Loading…

Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data

Objectives to compare care staff proxies with care home residents’ self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at basel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Age and ageing 2021-07, Vol.50 (4), p.1314-1320
Main Authors: Kelly, Charlotte, Hulme, Claire, Graham, Liz, Ellwood, Alison, Patel, Ismail, Cundill, Bonnie, Farrin, Amanda, Goodwin, Madeline, Hull, Karen, Fisher, Jill, Forster, Anne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3
container_end_page 1320
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1314
container_title Age and ageing
container_volume 50
creator Kelly, Charlotte
Hulme, Claire
Graham, Liz
Ellwood, Alison
Patel, Ismail
Cundill, Bonnie
Farrin, Amanda
Goodwin, Madeline
Hull, Karen
Fisher, Jill
Forster, Anne
description Objectives to compare care staff proxies with care home residents’ self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, collected as part of the PATCH trial. We calculated kappa scores. Interpreted as 0.6 substantial to almost perfect agreement. Qualitative interviews with care staff and researchers explored the challenges of completing these questions. Results over 50% of the HRQoL data from residents was missing at baseline compared with a 100% completion rate by care staff proxies. A fair-to-moderate level of agreement was found for the EQ-5D-5L index. A higher level of agreement was achieved for the EQ-5D-5L domains of mobility and pain. Resident ‘non-completers’ were more likely to: be older, have stayed a longer duration in the care home, have lower Barthel Index and Physical Activity and Mobility in Residential Care (PAM-RC) scores, a greater number of co-morbidities and have joined the trial through consultee agreement. Interviews with staff and researchers indicated that it was easier to rate residents’ mobility levels than other domains, but in general it was difficult to obtain data from residents or to make an accurate proxy judgement for those with dementia. Conclusions whilst assessing HRQoL by care staff proxy completion provides a more complete dataset, uncertainty remains as to how representative these values are for different groups of residents within care homes.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ageing/afab053
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8244559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ageing/afab053</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2571064326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2KFDEQx4Mo7jh69SgBL3ro3Xz2hwdhWVddWFBBz6G6O5nOkOnMJmnXufkavodP5JOYoWcW9SKEhKJ-9f-nikLoKSWnlDT8DFbajqszMNASye-hBRVlXbCai_toQQhhBalYc4IexbjOIZWUPUQnnNeM1ZIt0M-rMelQBMg3DtpZaK2zaYe9wR0EjQe_0TgmMObX9x8Rb4P_tsPrqV_pjR5TxLc2Dbkw2n4fZgZDjDrGOZtV0qBtwP52xIMGl4Yiu2S3Ht9McHRy1uhXGMZ8wO2iPRbij-efL97jFCw4fPmpkG9wDwkeowcGXNRPDu8SfXl7mcHi-sO7q4vz66ITkqVC1K0hFWdE846YSlZNnpHpG8qBdKaVJYGWtw3t-xo4rTvRGCFMrUnPOe9ky5fo9ay7ndqN7rvcUgCntsFuIOyUB6v-zox2UCv_VdVMCCmbLPDiIBD8zaRjUhsbO-0cjNpPUTFJmpKUIvst0fN_0LWfQh7HnqroHmJlpk5nqgs-xqDN3WcoUfuFUPNCqMNC5IJnf7Zwhx83IAMvZ8BP2_-J_QbLNscG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571064326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Kelly, Charlotte ; Hulme, Claire ; Graham, Liz ; Ellwood, Alison ; Patel, Ismail ; Cundill, Bonnie ; Farrin, Amanda ; Goodwin, Madeline ; Hull, Karen ; Fisher, Jill ; Forster, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Charlotte ; Hulme, Claire ; Graham, Liz ; Ellwood, Alison ; Patel, Ismail ; Cundill, Bonnie ; Farrin, Amanda ; Goodwin, Madeline ; Hull, Karen ; Fisher, Jill ; Forster, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives to compare care staff proxies with care home residents’ self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, collected as part of the PATCH trial. We calculated kappa scores. Interpreted as &lt;0 no agreement, 0–0.2 slight, 0.21–0.60 fair to moderate and &gt;0.6 substantial to almost perfect agreement. Qualitative interviews with care staff and researchers explored the challenges of completing these questions. Results over 50% of the HRQoL data from residents was missing at baseline compared with a 100% completion rate by care staff proxies. A fair-to-moderate level of agreement was found for the EQ-5D-5L index. A higher level of agreement was achieved for the EQ-5D-5L domains of mobility and pain. Resident ‘non-completers’ were more likely to: be older, have stayed a longer duration in the care home, have lower Barthel Index and Physical Activity and Mobility in Residential Care (PAM-RC) scores, a greater number of co-morbidities and have joined the trial through consultee agreement. Interviews with staff and researchers indicated that it was easier to rate residents’ mobility levels than other domains, but in general it was difficult to obtain data from residents or to make an accurate proxy judgement for those with dementia. Conclusions whilst assessing HRQoL by care staff proxy completion provides a more complete dataset, uncertainty remains as to how representative these values are for different groups of residents within care homes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33822852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Barthel Index ; Dementia ; Dementia disorders ; Health status ; Humans ; Interviews ; Mobility ; Nursing Homes ; Pain ; Physical activity ; Proxies ; Proxy ; Quality of Life ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Paper ; Residential care ; Self evaluation ; Self-assessment ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2021-07, Vol.50 (4), p.1314-1320</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4276-1257</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,30978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33822852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellwood, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cundill, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrin, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description>Objectives to compare care staff proxies with care home residents’ self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, collected as part of the PATCH trial. We calculated kappa scores. Interpreted as &lt;0 no agreement, 0–0.2 slight, 0.21–0.60 fair to moderate and &gt;0.6 substantial to almost perfect agreement. Qualitative interviews with care staff and researchers explored the challenges of completing these questions. Results over 50% of the HRQoL data from residents was missing at baseline compared with a 100% completion rate by care staff proxies. A fair-to-moderate level of agreement was found for the EQ-5D-5L index. A higher level of agreement was achieved for the EQ-5D-5L domains of mobility and pain. Resident ‘non-completers’ were more likely to: be older, have stayed a longer duration in the care home, have lower Barthel Index and Physical Activity and Mobility in Residential Care (PAM-RC) scores, a greater number of co-morbidities and have joined the trial through consultee agreement. Interviews with staff and researchers indicated that it was easier to rate residents’ mobility levels than other domains, but in general it was difficult to obtain data from residents or to make an accurate proxy judgement for those with dementia. Conclusions whilst assessing HRQoL by care staff proxy completion provides a more complete dataset, uncertainty remains as to how representative these values are for different groups of residents within care homes.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Barthel Index</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Proxies</subject><subject>Proxy</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Residential care</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Self-assessment</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks2KFDEQx4Mo7jh69SgBL3ro3Xz2hwdhWVddWFBBz6G6O5nOkOnMJmnXufkavodP5JOYoWcW9SKEhKJ-9f-nikLoKSWnlDT8DFbajqszMNASye-hBRVlXbCai_toQQhhBalYc4IexbjOIZWUPUQnnNeM1ZIt0M-rMelQBMg3DtpZaK2zaYe9wR0EjQe_0TgmMObX9x8Rb4P_tsPrqV_pjR5TxLc2Dbkw2n4fZgZDjDrGOZtV0qBtwP52xIMGl4Yiu2S3Ht9McHRy1uhXGMZ8wO2iPRbij-efL97jFCw4fPmpkG9wDwkeowcGXNRPDu8SfXl7mcHi-sO7q4vz66ITkqVC1K0hFWdE846YSlZNnpHpG8qBdKaVJYGWtw3t-xo4rTvRGCFMrUnPOe9ky5fo9ay7ndqN7rvcUgCntsFuIOyUB6v-zox2UCv_VdVMCCmbLPDiIBD8zaRjUhsbO-0cjNpPUTFJmpKUIvst0fN_0LWfQh7HnqroHmJlpk5nqgs-xqDN3WcoUfuFUPNCqMNC5IJnf7Zwhx83IAMvZ8BP2_-J_QbLNscG</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Kelly, Charlotte</creator><creator>Hulme, Claire</creator><creator>Graham, Liz</creator><creator>Ellwood, Alison</creator><creator>Patel, Ismail</creator><creator>Cundill, Bonnie</creator><creator>Farrin, Amanda</creator><creator>Goodwin, Madeline</creator><creator>Hull, Karen</creator><creator>Fisher, Jill</creator><creator>Forster, Anne</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4276-1257</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data</title><author>Kelly, Charlotte ; Hulme, Claire ; Graham, Liz ; Ellwood, Alison ; Patel, Ismail ; Cundill, Bonnie ; Farrin, Amanda ; Goodwin, Madeline ; Hull, Karen ; Fisher, Jill ; Forster, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Barthel Index</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Proxies</topic><topic>Proxy</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Residential care</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Self-assessment</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellwood, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cundill, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrin, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Open</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, Charlotte</au><au>Hulme, Claire</au><au>Graham, Liz</au><au>Ellwood, Alison</au><au>Patel, Ismail</au><au>Cundill, Bonnie</au><au>Farrin, Amanda</au><au>Goodwin, Madeline</au><au>Hull, Karen</au><au>Fisher, Jill</au><au>Forster, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1314</spage><epage>1320</epage><pages>1314-1320</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><abstract>Objectives to compare care staff proxies with care home residents’ self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, collected as part of the PATCH trial. We calculated kappa scores. Interpreted as &lt;0 no agreement, 0–0.2 slight, 0.21–0.60 fair to moderate and &gt;0.6 substantial to almost perfect agreement. Qualitative interviews with care staff and researchers explored the challenges of completing these questions. Results over 50% of the HRQoL data from residents was missing at baseline compared with a 100% completion rate by care staff proxies. A fair-to-moderate level of agreement was found for the EQ-5D-5L index. A higher level of agreement was achieved for the EQ-5D-5L domains of mobility and pain. Resident ‘non-completers’ were more likely to: be older, have stayed a longer duration in the care home, have lower Barthel Index and Physical Activity and Mobility in Residential Care (PAM-RC) scores, a greater number of co-morbidities and have joined the trial through consultee agreement. Interviews with staff and researchers indicated that it was easier to rate residents’ mobility levels than other domains, but in general it was difficult to obtain data from residents or to make an accurate proxy judgement for those with dementia. Conclusions whilst assessing HRQoL by care staff proxy completion provides a more complete dataset, uncertainty remains as to how representative these values are for different groups of residents within care homes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33822852</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/afab053</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4276-1257</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-0729
ispartof Age and ageing, 2021-07, Vol.50 (4), p.1314-1320
issn 0002-0729
1468-2834
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8244559
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford Journals Online
subjects Agreements
Barthel Index
Dementia
Dementia disorders
Health status
Humans
Interviews
Mobility
Nursing Homes
Pain
Physical activity
Proxies
Proxy
Quality of Life
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Research Paper
Residential care
Self evaluation
Self-assessment
Surveys and Questionnaires
Uncertainty
title Inter-rater reliability of care home staff’s proxy judgements with residents’ assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T02%3A55%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-rater%20reliability%20of%20care%20home%20staff%E2%80%99s%20proxy%20judgements%20with%20residents%E2%80%99%20assessments%20of%20their%20own%20health-related%20quality%20of%20life:%20an%20analysis%20of%20the%20PATCH%20trial%20EQ-5D%20data&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Kelly,%20Charlotte&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1314&rft.epage=1320&rft.pages=1314-1320&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afab053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2571064326%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-48bf07320e3c0f7579b05fd913a0cfb560ab3b91dd8a318c49f44f8e0d333c5b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571064326&rft_id=info:pmid/33822852&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ageing/afab053&rfr_iscdi=true