Loading…
Forest management affects seasonal source-sink dynamics in a territorial, group-living bird
The persistence of wildlife populations is under threat as a consequence of human activities, which are degrading natural ecosystems. Commercial forestry is the greatest threat to biodiversity in boreal forests. Forestry practices have degraded most available habitat, threatening the persistence of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Oecologia 2021-06, Vol.196 (2), p.399-412 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-530a1229a6e0445171e44ee2832fece40ba806d12cfd3fc7e91bbe3d4ab2985e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-530a1229a6e0445171e44ee2832fece40ba806d12cfd3fc7e91bbe3d4ab2985e3 |
container_end_page | 412 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 399 |
container_title | Oecologia |
container_volume | 196 |
creator | Layton-Matthews, Kate Griesser, Michael Coste, Christophe F. D. Ozgul, Arpat |
description | The persistence of wildlife populations is under threat as a consequence of human activities, which are degrading natural ecosystems. Commercial forestry is the greatest threat to biodiversity in boreal forests. Forestry practices have degraded most available habitat, threatening the persistence of natural populations. Understanding population responses is, therefore, critical for their conservation. Population viability analyses are effective tools to predict population persistence under forestry management. However, quantifying the mechanisms driving population responses is complex as population dynamics vary temporally and spatially. Metapopulation dynamics are governed by local dynamics and spatial factors, potentially mediating the impacts of forestry e.g., through dispersal. Here, we performed a seasonal, spatially explicit population viability analysis, using long-term data from a group-living territorial bird (Siberian jay,
Perisoreus infaustus
). We quantified the effects of forest management on metapopulation dynamics, via forest type-specific demography and spatially explicit dispersal, and how forestry impacted the stability of metapopulation dynamics. Forestry reduced metapopulation growth and stability, through negative effects on reproduction and survival. Territories in higher quality natural forest contributed more to metapopulation dynamics than managed forests, largely through demographic processes rather than dispersal. Metapopulation dynamics in managed forest were also less resilient to disturbances and consequently, may be more vulnerable to environmental change. Seasonal differences in source-sink dynamics observed in managed forest, but not natural forests, were caused by associated seasonal differences in dispersal. As shown here, capturing seasonal source-sink dynamics allows us to predict population persistence under human disturbance and to provide targeted conservation recommendations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00442-021-04935-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8241677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A666929422</galeid><sourcerecordid>A666929422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-530a1229a6e0445171e44ee2832fece40ba806d12cfd3fc7e91bbe3d4ab2985e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1rFTEYhYMo9lr9Ay5kwI2CU998zmQjlGK1UCj4sXIRMjPvjKkzyW0yU-y_N7e3tr1FJItA8rwnOYdDyEsKBxSgep8AhGAlMFqC0FyW6hFZUcFZSTXXj8kKgOmylkLvkWcpnQNQQaV8Sva4AEWZ0Cvy4zhETHMxWW8HnNDPhe17bOdUJLQpeDsWKSyxxTI5_6vorrydXJsK5wtbzBijm0N0dnxXDDEs63J0l84PReNi95w86e2Y8MXNvk--H3_8dvS5PD37dHJ0eFq2spJzKTlYypi2CrMfSSuKQiCymrP8ERTQ2BpUR1nbd7xvK9S0aZB3wjZM1xL5Pvmw1V0vzYRdm01EO5p1dJONVyZYZ3ZvvPtphnBpaiaoqqos8OZGIIaLJcdhJpdaHEfrMSzJMMllzYGDyujrB-h5TientKGEEgDA5R012BGN833I77YbUXOolNJMC8YydfAPKq8Oc8TBY-_y-c7A252BzMz4ex7skpI5-fpll2Vbto0hpYj9bR4UzKY-Zlsfk-tjrutjNu5e3U_yduRvXzLAt0DKV37AeGf_P7J_AFQazyM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2546400035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forest management affects seasonal source-sink dynamics in a territorial, group-living bird</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Layton-Matthews, Kate ; Griesser, Michael ; Coste, Christophe F. D. ; Ozgul, Arpat</creator><creatorcontrib>Layton-Matthews, Kate ; Griesser, Michael ; Coste, Christophe F. D. ; Ozgul, Arpat</creatorcontrib><description>The persistence of wildlife populations is under threat as a consequence of human activities, which are degrading natural ecosystems. Commercial forestry is the greatest threat to biodiversity in boreal forests. Forestry practices have degraded most available habitat, threatening the persistence of natural populations. Understanding population responses is, therefore, critical for their conservation. Population viability analyses are effective tools to predict population persistence under forestry management. However, quantifying the mechanisms driving population responses is complex as population dynamics vary temporally and spatially. Metapopulation dynamics are governed by local dynamics and spatial factors, potentially mediating the impacts of forestry e.g., through dispersal. Here, we performed a seasonal, spatially explicit population viability analysis, using long-term data from a group-living territorial bird (Siberian jay,
Perisoreus infaustus
). We quantified the effects of forest management on metapopulation dynamics, via forest type-specific demography and spatially explicit dispersal, and how forestry impacted the stability of metapopulation dynamics. Forestry reduced metapopulation growth and stability, through negative effects on reproduction and survival. Territories in higher quality natural forest contributed more to metapopulation dynamics than managed forests, largely through demographic processes rather than dispersal. Metapopulation dynamics in managed forest were also less resilient to disturbances and consequently, may be more vulnerable to environmental change. Seasonal differences in source-sink dynamics observed in managed forest, but not natural forests, were caused by associated seasonal differences in dispersal. As shown here, capturing seasonal source-sink dynamics allows us to predict population persistence under human disturbance and to provide targeted conservation recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04935-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34061249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Boreal forests ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Demography ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Dynamic stability ; Dynamics ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Environmental changes ; Environmental protection ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Forests ; Habitat availability ; Humans ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Life Sciences ; Metapopulations ; Natural populations ; Passeriformes ; Plant Sciences ; Population Dynamics ; Population ecology ; Population Ecology–Original Research ; Population viability ; Populations ; Seasonal variations ; Seasons ; Source-sink relationships ; Survival ; Sustainable forestry ; Wildlife ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2021-06, Vol.196 (2), p.399-412</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-530a1229a6e0445171e44ee2832fece40ba806d12cfd3fc7e91bbe3d4ab2985e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-530a1229a6e0445171e44ee2832fece40ba806d12cfd3fc7e91bbe3d4ab2985e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5275-1218</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34061249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Layton-Matthews, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesser, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coste, Christophe F. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgul, Arpat</creatorcontrib><title>Forest management affects seasonal source-sink dynamics in a territorial, group-living bird</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>The persistence of wildlife populations is under threat as a consequence of human activities, which are degrading natural ecosystems. Commercial forestry is the greatest threat to biodiversity in boreal forests. Forestry practices have degraded most available habitat, threatening the persistence of natural populations. Understanding population responses is, therefore, critical for their conservation. Population viability analyses are effective tools to predict population persistence under forestry management. However, quantifying the mechanisms driving population responses is complex as population dynamics vary temporally and spatially. Metapopulation dynamics are governed by local dynamics and spatial factors, potentially mediating the impacts of forestry e.g., through dispersal. Here, we performed a seasonal, spatially explicit population viability analysis, using long-term data from a group-living territorial bird (Siberian jay,
Perisoreus infaustus
). We quantified the effects of forest management on metapopulation dynamics, via forest type-specific demography and spatially explicit dispersal, and how forestry impacted the stability of metapopulation dynamics. Forestry reduced metapopulation growth and stability, through negative effects on reproduction and survival. Territories in higher quality natural forest contributed more to metapopulation dynamics than managed forests, largely through demographic processes rather than dispersal. Metapopulation dynamics in managed forest were also less resilient to disturbances and consequently, may be more vulnerable to environmental change. Seasonal differences in source-sink dynamics observed in managed forest, but not natural forests, were caused by associated seasonal differences in dispersal. As shown here, capturing seasonal source-sink dynamics allows us to predict population persistence under human disturbance and to provide targeted conservation recommendations.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Boreal forests</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Dynamic stability</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Habitat availability</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Metapopulations</subject><subject>Natural populations</subject><subject>Passeriformes</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population Ecology–Original Research</subject><subject>Population viability</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Source-sink relationships</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Sustainable forestry</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kk1rFTEYhYMo9lr9Ay5kwI2CU998zmQjlGK1UCj4sXIRMjPvjKkzyW0yU-y_N7e3tr1FJItA8rwnOYdDyEsKBxSgep8AhGAlMFqC0FyW6hFZUcFZSTXXj8kKgOmylkLvkWcpnQNQQaV8Sva4AEWZ0Cvy4zhETHMxWW8HnNDPhe17bOdUJLQpeDsWKSyxxTI5_6vorrydXJsK5wtbzBijm0N0dnxXDDEs63J0l84PReNi95w86e2Y8MXNvk--H3_8dvS5PD37dHJ0eFq2spJzKTlYypi2CrMfSSuKQiCymrP8ERTQ2BpUR1nbd7xvK9S0aZB3wjZM1xL5Pvmw1V0vzYRdm01EO5p1dJONVyZYZ3ZvvPtphnBpaiaoqqos8OZGIIaLJcdhJpdaHEfrMSzJMMllzYGDyujrB-h5TientKGEEgDA5R012BGN833I77YbUXOolNJMC8YydfAPKq8Oc8TBY-_y-c7A252BzMz4ex7skpI5-fpll2Vbto0hpYj9bR4UzKY-Zlsfk-tjrutjNu5e3U_yduRvXzLAt0DKV37AeGf_P7J_AFQazyM</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Layton-Matthews, Kate</creator><creator>Griesser, Michael</creator><creator>Coste, Christophe F. D.</creator><creator>Ozgul, Arpat</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-1218</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Forest management affects seasonal source-sink dynamics in a territorial, group-living bird</title><author>Layton-Matthews, Kate ; Griesser, Michael ; Coste, Christophe F. D. ; Ozgul, Arpat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-530a1229a6e0445171e44ee2832fece40ba806d12cfd3fc7e91bbe3d4ab2985e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Boreal forests</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Dynamic stability</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Habitat availability</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Metapopulations</topic><topic>Natural populations</topic><topic>Passeriformes</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population Ecology–Original Research</topic><topic>Population viability</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Source-sink relationships</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Sustainable forestry</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Layton-Matthews, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesser, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coste, Christophe F. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgul, Arpat</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Layton-Matthews, Kate</au><au>Griesser, Michael</au><au>Coste, Christophe F. D.</au><au>Ozgul, Arpat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forest management affects seasonal source-sink dynamics in a territorial, group-living bird</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>399-412</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><abstract>The persistence of wildlife populations is under threat as a consequence of human activities, which are degrading natural ecosystems. Commercial forestry is the greatest threat to biodiversity in boreal forests. Forestry practices have degraded most available habitat, threatening the persistence of natural populations. Understanding population responses is, therefore, critical for their conservation. Population viability analyses are effective tools to predict population persistence under forestry management. However, quantifying the mechanisms driving population responses is complex as population dynamics vary temporally and spatially. Metapopulation dynamics are governed by local dynamics and spatial factors, potentially mediating the impacts of forestry e.g., through dispersal. Here, we performed a seasonal, spatially explicit population viability analysis, using long-term data from a group-living territorial bird (Siberian jay,
Perisoreus infaustus
). We quantified the effects of forest management on metapopulation dynamics, via forest type-specific demography and spatially explicit dispersal, and how forestry impacted the stability of metapopulation dynamics. Forestry reduced metapopulation growth and stability, through negative effects on reproduction and survival. Territories in higher quality natural forest contributed more to metapopulation dynamics than managed forests, largely through demographic processes rather than dispersal. Metapopulation dynamics in managed forest were also less resilient to disturbances and consequently, may be more vulnerable to environmental change. Seasonal differences in source-sink dynamics observed in managed forest, but not natural forests, were caused by associated seasonal differences in dispersal. As shown here, capturing seasonal source-sink dynamics allows us to predict population persistence under human disturbance and to provide targeted conservation recommendations.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34061249</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-021-04935-6</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-1218</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8549 |
ispartof | Oecologia, 2021-06, Vol.196 (2), p.399-412 |
issn | 0029-8549 1432-1939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8241677 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Analysis Animal behavior Animals Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Birds Boreal forests Conservation Conservation of Natural Resources Demography Dispersal Dispersion Dynamic stability Dynamics Ecology Ecosystem Ecosystems Environmental changes Environmental protection Forest management Forestry Forests Habitat availability Humans Hydrology/Water Resources Life Sciences Metapopulations Natural populations Passeriformes Plant Sciences Population Dynamics Population ecology Population Ecology–Original Research Population viability Populations Seasonal variations Seasons Source-sink relationships Survival Sustainable forestry Wildlife Wildlife habitats Wildlife management |
title | Forest management affects seasonal source-sink dynamics in a territorial, group-living bird |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A17%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forest%20management%20affects%20seasonal%20source-sink%20dynamics%20in%20a%20territorial,%20group-living%20bird&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Layton-Matthews,%20Kate&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=399-412&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-021-04935-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA666929422%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-530a1229a6e0445171e44ee2832fece40ba806d12cfd3fc7e91bbe3d4ab2985e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2546400035&rft_id=info:pmid/34061249&rft_galeid=A666929422&rfr_iscdi=true |