Loading…

Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach

Purpose With the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Abdominal imaging 2020-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2726-2735
Main Authors: Fehrenbach, Uli, Gül-Klein, Safak, de Sousa Mendes, Miguel, Steffen, Ingo, Stern, Julienne, Geisel, Dominik, Puhl, Gero, Denecke, Timm
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83
container_end_page 2735
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2726
container_title Abdominal imaging
container_volume 45
creator Fehrenbach, Uli
Gül-Klein, Safak
de Sousa Mendes, Miguel
Steffen, Ingo
Stern, Julienne
Geisel, Dominik
Puhl, Gero
Denecke, Timm
description Purpose With the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS approach. Material and methods Forty-four patients who underwent PSSS (2002 to 2013) were examined by contrast-enhanced CT ( n = 33) and/or MRI ( n = 15) prior to surgery. Imaging was analyzed independently by two observers (O1 and O2) with different levels of experience (O1 > O2). They recommended two shunting techniques (vessels and anastomotic variant) for each patient and ranked them according to their appropriateness and complexity. Findings were compared with the actually performed shunt procedure and its outcome. Results The first two choices taken together covered the performed PSSS regarding vessels in 88%/100% (CT/MRI, O1) and 76%/73% (O2); and vessels + anastomosis in 79%/73% (O1) and 67%/60% (O2). The prediction of complex surgical procedures (resection of interposing structures, additional thrombectomy, use of a collateral vessel, and use of a graft interposition) was confirmed in 87%, resulting in 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Larger shunt vessel distances were associated with therapy failure ( p = 0.030) and a vessel distance of ≥ 20 mm was identified as optimal cutoff, in which a graft interposition was used. There was no significant difference between MRI and CT in predicting the intraoperative decisions ( p = 0.294 to 1.000). Conclusion Preoperative imaging and an experienced radiologist can guide surgeons in PSSS. CT and MRI provide the information necessary to identify technically feasible variants and complicating factors.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00261-020-02599-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8197708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2540280881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVoyC5J_kBPgl56cTKSJVnqoVCWpg0EEkgCvQlZlncdvJIr2YXNr6_cDQnNYQ-DRsz3HjM8hD4SuCAA1WUCoIIUQCEXV6p4PkJLWgpRAHD54bVnvxboPKUnACCCE0L5CVqUlAMjJSyRvgtxDGmXRrftLE6byY84TXHt4g53Ho8bh100OLT44fru_gvutmbd-XVRm-QaPPTG-_yd5zM6KztremyGIQZjN2fouDV9cucv7yl6vPr-sPpZ3Nz-uF59uyksq9RY1FwZXtlaUUVdzZxqwYBQllfQSNkIaltpRKMaIdumpsYpq6g1kkngltayPEVf977DVG9dY50fo-n1EPO-caeD6fT_E99t9Dr80ZKoqoLZ4POLQQy_J5dGve2SdX0-0IUpacoIlEIKJjL66R36FKbo83macgZUgpTkIMVKKiQrxUzRPWVjSCm69nVlAnoOWu-D1jlo_S9o_ZxF5V6UMuxzVG_WB1R_AW78qqo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2432684361</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Fehrenbach, Uli ; Gül-Klein, Safak ; de Sousa Mendes, Miguel ; Steffen, Ingo ; Stern, Julienne ; Geisel, Dominik ; Puhl, Gero ; Denecke, Timm</creator><creatorcontrib>Fehrenbach, Uli ; Gül-Klein, Safak ; de Sousa Mendes, Miguel ; Steffen, Ingo ; Stern, Julienne ; Geisel, Dominik ; Puhl, Gero ; Denecke, Timm</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose With the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS approach. Material and methods Forty-four patients who underwent PSSS (2002 to 2013) were examined by contrast-enhanced CT ( n = 33) and/or MRI ( n = 15) prior to surgery. Imaging was analyzed independently by two observers (O1 and O2) with different levels of experience (O1 &gt; O2). They recommended two shunting techniques (vessels and anastomotic variant) for each patient and ranked them according to their appropriateness and complexity. Findings were compared with the actually performed shunt procedure and its outcome. Results The first two choices taken together covered the performed PSSS regarding vessels in 88%/100% (CT/MRI, O1) and 76%/73% (O2); and vessels + anastomosis in 79%/73% (O1) and 67%/60% (O2). The prediction of complex surgical procedures (resection of interposing structures, additional thrombectomy, use of a collateral vessel, and use of a graft interposition) was confirmed in 87%, resulting in 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Larger shunt vessel distances were associated with therapy failure ( p = 0.030) and a vessel distance of ≥ 20 mm was identified as optimal cutoff, in which a graft interposition was used. There was no significant difference between MRI and CT in predicting the intraoperative decisions ( p = 0.294 to 1.000). Conclusion Preoperative imaging and an experienced radiologist can guide surgeons in PSSS. CT and MRI provide the information necessary to identify technically feasible variants and complicating factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2366-004X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-0058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02599-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32504130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Anastomosis ; Blood vessels ; Bypasses ; Catheters ; Complex patients ; Complexity ; Computed tomography ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Hepatobiliary ; Hepatology ; Hypertension ; Imaging ; Liver ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Radiology ; Shunts ; Surgery ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Abdominal imaging, 2020-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2726-2735</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2021</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3622-3268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fehrenbach, Uli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gül-Klein, Safak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sousa Mendes, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffen, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Julienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geisel, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puhl, Gero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denecke, Timm</creatorcontrib><title>Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach</title><title>Abdominal imaging</title><addtitle>Abdom Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose With the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS approach. Material and methods Forty-four patients who underwent PSSS (2002 to 2013) were examined by contrast-enhanced CT ( n = 33) and/or MRI ( n = 15) prior to surgery. Imaging was analyzed independently by two observers (O1 and O2) with different levels of experience (O1 &gt; O2). They recommended two shunting techniques (vessels and anastomotic variant) for each patient and ranked them according to their appropriateness and complexity. Findings were compared with the actually performed shunt procedure and its outcome. Results The first two choices taken together covered the performed PSSS regarding vessels in 88%/100% (CT/MRI, O1) and 76%/73% (O2); and vessels + anastomosis in 79%/73% (O1) and 67%/60% (O2). The prediction of complex surgical procedures (resection of interposing structures, additional thrombectomy, use of a collateral vessel, and use of a graft interposition) was confirmed in 87%, resulting in 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Larger shunt vessel distances were associated with therapy failure ( p = 0.030) and a vessel distance of ≥ 20 mm was identified as optimal cutoff, in which a graft interposition was used. There was no significant difference between MRI and CT in predicting the intraoperative decisions ( p = 0.294 to 1.000). Conclusion Preoperative imaging and an experienced radiologist can guide surgeons in PSSS. CT and MRI provide the information necessary to identify technically feasible variants and complicating factors.</description><subject>Anastomosis</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Bypasses</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Complex patients</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Hepatobiliary</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Shunts</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2366-004X</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVoyC5J_kBPgl56cTKSJVnqoVCWpg0EEkgCvQlZlncdvJIr2YXNr6_cDQnNYQ-DRsz3HjM8hD4SuCAA1WUCoIIUQCEXV6p4PkJLWgpRAHD54bVnvxboPKUnACCCE0L5CVqUlAMjJSyRvgtxDGmXRrftLE6byY84TXHt4g53Ho8bh100OLT44fru_gvutmbd-XVRm-QaPPTG-_yd5zM6KztremyGIQZjN2fouDV9cucv7yl6vPr-sPpZ3Nz-uF59uyksq9RY1FwZXtlaUUVdzZxqwYBQllfQSNkIaltpRKMaIdumpsYpq6g1kkngltayPEVf977DVG9dY50fo-n1EPO-caeD6fT_E99t9Dr80ZKoqoLZ4POLQQy_J5dGve2SdX0-0IUpacoIlEIKJjL66R36FKbo83macgZUgpTkIMVKKiQrxUzRPWVjSCm69nVlAnoOWu-D1jlo_S9o_ZxF5V6UMuxzVG_WB1R_AW78qqo</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Fehrenbach, Uli</creator><creator>Gül-Klein, Safak</creator><creator>de Sousa Mendes, Miguel</creator><creator>Steffen, Ingo</creator><creator>Stern, Julienne</creator><creator>Geisel, Dominik</creator><creator>Puhl, Gero</creator><creator>Denecke, Timm</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-3268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach</title><author>Fehrenbach, Uli ; Gül-Klein, Safak ; de Sousa Mendes, Miguel ; Steffen, Ingo ; Stern, Julienne ; Geisel, Dominik ; Puhl, Gero ; Denecke, Timm</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anastomosis</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Bypasses</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Complex patients</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Hepatobiliary</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Shunts</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fehrenbach, Uli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gül-Klein, Safak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sousa Mendes, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffen, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Julienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geisel, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puhl, Gero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denecke, Timm</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fehrenbach, Uli</au><au>Gül-Klein, Safak</au><au>de Sousa Mendes, Miguel</au><au>Steffen, Ingo</au><au>Stern, Julienne</au><au>Geisel, Dominik</au><au>Puhl, Gero</au><au>Denecke, Timm</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach</atitle><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle><stitle>Abdom Radiol</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2726</spage><epage>2735</epage><pages>2726-2735</pages><issn>2366-004X</issn><eissn>2366-0058</eissn><abstract>Purpose With the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS approach. Material and methods Forty-four patients who underwent PSSS (2002 to 2013) were examined by contrast-enhanced CT ( n = 33) and/or MRI ( n = 15) prior to surgery. Imaging was analyzed independently by two observers (O1 and O2) with different levels of experience (O1 &gt; O2). They recommended two shunting techniques (vessels and anastomotic variant) for each patient and ranked them according to their appropriateness and complexity. Findings were compared with the actually performed shunt procedure and its outcome. Results The first two choices taken together covered the performed PSSS regarding vessels in 88%/100% (CT/MRI, O1) and 76%/73% (O2); and vessels + anastomosis in 79%/73% (O1) and 67%/60% (O2). The prediction of complex surgical procedures (resection of interposing structures, additional thrombectomy, use of a collateral vessel, and use of a graft interposition) was confirmed in 87%, resulting in 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Larger shunt vessel distances were associated with therapy failure ( p = 0.030) and a vessel distance of ≥ 20 mm was identified as optimal cutoff, in which a graft interposition was used. There was no significant difference between MRI and CT in predicting the intraoperative decisions ( p = 0.294 to 1.000). Conclusion Preoperative imaging and an experienced radiologist can guide surgeons in PSSS. CT and MRI provide the information necessary to identify technically feasible variants and complicating factors.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32504130</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00261-020-02599-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-3268</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2366-004X
ispartof Abdominal imaging, 2020-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2726-2735
issn 2366-004X
2366-0058
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8197708
source Springer Nature
subjects Anastomosis
Blood vessels
Bypasses
Catheters
Complex patients
Complexity
Computed tomography
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal surgery
Hepatobiliary
Hepatology
Hypertension
Imaging
Liver
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Radiology
Shunts
Surgery
Tomography
title Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A29%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Portosystemic%20shunt%20surgery%20in%20the%20era%20of%20TIPS:%20imaging-based%20planning%20of%20the%20surgical%20approach&rft.jtitle=Abdominal%20imaging&rft.au=Fehrenbach,%20Uli&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2726&rft.epage=2735&rft.pages=2726-2735&rft.issn=2366-004X&rft.eissn=2366-0058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00261-020-02599-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2540280881%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b59a57cb9292eb4e9f0a069c570d88d62cf8a6d9d68fdb2ae9c92ca84805c2b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2432684361&rft_id=info:pmid/32504130&rfr_iscdi=true