Differential In Vitro Pharmacological Profiles of Structurally Diverse Nociceptin Receptor Agonists in Activating G Protein and Beta-Arrestin Signaling at the Human Nociceptin Opioid Receptor

• Published in: Molecular pharmacology 2021-07, Vol.100 (1), p.7-18
• Main Authors: Lu, James J., Polgar, Willma E., Mann, Anika, Dasgupta, Pooja, Schulz, Stefan, Zaveri, Nurulain T.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0026-895X; 1521-0111
• DOI: 10.1124/molpharm.120.000076

Agonists at the nociceptin opioid peptide receptor (NOP) are under investigation as therapeutics for nonaddicting analgesia, opioid use disorder, Parkinson’s disease, and other indications. NOP full and partial agonists have both been of interest, particularly since NOP partial agonists show a reduced propensity for behavioral disruption than NOP full agonists. Here, we investigated the in vitro pharmacological properties of chemically diverse NOP receptor agonists in assays measuring functional activation of the NOP receptor such as guanosine 5'-O-[gamma-thio]triphosphate (GTPγS) binding, cAMP inhibition, G protein–coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channel activation, phosphorylation, β-arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization. When normalized to the efficacy of the natural agonist nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), we found that different functional assays that measure intrinsic activity produce inconsistent levels of agonist efficacy, particularly for ligands that were partial agonists. Agonist efficacy obtained in the GTPγS assay tended to be lower than that in the cAMP and GIRK assays. These structurally diverse NOP agonists also showed differential receptor phosphorylation profiles at the phosphosites we examined and induced varying levels of receptor internalization. Interestingly, although the rank order for β-arrestin recruitment by these NOP agonists was consistent with their ability to induce receptor internalization, their phosphorylation signatures at the time point we investigated were not indicative of the levels of β-arrestin recruitment or internalization induced by these agonists. It is possible that other phosphorylation sites, yet to be identified, drive the recruitment of NOP receptor ensembles and subsequent receptor trafficking by some nonpeptide NOP agonists. These findings potentially help understand NOP agonist pharmacology in the context of ligand-activated receptor trafficking. Chemically diverse agonist ligands at the nociceptin opioid receptor G protein–coupled receptor showed differential efficacy for activating downstream events after receptor binding, in a suite of functional assays measuring guanosine 5'-O-[gamma-thio]triphosphate binding, cAMP inhibition, G protein–coupled inwardly rectifying protein channel activation, β-arrestin recruitment, receptor internalization and receptor phosphorylation. These analyses provide a context for understanding nociceptin opioid peptide receptor (NOP) agonist pharmacol