPr-sPpZ3Nz-uF59uyksq9RY1FwZXtlaUUVdzZxqwYBQllfQSNkIaltpRKMaIdumpsYpq6g1kkngltayPEVf977DVG9dY50fo-n1EPO-caeD6fT_E99t9Dr80ZKoqoLZ4POLQQy_J5dGve2SdX0-0IUpacoIlEIKJjL66R36FKbo83macgZUgpTkIMVKKiQrxUzRPWVjSCm69nVlAnoOWu-D1jlo_S9o_ZxF5V6UMuxzVG_WB1R_AW78qqo</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Fehrenbach, Uli</creator><creator>Gül-Klein, Safak</creator><creator>de Sousa Mendes, Miguel</creator><creator>Steffen, Ingo</creator><creator>Stern, Julienne</creator><creator>Geisel, Dominik</creator><creator>Puhl, Gero</creator><creator>Denecke, Timm</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-3268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach</title><author>Fehrenbach, Uli ; Gül-Klein, Safak ; de Sousa Mendes, Miguel ; Steffen, Ingo ; Stern, Julienne ; Geisel, Dominik ; Puhl, Gero ; Denecke, Timm</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anastomosis</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Bypasses</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Complex patients</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Hepatobiliary</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Shunts</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fehrenbach, Uli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gül-Klein, Safak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sousa Mendes, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffen, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Julienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geisel, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puhl, Gero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denecke, Timm</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fehrenbach, Uli</au><au>Gül-Klein, Safak</au><au>de Sousa Mendes, Miguel</au><au>Steffen, Ingo</au><au>Stern, Julienne</au><au>Geisel, Dominik</au><au>Puhl, Gero</au><au>Denecke, Timm</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach</atitle><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle><stitle>Abdom Radiol</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2726</spage><epage>2735</epage><pages>2726-2735</pages><issn>2366-004X</issn><eissn>2366-0058</eissn><abstract>Purpose
With the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS approach.
Material and methods
Forty-four patients who underwent PSSS (2002 to 2013) were examined by contrast-enhanced CT (
n
= 33) and/or MRI (
n
= 15) prior to surgery. Imaging was analyzed independently by two observers (O1 and O2) with different levels of experience (O1 > O2). They recommended two shunting techniques (vessels and anastomotic variant) for each patient and ranked them according to their appropriateness and complexity. Findings were compared with the actually performed shunt procedure and its outcome.
Results
The first two choices taken together covered the performed PSSS regarding vessels in 88%/100% (CT/MRI, O1) and 76%/73% (O2); and vessels + anastomosis in 79%/73% (O1) and 67%/60% (O2). The prediction of complex surgical procedures (resection of interposing structures, additional thrombectomy, use of a collateral vessel, and use of a graft interposition) was confirmed in 87%, resulting in 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Larger shunt vessel distances were associated with therapy failure (
p
= 0.030) and a vessel distance of ≥ 20 mm was identified as optimal cutoff, in which a graft interposition was used. There was no significant difference between MRI and CT in predicting the intraoperative decisions (
p
= 0.294 to 1.000).
Conclusion
Preoperative imaging and an experienced radiologist can guide surgeons in PSSS. CT and MRI provide the information necessary to identify technically feasible variants and complicating factors.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32504130</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00261-020-02599-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-3268</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2366-004X |
ispartof | Abdominal imaging, 2020-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2726-2735 |
issn | 2366-004X 2366-0058 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8197708 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Anastomosis Blood vessels Bypasses Catheters Complex patients Complexity Computed tomography Gastroenterology Gastrointestinal surgery Hepatobiliary Hepatology Hypertension Imaging Liver Magnetic resonance imaging Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Radiology Shunts Surgery Tomography |
title | Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A29%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Portosystemic%20shunt%20surgery%20in%20the%20era%20of%20TIPS:%20imaging-based%20planning%20of%20the%20surgical%20approach&rft.jtitle=Abdominal%20imaging&rft.au=Fehrenbach,%20Uli&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2726&rft.epage=2735&rft.pages=2726-2735&rft.issn=2366-004X&rft.eissn=2366-0058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00261-020-02599-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2540280881%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2432684361&rft_id=info:pmid/32504130&rfr_iscdi=true |