Loading…
Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Patients with Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections
Background. Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (KP-BSI) has been reported to account for more than 10% of all KP-BSI, but few studies have characterized polymicrobial KP-BSI. Our study investigated the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of polymicrobial KP-BS...
Saved in:
Published in: | BioMed research international 2021, Vol.2021 (1), p.6619911 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-4e43b6b97a5fa0f22092890a2d1b18251134951c4d5c98aeff043b9022be609a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-4e43b6b97a5fa0f22092890a2d1b18251134951c4d5c98aeff043b9022be609a3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 6619911 |
container_title | BioMed research international |
container_volume | 2021 |
creator | Song, Feizhen Zhang, Kai Huang, Jianjiang Qian, Zhenhua Zhou, Hongwei Cai, Jiachang Zheng, Cheng Zhou, Feifei Cui, Wei Zhang, Gensheng |
description | Background. Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (KP-BSI) has been reported to account for more than 10% of all KP-BSI, but few studies have characterized polymicrobial KP-BSI. Our study investigated the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of polymicrobial KP-BSI by comparing with monomicrobial KP-BSI. Methods. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with KP-BSI from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018 and collected the clinical data by reviewing electronic medical records. Results. Of the 818 patients with KP-BSI recruited, 13.9% (114/818) were polymicrobial KP-BSI. The severity of illness in polymicrobial and monomicrobial KP-BSI was similar, while the rate of resistance to carbapenems was obviously higher in polymicrobial KP-BSI (78.1% vs. 65.6%, p=0.009). On multivariate analysis, hospitalization in burn ward (odds ratio (OR) 6.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.00-18.76, p=0.001) and intensive care unit (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.05-5.43, p=0.038) was independently associated with polymicrobial KP-BSI. Gram-negative bacteria accounted for the highest proportion (68.9%) among copathogens of polymicrobial KP-BSI, whereas gram-positive bacteria (22.9%) and Candida (8.2%) ranked the second and the third, respectively, with Acinetobacter baumannii being the most common (23.0%). Patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had longer hospital days after BSI onset and total hospital days than patients with monomicrobial KP-BSI (median (interquartile range (IQR)), 19 (5, 39) vs. 12 (6, 25), 37 (21, 67) vs. 29 (16, 53), respectively, p0.05). Conclusions. It was observed that polymicrobial KP-BSI accounted for a significant proportion among all KP-BSI in the current study. Hospitalization in burn ward and intensive care unit was an independent risk factor for the development of polymicrobial KP-BSI. The patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had a higher rate of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and might have poor outcomes compared to monomicrobial KP-BSI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2021/6619911 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8235985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A696886317</galeid><sourcerecordid>A696886317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-4e43b6b97a5fa0f22092890a2d1b18251134951c4d5c98aeff043b9022be609a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1vFCEYxidGY5vam2dD4sXEruV7h4tJ3VhtbNLG6JkwDNN9KwNbYGx680-Xya7rx0EufP14eB54m-Y5wW8IEeKUYkpOpSRKEfKoOaSM8IUknDzejxk7aI5zvsW1tURiJZ82B4xTphRtD5sfKw8BrPFotTbJ2OIS5AI2n6DPkL-h87oUU52Z0KOrqdg4uozigK5NARdKRvdQ1ug6-ocRbIodVKlP3nUZnPcGbYKbxhjAOPTOx9jnkpwZ0UUYnC0QQ37WPBmMz-541x81X8_ff1l9XFxefbhYnV0uLF_KsuCOs052amnEYPBAKa72FTa0Jx1pqSCEcSWI5b2wqjVuGHA9oDClnauhDTtq3m51N1M3ut5W78l4vUkwmvSgowH9906Atb6J33VLmVCtqAKvdgIp3k0uFz1CtnPI4OKUNRUCU0mXyxl9-Q96G6cUarxKccEZWRL8m7ox3mkIQ6z32llUn0kl21ZWrlInW6o-bs7JDXvLBOu5BvRcA3pXAxV_8WfMPfzrxyvwegusIfTmHv4v9xNtSbk7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2545431710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Patients with Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Song, Feizhen ; Zhang, Kai ; Huang, Jianjiang ; Qian, Zhenhua ; Zhou, Hongwei ; Cai, Jiachang ; Zheng, Cheng ; Zhou, Feifei ; Cui, Wei ; Zhang, Gensheng</creator><contributor>dos Santos, Washington L. C. ; Washington L C dos Santos</contributor><creatorcontrib>Song, Feizhen ; Zhang, Kai ; Huang, Jianjiang ; Qian, Zhenhua ; Zhou, Hongwei ; Cai, Jiachang ; Zheng, Cheng ; Zhou, Feifei ; Cui, Wei ; Zhang, Gensheng ; dos Santos, Washington L. C. ; Washington L C dos Santos</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (KP-BSI) has been reported to account for more than 10% of all KP-BSI, but few studies have characterized polymicrobial KP-BSI. Our study investigated the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of polymicrobial KP-BSI by comparing with monomicrobial KP-BSI. Methods. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with KP-BSI from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018 and collected the clinical data by reviewing electronic medical records. Results. Of the 818 patients with KP-BSI recruited, 13.9% (114/818) were polymicrobial KP-BSI. The severity of illness in polymicrobial and monomicrobial KP-BSI was similar, while the rate of resistance to carbapenems was obviously higher in polymicrobial KP-BSI (78.1% vs. 65.6%, p=0.009). On multivariate analysis, hospitalization in burn ward (odds ratio (OR) 6.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.00-18.76, p=0.001) and intensive care unit (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.05-5.43, p=0.038) was independently associated with polymicrobial KP-BSI. Gram-negative bacteria accounted for the highest proportion (68.9%) among copathogens of polymicrobial KP-BSI, whereas gram-positive bacteria (22.9%) and Candida (8.2%) ranked the second and the third, respectively, with Acinetobacter baumannii being the most common (23.0%). Patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had longer hospital days after BSI onset and total hospital days than patients with monomicrobial KP-BSI (median (interquartile range (IQR)), 19 (5, 39) vs. 12 (6, 25), 37 (21, 67) vs. 29 (16, 53), respectively, p<0.05). The mortality did not differ between polymicrobial KP-BSI and monomicrobial KP-BSI (all p>0.05). Conclusions. It was observed that polymicrobial KP-BSI accounted for a significant proportion among all KP-BSI in the current study. Hospitalization in burn ward and intensive care unit was an independent risk factor for the development of polymicrobial KP-BSI. The patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had a higher rate of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and might have poor outcomes compared to monomicrobial KP-BSI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-6133</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2314-6141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-6141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2021/6619911</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34239928</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Antibiotics ; Bacteremia - microbiology ; Bacteria ; Carbapenems ; Carbapenems - pharmacology ; Comorbidity ; Confidence intervals ; Diagnosis ; Drug dosages ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Ertapenem - pharmacology ; Female ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Gram-positive bacteria ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Imipenem - pharmacology ; Infections ; Intensive Care Units ; Intubation ; Klebsiella ; Klebsiella infections ; Klebsiella Infections - blood ; Klebsiella pneumoniae ; Klebsiella pneumoniae - metabolism ; Laboratories ; Male ; Meropenem - pharmacology ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Pathogens ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk analysis ; Risk Factors ; Sepsis ; Statistical analysis ; Survival analysis ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>BioMed research international, 2021, Vol.2021 (1), p.6619911</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Feizhen Song et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Feizhen Song et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Feizhen Song et al. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-4e43b6b97a5fa0f22092890a2d1b18251134951c4d5c98aeff043b9022be609a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-4e43b6b97a5fa0f22092890a2d1b18251134951c4d5c98aeff043b9022be609a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6602-4406 ; 0000-0001-9298-3961</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2545431710/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2545431710?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4009,25732,27902,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,74873</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34239928$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>dos Santos, Washington L. C.</contributor><contributor>Washington L C dos Santos</contributor><creatorcontrib>Song, Feizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jianjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Zhenhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Jiachang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Feifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Gensheng</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Patients with Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections</title><title>BioMed research international</title><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><description>Background. Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (KP-BSI) has been reported to account for more than 10% of all KP-BSI, but few studies have characterized polymicrobial KP-BSI. Our study investigated the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of polymicrobial KP-BSI by comparing with monomicrobial KP-BSI. Methods. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with KP-BSI from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018 and collected the clinical data by reviewing electronic medical records. Results. Of the 818 patients with KP-BSI recruited, 13.9% (114/818) were polymicrobial KP-BSI. The severity of illness in polymicrobial and monomicrobial KP-BSI was similar, while the rate of resistance to carbapenems was obviously higher in polymicrobial KP-BSI (78.1% vs. 65.6%, p=0.009). On multivariate analysis, hospitalization in burn ward (odds ratio (OR) 6.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.00-18.76, p=0.001) and intensive care unit (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.05-5.43, p=0.038) was independently associated with polymicrobial KP-BSI. Gram-negative bacteria accounted for the highest proportion (68.9%) among copathogens of polymicrobial KP-BSI, whereas gram-positive bacteria (22.9%) and Candida (8.2%) ranked the second and the third, respectively, with Acinetobacter baumannii being the most common (23.0%). Patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had longer hospital days after BSI onset and total hospital days than patients with monomicrobial KP-BSI (median (interquartile range (IQR)), 19 (5, 39) vs. 12 (6, 25), 37 (21, 67) vs. 29 (16, 53), respectively, p<0.05). The mortality did not differ between polymicrobial KP-BSI and monomicrobial KP-BSI (all p>0.05). Conclusions. It was observed that polymicrobial KP-BSI accounted for a significant proportion among all KP-BSI in the current study. Hospitalization in burn ward and intensive care unit was an independent risk factor for the development of polymicrobial KP-BSI. The patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had a higher rate of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and might have poor outcomes compared to monomicrobial KP-BSI.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteremia - microbiology</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Carbapenems</subject><subject>Carbapenems - pharmacology</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Ertapenem - pharmacology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Gram-positive bacteria</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imipenem - pharmacology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Klebsiella</subject><subject>Klebsiella infections</subject><subject>Klebsiella Infections - blood</subject><subject>Klebsiella pneumoniae</subject><subject>Klebsiella pneumoniae - metabolism</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meropenem - pharmacology</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2314-6133</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1vFCEYxidGY5vam2dD4sXEruV7h4tJ3VhtbNLG6JkwDNN9KwNbYGx680-Xya7rx0EufP14eB54m-Y5wW8IEeKUYkpOpSRKEfKoOaSM8IUknDzejxk7aI5zvsW1tURiJZ82B4xTphRtD5sfKw8BrPFotTbJ2OIS5AI2n6DPkL-h87oUU52Z0KOrqdg4uozigK5NARdKRvdQ1ug6-ocRbIodVKlP3nUZnPcGbYKbxhjAOPTOx9jnkpwZ0UUYnC0QQ37WPBmMz-541x81X8_ff1l9XFxefbhYnV0uLF_KsuCOs052amnEYPBAKa72FTa0Jx1pqSCEcSWI5b2wqjVuGHA9oDClnauhDTtq3m51N1M3ut5W78l4vUkwmvSgowH9906Atb6J33VLmVCtqAKvdgIp3k0uFz1CtnPI4OKUNRUCU0mXyxl9-Q96G6cUarxKccEZWRL8m7ox3mkIQ6z32llUn0kl21ZWrlInW6o-bs7JDXvLBOu5BvRcA3pXAxV_8WfMPfzrxyvwegusIfTmHv4v9xNtSbk7</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Song, Feizhen</creator><creator>Zhang, Kai</creator><creator>Huang, Jianjiang</creator><creator>Qian, Zhenhua</creator><creator>Zhou, Hongwei</creator><creator>Cai, Jiachang</creator><creator>Zheng, Cheng</creator><creator>Zhou, Feifei</creator><creator>Cui, Wei</creator><creator>Zhang, Gensheng</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6602-4406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-3961</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Patients with Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections</title><author>Song, Feizhen ; Zhang, Kai ; Huang, Jianjiang ; Qian, Zhenhua ; Zhou, Hongwei ; Cai, Jiachang ; Zheng, Cheng ; Zhou, Feifei ; Cui, Wei ; Zhang, Gensheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-4e43b6b97a5fa0f22092890a2d1b18251134951c4d5c98aeff043b9022be609a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteremia - microbiology</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Carbapenems</topic><topic>Carbapenems - pharmacology</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Ertapenem - pharmacology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Gram-positive bacteria</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imipenem - pharmacology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Klebsiella</topic><topic>Klebsiella infections</topic><topic>Klebsiella Infections - blood</topic><topic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</topic><topic>Klebsiella pneumoniae - metabolism</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meropenem - pharmacology</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Feizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jianjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Zhenhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Jiachang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Feifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Gensheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Feizhen</au><au>Zhang, Kai</au><au>Huang, Jianjiang</au><au>Qian, Zhenhua</au><au>Zhou, Hongwei</au><au>Cai, Jiachang</au><au>Zheng, Cheng</au><au>Zhou, Feifei</au><au>Cui, Wei</au><au>Zhang, Gensheng</au><au>dos Santos, Washington L. C.</au><au>Washington L C dos Santos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Patients with Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections</atitle><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2021</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>6619911</spage><pages>6619911-</pages><issn>2314-6133</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><eissn>2314-6141</eissn><abstract>Background. Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (KP-BSI) has been reported to account for more than 10% of all KP-BSI, but few studies have characterized polymicrobial KP-BSI. Our study investigated the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of polymicrobial KP-BSI by comparing with monomicrobial KP-BSI. Methods. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with KP-BSI from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018 and collected the clinical data by reviewing electronic medical records. Results. Of the 818 patients with KP-BSI recruited, 13.9% (114/818) were polymicrobial KP-BSI. The severity of illness in polymicrobial and monomicrobial KP-BSI was similar, while the rate of resistance to carbapenems was obviously higher in polymicrobial KP-BSI (78.1% vs. 65.6%, p=0.009). On multivariate analysis, hospitalization in burn ward (odds ratio (OR) 6.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.00-18.76, p=0.001) and intensive care unit (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.05-5.43, p=0.038) was independently associated with polymicrobial KP-BSI. Gram-negative bacteria accounted for the highest proportion (68.9%) among copathogens of polymicrobial KP-BSI, whereas gram-positive bacteria (22.9%) and Candida (8.2%) ranked the second and the third, respectively, with Acinetobacter baumannii being the most common (23.0%). Patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had longer hospital days after BSI onset and total hospital days than patients with monomicrobial KP-BSI (median (interquartile range (IQR)), 19 (5, 39) vs. 12 (6, 25), 37 (21, 67) vs. 29 (16, 53), respectively, p<0.05). The mortality did not differ between polymicrobial KP-BSI and monomicrobial KP-BSI (all p>0.05). Conclusions. It was observed that polymicrobial KP-BSI accounted for a significant proportion among all KP-BSI in the current study. Hospitalization in burn ward and intensive care unit was an independent risk factor for the development of polymicrobial KP-BSI. The patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had a higher rate of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and might have poor outcomes compared to monomicrobial KP-BSI.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><pmid>34239928</pmid><doi>10.1155/2021/6619911</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6602-4406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-3961</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2314-6133 |
ispartof | BioMed research international, 2021, Vol.2021 (1), p.6619911 |
issn | 2314-6133 2314-6141 2314-6141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8235985 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Adult Age Aged Antibiotics Bacteremia - microbiology Bacteria Carbapenems Carbapenems - pharmacology Comorbidity Confidence intervals Diagnosis Drug dosages Electronic health records Electronic medical records Ertapenem - pharmacology Female Gram-negative bacteria Gram-positive bacteria Hospitalization Hospitals Humans Imipenem - pharmacology Infections Intensive Care Units Intubation Klebsiella Klebsiella infections Klebsiella Infections - blood Klebsiella pneumoniae Klebsiella pneumoniae - metabolism Laboratories Male Meropenem - pharmacology Microbial Sensitivity Tests Middle Aged Mortality Multivariate Analysis Odds Ratio Pathogens Patient outcomes Patients Retrospective Studies Risk analysis Risk Factors Sepsis Statistical analysis Survival analysis Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Patients with Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A16%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Characteristics,%20Risk%20Factors,%20and%20Outcomes%20of%20Patients%20with%20Polymicrobial%20Klebsiella%20pneumoniae%20Bloodstream%20Infections&rft.jtitle=BioMed%20research%20international&rft.au=Song,%20Feizhen&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=2021&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=6619911&rft.pages=6619911-&rft.issn=2314-6133&rft.eissn=2314-6141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2021/6619911&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA696886317%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-4e43b6b97a5fa0f22092890a2d1b18251134951c4d5c98aeff043b9022be609a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2545431710&rft_id=info:pmid/34239928&rft_galeid=A696886317&rfr_iscdi=true |