Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study

• Published in: European radiology 2021-08, Vol.31 (8), p.5734-5745
• Main Authors: Schreiner, Markus M., Raudner, Marcus, Röhrich, Sebastian, Zalaudek, Martin, Weber, Michael, Kaiser, Georg, Aldrian, Silke, Chiari, Catharina, Windhager, Reinhard, Trattnig, Siegfried
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Autografts; Autologous chondrocyte implantation; Biomedical materials; Cartilage; Chondrocytes; Correlation coefficient; Correlation coefficients; Diagnostic Radiology; Imaging; Internal Medicine; Interventional Radiology; Knee; Lesions; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Microfracture; Musculoskeletal; Neuroradiology; Observational studies; Patients; Radiology; Reliability analysis; Surgery; Tissues; Transplantation; Ultrasound
• ISSN: 0938-7994; 1432-1084
• DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07688-1

Objectives To evaluate the reliability of the MOCART 2.0 knee score in the radiological assessment of repair tissue after different cartilage repair procedures. Methods A total of 114 patients (34 females) who underwent cartilage repair of a femoral cartilage lesion with at least one postoperative MRI examination were selected, and one random postoperative MRI examination was retrospectively included. Mean age was 32.5 ± 9.6 years at time of surgery. Overall, 66 chondral and 48 osteochondral lesions were included in the study. Forty-eight patients were treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), 27 via osteochondral autologous transplantation, five using an osteochondral scaffold, and 34 underwent microfracture (MFX). The original MOCART and MOCART 2.0 knee scores were assessed by two independent readers. After a minimum 4-week interval, both readers performed a second reading of both scores. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results The MOCART 2.0 knee score showed higher interrater reliability than the original MOCART score with an ICC of 0.875 versus 0.759, ranging from 0.863 in the MFX group to 0.878 in the ACI group. Intrarater reliability was good with an overall ICC of 0.860 and 0.866, respectively. Overall, interrater reliability was higher for osteochondral lesions than for chondral lesions, with ICCs of 0.906 versus 0.786. Conclusions The MOCART 2.0 knee score enables the assessment of cartilage repair tissue after different cartilage repair techniques (ACI, osteochondral repair techniques, MFX), as well as for different lesion types with good intra- and interrater reliability. Key Points • The MOCART 2.0 knee score provides improved intra- and interrater reliability when compared to the original MOCART score. • The MOCART 2.0 knee score enables the assessment of cartilage repair tissue after different cartilage repair techniques (ACI, osteochondral repair techniques, MFX) with similarly good intra- and interrater reliability. • The assessment of osteochondral lesions demonstrated better intra- and interrater reliability than the assessment of chondral lesions in this study.