Loading…
Predicting death in home care users: derivation and validation of the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT)
Prognostication tools that report personalized mortality risk and survival could improve discussions about end-of-life and advance care planning. We sought to develop and validate a mortality risk model for older adults with diverse care needs in home care using self-reportable information - the Ris...
Saved in:
Published in: | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 2021-07, Vol.193 (26), p.E997-E1005 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-d246d6fe6a799058f489ff31054ed0ffcf60ae81865665805e90948b4755efe93 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | E1005 |
container_issue | 26 |
container_start_page | E997 |
container_title | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) |
container_volume | 193 |
creator | Hsu, Amy T Manuel, Douglas G Spruin, Sarah Bennett, Carol Taljaard, Monica Beach, Sarah Sequeira, Yulric Talarico, Robert Chalifoux, Mathieu Kobewka, Daniel Costa, Andrew P Bronskill, Susan E Tanuseputro, Peter |
description | Prognostication tools that report personalized mortality risk and survival could improve discussions about end-of-life and advance care planning. We sought to develop and validate a mortality risk model for older adults with diverse care needs in home care using self-reportable information - the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT).
Using a derivation cohort that comprised adults living in Ontario, Canada, aged 50 years and older with at least 1 Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC) record between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2012, we developed a mortality risk model. The primary outcome was mortality 6 months after a RAI-HC assessment. We used proportional hazards regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering by the individual. We validated this algorithm for a second cohort of users of home care who were assessed between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2013. We used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to estimate the observed risk of death at 6 months for assessment of calibration and median survival. We constructed 61 risk groups based on incremental increases in the estimated median survival of about 3 weeks among adults at high risk and 3 months among adults at lower risk.
The derivation and validation cohorts included 435 009 and 139 388 adults, respectively. We identified a total of 122 823 deaths within 6 months of a RAI-HC assessment in the derivation cohort. The mean predicted 6-month mortality risk was 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7%-10.8%) and ranged from 1.54% (95% CI 1.53%-1.54%) in the lowest to 98.1% (95% CI 98.1%-98.2%) in the highest risk group. Estimated median survival spanned from 28 days (11 to 84 d at the 25th and 75th percentiles) in the highest risk group to over 8 years (1925 to 3420 d) in the lowest risk group. The algorithm had a c-statistic of 0.753 (95% CI 0.750-0.756) in our validation cohort.
The RESPECT mortality risk prediction tool that makes use of readily available information can improve the identification of palliative and end-of-life care needs in a diverse older adult population receiving home care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1503/cmaj.200022 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8248571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A666446447</galeid><sourcerecordid>A666446447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-d246d6fe6a799058f489ff31054ed0ffcf60ae81865665805e90948b4755efe93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV00Fv0zAUB_AIgVgZnLgjCyS0CWU4juM6OyBNVYFJFUxtOVte8ty6JHZnOxX7MHxXnHUbLeoFJVIUv5__duS8JHmd4bOswPnHqpWrM4IxJuRJMsgo5ynJSfk0GWBOcJqXlB0lL7xfRYJzMnyeHOWUEEZYPkh-XzmodRW0WaAaZFgibdDStoAq6QB1Hpw_jxWnNzJoa5A0NdrIRtfbV6tQWAKaav8TjeN4tx1W1qFZt15bF87RwxLW-LvCuIl56UQr6Bfrp49s23ZGh1s0t7ZBJ9Px7Go8mp--TJ4p2Xh4df88Tn58Hs9HX9PJ9y-Xo4tJWjGKQ1oTymqmgMlhWeKCK8pLpfIMFxRqrFSlGJbAM84KxgqOCyhxSfk1HRYFKCjz4-TTNnfdXbdQV2CCk41YO91Kdyus1GK_YvRSLOxGcEJ5McxiwMl9gLM3HfggWu0raBppwHZekCJuKSOYDyN99w9d2c6Z-Hm9KksaHfurFrIBoY2ycd2qDxUXjDFK491npQfUAgzETVoDSsfhPf_2gK_W-kbsorMDKF41tLo6mHq6NyGaAL_CQnbei8vZ9D_st337fscuQTZh6W3T3f1J-_DDFlbOeu9APZ5chkXfI6LvEbHtkajf7B72o31oivwP1GUIVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549949126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting death in home care users: derivation and validation of the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT)</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hsu, Amy T ; Manuel, Douglas G ; Spruin, Sarah ; Bennett, Carol ; Taljaard, Monica ; Beach, Sarah ; Sequeira, Yulric ; Talarico, Robert ; Chalifoux, Mathieu ; Kobewka, Daniel ; Costa, Andrew P ; Bronskill, Susan E ; Tanuseputro, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Amy T ; Manuel, Douglas G ; Spruin, Sarah ; Bennett, Carol ; Taljaard, Monica ; Beach, Sarah ; Sequeira, Yulric ; Talarico, Robert ; Chalifoux, Mathieu ; Kobewka, Daniel ; Costa, Andrew P ; Bronskill, Susan E ; Tanuseputro, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Prognostication tools that report personalized mortality risk and survival could improve discussions about end-of-life and advance care planning. We sought to develop and validate a mortality risk model for older adults with diverse care needs in home care using self-reportable information - the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT).
Using a derivation cohort that comprised adults living in Ontario, Canada, aged 50 years and older with at least 1 Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC) record between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2012, we developed a mortality risk model. The primary outcome was mortality 6 months after a RAI-HC assessment. We used proportional hazards regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering by the individual. We validated this algorithm for a second cohort of users of home care who were assessed between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2013. We used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to estimate the observed risk of death at 6 months for assessment of calibration and median survival. We constructed 61 risk groups based on incremental increases in the estimated median survival of about 3 weeks among adults at high risk and 3 months among adults at lower risk.
The derivation and validation cohorts included 435 009 and 139 388 adults, respectively. We identified a total of 122 823 deaths within 6 months of a RAI-HC assessment in the derivation cohort. The mean predicted 6-month mortality risk was 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7%-10.8%) and ranged from 1.54% (95% CI 1.53%-1.54%) in the lowest to 98.1% (95% CI 98.1%-98.2%) in the highest risk group. Estimated median survival spanned from 28 days (11 to 84 d at the 25th and 75th percentiles) in the highest risk group to over 8 years (1925 to 3420 d) in the lowest risk group. The algorithm had a c-statistic of 0.753 (95% CI 0.750-0.756) in our validation cohort.
The RESPECT mortality risk prediction tool that makes use of readily available information can improve the identification of palliative and end-of-life care needs in a diverse older adult population receiving home care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0820-3946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2329</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.200022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34226263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: CMA Joule Inc</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Advance Care Planning ; Aged ; Aged patients ; Canada ; Cancer ; Cardiovascular disease ; Care and treatment ; Chronic illnesses ; Death ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Health aspects ; Health risk assessment ; Home care ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Medical care ; Medical prognosis ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Needs assessment ; Older people ; Palliative care ; Patient outcomes ; Planning ; Population ; Primary care ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Sociodemographics ; Terminal Care ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2021-07, Vol.193 (26), p.E997-E1005</ispartof><rights>2021 CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 CMA Joule Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Joule Inc Jul 5, 2021</rights><rights>2021 CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-d246d6fe6a799058f489ff31054ed0ffcf60ae81865665805e90948b4755efe93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248571/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248571/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34226263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Amy T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuel, Douglas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spruin, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taljaard, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beach, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Yulric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talarico, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalifoux, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobewka, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Andrew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronskill, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanuseputro, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting death in home care users: derivation and validation of the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT)</title><title>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</title><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><description>Prognostication tools that report personalized mortality risk and survival could improve discussions about end-of-life and advance care planning. We sought to develop and validate a mortality risk model for older adults with diverse care needs in home care using self-reportable information - the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT).
Using a derivation cohort that comprised adults living in Ontario, Canada, aged 50 years and older with at least 1 Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC) record between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2012, we developed a mortality risk model. The primary outcome was mortality 6 months after a RAI-HC assessment. We used proportional hazards regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering by the individual. We validated this algorithm for a second cohort of users of home care who were assessed between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2013. We used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to estimate the observed risk of death at 6 months for assessment of calibration and median survival. We constructed 61 risk groups based on incremental increases in the estimated median survival of about 3 weeks among adults at high risk and 3 months among adults at lower risk.
The derivation and validation cohorts included 435 009 and 139 388 adults, respectively. We identified a total of 122 823 deaths within 6 months of a RAI-HC assessment in the derivation cohort. The mean predicted 6-month mortality risk was 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7%-10.8%) and ranged from 1.54% (95% CI 1.53%-1.54%) in the lowest to 98.1% (95% CI 98.1%-98.2%) in the highest risk group. Estimated median survival spanned from 28 days (11 to 84 d at the 25th and 75th percentiles) in the highest risk group to over 8 years (1925 to 3420 d) in the lowest risk group. The algorithm had a c-statistic of 0.753 (95% CI 0.750-0.756) in our validation cohort.
The RESPECT mortality risk prediction tool that makes use of readily available information can improve the identification of palliative and end-of-life care needs in a diverse older adult population receiving home care.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Advance Care Planning</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged patients</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Home care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Needs assessment</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Terminal Care</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0820-3946</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqV00Fv0zAUB_AIgVgZnLgjCyS0CWU4juM6OyBNVYFJFUxtOVte8ty6JHZnOxX7MHxXnHUbLeoFJVIUv5__duS8JHmd4bOswPnHqpWrM4IxJuRJMsgo5ynJSfk0GWBOcJqXlB0lL7xfRYJzMnyeHOWUEEZYPkh-XzmodRW0WaAaZFgibdDStoAq6QB1Hpw_jxWnNzJoa5A0NdrIRtfbV6tQWAKaav8TjeN4tx1W1qFZt15bF87RwxLW-LvCuIl56UQr6Bfrp49s23ZGh1s0t7ZBJ9Px7Go8mp--TJ4p2Xh4df88Tn58Hs9HX9PJ9y-Xo4tJWjGKQ1oTymqmgMlhWeKCK8pLpfIMFxRqrFSlGJbAM84KxgqOCyhxSfk1HRYFKCjz4-TTNnfdXbdQV2CCk41YO91Kdyus1GK_YvRSLOxGcEJ5McxiwMl9gLM3HfggWu0raBppwHZekCJuKSOYDyN99w9d2c6Z-Hm9KksaHfurFrIBoY2ycd2qDxUXjDFK491npQfUAgzETVoDSsfhPf_2gK_W-kbsorMDKF41tLo6mHq6NyGaAL_CQnbei8vZ9D_st337fscuQTZh6W3T3f1J-_DDFlbOeu9APZ5chkXfI6LvEbHtkajf7B72o31oivwP1GUIVQ</recordid><startdate>20210705</startdate><enddate>20210705</enddate><creator>Hsu, Amy T</creator><creator>Manuel, Douglas G</creator><creator>Spruin, Sarah</creator><creator>Bennett, Carol</creator><creator>Taljaard, Monica</creator><creator>Beach, Sarah</creator><creator>Sequeira, Yulric</creator><creator>Talarico, Robert</creator><creator>Chalifoux, Mathieu</creator><creator>Kobewka, Daniel</creator><creator>Costa, Andrew P</creator><creator>Bronskill, Susan E</creator><creator>Tanuseputro, Peter</creator><general>CMA Joule Inc</general><general>CMA Impact, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210705</creationdate><title>Predicting death in home care users: derivation and validation of the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT)</title><author>Hsu, Amy T ; Manuel, Douglas G ; Spruin, Sarah ; Bennett, Carol ; Taljaard, Monica ; Beach, Sarah ; Sequeira, Yulric ; Talarico, Robert ; Chalifoux, Mathieu ; Kobewka, Daniel ; Costa, Andrew P ; Bronskill, Susan E ; Tanuseputro, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-d246d6fe6a799058f489ff31054ed0ffcf60ae81865665805e90948b4755efe93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Advance Care Planning</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged patients</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Home care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Needs assessment</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Terminal Care</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Amy T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuel, Douglas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spruin, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taljaard, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beach, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Yulric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talarico, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalifoux, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobewka, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Andrew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronskill, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanuseputro, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hsu, Amy T</au><au>Manuel, Douglas G</au><au>Spruin, Sarah</au><au>Bennett, Carol</au><au>Taljaard, Monica</au><au>Beach, Sarah</au><au>Sequeira, Yulric</au><au>Talarico, Robert</au><au>Chalifoux, Mathieu</au><au>Kobewka, Daniel</au><au>Costa, Andrew P</au><au>Bronskill, Susan E</au><au>Tanuseputro, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting death in home care users: derivation and validation of the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT)</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><date>2021-07-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>193</volume><issue>26</issue><spage>E997</spage><epage>E1005</epage><pages>E997-E1005</pages><issn>0820-3946</issn><eissn>1488-2329</eissn><abstract>Prognostication tools that report personalized mortality risk and survival could improve discussions about end-of-life and advance care planning. We sought to develop and validate a mortality risk model for older adults with diverse care needs in home care using self-reportable information - the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT).
Using a derivation cohort that comprised adults living in Ontario, Canada, aged 50 years and older with at least 1 Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC) record between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2012, we developed a mortality risk model. The primary outcome was mortality 6 months after a RAI-HC assessment. We used proportional hazards regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering by the individual. We validated this algorithm for a second cohort of users of home care who were assessed between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2013. We used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to estimate the observed risk of death at 6 months for assessment of calibration and median survival. We constructed 61 risk groups based on incremental increases in the estimated median survival of about 3 weeks among adults at high risk and 3 months among adults at lower risk.
The derivation and validation cohorts included 435 009 and 139 388 adults, respectively. We identified a total of 122 823 deaths within 6 months of a RAI-HC assessment in the derivation cohort. The mean predicted 6-month mortality risk was 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7%-10.8%) and ranged from 1.54% (95% CI 1.53%-1.54%) in the lowest to 98.1% (95% CI 98.1%-98.2%) in the highest risk group. Estimated median survival spanned from 28 days (11 to 84 d at the 25th and 75th percentiles) in the highest risk group to over 8 years (1925 to 3420 d) in the lowest risk group. The algorithm had a c-statistic of 0.753 (95% CI 0.750-0.756) in our validation cohort.
The RESPECT mortality risk prediction tool that makes use of readily available information can improve the identification of palliative and end-of-life care needs in a diverse older adult population receiving home care.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>CMA Joule Inc</pub><pmid>34226263</pmid><doi>10.1503/cmaj.200022</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0820-3946 |
ispartof | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2021-07, Vol.193 (26), p.E997-E1005 |
issn | 0820-3946 1488-2329 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8248571 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Activities of daily living Advance Care Planning Aged Aged patients Canada Cancer Cardiovascular disease Care and treatment Chronic illnesses Death Geriatric Assessment - methods Health aspects Health risk assessment Home care Humans Kaplan-Meier Estimate Medical care Medical prognosis Methods Middle Aged Mortality Needs assessment Older people Palliative care Patient outcomes Planning Population Primary care Proportional Hazards Models Risk Assessment - methods Sociodemographics Terminal Care Variables |
title | Predicting death in home care users: derivation and validation of the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A12%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20death%20in%20home%20care%20users:%20derivation%20and%20validation%20of%20the%20Risk%20Evaluation%20for%20Support:%20Predictions%20for%20Elder-Life%20in%20the%20Community%20Tool%20(RESPECT)&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Medical%20Association%20journal%20(CMAJ)&rft.au=Hsu,%20Amy%20T&rft.date=2021-07-05&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=26&rft.spage=E997&rft.epage=E1005&rft.pages=E997-E1005&rft.issn=0820-3946&rft.eissn=1488-2329&rft_id=info:doi/10.1503/cmaj.200022&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA666446447%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-d246d6fe6a799058f489ff31054ed0ffcf60ae81865665805e90948b4755efe93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549949126&rft_id=info:pmid/34226263&rft_galeid=A666446447&rfr_iscdi=true |