Loading…
Perceived Social Influences on Women's Decisions to use Medications not Studied in Pregnancy. A Qualitative Ethical Analysis of Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation Research in Kenya
Implementation research ethics can be particularly challenging when pregnant women have been excluded from earlier clinical stages of research given greater uncertainty about safety and efficacy in pregnancy. The evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of empirical research on human research ethics 2021-07, Vol.16 (3), p.225-237 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-bf5d1e9b73d69c49cb19ace1f37748490c8695996e08b2a667cf149a51bbc0bb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-bf5d1e9b73d69c49cb19ace1f37748490c8695996e08b2a667cf149a51bbc0bb3 |
container_end_page | 237 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 225 |
container_title | Journal of empirical research on human research ethics |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Ngure, Kenneth Trinidad, Susan B. Beima-Sofie, Kristin Kinuthia, John Matemo, Daniel Kimemia, Grace Njoroge, Anne Achiro, Lillian Pintye, Jillian Mugo, Nelly R. Bukusi, Elizabeth A. Baeten, Jared M. Heffron, Renee John-Stewart, Grace Kelley, Maureen C. |
description | Implementation research ethics can be particularly challenging when pregnant women have been excluded from earlier clinical stages of research given greater uncertainty about safety and efficacy in pregnancy. The evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during pregnancy offered an opportunity to understand important ethical considerations and social influences shaping women's decisions to participate in the evaluation of PrEP and investigational drugs during pregnancy. We conducted interviews with women (n = 51), focus groups with male partners (five focus group discussions [FGDs]), interviews with health providers (n = 45), four FGDs with pregnant/postpartum adolescents and four FGDs with young women. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis, including ethical aspects of the data. Our study reveals that women navigate a complex network of social influences, expectations, support, and gender roles, not only with male partners, but also with clinicians, family, and friends when making decisions about PrEP or other drugs that lack complete safety data during pregnancy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/15562646211012296 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8261769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15562646211012296</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2545497101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-bf5d1e9b73d69c49cb19ace1f37748490c8695996e08b2a667cf149a51bbc0bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kttuEzEQhlcIRA_wANwgS1zATcL6HN8gRaWFiCIKBXG58npnE1eOvdi7UffNeDycpISTuPJo5pv_H9tTFE9wOcVYypeYc0EEEwTjEhOixL3ieJubEMHZ_UPMxFFxktJNWTJOMXtYHFGGKSUUHxffryAasBto0HUwVju08K0bwBtIKHj0NazBP0_oNRibbPAJ9QENCdB7aKzR_S7lQ4-u-6GxWcV6dBVh6bU34xTN0cdBO9tncAPovF_lHofmXrsx2WzQbmG47UIaIuQ4dKvR6dtcWqw7B9m733mgT5BAR7Pa6r8DP-pHxYNWuwSP787T4svF-eezt5PLD28WZ_PLiWFC9JO65Q0GVUvaCGWYMjVW2gBuqZRsxlRpZkJxpQSUs5poIaRpMVOa47o2ZV3T0-LVXrcb6jU0Jk8Utau6aNc6jlXQtvqz4u2qWoZNNSMCS6GywIs7gRi-DZD6am2TAee0hzCkinBGKJdUyIw--wu9CUPMj7WjOFMy_3Om8J4yMaQUoT0Mg8tquxfVP3uRe57-fotDx89FyMB0DyS9hF-2_1f8Af3WxDc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2545497101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived Social Influences on Women's Decisions to use Medications not Studied in Pregnancy. A Qualitative Ethical Analysis of Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation Research in Kenya</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Ngure, Kenneth ; Trinidad, Susan B. ; Beima-Sofie, Kristin ; Kinuthia, John ; Matemo, Daniel ; Kimemia, Grace ; Njoroge, Anne ; Achiro, Lillian ; Pintye, Jillian ; Mugo, Nelly R. ; Bukusi, Elizabeth A. ; Baeten, Jared M. ; Heffron, Renee ; John-Stewart, Grace ; Kelley, Maureen C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ngure, Kenneth ; Trinidad, Susan B. ; Beima-Sofie, Kristin ; Kinuthia, John ; Matemo, Daniel ; Kimemia, Grace ; Njoroge, Anne ; Achiro, Lillian ; Pintye, Jillian ; Mugo, Nelly R. ; Bukusi, Elizabeth A. ; Baeten, Jared M. ; Heffron, Renee ; John-Stewart, Grace ; Kelley, Maureen C.</creatorcontrib><description>Implementation research ethics can be particularly challenging when pregnant women have been excluded from earlier clinical stages of research given greater uncertainty about safety and efficacy in pregnancy. The evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during pregnancy offered an opportunity to understand important ethical considerations and social influences shaping women's decisions to participate in the evaluation of PrEP and investigational drugs during pregnancy. We conducted interviews with women (n = 51), focus groups with male partners (five focus group discussions [FGDs]), interviews with health providers (n = 45), four FGDs with pregnant/postpartum adolescents and four FGDs with young women. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis, including ethical aspects of the data. Our study reveals that women navigate a complex network of social influences, expectations, support, and gender roles, not only with male partners, but also with clinicians, family, and friends when making decisions about PrEP or other drugs that lack complete safety data during pregnancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-2646</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-2654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15562646211012296</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34133231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Anti-HIV Agents - therapeutic use ; Decision making ; Disease prevention ; Empirical Studies on Ethical Issues in Community Based Research ; Ethical Analysis ; Ethics ; Female ; HIV Infections - prevention & control ; Humans ; Kenya ; Male ; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis ; Pregnancy ; Qualitative Research ; Research ethics ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics, 2021-07, Vol.16 (3), p.225-237</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021 2021 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-bf5d1e9b73d69c49cb19ace1f37748490c8695996e08b2a667cf149a51bbc0bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-bf5d1e9b73d69c49cb19ace1f37748490c8695996e08b2a667cf149a51bbc0bb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8062-0933</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34133231$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ngure, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinidad, Susan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beima-Sofie, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinuthia, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matemo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimemia, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Njoroge, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achiro, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintye, Jillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugo, Nelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bukusi, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baeten, Jared M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffron, Renee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John-Stewart, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Maureen C.</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived Social Influences on Women's Decisions to use Medications not Studied in Pregnancy. A Qualitative Ethical Analysis of Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation Research in Kenya</title><title>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</title><addtitle>Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics</addtitle><description>Implementation research ethics can be particularly challenging when pregnant women have been excluded from earlier clinical stages of research given greater uncertainty about safety and efficacy in pregnancy. The evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during pregnancy offered an opportunity to understand important ethical considerations and social influences shaping women's decisions to participate in the evaluation of PrEP and investigational drugs during pregnancy. We conducted interviews with women (n = 51), focus groups with male partners (five focus group discussions [FGDs]), interviews with health providers (n = 45), four FGDs with pregnant/postpartum adolescents and four FGDs with young women. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis, including ethical aspects of the data. Our study reveals that women navigate a complex network of social influences, expectations, support, and gender roles, not only with male partners, but also with clinicians, family, and friends when making decisions about PrEP or other drugs that lack complete safety data during pregnancy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Anti-HIV Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Empirical Studies on Ethical Issues in Community Based Research</subject><subject>Ethical Analysis</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>HIV Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1556-2646</issn><issn>1556-2654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kttuEzEQhlcIRA_wANwgS1zATcL6HN8gRaWFiCIKBXG58npnE1eOvdi7UffNeDycpISTuPJo5pv_H9tTFE9wOcVYypeYc0EEEwTjEhOixL3ieJubEMHZ_UPMxFFxktJNWTJOMXtYHFGGKSUUHxffryAasBto0HUwVju08K0bwBtIKHj0NazBP0_oNRibbPAJ9QENCdB7aKzR_S7lQ4-u-6GxWcV6dBVh6bU34xTN0cdBO9tncAPovF_lHofmXrsx2WzQbmG47UIaIuQ4dKvR6dtcWqw7B9m733mgT5BAR7Pa6r8DP-pHxYNWuwSP787T4svF-eezt5PLD28WZ_PLiWFC9JO65Q0GVUvaCGWYMjVW2gBuqZRsxlRpZkJxpQSUs5poIaRpMVOa47o2ZV3T0-LVXrcb6jU0Jk8Utau6aNc6jlXQtvqz4u2qWoZNNSMCS6GywIs7gRi-DZD6am2TAee0hzCkinBGKJdUyIw--wu9CUPMj7WjOFMy_3Om8J4yMaQUoT0Mg8tquxfVP3uRe57-fotDx89FyMB0DyS9hF-2_1f8Af3WxDc</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Ngure, Kenneth</creator><creator>Trinidad, Susan B.</creator><creator>Beima-Sofie, Kristin</creator><creator>Kinuthia, John</creator><creator>Matemo, Daniel</creator><creator>Kimemia, Grace</creator><creator>Njoroge, Anne</creator><creator>Achiro, Lillian</creator><creator>Pintye, Jillian</creator><creator>Mugo, Nelly R.</creator><creator>Bukusi, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Baeten, Jared M.</creator><creator>Heffron, Renee</creator><creator>John-Stewart, Grace</creator><creator>Kelley, Maureen C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8062-0933</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Perceived Social Influences on Women's Decisions to use Medications not Studied in Pregnancy. A Qualitative Ethical Analysis of Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation Research in Kenya</title><author>Ngure, Kenneth ; Trinidad, Susan B. ; Beima-Sofie, Kristin ; Kinuthia, John ; Matemo, Daniel ; Kimemia, Grace ; Njoroge, Anne ; Achiro, Lillian ; Pintye, Jillian ; Mugo, Nelly R. ; Bukusi, Elizabeth A. ; Baeten, Jared M. ; Heffron, Renee ; John-Stewart, Grace ; Kelley, Maureen C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-bf5d1e9b73d69c49cb19ace1f37748490c8695996e08b2a667cf149a51bbc0bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Anti-HIV Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Empirical Studies on Ethical Issues in Community Based Research</topic><topic>Ethical Analysis</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>HIV Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ngure, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinidad, Susan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beima-Sofie, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinuthia, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matemo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimemia, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Njoroge, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achiro, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintye, Jillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugo, Nelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bukusi, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baeten, Jared M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffron, Renee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John-Stewart, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Maureen C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ngure, Kenneth</au><au>Trinidad, Susan B.</au><au>Beima-Sofie, Kristin</au><au>Kinuthia, John</au><au>Matemo, Daniel</au><au>Kimemia, Grace</au><au>Njoroge, Anne</au><au>Achiro, Lillian</au><au>Pintye, Jillian</au><au>Mugo, Nelly R.</au><au>Bukusi, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Baeten, Jared M.</au><au>Heffron, Renee</au><au>John-Stewart, Grace</au><au>Kelley, Maureen C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived Social Influences on Women's Decisions to use Medications not Studied in Pregnancy. A Qualitative Ethical Analysis of Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation Research in Kenya</atitle><jtitle>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>225-237</pages><issn>1556-2646</issn><eissn>1556-2654</eissn><abstract>Implementation research ethics can be particularly challenging when pregnant women have been excluded from earlier clinical stages of research given greater uncertainty about safety and efficacy in pregnancy. The evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during pregnancy offered an opportunity to understand important ethical considerations and social influences shaping women's decisions to participate in the evaluation of PrEP and investigational drugs during pregnancy. We conducted interviews with women (n = 51), focus groups with male partners (five focus group discussions [FGDs]), interviews with health providers (n = 45), four FGDs with pregnant/postpartum adolescents and four FGDs with young women. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis, including ethical aspects of the data. Our study reveals that women navigate a complex network of social influences, expectations, support, and gender roles, not only with male partners, but also with clinicians, family, and friends when making decisions about PrEP or other drugs that lack complete safety data during pregnancy.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34133231</pmid><doi>10.1177/15562646211012296</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8062-0933</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1556-2646 |
ispartof | Journal of empirical research on human research ethics, 2021-07, Vol.16 (3), p.225-237 |
issn | 1556-2646 1556-2654 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8261769 |
source | SAGE Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Anti-HIV Agents - therapeutic use Decision making Disease prevention Empirical Studies on Ethical Issues in Community Based Research Ethical Analysis Ethics Female HIV Infections - prevention & control Humans Kenya Male Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Pregnancy Qualitative Research Research ethics Women |
title | Perceived Social Influences on Women's Decisions to use Medications not Studied in Pregnancy. A Qualitative Ethical Analysis of Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation Research in Kenya |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A10%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20Social%20Influences%20on%20Women's%20Decisions%20to%20use%20Medications%20not%20Studied%20in%20Pregnancy.%20A%20Qualitative%20Ethical%20Analysis%20of%20Preexposure%20Prophylaxis%20Implementation%20Research%20in%20Kenya&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20empirical%20research%20on%20human%20research%20ethics&rft.au=Ngure,%20Kenneth&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=225-237&rft.issn=1556-2646&rft.eissn=1556-2654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15562646211012296&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2545497101%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-bf5d1e9b73d69c49cb19ace1f37748490c8695996e08b2a667cf149a51bbc0bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2545497101&rft_id=info:pmid/34133231&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15562646211012296&rfr_iscdi=true |