Loading…
Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data
Objectives to compare care staff proxies with care home residents’ self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at basel...
Saved in:
Published in: | Age and ageing 2021-07, Vol.50 (4), p.1314-1320 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3 |
container_end_page | 1320 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1314 |
container_title | Age and ageing |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Kelly, Charlotte Hulme, Claire Graham, Liz Ellwood, Alison Patel, Ismail Cundill, Bonnie Farrin, Amanda Goodwin, Madeline Hull, Karen Fisher, Jill Forster, Anne |
description | Objectives
to compare care staff proxies with care home residents’ self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Methods
we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, collected as part of the PATCH trial. We calculated kappa scores. Interpreted as 0.6 substantial to almost perfect agreement. Qualitative interviews with care staff and researchers explored the challenges of completing these questions.
Results
over 50% of the HRQoL data from residents was missing at baseline compared with a 100% completion rate by care staff proxies. A fair-to-moderate level of agreement was found for the EQ-5D-5L index. A higher level of agreement was achieved for the EQ-5D-5L domains of mobility and pain. Resident ‘non-completers’ were more likely to: be older, have stayed a longer duration in the care home, have lower Barthel Index and Physical Activity and Mobility in Residential Care (PAM-RC) scores, a greater number of co-morbidities and have joined the trial through consultee agreement. Interviews with staff and researchers indicated that it was easier to rate residents’ mobility levels than other domains, but in general it was difficult to obtain data from residents or to make an accurate proxy judgement for those with dementia.
Conclusions
whilst assessing HRQoL by care staff proxy completion provides a more complete dataset, uncertainty remains as to how representative these values are for different groups of residents within care homes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ageing/afab053 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8244559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ageing/afab053</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2571064326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2KFDEQx4Mo7jh69SgBL3ro3Xz2hwdhWVddWFBBz6G6O5nOkOnMJmnXufkavodP5JOYoWcW9SKEhKJ-9f-nikLoKSWnlDT8DFbajqszMNASye-hBRVlXbCai_toQQhhBalYc4IexbjOIZWUPUQnnNeM1ZIt0M-rMelQBMg3DtpZaK2zaYe9wR0EjQe_0TgmMObX9x8Rb4P_tsPrqV_pjR5TxLc2Dbkw2n4fZgZDjDrGOZtV0qBtwP52xIMGl4Yiu2S3Ht9McHRy1uhXGMZ8wO2iPRbij-efL97jFCw4fPmpkG9wDwkeowcGXNRPDu8SfXl7mcHi-sO7q4vz66ITkqVC1K0hFWdE846YSlZNnpHpG8qBdKaVJYGWtw3t-xo4rTvRGCFMrUnPOe9ky5fo9ay7ndqN7rvcUgCntsFuIOyUB6v-zox2UCv_VdVMCCmbLPDiIBD8zaRjUhsbO-0cjNpPUTFJmpKUIvst0fN_0LWfQh7HnqroHmJlpk5nqgs-xqDN3WcoUfuFUPNCqMNC5IJnf7Zwhx83IAMvZ8BP2_-J_QbLNscG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571064326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Kelly, Charlotte ; Hulme, Claire ; Graham, Liz ; Ellwood, Alison ; Patel, Ismail ; Cundill, Bonnie ; Farrin, Amanda ; Goodwin, Madeline ; Hull, Karen ; Fisher, Jill ; Forster, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Charlotte ; Hulme, Claire ; Graham, Liz ; Ellwood, Alison ; Patel, Ismail ; Cundill, Bonnie ; Farrin, Amanda ; Goodwin, Madeline ; Hull, Karen ; Fisher, Jill ; Forster, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
to compare care staff proxies with care home residents’ self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Methods
we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, collected as part of the PATCH trial. We calculated kappa scores. Interpreted as <0 no agreement, 0–0.2 slight, 0.21–0.60 fair to moderate and >0.6 substantial to almost perfect agreement. Qualitative interviews with care staff and researchers explored the challenges of completing these questions.
Results
over 50% of the HRQoL data from residents was missing at baseline compared with a 100% completion rate by care staff proxies. A fair-to-moderate level of agreement was found for the EQ-5D-5L index. A higher level of agreement was achieved for the EQ-5D-5L domains of mobility and pain. Resident ‘non-completers’ were more likely to: be older, have stayed a longer duration in the care home, have lower Barthel Index and Physical Activity and Mobility in Residential Care (PAM-RC) scores, a greater number of co-morbidities and have joined the trial through consultee agreement. Interviews with staff and researchers indicated that it was easier to rate residents’ mobility levels than other domains, but in general it was difficult to obtain data from residents or to make an accurate proxy judgement for those with dementia.
Conclusions
whilst assessing HRQoL by care staff proxy completion provides a more complete dataset, uncertainty remains as to how representative these values are for different groups of residents within care homes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33822852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Barthel Index ; Dementia ; Dementia disorders ; Health status ; Humans ; Interviews ; Mobility ; Nursing Homes ; Pain ; Physical activity ; Proxies ; Proxy ; Quality of Life ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Paper ; Residential care ; Self evaluation ; Self-assessment ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2021-07, Vol.50 (4), p.1314-1320</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4276-1257</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,30978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33822852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellwood, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cundill, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrin, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description>Objectives
to compare care staff proxies with care home residents’ self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Methods
we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, collected as part of the PATCH trial. We calculated kappa scores. Interpreted as <0 no agreement, 0–0.2 slight, 0.21–0.60 fair to moderate and >0.6 substantial to almost perfect agreement. Qualitative interviews with care staff and researchers explored the challenges of completing these questions.
Results
over 50% of the HRQoL data from residents was missing at baseline compared with a 100% completion rate by care staff proxies. A fair-to-moderate level of agreement was found for the EQ-5D-5L index. A higher level of agreement was achieved for the EQ-5D-5L domains of mobility and pain. Resident ‘non-completers’ were more likely to: be older, have stayed a longer duration in the care home, have lower Barthel Index and Physical Activity and Mobility in Residential Care (PAM-RC) scores, a greater number of co-morbidities and have joined the trial through consultee agreement. Interviews with staff and researchers indicated that it was easier to rate residents’ mobility levels than other domains, but in general it was difficult to obtain data from residents or to make an accurate proxy judgement for those with dementia.
Conclusions
whilst assessing HRQoL by care staff proxy completion provides a more complete dataset, uncertainty remains as to how representative these values are for different groups of residents within care homes.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Barthel Index</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Proxies</subject><subject>Proxy</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Residential care</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Self-assessment</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks2KFDEQx4Mo7jh69SgBL3ro3Xz2hwdhWVddWFBBz6G6O5nOkOnMJmnXufkavodP5JOYoWcW9SKEhKJ-9f-nikLoKSWnlDT8DFbajqszMNASye-hBRVlXbCai_toQQhhBalYc4IexbjOIZWUPUQnnNeM1ZIt0M-rMelQBMg3DtpZaK2zaYe9wR0EjQe_0TgmMObX9x8Rb4P_tsPrqV_pjR5TxLc2Dbkw2n4fZgZDjDrGOZtV0qBtwP52xIMGl4Yiu2S3Ht9McHRy1uhXGMZ8wO2iPRbij-efL97jFCw4fPmpkG9wDwkeowcGXNRPDu8SfXl7mcHi-sO7q4vz66ITkqVC1K0hFWdE846YSlZNnpHpG8qBdKaVJYGWtw3t-xo4rTvRGCFMrUnPOe9ky5fo9ay7ndqN7rvcUgCntsFuIOyUB6v-zox2UCv_VdVMCCmbLPDiIBD8zaRjUhsbO-0cjNpPUTFJmpKUIvst0fN_0LWfQh7HnqroHmJlpk5nqgs-xqDN3WcoUfuFUPNCqMNC5IJnf7Zwhx83IAMvZ8BP2_-J_QbLNscG</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Kelly, Charlotte</creator><creator>Hulme, Claire</creator><creator>Graham, Liz</creator><creator>Ellwood, Alison</creator><creator>Patel, Ismail</creator><creator>Cundill, Bonnie</creator><creator>Farrin, Amanda</creator><creator>Goodwin, Madeline</creator><creator>Hull, Karen</creator><creator>Fisher, Jill</creator><creator>Forster, Anne</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4276-1257</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data</title><author>Kelly, Charlotte ; Hulme, Claire ; Graham, Liz ; Ellwood, Alison ; Patel, Ismail ; Cundill, Bonnie ; Farrin, Amanda ; Goodwin, Madeline ; Hull, Karen ; Fisher, Jill ; Forster, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Barthel Index</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Proxies</topic><topic>Proxy</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Residential care</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Self-assessment</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellwood, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cundill, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrin, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Open</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, Charlotte</au><au>Hulme, Claire</au><au>Graham, Liz</au><au>Ellwood, Alison</au><au>Patel, Ismail</au><au>Cundill, Bonnie</au><au>Farrin, Amanda</au><au>Goodwin, Madeline</au><au>Hull, Karen</au><au>Fisher, Jill</au><au>Forster, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1314</spage><epage>1320</epage><pages>1314-1320</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><abstract>Objectives
to compare care staff proxies with care home residents’ self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Methods
we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, collected as part of the PATCH trial. We calculated kappa scores. Interpreted as <0 no agreement, 0–0.2 slight, 0.21–0.60 fair to moderate and >0.6 substantial to almost perfect agreement. Qualitative interviews with care staff and researchers explored the challenges of completing these questions.
Results
over 50% of the HRQoL data from residents was missing at baseline compared with a 100% completion rate by care staff proxies. A fair-to-moderate level of agreement was found for the EQ-5D-5L index. A higher level of agreement was achieved for the EQ-5D-5L domains of mobility and pain. Resident ‘non-completers’ were more likely to: be older, have stayed a longer duration in the care home, have lower Barthel Index and Physical Activity and Mobility in Residential Care (PAM-RC) scores, a greater number of co-morbidities and have joined the trial through consultee agreement. Interviews with staff and researchers indicated that it was easier to rate residents’ mobility levels than other domains, but in general it was difficult to obtain data from residents or to make an accurate proxy judgement for those with dementia.
Conclusions
whilst assessing HRQoL by care staff proxy completion provides a more complete dataset, uncertainty remains as to how representative these values are for different groups of residents within care homes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33822852</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/afab053</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4276-1257</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-0729 |
ispartof | Age and ageing, 2021-07, Vol.50 (4), p.1314-1320 |
issn | 0002-0729 1468-2834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8244559 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Agreements Barthel Index Dementia Dementia disorders Health status Humans Interviews Mobility Nursing Homes Pain Physical activity Proxies Proxy Quality of Life Reliability Reproducibility of Results Research Paper Residential care Self evaluation Self-assessment Surveys and Questionnaires Uncertainty |
title | Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T02%3A55%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-rater%20reliability%20of%20care%20home%20staff%E2%80%99s%20proxy%20judgements%20with%20residents%E2%80%99%20assessments%20of%20their%20own%20health-related%20quality%20of%20life:%20an%20analysis%20of%20the%20PATCH%20trial%20EQ-5D%20data&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Kelly,%20Charlotte&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1314&rft.epage=1320&rft.pages=1314-1320&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afab053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2571064326%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571064326&rft_id=info:pmid/33822852&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ageing/afab053&rfr_iscdi=true |