Loading…
Evaluation of saliva as a complementary technique to the diagnosis of COVID-19: a systematic review
Infectious disease coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and it mainly affects the upper respiratory tract. The gold standard for its diagnosis is real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) performed on a nasopharyngeal swab. In contrast, testing sal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2021-07, Vol.26 (4), p.e526-e532 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-18513e82137f3ddf69415ff42d4dda89b69a95843f60bdc7aa7e71328b05a1093 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | e532 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e526 |
container_title | Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Sagredo-Olivares, K Morales-Gómez, C Aitken-Saavedra, J |
description | Infectious disease coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and it mainly affects the upper respiratory tract. The gold standard for its diagnosis is real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) performed on a nasopharyngeal swab. In contrast, testing saliva has significant advantages as a diagnostic method.
We searched for articles evaluating saliva as a diagnostic method for COVID-19 on the PUBMED/MEDLINE, WEB OF SCIENCE, COCHRANE, and SCIELO platforms. We initially found 233 articles and 20 were selected for inclusion following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol: 18 cross-sectional studies and 2 case reports, including 8 from America, 8 from Asia, and 4 from Europe. The studies evaluated the presence of viral RNA, IgG, IgM, and IgA in samples of unstimulated saliva from adults with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. The vast majority of the studies performed RT-qPCR on the saliva samples and compared the results with the gold standard (a nasopharyngeal swab of the same patient).
Saliva samples analyzed by RT-qPCR, reverse transcription isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), spectroscopy, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) offer high sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2 in the early stages of the disease and among asymptomatic patients as compared to nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR. In addition, the self-collection of saliva offers the possibility of receiving telemedicine instructions to carry out the test, reducing the risk of contagion.
The diagnosis of COVID-19 through saliva is sensitive, non-invasive, and is of low risk for the healthcare professionals. However, further studies are recommended to validate its clinical use. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4317/medoral.24424 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8254882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491946008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-18513e82137f3ddf69415ff42d4dda89b69a95843f60bdc7aa7e71328b05a1093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBCIlsKRK_KRS4pfSWwOSKg8pUpcgKu1cRxqlMQlTor4ewwtVTntSjs7OzuD0CklU8FpftHY0ndQT5kQTOyhMc2UTDIlsv2dfoSOQngnhOc0zw7RiPOMKMLYGJnbFdQD9M632Fc4QO1WgCFgwMY3y9o2tu2h-8K9NYvWfQwW9x73C4tLB2-tDy787M2eXh9vEqou4174Cr1tIqXBnV05-3mMDiqogz3Z1Al6ubt9nj0k86f7x9n1PDEi5X1CZUq5lYzyvOJlWUXhNK0qwUpRliBVkSlQqRS8ykhRmhwgtznlTBYkBUoUn6CrNe9yKKItJiqPzuhl55r4gfbg9P9J6xb6za-0ZKmQkkWC8w1B5-OnodeNC8bWNbTWD0EzoWh0kxAZockaajofQmer7RlK9E8wehOM_g0m4s92tW3Rf0nwbxt7i90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491946008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of saliva as a complementary technique to the diagnosis of COVID-19: a systematic review</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Sagredo-Olivares, K ; Morales-Gómez, C ; Aitken-Saavedra, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Sagredo-Olivares, K ; Morales-Gómez, C ; Aitken-Saavedra, J</creatorcontrib><description>Infectious disease coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and it mainly affects the upper respiratory tract. The gold standard for its diagnosis is real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) performed on a nasopharyngeal swab. In contrast, testing saliva has significant advantages as a diagnostic method.
We searched for articles evaluating saliva as a diagnostic method for COVID-19 on the PUBMED/MEDLINE, WEB OF SCIENCE, COCHRANE, and SCIELO platforms. We initially found 233 articles and 20 were selected for inclusion following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol: 18 cross-sectional studies and 2 case reports, including 8 from America, 8 from Asia, and 4 from Europe. The studies evaluated the presence of viral RNA, IgG, IgM, and IgA in samples of unstimulated saliva from adults with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. The vast majority of the studies performed RT-qPCR on the saliva samples and compared the results with the gold standard (a nasopharyngeal swab of the same patient).
Saliva samples analyzed by RT-qPCR, reverse transcription isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), spectroscopy, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) offer high sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2 in the early stages of the disease and among asymptomatic patients as compared to nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR. In addition, the self-collection of saliva offers the possibility of receiving telemedicine instructions to carry out the test, reducing the risk of contagion.
The diagnosis of COVID-19 through saliva is sensitive, non-invasive, and is of low risk for the healthcare professionals. However, further studies are recommended to validate its clinical use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1698-6946</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1698-4447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1698-6946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4317/medoral.24424</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33609022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Medicina Oral S.L</publisher><subject>Adult ; Asia ; COVID-19 ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Europe ; Humans ; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques ; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques ; Review ; Saliva ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2021-07, Vol.26 (4), p.e526-e532</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-18513e82137f3ddf69415ff42d4dda89b69a95843f60bdc7aa7e71328b05a1093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254882/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254882/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609022$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sagredo-Olivares, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales-Gómez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aitken-Saavedra, J</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of saliva as a complementary technique to the diagnosis of COVID-19: a systematic review</title><title>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</title><addtitle>Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal</addtitle><description>Infectious disease coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and it mainly affects the upper respiratory tract. The gold standard for its diagnosis is real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) performed on a nasopharyngeal swab. In contrast, testing saliva has significant advantages as a diagnostic method.
We searched for articles evaluating saliva as a diagnostic method for COVID-19 on the PUBMED/MEDLINE, WEB OF SCIENCE, COCHRANE, and SCIELO platforms. We initially found 233 articles and 20 were selected for inclusion following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol: 18 cross-sectional studies and 2 case reports, including 8 from America, 8 from Asia, and 4 from Europe. The studies evaluated the presence of viral RNA, IgG, IgM, and IgA in samples of unstimulated saliva from adults with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. The vast majority of the studies performed RT-qPCR on the saliva samples and compared the results with the gold standard (a nasopharyngeal swab of the same patient).
Saliva samples analyzed by RT-qPCR, reverse transcription isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), spectroscopy, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) offer high sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2 in the early stages of the disease and among asymptomatic patients as compared to nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR. In addition, the self-collection of saliva offers the possibility of receiving telemedicine instructions to carry out the test, reducing the risk of contagion.
The diagnosis of COVID-19 through saliva is sensitive, non-invasive, and is of low risk for the healthcare professionals. However, further studies are recommended to validate its clinical use.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1698-6946</issn><issn>1698-4447</issn><issn>1698-6946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBCIlsKRK_KRS4pfSWwOSKg8pUpcgKu1cRxqlMQlTor4ewwtVTntSjs7OzuD0CklU8FpftHY0ndQT5kQTOyhMc2UTDIlsv2dfoSOQngnhOc0zw7RiPOMKMLYGJnbFdQD9M632Fc4QO1WgCFgwMY3y9o2tu2h-8K9NYvWfQwW9x73C4tLB2-tDy787M2eXh9vEqou4174Cr1tIqXBnV05-3mMDiqogz3Z1Al6ubt9nj0k86f7x9n1PDEi5X1CZUq5lYzyvOJlWUXhNK0qwUpRliBVkSlQqRS8ykhRmhwgtznlTBYkBUoUn6CrNe9yKKItJiqPzuhl55r4gfbg9P9J6xb6za-0ZKmQkkWC8w1B5-OnodeNC8bWNbTWD0EzoWh0kxAZockaajofQmer7RlK9E8wehOM_g0m4s92tW3Rf0nwbxt7i90</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Sagredo-Olivares, K</creator><creator>Morales-Gómez, C</creator><creator>Aitken-Saavedra, J</creator><general>Medicina Oral S.L</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of saliva as a complementary technique to the diagnosis of COVID-19: a systematic review</title><author>Sagredo-Olivares, K ; Morales-Gómez, C ; Aitken-Saavedra, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-18513e82137f3ddf69415ff42d4dda89b69a95843f60bdc7aa7e71328b05a1093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sagredo-Olivares, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales-Gómez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aitken-Saavedra, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sagredo-Olivares, K</au><au>Morales-Gómez, C</au><au>Aitken-Saavedra, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of saliva as a complementary technique to the diagnosis of COVID-19: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</jtitle><addtitle>Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e526</spage><epage>e532</epage><pages>e526-e532</pages><issn>1698-6946</issn><issn>1698-4447</issn><eissn>1698-6946</eissn><abstract>Infectious disease coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and it mainly affects the upper respiratory tract. The gold standard for its diagnosis is real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) performed on a nasopharyngeal swab. In contrast, testing saliva has significant advantages as a diagnostic method.
We searched for articles evaluating saliva as a diagnostic method for COVID-19 on the PUBMED/MEDLINE, WEB OF SCIENCE, COCHRANE, and SCIELO platforms. We initially found 233 articles and 20 were selected for inclusion following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol: 18 cross-sectional studies and 2 case reports, including 8 from America, 8 from Asia, and 4 from Europe. The studies evaluated the presence of viral RNA, IgG, IgM, and IgA in samples of unstimulated saliva from adults with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. The vast majority of the studies performed RT-qPCR on the saliva samples and compared the results with the gold standard (a nasopharyngeal swab of the same patient).
Saliva samples analyzed by RT-qPCR, reverse transcription isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), spectroscopy, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) offer high sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2 in the early stages of the disease and among asymptomatic patients as compared to nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR. In addition, the self-collection of saliva offers the possibility of receiving telemedicine instructions to carry out the test, reducing the risk of contagion.
The diagnosis of COVID-19 through saliva is sensitive, non-invasive, and is of low risk for the healthcare professionals. However, further studies are recommended to validate its clinical use.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Medicina Oral S.L</pub><pmid>33609022</pmid><doi>10.4317/medoral.24424</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1698-6946 |
ispartof | Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2021-07, Vol.26 (4), p.e526-e532 |
issn | 1698-6946 1698-4447 1698-6946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8254882 |
source | PubMed Central(OpenAccess) |
subjects | Adult Asia COVID-19 Cross-Sectional Studies Europe Humans Molecular Diagnostic Techniques Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques Review Saliva SARS-CoV-2 Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Evaluation of saliva as a complementary technique to the diagnosis of COVID-19: a systematic review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T05%3A43%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20saliva%20as%20a%20complementary%20technique%20to%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20COVID-19:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Medicina%20oral,%20patolog%C3%ADa%20oral%20y%20cirug%C3%ADa%20bucal&rft.au=Sagredo-Olivares,%20K&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e526&rft.epage=e532&rft.pages=e526-e532&rft.issn=1698-6946&rft.eissn=1698-6946&rft_id=info:doi/10.4317/medoral.24424&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2491946008%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-18513e82137f3ddf69415ff42d4dda89b69a95843f60bdc7aa7e71328b05a1093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491946008&rft_id=info:pmid/33609022&rfr_iscdi=true |