Loading…
Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review
The identity and institutional image of universities are presented to the world through their websites. On their websites, universities publish their academic offerings, their mission, their vision, their academic objectives, their achievements, their regulations, their news and all their university...
Saved in:
Published in: | Universal access in the information society 2023-03, Vol.22 (1), p.133-168 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93 |
container_end_page | 168 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | Universal access in the information society |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Campoverde-Molina, Milton Luján-Mora, Sergio Valverde, Llorenç |
description | The identity and institutional image of universities are presented to the world through their websites. On their websites, universities publish their academic offerings, their mission, their vision, their academic objectives, their achievements, their regulations, their news and all their university work. Hence, the importance of university websites is accessible. The accessibility of university websites has been evaluated several times in the past, but there is no work that has summarized all the evaluations performed to provide a general overview of the situation. Therefore, in this research we have performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to consolidate, analyze, synthesize and interpret the accessibility results of university websites published in 42 papers that have been selected for this study. The methodology used in this SLR was that proposed in Kitchenham’s guidelines, which includes three stages: planning the review, conducting the review and reporting the review. The results present the analysis and synthesis of the evaluations of 9,140 universities in 67 countries. Of these, 38,416 web pages, 91,421 YouTube videos and 28,395 PDF documents were evaluated. Manual methods, methods with automatic tools and the combination of both methods were used for the evaluation. Most websites were evaluated using the ISO/IEC 40500:2012 and Section 508 standards. The accessibility guidelines most commonly violated in the evaluations were: adaptable, compatible, distinguishable, input assistance, keyboard accessible, navigable, predictable, readable and text alternatives. In conclusion, the university websites, YouTube videos and PDF documents analyzed in the 42 papers present important accessibility problems. The main contribution of this SLR is the consolidation of the results of the 42 studies selected to determine the findings and trends in the accessibility of university websites around the world. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10209-021-00825-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8259087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2786672315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBJT2D7BAkbphE3r9iB8skBCigIRgA2vLce5MjTIJ2MmMhl9fDzNMH4uurq37nXN9fQg5onBKAdT3RIGBKYHREkCzqnzbIQdU0qqsmFGftmdt9snnlJ4hk5rSPbLPBRNaVPKA3F94jymFOrRhWBb9pBi7MMeYVrcF1rliKhZ9bJtFaPCscEVapgFnbgi-yBqMbhgjFhHnARdfyO7EtQm_buohefpx9Xh5U949XN9eXtyVXigxlMw7jo1QIIVyQiheN7VAD2jEpJFKO9BoPOXcScqkBi6VAWqQVQw884YfkvO178tYz7Dx2A3RtfYlhpmLS9u7YP_udOGnnfZzm7_JgFbZ4GRjEPvXEdNgZyF5bFvXYT8my6oKJKfAq4x--wd97sfY5fUsU1pKxThdUWxN-dinFHGyfQwFu4rLruOyOQT7Hpd9y6LjP9fYSj7yyQBfAym3uinG37P_Y_sLhVih4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2786672315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Campoverde-Molina, Milton ; Luján-Mora, Sergio ; Valverde, Llorenç</creator><creatorcontrib>Campoverde-Molina, Milton ; Luján-Mora, Sergio ; Valverde, Llorenç</creatorcontrib><description>The identity and institutional image of universities are presented to the world through their websites. On their websites, universities publish their academic offerings, their mission, their vision, their academic objectives, their achievements, their regulations, their news and all their university work. Hence, the importance of university websites is accessible. The accessibility of university websites has been evaluated several times in the past, but there is no work that has summarized all the evaluations performed to provide a general overview of the situation. Therefore, in this research we have performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to consolidate, analyze, synthesize and interpret the accessibility results of university websites published in 42 papers that have been selected for this study. The methodology used in this SLR was that proposed in Kitchenham’s guidelines, which includes three stages: planning the review, conducting the review and reporting the review. The results present the analysis and synthesis of the evaluations of 9,140 universities in 67 countries. Of these, 38,416 web pages, 91,421 YouTube videos and 28,395 PDF documents were evaluated. Manual methods, methods with automatic tools and the combination of both methods were used for the evaluation. Most websites were evaluated using the ISO/IEC 40500:2012 and Section 508 standards. The accessibility guidelines most commonly violated in the evaluations were: adaptable, compatible, distinguishable, input assistance, keyboard accessible, navigable, predictable, readable and text alternatives. In conclusion, the university websites, YouTube videos and PDF documents analyzed in the 42 papers present important accessibility problems. The main contribution of this SLR is the consolidation of the results of the 42 studies selected to determine the findings and trends in the accessibility of university websites around the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-5289</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1615-5297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10209-021-00825-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34248456</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Colleges & universities ; Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Computers and Society ; Documents ; Guidelines ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; IT in Business ; Keyboards ; Literature reviews ; Review Paper ; Systematic review ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction ; Video ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Universal access in the information society, 2023-03, Vol.22 (1), p.133-168</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5000-864X ; 0000-0002-9163-568X ; 0000-0001-5647-5150</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34248456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campoverde-Molina, Milton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luján-Mora, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde, Llorenç</creatorcontrib><title>Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review</title><title>Universal access in the information society</title><addtitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</addtitle><addtitle>Univers Access Inf Soc</addtitle><description>The identity and institutional image of universities are presented to the world through their websites. On their websites, universities publish their academic offerings, their mission, their vision, their academic objectives, their achievements, their regulations, their news and all their university work. Hence, the importance of university websites is accessible. The accessibility of university websites has been evaluated several times in the past, but there is no work that has summarized all the evaluations performed to provide a general overview of the situation. Therefore, in this research we have performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to consolidate, analyze, synthesize and interpret the accessibility results of university websites published in 42 papers that have been selected for this study. The methodology used in this SLR was that proposed in Kitchenham’s guidelines, which includes three stages: planning the review, conducting the review and reporting the review. The results present the analysis and synthesis of the evaluations of 9,140 universities in 67 countries. Of these, 38,416 web pages, 91,421 YouTube videos and 28,395 PDF documents were evaluated. Manual methods, methods with automatic tools and the combination of both methods were used for the evaluation. Most websites were evaluated using the ISO/IEC 40500:2012 and Section 508 standards. The accessibility guidelines most commonly violated in the evaluations were: adaptable, compatible, distinguishable, input assistance, keyboard accessible, navigable, predictable, readable and text alternatives. In conclusion, the university websites, YouTube videos and PDF documents analyzed in the 42 papers present important accessibility problems. The main contribution of this SLR is the consolidation of the results of the 42 studies selected to determine the findings and trends in the accessibility of university websites around the world.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computers and Society</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Keyboards</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Review Paper</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><subject>Video</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1615-5289</issn><issn>1615-5297</issn><issn>1615-5297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBJT2D7BAkbphE3r9iB8skBCigIRgA2vLce5MjTIJ2MmMhl9fDzNMH4uurq37nXN9fQg5onBKAdT3RIGBKYHREkCzqnzbIQdU0qqsmFGftmdt9snnlJ4hk5rSPbLPBRNaVPKA3F94jymFOrRhWBb9pBi7MMeYVrcF1rliKhZ9bJtFaPCscEVapgFnbgi-yBqMbhgjFhHnARdfyO7EtQm_buohefpx9Xh5U949XN9eXtyVXigxlMw7jo1QIIVyQiheN7VAD2jEpJFKO9BoPOXcScqkBi6VAWqQVQw884YfkvO178tYz7Dx2A3RtfYlhpmLS9u7YP_udOGnnfZzm7_JgFbZ4GRjEPvXEdNgZyF5bFvXYT8my6oKJKfAq4x--wd97sfY5fUsU1pKxThdUWxN-dinFHGyfQwFu4rLruOyOQT7Hpd9y6LjP9fYSj7yyQBfAym3uinG37P_Y_sLhVih4A</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Campoverde-Molina, Milton</creator><creator>Luján-Mora, Sergio</creator><creator>Valverde, Llorenç</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5000-864X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-568X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5647-5150</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review</title><author>Campoverde-Molina, Milton ; Luján-Mora, Sergio ; Valverde, Llorenç</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computers and Society</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Keyboards</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Review Paper</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><topic>Video</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campoverde-Molina, Milton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luján-Mora, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde, Llorenç</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campoverde-Molina, Milton</au><au>Luján-Mora, Sergio</au><au>Valverde, Llorenç</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle><stitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</stitle><addtitle>Univers Access Inf Soc</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>133-168</pages><issn>1615-5289</issn><issn>1615-5297</issn><eissn>1615-5297</eissn><abstract>The identity and institutional image of universities are presented to the world through their websites. On their websites, universities publish their academic offerings, their mission, their vision, their academic objectives, their achievements, their regulations, their news and all their university work. Hence, the importance of university websites is accessible. The accessibility of university websites has been evaluated several times in the past, but there is no work that has summarized all the evaluations performed to provide a general overview of the situation. Therefore, in this research we have performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to consolidate, analyze, synthesize and interpret the accessibility results of university websites published in 42 papers that have been selected for this study. The methodology used in this SLR was that proposed in Kitchenham’s guidelines, which includes three stages: planning the review, conducting the review and reporting the review. The results present the analysis and synthesis of the evaluations of 9,140 universities in 67 countries. Of these, 38,416 web pages, 91,421 YouTube videos and 28,395 PDF documents were evaluated. Manual methods, methods with automatic tools and the combination of both methods were used for the evaluation. Most websites were evaluated using the ISO/IEC 40500:2012 and Section 508 standards. The accessibility guidelines most commonly violated in the evaluations were: adaptable, compatible, distinguishable, input assistance, keyboard accessible, navigable, predictable, readable and text alternatives. In conclusion, the university websites, YouTube videos and PDF documents analyzed in the 42 papers present important accessibility problems. The main contribution of this SLR is the consolidation of the results of the 42 studies selected to determine the findings and trends in the accessibility of university websites around the world.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34248456</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10209-021-00825-z</doi><tpages>36</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5000-864X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-568X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5647-5150</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1615-5289 |
ispartof | Universal access in the information society, 2023-03, Vol.22 (1), p.133-168 |
issn | 1615-5289 1615-5297 1615-5297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8259087 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Accessibility Colleges & universities Computer Communication Networks Computer Science Computers and Society Documents Guidelines Information Storage and Retrieval Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) IT in Business Keyboards Literature reviews Review Paper Systematic review User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction Video Websites |
title | Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T12%3A24%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accessibility%20of%20university%20websites%20worldwide:%20a%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Universal%20access%20in%20the%20information%20society&rft.au=Campoverde-Molina,%20Milton&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=133-168&rft.issn=1615-5289&rft.eissn=1615-5297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10209-021-00825-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2786672315%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-2ca3ed470647a4473bdb4ec0e94fd678a08e9c133a6126803679019e2520c2c93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2786672315&rft_id=info:pmid/34248456&rfr_iscdi=true |