Loading…

Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review

The identity and institutional image of universities are presented to the world through their websites. On their websites, universities publish their academic offerings, their mission, their vision, their academic objectives, their achievements, their regulations, their news and all their university...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Universal access in the information society 2023-03, Vol.22 (1), p.133-168
Main Authors: Campoverde-Molina, Milton, Luján-Mora, Sergio, Valverde, Llorenç
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93
container_end_page 168
container_issue 1
container_start_page 133
container_title Universal access in the information society
container_volume 22
creator Campoverde-Molina, Milton
Luján-Mora, Sergio
Valverde, Llorenç
description The identity and institutional image of universities are presented to the world through their websites. On their websites, universities publish their academic offerings, their mission, their vision, their academic objectives, their achievements, their regulations, their news and all their university work. Hence, the importance of university websites is accessible. The accessibility of university websites has been evaluated several times in the past, but there is no work that has summarized all the evaluations performed to provide a general overview of the situation. Therefore, in this research we have performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to consolidate, analyze, synthesize and interpret the accessibility results of university websites published in 42 papers that have been selected for this study. The methodology used in this SLR was that proposed in Kitchenham’s guidelines, which includes three stages: planning the review, conducting the review and reporting the review. The results present the analysis and synthesis of the evaluations of 9,140 universities in 67 countries. Of these, 38,416 web pages, 91,421 YouTube videos and 28,395 PDF documents were evaluated. Manual methods, methods with automatic tools and the combination of both methods were used for the evaluation. Most websites were evaluated using the ISO/IEC 40500:2012 and Section 508 standards. The accessibility guidelines most commonly violated in the evaluations were: adaptable, compatible, distinguishable, input assistance, keyboard accessible, navigable, predictable, readable and text alternatives. In conclusion, the university websites, YouTube videos and PDF documents analyzed in the 42 papers present important accessibility problems. The main contribution of this SLR is the consolidation of the results of the 42 studies selected to determine the findings and trends in the accessibility of university websites around the world.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10209-021-00825-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8259087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2786672315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBJT2D7BAkbphE3r9iB8skBCigIRgA2vLce5MjTIJ2MmMhl9fDzNMH4uurq37nXN9fQg5onBKAdT3RIGBKYHREkCzqnzbIQdU0qqsmFGftmdt9snnlJ4hk5rSPbLPBRNaVPKA3F94jymFOrRhWBb9pBi7MMeYVrcF1rliKhZ9bJtFaPCscEVapgFnbgi-yBqMbhgjFhHnARdfyO7EtQm_buohefpx9Xh5U949XN9eXtyVXigxlMw7jo1QIIVyQiheN7VAD2jEpJFKO9BoPOXcScqkBi6VAWqQVQw884YfkvO178tYz7Dx2A3RtfYlhpmLS9u7YP_udOGnnfZzm7_JgFbZ4GRjEPvXEdNgZyF5bFvXYT8my6oKJKfAq4x--wd97sfY5fUsU1pKxThdUWxN-dinFHGyfQwFu4rLruOyOQT7Hpd9y6LjP9fYSj7yyQBfAym3uinG37P_Y_sLhVih4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2786672315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Campoverde-Molina, Milton ; Luján-Mora, Sergio ; Valverde, Llorenç</creator><creatorcontrib>Campoverde-Molina, Milton ; Luján-Mora, Sergio ; Valverde, Llorenç</creatorcontrib><description>The identity and institutional image of universities are presented to the world through their websites. On their websites, universities publish their academic offerings, their mission, their vision, their academic objectives, their achievements, their regulations, their news and all their university work. Hence, the importance of university websites is accessible. The accessibility of university websites has been evaluated several times in the past, but there is no work that has summarized all the evaluations performed to provide a general overview of the situation. Therefore, in this research we have performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to consolidate, analyze, synthesize and interpret the accessibility results of university websites published in 42 papers that have been selected for this study. The methodology used in this SLR was that proposed in Kitchenham’s guidelines, which includes three stages: planning the review, conducting the review and reporting the review. The results present the analysis and synthesis of the evaluations of 9,140 universities in 67 countries. Of these, 38,416 web pages, 91,421 YouTube videos and 28,395 PDF documents were evaluated. Manual methods, methods with automatic tools and the combination of both methods were used for the evaluation. Most websites were evaluated using the ISO/IEC 40500:2012 and Section 508 standards. The accessibility guidelines most commonly violated in the evaluations were: adaptable, compatible, distinguishable, input assistance, keyboard accessible, navigable, predictable, readable and text alternatives. In conclusion, the university websites, YouTube videos and PDF documents analyzed in the 42 papers present important accessibility problems. The main contribution of this SLR is the consolidation of the results of the 42 studies selected to determine the findings and trends in the accessibility of university websites around the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-5289</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1615-5297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10209-021-00825-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34248456</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Computers and Society ; Documents ; Guidelines ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; IT in Business ; Keyboards ; Literature reviews ; Review Paper ; Systematic review ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction ; Video ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Universal access in the information society, 2023-03, Vol.22 (1), p.133-168</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5000-864X ; 0000-0002-9163-568X ; 0000-0001-5647-5150</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34248456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campoverde-Molina, Milton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luján-Mora, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde, Llorenç</creatorcontrib><title>Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review</title><title>Universal access in the information society</title><addtitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</addtitle><addtitle>Univers Access Inf Soc</addtitle><description>The identity and institutional image of universities are presented to the world through their websites. On their websites, universities publish their academic offerings, their mission, their vision, their academic objectives, their achievements, their regulations, their news and all their university work. Hence, the importance of university websites is accessible. The accessibility of university websites has been evaluated several times in the past, but there is no work that has summarized all the evaluations performed to provide a general overview of the situation. Therefore, in this research we have performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to consolidate, analyze, synthesize and interpret the accessibility results of university websites published in 42 papers that have been selected for this study. The methodology used in this SLR was that proposed in Kitchenham’s guidelines, which includes three stages: planning the review, conducting the review and reporting the review. The results present the analysis and synthesis of the evaluations of 9,140 universities in 67 countries. Of these, 38,416 web pages, 91,421 YouTube videos and 28,395 PDF documents were evaluated. Manual methods, methods with automatic tools and the combination of both methods were used for the evaluation. Most websites were evaluated using the ISO/IEC 40500:2012 and Section 508 standards. The accessibility guidelines most commonly violated in the evaluations were: adaptable, compatible, distinguishable, input assistance, keyboard accessible, navigable, predictable, readable and text alternatives. In conclusion, the university websites, YouTube videos and PDF documents analyzed in the 42 papers present important accessibility problems. The main contribution of this SLR is the consolidation of the results of the 42 studies selected to determine the findings and trends in the accessibility of university websites around the world.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computers and Society</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Keyboards</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Review Paper</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><subject>Video</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1615-5289</issn><issn>1615-5297</issn><issn>1615-5297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBJT2D7BAkbphE3r9iB8skBCigIRgA2vLce5MjTIJ2MmMhl9fDzNMH4uurq37nXN9fQg5onBKAdT3RIGBKYHREkCzqnzbIQdU0qqsmFGftmdt9snnlJ4hk5rSPbLPBRNaVPKA3F94jymFOrRhWBb9pBi7MMeYVrcF1rliKhZ9bJtFaPCscEVapgFnbgi-yBqMbhgjFhHnARdfyO7EtQm_buohefpx9Xh5U949XN9eXtyVXigxlMw7jo1QIIVyQiheN7VAD2jEpJFKO9BoPOXcScqkBi6VAWqQVQw884YfkvO178tYz7Dx2A3RtfYlhpmLS9u7YP_udOGnnfZzm7_JgFbZ4GRjEPvXEdNgZyF5bFvXYT8my6oKJKfAq4x--wd97sfY5fUsU1pKxThdUWxN-dinFHGyfQwFu4rLruOyOQT7Hpd9y6LjP9fYSj7yyQBfAym3uinG37P_Y_sLhVih4A</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Campoverde-Molina, Milton</creator><creator>Luján-Mora, Sergio</creator><creator>Valverde, Llorenç</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5000-864X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-568X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5647-5150</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review</title><author>Campoverde-Molina, Milton ; Luján-Mora, Sergio ; Valverde, Llorenç</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computers and Society</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Keyboards</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Review Paper</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><topic>Video</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campoverde-Molina, Milton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luján-Mora, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde, Llorenç</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campoverde-Molina, Milton</au><au>Luján-Mora, Sergio</au><au>Valverde, Llorenç</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle><stitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</stitle><addtitle>Univers Access Inf Soc</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>133-168</pages><issn>1615-5289</issn><issn>1615-5297</issn><eissn>1615-5297</eissn><abstract>The identity and institutional image of universities are presented to the world through their websites. On their websites, universities publish their academic offerings, their mission, their vision, their academic objectives, their achievements, their regulations, their news and all their university work. Hence, the importance of university websites is accessible. The accessibility of university websites has been evaluated several times in the past, but there is no work that has summarized all the evaluations performed to provide a general overview of the situation. Therefore, in this research we have performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to consolidate, analyze, synthesize and interpret the accessibility results of university websites published in 42 papers that have been selected for this study. The methodology used in this SLR was that proposed in Kitchenham’s guidelines, which includes three stages: planning the review, conducting the review and reporting the review. The results present the analysis and synthesis of the evaluations of 9,140 universities in 67 countries. Of these, 38,416 web pages, 91,421 YouTube videos and 28,395 PDF documents were evaluated. Manual methods, methods with automatic tools and the combination of both methods were used for the evaluation. Most websites were evaluated using the ISO/IEC 40500:2012 and Section 508 standards. The accessibility guidelines most commonly violated in the evaluations were: adaptable, compatible, distinguishable, input assistance, keyboard accessible, navigable, predictable, readable and text alternatives. In conclusion, the university websites, YouTube videos and PDF documents analyzed in the 42 papers present important accessibility problems. The main contribution of this SLR is the consolidation of the results of the 42 studies selected to determine the findings and trends in the accessibility of university websites around the world.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34248456</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10209-021-00825-z</doi><tpages>36</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5000-864X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-568X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5647-5150</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1615-5289
ispartof Universal access in the information society, 2023-03, Vol.22 (1), p.133-168
issn 1615-5289
1615-5297
1615-5297
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8259087
source Springer Link
subjects Accessibility
Colleges & universities
Computer Communication Networks
Computer Science
Computers and Society
Documents
Guidelines
Information Storage and Retrieval
Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)
IT in Business
Keyboards
Literature reviews
Review Paper
Systematic review
User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction
Video
Websites
title Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T12%3A24%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accessibility%20of%20university%20websites%20worldwide:%20a%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Universal%20access%20in%20the%20information%20society&rft.au=Campoverde-Molina,%20Milton&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=133-168&rft.issn=1615-5289&rft.eissn=1615-5297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10209-021-00825-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2786672315%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2786672315&rft_id=info:pmid/34248456&rfr_iscdi=true